Skip to content

Parietex Progrip Study

ProGrip Mesh Repair Versus Lichtenstein Mesh Repair: a Comparative Randomized Study in Primary Inguinal Hernia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00827944
Enrollment
603
Registered
2009-01-23
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2016-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hernia, Inguinal

Keywords

Uncomplicated primary inguinal hernias

Brief summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate pain and disabling complications inducing social consequences in primary inguinal hernia ProGrip mesh repair compared to Lichtenstein repair with lightweight polypropylene mesh.

Detailed description

* Patients in ProGrip group will be treated with self-gripping lightweight Polyester and Polylactic acid meshes providing a sutureless fixation. * Patients in Lichtenstein group will be treated with lightweight Polypropylene meshes requiring fixation by sutures. * Study participation will start at signature of informed consent and each patient will be assessed before surgery. A close follow-up will be performed: 7 days (questionnaires and phone call), 1 month (clinical visit), 3 months (questionnaires and phone call), and final evaluation at 12 months (clinical visit) after surgery, which will end the participation to the study. * 600 adult males divided in 2 groups requiring primary uncomplicated elective inguinal hernia mesh repair will be included in the study. Patients will be stratified by center.

Interventions

DEVICEParietex Progrip

Surgical technique: Self-gripping lightweight Polyester and Polylactic acid meshes providing a sutureless fixation.

DEVICELow weight polypropylene mesh

Surgical technique: Lichtenstein repair with lightweight polypropylene mesh (inferior to 70gr/m2) secured to the posterior inguinal wall with sutures

Sponsors

Medtronic - MITG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
31 Years to 74 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All male patients at participating centers with a primary, uncomplicated inguinal hernia. * Collar of the defect ≤ 4 cm * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* 30 years ≥ Age ≥ 75 years * Emergency procedure * Inclusion in other trials * Bilateral inguinal hernia * Recurrence

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Assessment During the First Three Months and at One Year After Surgery Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)M3, M12 after surgeryPain assessment during patient follow up after surgery using VAS score. VAS going from 0 mm (no pain) to 150 mm (worst conceivable pain) is presented to the patient who draw a vertical line on the scale to indicate the average amount of pain at the time of consultation or at home.
Pain Assessment During the First Three Months and at One Year After Surgery Using a Surgical Pain Scales (SPS)M3, M12 after surgerySurgical pain scales (=SPS) completed by patient during consultation or will be sent to the patient with instructions to complete it and send it back by mailing. The score of evaluation will be reported in mm, specifying if pain occurs at rest, during normal activities, during exercise. The score is ranged from 0 (no pain) to 150 mm (the worst pain yu have never known).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound Complications and Hernia RecurrencesM12 after surgery
Foreign Body SensationM1, M3, M12 months after surgeryForeign body sensation using a specific questionnaire at M1, M3, M12 months after surgery. Questionnaire will be completed by patient during consultation or will be sent to the patient with instructions to complete it and send it back by mailing.
Other Post-operative ComplicationsM12 after surgery
Return to Work and to Normal Daily ActivitiesEffective date
Chronic Pain Defined as Pain Lasting More Than 3 Months Using VAS Score3 months after surgeryChronic pain defined as pain lasting more than 3 months using VAS score. A VAS going from 0 mm (no pain) to 150 mm (worst conceivable pain) is presented to the patient who draw a vertical line on the scale to indicate the average amount of pain at the time of consultation or at home.

