Skip to content

The Effect of Reflexology on Radiation-related Fatigue in Breast Cancer Patients

The Effect of Reflexology on Radiation-related Fatigue and QOL in Breast Cancer Patients: a Pilot Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00825682
Enrollment
72
Registered
2009-01-21
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2009-05-31
Last updated
2016-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fatigue

Keywords

Breast cancer, Radiation therapy, Reflexology, Fatigue, Quality of life, Sleep disturbance

Brief summary

Oncologic patients often report increased fatigue during and after radiation therapy. Reflexology treatment has been demonstrated to alleviate symptoms of fatigue, nausea, and anxiety in oncologic patients treated with chemotherapy. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of reflexology on fatigue, quality of life, and quality of sleep of breast cancer patients during and after radiation therapy.

Detailed description

Reflexology (foot massage) is a complementary medicine technique which is performed by manual pressure on specific areas of the feet. Reflexology is based on a system of zones and reflex areas that are believed to reflect an image of the body on the feet with a premise that such work effects a physical change to the body. The effect of reflexology on fatigue, quality of life, and quality of sleep of 20 breast cancer patients during and after radiation therapy will be compared to age-matched control group of 20 breast cancer patients treated by radiation therapy.

Interventions

OTHERReflexology treatment.

Reflexology treatments (45 min. each) will be initiated at the beginning of radiation therapy, once a week, for 10 weeks.The treatment includes manual pressure on specific points of foot soles and massage of the calf area, adapted individually to each patient.

Sponsors

Tel Aviv University
CollaboratorOTHER
Sheba Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Breast cancer adult patients scheduled to receive adjuvant radiation therapy

Exclusion criteria

* Open wounds or evidence of metastases on the lower limbs * Touch therapy or other complementary therapy other than intervention procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Lee Fatigue ScaleBeginning of study (initiation of radiation therapy and reflexology), 5 weeks after start (end of radiation therapy), 10 weeks after startThe Lee Fatigue Scale consists of 18 items related to fatigue and energy: 13 items in the fatigue subscale and 5 items in the energy subscale. The mean of the 13 items in the fatigue subscale (range from 0-10) and the mean of the 5 items in the energy subscale (range from 0-10) are calculated. Higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived fatigue and energy . Items in the energy subscale were recoded, and a Lee fatigue total score was calculated as the average of all 18 items (ranging between 0 and 10), higher scores indicating higher levels of fatigue. The Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficient of the English version of the questionnaire is 0.77 . The questionnaire's validity and reliability have been established in cancer patients.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale Cancer MQOLS-CA Was Written by Padilla (1992) and Translated Into Hebrew by Dorit Pud (2007).Beginning of study (initiation of radiation therapy and reflexology), 5 weeks after start (end of radiation therapy), 10 weeks after startThe questionnaire includes 33 items describing different forms in which the disease may affect patient's quality of life. For each item, subjects are asked to mark the number that best describes their feelings right now, in a Likert scale ranging between 0 and 10. Items include happiness feelings, anxiety levels, how affected are the social ties because of the disease, etc. A total quality of life score was calculated as the average of all 33 items (ranging between 0 and 10), higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
The General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS), Compiled by Lee (1992) and Translated Into Hebrew by Dr. Dorit Pud (2007)Beginning of study (initiation of radiation therapy and reflexology), 5 weeks after start (end of radiation therapy), 10 weeks after startexamines several aspects of sleep disorders and includes 21 items that describe feelings and behaviors associated with sleep during the last week. It uses a 0 (never) to 7 (every day) Likert scale on questions like feeling nervous during the day; falling asleep while unplanned and using sleeping pills. A total sleep disturbance score was calculated as the average of all 21 items (ranging between 0 and 7), higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

Countries

Israel

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study included 72 breast cancer patients, scheduled for complementary radiation therapy at the Cancer Center at Tel Hashomer Hospital during the years 2008-2011. Participants were recruited to the experimental and control groups, on a voluntary basis.

Pre-assignment details

Exclusion criteria: breast cancer patients with metastatic lesions on lower limbs, coagulation disorders and patients receiving other contact treatments.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Reflexology Group
The experimental group included 47 women with breast cancer scheduled for adjunctive radiation treatment. The women received reflexology treatment initiated at the beginning of radiation therapy, once a week (45 min each), for 10 weeks.
47
Control Group
The control group (no intervention,treatment as usual)included 25 breast cancer patients, scheduled for adjunctive radiation treatment, who completed the same questionnaires at the same time points as the as the intervention group.
25
Total72

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studypersonal reasons/ inconvenience135

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl GroupReflexology GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants8 Participants11 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
22 Participants39 Participants61 Participants
Age, Continuous52.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.78
56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.47
54.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
Region of Enrollment
Israel
25 participants47 participants72 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants47 Participants72 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 470 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 470 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

The Lee Fatigue Scale

The Lee Fatigue Scale consists of 18 items related to fatigue and energy: 13 items in the fatigue subscale and 5 items in the energy subscale. The mean of the 13 items in the fatigue subscale (range from 0-10) and the mean of the 5 items in the energy subscale (range from 0-10) are calculated. Higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived fatigue and energy . Items in the energy subscale were recoded, and a Lee fatigue total score was calculated as the average of all 18 items (ranging between 0 and 10), higher scores indicating higher levels of fatigue. The Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficient of the English version of the questionnaire is 0.77 . The questionnaire's validity and reliability have been established in cancer patients.

