Skip to content

Impact of Accu-Chek 360 in Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes

Impact of Accu-Chek 360 View on Practice Patterns and HBA1C in Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00824694
Enrollment
348
Registered
2009-01-19
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2010-05-31
Last updated
2011-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, HbA1c

Brief summary

To show that a structured treatment plan based upon Accu-Chek 360 View has a favorable effect on physician decision-making and HbA1c for patients on oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) or insulin for type 2 diabetes (T2D). Hypothesis 1: Compared to controls, intervention subjects will undergo a greater number of medication changes and have a lower HbA1 at the conclusion of the study. Hypothesis 2: Higher rates of monitoring at entry will be associated with lower CHO consumption, lower percent body fat, higher medication compliance, and higher physical activity levels. Hypothesis 3: Patients with lower rates of monitoring at entry will have higher rates of depression, more likely to have an external locus of control, and express greater fear about self-testing.

Detailed description

Primary care providers (PCP's) will be randomized to intervention and control arms. Their T2D patients will be identified by searching computerized pharmacy records for OHA or insulin, followed until they are on a stable medical regimen, and eligible to participate if their baseline HbA1c is 7.0 - 9.5% if on OHA or 7.5 - 10.0% if on insulin. Two sample frames will be created for intervention patients: one of patients on OHA alone and one of patients on insulin alone or in combination with OHA. The same procedure will be used to develop corresponding sample frames for control patients. OHA patients will be randomly sampled from the intervention and control groups at a ratio of 1:1 until 174 subjects have been enrolled. Insulin patients will be recruited in the same manner until another 174 subjects are recruited. At entry, patients will have measurements of fat mass, insulin-resistance, stimulated C-peptide, carbohydrate intake, and physical activity level. The intervention will consist of targeted SMBG, provider training, and patient education, all of which will be focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time. SMBG will alternate between 2 strategies: glucose profiling and target monitoring. Intervention PCP's will use 360 View to identify a patient's most significant glucose elevation(s) and devise a treatment plan that includes the medication to be used, starting dose, dose increment per cycle, interval between dose increases, monitoring times and frequency, goal for the target, and stop criteria. Separate treatment protocols will be recommended for OHA patients with basal hyperglycemia, OHA patients with PP hyperglycemia, insulin patients with basal hyperglycemia, and insulin patients with PP hyperglycemia. Treatment will conform to current standards of practice as defined by package inserts and Micromedex, the VA's official on-line drug reference. Subjects will repeat the dose titration cycle under the guidance of a case manager until the target is reached, maximal recommended doses of medications are used, or a stop criterion is met. They will then resume glucose profiling to identify the next target. This process is repeated until all targets reach their optimal value. Intervention subjects will undergo no less than 4 cycles in 48 weeks. Control patients will monitor and be treated in the customary manner.

Interventions

OTHERTargeted Self-Monitoring Of Blood Glucose (SMBG)

SMBG will alternate between 2 strategies: glucose profiling and target monitoring.

Focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time.

OTHERPatient Education

Focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time.

Sponsors

New Mexico VA Healthcare System
CollaboratorFED
Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center
CollaboratorFED
Southern Arizona VA Health Care System
CollaboratorFED
Biomedical Research Institute of New Mexico
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must have a primary care provider * Diabetes diagnosed after age 35 * Eat 3 meals daily and ≤ 1 snack * If on OHA, have willingness to start insulin

Exclusion criteria

* Type 1 diabetes or DKA * On insulin pump or CGM * Preference for language other than English * Can't or won't monitor * Unfavorable occupation or living arrangements * Terminal illness * Active alcoholism or substance abuse * Severe depression * Chronic liver disease * Pituitary or adrenal dysfunction * Immunosuppression * Hct \< 35 * Creatinine ≥ 2.5

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Principal endpoints will be measured 48 weeks after group assignment and include the number of medication changes and HbA1c. Interim analysis will include HbA1c measurement at 3 mont intervals.48 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary endpoints include changes in patient attitudes toward SMBG, daily carbohydrate consumption, physical activity level, BMI, and medication compliance (for subjects on OHA).48 weeks

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026