Skip to content

Subcutaneous Progesterone Versus Vaginal Progesterone Tablets for Luteal Phase Support in In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

Efficacy and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Progesterone (IBSA) Versus Vaginal Progesterone for Luteal Phase Support in Patients Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00828191
Enrollment
800
Registered
2009-01-23
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2012-02-29
Last updated
2013-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

In Vitro Fertilization

Keywords

Luteal support in IVF

Brief summary

Prospective, open, randomized, parallel, multicenter, two-arm trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new progesterone formulation to be used for luteal support in IVF (Progesterone-IBSA) administered subcutaneously at a daily dose of 25 mg versus Progesterone tablets administered intravaginally at 100 mg twice daily for a total dose of 200 mg.

Interventions

DRUGProgesterone

25 mg, once a day, SC

Sponsors

IBSA Institut Biochimique SA
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 42 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient has given written informed consent; * BMI \< 30 kg/m2; * Age 18 - 42 (upon starting COH); * \<3 prior ART cycles (IVF, ICSI and related procedures); * Baseline (day 2-3 of cycling) FSH \<15 IU/L and E2 \<80 pg/mL; * Normal uterine cavity as per recent hysterosalpingogram, sonohysterogram or hysteroscopic exam (i.e. no polyps or protruding submucosal fibroids); * Patients must have at least three retrieved oocytes.

Exclusion criteria

* Intramural uterine fibroids that distort the uterine cavity or polyps \>1 cm; * Stage III or IV endometriosis (no endometriomas); * Hydrosalpinges; * History of past poor response to COH resulting in canceling ART; * Use of thawed/donated oocytes; * Use of thawed/donated embryos; * Gestational carrier; * Patients affected by pathologies associated with any contraindication of being pregnant; * Hypersensitivity to study medication; * Uncontrolled adrenal or thyroid dysfunction; * History of conditions (i.e. toxic shock syndrome) that would contraindicate use of a vaginal progesterone product; * History of arterial disease; * Patients with hepatic impairment (liver function tests \> 2x upper limits of normal); * Patients with dermatologic disease; * Patients with renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance \<60 mL/min/1.73 m2); * Neoplasias (current) or history of neoplasia that may be responsive to progesterone; * High grade cervical dysplasia; * History of recurrent pregnancy loss defined as 3 or more spontaneous miscarriages, wherein pregnancy developed to a minimum of a gestational sac on TVUS; * Participation in a concurrent clinical trial or in another trial within the past 2 months; * Use of concomitant medications that might interfere with the study evaluation; * Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis/screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate10 weeks after treatment start

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Implantation Rate4-5 weeks after treatment startImplantation rate was defined as the number of gestational sacs divided by the number of embryos transferred (%). This value was calculated for all the patients who had at least one embryo transferred.
Delivery Ratenearly 9 months after treatment start

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Progesterone SC
Progesterone SC given at a daily dose of 25 mg.
400
Progesterone Tablets
Progesterone vaginal tables 100 mg given twice à day.
400
Total800

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicProgesterone TabletsProgesterone SCTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
400 Participants400 Participants800 Participants
Age Continuous34.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
34.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
34.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
Region of Enrollment
United States
400 participants400 participants800 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
400 Participants400 Participants800 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
156 / 400161 / 400
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 4000 / 400

Outcome results

Primary

Ongoing Pregnancy Rate

Time frame: 10 weeks after treatment start

Population: All randomized patients were included in the analysis

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Progesterone SCOngoing Pregnancy Rate40.8 percentage of randomized patients
Progesterone TabletsOngoing Pregnancy Rate43.3 percentage of randomized patients
Comparison: The non -inferiority hypothesis to be tested for the primary endpoint was that the ongoing pregnancy rate (oPR) in the test group (Pe)was lower than the oPR in the control group (Pc)against the alternative one that the oPR in the test group was equal to or higher than the oPR in the control group.~H0 : Pc\>= Pe + d(-10%) H1 : Pc\< Pe + d(-10%)p-value: 0.5295% CI: [-9.4, 4.4]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Delivery Rate

Time frame: nearly 9 months after treatment start

Population: All randomized patients

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Progesterone SCDelivery Rate40.5 percentage of randomized patients
Progesterone TabletsDelivery Rate42.5 percentage of randomized patients
p-value: 0.6295% CI: [-8.8, 4.8]Fisher Exact
Secondary

Implantation Rate

Implantation rate was defined as the number of gestational sacs divided by the number of embryos transferred (%). This value was calculated for all the patients who had at least one embryo transferred.

Time frame: 4-5 weeks after treatment start

Population: Patient who had at least one embryo transferred.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Progesterone SCImplantation Rate33.2 percentage of embryos transferredStandard Deviation 42
Progesterone TabletsImplantation Rate35.1 percentage of embryos transferredStandard Deviation 40.9
p-value: 0.5495% CI: [-7.6, 4]ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026