Skip to content

Home-based Self-delivered Mirror Therapy for Phantom Limb Pain

A Pilot Study of Self-delivered Home-based Mirror Therapy for Phantom Limb Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00827294
Enrollment
40
Registered
2009-01-22
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2010-11-30
Last updated
2019-10-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Phantom Limb Pain

Keywords

Phantom limb pain, Mirror therapy, amputation, Limb loss, treatment

Brief summary

The goals of the study are to determine whether self-delivered, home-based mirror therapy decreases the frequency and intensity of phantom limb pain and improves mood and physical function in persons with phantom limb pain. The investigators hypothesize that self-delivered home-based mirror therapy will significantly decrease phantom pain intensity, will improve mood, and will improve function at one-month follow-up.

Detailed description

Background: Incidence of acquired amputation is increasing due to military conflict injuries and the increasing prevalence of diabetes-related peripheral vascular disease. Phantom pain is a commonly experienced comorbid condition. Existing treatments have shown mixed success in treating phantom pain. Mirror therapy has been shown to be an effective treatment when used under the guidance of a therapist in a clinical setting. There is anecdotal evidence that home-based therapy may also be effective. Objective: Determine whether self-delivered, home-based mirror therapy decreases the frequency and intensity of phantom limb pain and improves the psychological status and physical function of amputees with phantom limb pain. Design: Single group trial comparing pre- and post-treatment measures. Setting and Subjects: Up to 50 subjects with unilateral limb amputation and phantom limb pain will be recruited from the VA and OHSU hospital clinics. The investigators will also be passively recruiting through Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW). The Pain Clinic and Physical Therapy Department at KPNW will post flyers in their waiting and patient areas for potential subjects to see. Interested patients will then self-refer to the study. Flyers will also be sent to regional amputee support groups in the Northwest and Southern California for distribution to their members. Certain inclusion and exclusion criteria must be met. Intervention: Subjects will receive an information sheet and instruction in performing mirror therapy at home. Measurements: Subjects will complete standard questionnaires designed to measure phantom pain level, function, depressive symptoms, pain-related anxiety, catastrophizing, and sleep quality. Subjects will also be asked about current use of pain medications and to keep a daily diary to keep track of treatment sessions. Analysis: For the primary analysis comparing difference between baseline and 1 month post treatment, a paired t-test will be used to compare continuous variables (pain, depressive symptoms, pain-related anxiety level, sleep quality, pain catastrophizing, function) and for categorical outcomes (use of pain medications), McNemar's test or test of symmetry will be used. To investigate whether treatment gains for pain, depressive symptoms, pain-related anxiety level, sleep quality, pain catastrophizing, or function are sustained over time, a linear model will be used with controlling for correlation within repeated measures. a. Specific Aims: 1\. Primary Aim and Hypothesis: Primary Aim: Determine whether self-delivered, home-based mirror therapy decreases the intensity of phantom limb pain at one month follow-up. The primary outcome measure will be average pain intensity (the Brief Pain Inventory-short form; BPI-sf). Hypothesis for Primary Aim #1: Amputees who practice mirror therapy at home will experience a decrease in the intensity of their phantom limb pain as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory-short form (BPI-sf) at one month follow-up.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMirror Therapy

The study is an uncontrolled pilot. Subjects receive instruction in performing mirror therapy at home, either in person or by viewing a DVD. Subjects will be asked to practice mirror therapy 20 minutes daily. Subjects will complete questionnaires for phantom pain, function, depressive symptoms, anxiety, catastrophizing, and sleep quality at baseline and post treatment at 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, and 6 months. Subjects will keep a diary of their practice and study staff will check in with subjects weekly for the first month, and monthly thereafter.

Sponsors

Oregon Health and Science University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-75 years * Unilateral amputation of upper or lower limb * At least 1 month after surgical healing * English-speaking (since not all study materials have been translated)

Exclusion criteria

* History of brain injury or cognitive difficulties * Severe mental illness that impairs cognition or function * Suicidal ideation * Current substance abuse or dependence * Amputation related to diabetes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in self-reported pain assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)month 1Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranges from score of 0 to 10, where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in self-reported pain assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)2 monthsNumeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranges from score of 0 to 10, where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain
Outcome will be determined by measuring changes in pain-related anxiety levels (baseline to one month) as measured by the Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale.Primary interested in outcome at month 1

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026