Countries

Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study period: 42 months First patient in: 13 October 2008 Last patient in: 27 April 2011 Last Patient visit: 8 May 2012 Follow-up duration: 1 year

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Progrip Group
Parietex ProGrip Parietex Progrip : Surgical technique: Self-gripping lightweight Polyester and Polylactic acid meshes providing a sutureless fixation.
304
Lichtenstein Group
Low weight polypropylene mesh Low weight polypropylene mesh : Surgical technique: Lichtenstein repair with lightweight polypropylene mesh (inferior to 70gr/m2) secured to the posterior inguinal wall with sutures
299
Total603

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicProgrip GroupLichtenstein GroupTotal
Age, Continuous57.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
57.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
57.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
Gender
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Gender
Male
304 Participants299 Participants603 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
13 participants12 participants25 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
54 participants53 participants107 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
58 participants59 participants117 participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
87 participants86 participants173 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
92 participants89 participants181 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 30429 / 299
serious
Total, serious adverse events
18 / 30421 / 299

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Assessment During the First Three Months and at One Year After Surgery Using a Surgical Pain Scales (SPS)

Surgical pain scales (=SPS) completed by patient during consultation or will be sent to the patient with instructions to complete it and send it back by mailing. The score of evaluation will be reported in mm, specifying if pain occurs at rest, during normal activities, during exercise. The score is ranged from 0 (no pain) to 150 mm (the worst pain yu have never known).

Time frame: M3, M12 after surgery

Population: The analysis were performed on an As Treated population (AT), with a 5% significance level.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Progrip GroupPain Assessment During the First Three Months and at One Year After Surgery Using a Surgical Pain Scales (SPS)Surgical Pain - 3 months6.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.42
Progrip GroupPain Assessment During the First Three Months and at One Year After Surgery Using a Surgical Pain Scales (SPS)Surgical Pain - 12 months5.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.12
Lichtenstein GroupPain Assessment During the First Three Months and at One Year After Surgery Using a Surgical Pain Scales (SPS)Surgical Pain - 3 months7.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.52
Lichtenstein GroupPain Assessment During the First Three Months and at One Year After Surgery Using a Surgical Pain Scales (SPS)Surgical Pain - 12 months4.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.77
Primary

Pain Assessment During the First Three Months and at One Year After Surgery Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Pain assessment during patient follow up after surgery using VAS score. VAS going from 0 mm (no pain) to 150 mm (worst conceivable pain) is presented to the patient who draw a vertical line on the scale to indicate the average amount of pain at the time of consultation or at home.

Time frame: M3, M12 after surgery

Population: The analysis were performed on an As Treated (AT)population, with a 5% significance level.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Progrip GroupPain Assessment During the First Three Months and at One Year After Surgery Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)VAS - 3 months7.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.82
Progrip GroupPain Assessment During the First Three Months and at One Year After Surgery Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)VAS - 12 months4.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.81
Lichtenstein GroupPain Assessment During the First Three Months and at One Year After Surgery Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)VAS - 3 months6.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.05
Lichtenstein GroupPain Assessment During the First Three Months and at One Year After Surgery Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)VAS - 12 months5.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.27
Secondary

Chronic Pain Defined as Pain Lasting More Than 3 Months Using VAS Score

Chronic pain defined as pain lasting more than 3 months using VAS score. A VAS going from 0 mm (no pain) to 150 mm (worst conceivable pain) is presented to the patient who draw a vertical line on the scale to indicate the average amount of pain at the time of consultation or at home.

Time frame: 3 months after surgery

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Progrip GroupChronic Pain Defined as Pain Lasting More Than 3 Months Using VAS Score9 participants
Lichtenstein GroupChronic Pain Defined as Pain Lasting More Than 3 Months Using VAS Score12 participants
Secondary

Foreign Body Sensation

Foreign body sensation using a specific questionnaire at M1, M3, M12 months after surgery. Questionnaire will be completed by patient during consultation or will be sent to the patient with instructions to complete it and send it back by mailing.