Time frame: Beginning of study (initiation of radiation therapy and reflexology), 5 weeks after start (end of radiation therapy), 10 weeks after start

Population: The final analysis included 33 women in the experimental group and 20 in the control group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Reflexology GroupThe Lee Fatigue Scalebegining of the study3.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.76
Reflexology GroupThe Lee Fatigue Scale5 weeks3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.57
Reflexology GroupThe Lee Fatigue Scale10 weeks3.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
Control GroupThe Lee Fatigue Scalebegining of the study3.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
Control GroupThe Lee Fatigue Scale5 weeks5.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.61
Control GroupThe Lee Fatigue Scale10 weeks4.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.05
Secondary

The General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS), Compiled by Lee (1992) and Translated Into Hebrew by Dr. Dorit Pud (2007)

examines several aspects of sleep disorders and includes 21 items that describe feelings and behaviors associated with sleep during the last week. It uses a 0 (never) to 7 (every day) Likert scale on questions like feeling nervous during the day; falling asleep while unplanned and using sleeping pills. A total sleep disturbance score was calculated as the average of all 21 items (ranging between 0 and 7), higher scores indicating a worse outcome.

Time frame: Beginning of study (initiation of radiation therapy and reflexology), 5 weeks after start (end of radiation therapy), 10 weeks after start

Population: The final analysis included 34 women in the experimental group and 20 in the control group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Reflexology GroupThe General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS), Compiled by Lee (1992) and Translated Into Hebrew by Dr. Dorit Pud (2007)beginning of study2.51 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Reflexology GroupThe General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS), Compiled by Lee (1992) and Translated Into Hebrew by Dr. Dorit Pud (2007)5 weeks2.27 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Reflexology GroupThe General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS), Compiled by Lee (1992) and Translated Into Hebrew by Dr. Dorit Pud (2007)10 weeks2.19 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.73
Control GroupThe General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS), Compiled by Lee (1992) and Translated Into Hebrew by Dr. Dorit Pud (2007)beginning of study2.35 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
Control GroupThe General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS), Compiled by Lee (1992) and Translated Into Hebrew by Dr. Dorit Pud (2007)5 weeks2.67 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Control GroupThe General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS), Compiled by Lee (1992) and Translated Into Hebrew by Dr. Dorit Pud (2007)10 weeks2.49 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Secondary

The Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale Cancer MQOLS-CA Was Written by Padilla (1992) and Translated Into Hebrew by Dorit Pud (2007).

The questionnaire includes 33 items describing different forms in which the disease may affect patient's quality of life. For each item, subjects are asked to mark the number that best describes their feelings right now, in a Likert scale ranging between 0 and 10. Items include happiness feelings, anxiety levels, how affected are the social ties because of the disease, etc. A total quality of life score was calculated as the average of all 33 items (ranging between 0 and 10), higher scores indicating a better quality of life.

Time frame: Beginning of study (initiation of radiation therapy and reflexology), 5 weeks after start (end of radiation therapy), 10 weeks after start

Population: The final ananlysis included 34 women in the experimental group, and 20 women in the control group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Reflexology GroupThe Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale Cancer MQOLS-CA Was Written by Padilla (1992) and Translated Into Hebrew by Dorit Pud (2007).beginning of study4.23 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.36
Reflexology GroupThe Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale Cancer MQOLS-CA Was Written by Padilla (1992) and Translated Into Hebrew by Dorit Pud (2007).5 weeks4.17 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
Reflexology GroupThe Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale Cancer MQOLS-CA Was Written by Padilla (1992) and Translated Into Hebrew by Dorit Pud (2007).10 weeks4.04 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
Control GroupThe Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale Cancer MQOLS-CA Was Written by Padilla (1992) and Translated Into Hebrew by Dorit Pud (2007).beginning of study4.09 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Control GroupThe Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale Cancer MQOLS-CA Was Written by Padilla (1992) and Translated Into Hebrew by Dorit Pud (2007).5 weeks4.58 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Control GroupThe Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale Cancer MQOLS-CA Was Written by Padilla (1992) and Translated Into Hebrew by Dorit Pud (2007).10 weeks4.49 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026