Skip to content

Study of beta2-Microglobulin Removal by Standard Versus New High Cut-Off Haemodialysis Membrane

Randomised, Cross Over Pilot Study Comparing Removal of beta2-Microglobulin by Standard Haemodialysis to Haemodialysis With a Novel Dialysis Membrane (P2SH) in Chronic Dialysis Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00824837
Acronym
HiCOF
Enrollment
8
Registered
2009-01-19
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2009-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Dialysis

Keywords

beta 2 microglobulin, haemodialysis, albumin

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a novel haemodialysis membrane, compared with the standard dialysis membrane, will increase the removal of beta2-microglobulin in chronic dialysis patients.

Detailed description

Despite advances in treatment of kidney diseases, morbidity and mortality of chronic dialysis patients remains unsatisfactory. Standard haemodialysis membranes remove middle-sized molecule solutes poorly such as beta2-microglobulin, which has a pathogenic role in dialysis-related amyloidosis. Pre-dialysis beta2-microglobulin concentration has been shown to be independently predictive of mortality. A new polyamide haemodialysis membrane has been developed with increased pore size to increase the removal of middle-sized uraemic toxins such as beta2-microglobulin. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the new membrane in beta2-microglobulin removal compared with standard haemodialysis membrane in dialysis patients and the degree of increased loss of albumin as a potential limiting factor of its use.

Interventions

OTHERLarger pore haemodialysis membrane

Patients receive haemodialysis sessions 3 times a week. They are randomized to start with either treatment A (experimental arm) or treatment B (active comparator arm) and continue for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week washout period. The patients then cross-over and receive the other treatment (either B or A) for 2 weeks.

OTHERStandard haemodialysis membrane

Patients receive haemodialysis sessions 3 times a week. They are randomized to start with either treatment A (experimental arm) or treatment B (active comparator arm) and continue for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week washout period. The patients then cross-over and receive the other treatment (either B or A) for 2 weeks.

Sponsors

Austin Health
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic haemodialysis patients for more than 2 years * Urine output \<100 mL per day * 3 haemodialysis sessions per week * Permanent arteriovenous dialysis access

Exclusion criteria

* Serum albumin \<25 g/L

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Beta2-microglobulin removal by new larger pore membrane versus standard haemodialysis membrane5 weeks (2 weeks in each arm, 1-week washout period)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Albumin loss with the use of new larger pore membrane compared with standard haemodialysis membrane5 weeks (2 weeks in each arm, 1-week washout period)
Removal of low-molecular-weight solutes by new larger pore membrane versus standard haemodialysis membrane5 weeks (2 weeks in each arm; 1-week washout period)

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026