Time frame: M1, M3, M12 months after surgery

Population: The analysis were performed on an As Treated population, with a 5% significance level.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Progrip GroupForeign Body SensationFBS at Rest - M1 (Answer : No)159 participants
Progrip GroupForeign Body SensationFBS Normal Activities - M1 (Answer: No)139 participants
Progrip GroupForeign Body SensationFBS Doing exercise - M1 (Answer : No)121 participants
Progrip GroupForeign Body SensationFBS General Feeling - M1 (Answer : No)144 participants
Progrip GroupForeign Body SensationFBS at Rest - M3 (Answer : No)186 participants
Progrip GroupForeign Body SensationFBS Normal Activities - M3 (Answer: No)166 participants
Progrip GroupForeign Body SensationFBS Doing exercise - M3 (Answer : No)140 participants
Progrip GroupForeign Body SensationFBS General feeling - M3 (Answer : No)172 participants
Progrip GroupForeign Body SensationFBS at Rest - M12 (Answer : No)178 participants
Progrip GroupForeign Body SensationFBS Normal Activities - M12 (Answer: No)169 participants
Progrip GroupForeign Body SensationFBS Doing exercise - M12 (Answer : No)171 participants
Progrip GroupForeign Body SensationFBS General Feeling - M12 (Answer : No)176 participants
Lichtenstein GroupForeign Body SensationFBS Doing exercise - M12 (Answer : No)165 participants
Lichtenstein GroupForeign Body SensationFBS at Rest - M1 (Answer : No)173 participants
Lichtenstein GroupForeign Body SensationFBS Doing exercise - M3 (Answer : No)155 participants
Lichtenstein GroupForeign Body SensationFBS Normal Activities - M1 (Answer: No)148 participants
Lichtenstein GroupForeign Body SensationFBS Normal Activities - M12 (Answer: No)197 participants
Lichtenstein GroupForeign Body SensationFBS Doing exercise - M1 (Answer : No)128 participants
Lichtenstein GroupForeign Body SensationFBS General feeling - M3 (Answer : No)189 participants
Lichtenstein GroupForeign Body SensationFBS General Feeling - M1 (Answer : No)151 participants
Lichtenstein GroupForeign Body SensationFBS General Feeling - M12 (Answer : No)199 participants
Lichtenstein GroupForeign Body SensationFBS at Rest - M3 (Answer : No)198 participants
Lichtenstein GroupForeign Body SensationFBS at Rest - M12 (Answer : No)196 participants
Lichtenstein GroupForeign Body SensationFBS Normal Activities - M3 (Answer: No)177 participants
Secondary

Other Post-operative Complications

Time frame: M12 after surgery

Population: As Treated population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Progrip GroupOther Post-operative Complications23 participants
Lichtenstein GroupOther Post-operative Complications29 participants
Secondary

Return to Work and to Normal Daily Activities

Time frame: Effective date

Population: The analysis were performed on an As Treated (AT) population, with a 5% significance level.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Progrip GroupReturn to Work and to Normal Daily ActivitiesReturn to work14.61 daysStandard Error 11.61
Progrip GroupReturn to Work and to Normal Daily ActivitiesReturn to daily activities7.99 daysStandard Error 8.78
Lichtenstein GroupReturn to Work and to Normal Daily ActivitiesReturn to work14.79 daysStandard Error 11.51
Lichtenstein GroupReturn to Work and to Normal Daily ActivitiesReturn to daily activities8.426 daysStandard Error 8.145
Secondary

Wound Complications and Hernia Recurrences

Time frame: M12 after surgery

Population: The analysis were performed on an As Treated (AT) population, with a 5% significance level.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Progrip GroupWound Complications and Hernia RecurrencesHematoma13 participants
Progrip GroupWound Complications and Hernia RecurrencesRecurrence4 participants
Progrip GroupWound Complications and Hernia RecurrencesSite Surgical Infection9 participants
Progrip GroupWound Complications and Hernia RecurrencesSeroma4 participants
Lichtenstein GroupWound Complications and Hernia RecurrencesSite Surgical Infection14 participants
Lichtenstein GroupWound Complications and Hernia RecurrencesHematoma5 participants
Lichtenstein GroupWound Complications and Hernia RecurrencesSeroma6 participants
Lichtenstein GroupWound Complications and Hernia RecurrencesRecurrence8 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026