Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic
Conditions
Keywords
Relapsed, Oncology, Safety, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Ofatumumab, Efficacy
Brief summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ofatumumab added to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).
Detailed description
Fludarabine is currently approved for treatment of relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Studies have shown that drugs in combination with fludarabine have shown more effectiveness than fludarabine alone. The addition of ofatumumab to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide combination offers potentially a more effective therapy, without additional toxicity. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ofatumumab added to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia who have responded previously to therapy but later develop progressive disease and require additional therapy.
Interventions
Ofatumumab Cycle 1-Day 1 300mg, Cycle 1-Day 8 1000mg, then Cycles 2-6 Day 1 1000mg every 28 days, Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles
Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria: * confirmed and active CLL requiring treatment * at least one previous treatment for CLL and having achieved a complete or partial remission/response but after a period of 6 or more months, shows evidence of disease progression * fully active at a minimum or fully capable of selfcare and up and about more than 50% of waking hours * age 18yrs or older * signed written informed consent Key
Exclusion criteria
* diagnosis of refractory CLL (failure to achieve a complete or partial remission/response or disease progression within 6 months of last anti-CLL treatment * abnormal/inadequate blood values, liver and kidney function * certain heart problems, serious significant diseases, AIHA, other current cancers or within the last 5 years * active or chronic infections * use of drugs to suppress allergic or inflammatory responses (glucocorticoids) * CLL transformation * CLL central nervous system involvement * current participation in other clinical study * inability to comply with the protocol activities * lactating or pregnant women or female patients of child-bearing potential (or male patients with such partners) not willing to use adequate contraception
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug | PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression (progressive disease,PD) and the date of death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Response, as Assessed by the IRC | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug | Time to response is defined as the time from randomization to the first response. Complete Response/remission(CR) all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment: no lymphadenopathy(Ly) \> 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/spleenomegaly/constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>1500 per microliter(µL), platelets(PL) \>100,000/µL, hemoglobin(Hb) \>11 grams/deciliter(g/dL), lymphocytes(LC) \<4000/µL, bone marrow(BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. Incomplete bone marrow recovery(CRi): CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. Partial Remission/response(PR): \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL \>100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline(BL), Hb \>11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. Nodular PR(nPR): persistent nodules BM. |
| Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC | From time of initial response to disease progression or death, whichever came first (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug) | DOR is defined as the time from the initial response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) to the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. |
| Time to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC | From randomization up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug | Time to progression is defined as the time from the date of randomization to PD. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. |
| Time to Next Therapy | From the start of study drug until the start of the next anti-CLL therapy (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug) | Time to next therapy is defined as the time from randomization until the start of the next-line of treatment. Data are presented for participants who took anti-cancer therapies and participants in the ITT population. |
| Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day1, follow up (FU) at 1Month (M) after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months) | The ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, how the disease affects the daily living, and determines appropriate treatment and prognosis. ECOG performance status are measured at Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1 and Cycle 6 Day1. During follow period, 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months). Improvement is defined as a decrease from baseline by at least one step on the ECOG performance status scale (yes/no). |
| Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Screening, Cycle1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and During at 1M after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months) | Participants with no B-symptoms (B-Sy) (no night sweat, no weight loss, no fever and no extreme fatigue) and at least one indicated B-sy(night sweats, weight loss, fever or extreme fatigue) were presented at Screening, Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and during follow up period at 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months). |
| Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug | OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response \[CR\], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery \[CRi\], partial response \[PR\], and nodular PR \[nPR\]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) \> 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) \>100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) \>11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) \<4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL \>100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb \>11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM. |
| Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug | OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response \[CR\], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery \[CRi\], partial response \[PR\], and nodular PR \[nPR\]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) \> 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) \>100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) \>11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) \<4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL \>100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb \>11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM. Responder = CR + CRi + NPR + PR |
| Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug | MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes. |
| Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug | MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes. |
| Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) | From first dose of study medication to 60 Days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE) | An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. |
| Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points | From start of study drug until 60 days after the last dose of study medication | Serum samples for analysis of HAHA were collected at Baseline (Screening), after 3 cycles were compelted, after 1 M and 6 M post last dose. All samples were first tested in a screening step; positive samples from the screening were further evaluated in a confirmation test. The confirmed positive samples were reported as HAHA-positive. |
| Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA) | From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE) | AIHA is a condition where the body's immune system fails to recognize red blood cells as self and begins destroying these red blood cells. The number of participants experienced AIHA are presented. |
| Overall Survival (OS) | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug | Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Each participant was followed at the time when the last IRC-assessed PFS events occurred. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact. |
| Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression Adverse Events | From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE) | Participants with at least one Grade 3 or Grade 4 myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) are presented. Myelosuppression is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. AEs were graded according to NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade, version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death). |
| Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug | Participants who received no transfusion and at least one transfusion during the study are presented. Participants who took any blood products or blood supportive care product are included. |
| Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | Baseline, 1M and 6M follow up | Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. Blood samples were collected from each participant and IgA, IgG, and IgM were measured at Baseline, and 1M and 6M after last dose during follow up period. |
| Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three months up to 45 M during Follow-up Period | CD5+ and CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (Baseline) on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during the treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month follow up up to 45 M. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. day 1 if available, otherwise, screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during Follow-up Period | CD5- CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (baseline) at Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during follow up period. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. Day 1 if available otherwise screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. |
| Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug | Blood samples were collected for the assessment of the following prognostic markers at BL: immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region(IgVH) homology; Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70(ZAP70), VH3-21 usage; Cytogenetics (by fluorescent in situ hybridization \[FISH\]); beta 2 microglobulin. Cox-regression model was used to explore the relationship between progression-free survival and the following explanatory variables: treatment group, cytogenetics (analyzed by FISH included 6q-,11q-, +12q, 17p-, 13q-) , ZAP-70 (positive, negative or intermediate), VH3-21 usage (Yes and No), IgVH homology (\>98%, 97%-98% and \<97%), beta 2 microglobulin (\>3500 microgram per liter \[µg/L\] and \<=3500 µg/L). For each covariate, a hazard ratio \<1 indicates a lower risk on the first effect tested compared with the other effects tested. Cytogenetics Group (based on \>=20%)=cytogenetics (CY G). |
| Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month. | The EORTC QLQ-CLL16 is comprised of 16 questions that address 5 domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) important in CLL. There are 4 multi-item scales - fatigue (2 items), treatment side effects (\[TSE\], 4 items), disease symptoms (disease effects scale \[DES\], 4 items), and infection scale \[IS\] (4 items) - and single item scales (social activities \[Social Problems (SP) Scale\] and future health worries\[Future Health (FH) Scale\].). These are measured on a four point scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. These scores are transformed to give a rating from 0 - 100, where 0 =no symptoms or problems and 100 = a severe symptoms or problems. EORTC QLQ-CLL16 was assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value was obtained at randomization. |
| Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month. | EQ-5D is comprised of a 5-item health status measure and a visual analogue scale (VAS) and is used to generate two scores: the utility score and the thermometer score. The utility score measures mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Responses to each of the 5 health states are measured on a 3-point scale (level 1 = no problem; level 2 = some or moderate problem(s) and level 3 = unable, or extreme problems). Responses are typically converted into health utilities or valuations on a scale ranging from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). The thermometer score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A Negative health status describes health state worse than death.Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study drug dose date. |
| Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month. | EORTC QLQ-C30, a self-reported, cancer-specific instrument assessing 15 domains: physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning, pain,fatigue, nausea and vomiting, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhea, and dyspnea, financial difficulties and a global health status/quality of life (QOF). Functional and symptoms scales were measured on four point Likert scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. Pat. assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date. Clinically meaningful changes or minimally important differences (MIDs)have been previously established for the EORTC QLQ C30, and categorized as 'small' if the mean change in scores is 5-10 points, 'moderate' if 10-20 points, and 'large' if \>20points. |
| Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month. | The HCQ consists of a single question in which the participant is asked if he/she has experienced any change in his/her health overall since beginning the study. For HCQ, values from 1 to 9 were assigned to the 9 responses in the HCQ questionnaire, ranging from 1 for 'my health is a great deal better' to 9 for 'my health is a great deal worse' since the beginning of the study. Lower scores represent better conditions. |
| Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumab | Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5,6 | Area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) over the dosing interval (AUC\[0-tau\]) was evaluated. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141). |
| Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab | Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5 | Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma concentration of ofatumumab.Cmax and Ctrough were determined. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141). |
| Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Ofatumumab | Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycle 4 | Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4. |
| Number of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or Higher | From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE) | An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Maximum severity grades were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death). |
Countries
Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Germany, Greece, India, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants (par) were screened within 14 days prior to the start of study drug administration to determine eligibility.
Pre-assignment details
Eligible par were stratified by Stage (Binet A vs. B vs. C) and number of prior therapies (1-2 vs. ≥3). Par in each stratum were then centrally randomized in a 1:1 ratio to recive intravenous (IV) fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in combination with ofatumumab or IV fludarabine and cyclophosphamide alone.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared \[m\^2\] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m\^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | 183 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m\^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m\^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status. | 182 |
| Total | 365 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Follow-up Phase | w/drew consent, no f/u, or MD choice | 18 | 31 |
| Survival Follow-up Phase | w/drew consent, no f/u, or MD choice | 9 | 16 |
| Treatment Phase | Adverse Event,non-fatal | 50 | 52 |
| Treatment Phase | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 1 |
| Treatment Phase | Physician Decision | 6 | 12 |
| Treatment Phase | Protocol Violation | 1 | 0 |
| Treatment Phase | Withdrawal by Subject | 6 | 15 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 61.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.82 | 61.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.21 | 61.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.53 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized African American/African Heritage | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian - Central/South Asian Heritage | 13 Participants | 16 Participants | 29 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian - East Asian Heritage | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian - South East Asian Heritage | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White - Arabic/North African Heritage | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage | 158 Participants | 153 Participants | 311 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 79 Participants | 66 Participants | 145 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 104 Participants | 116 Participants | 220 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 40 / 181 | 42 / 178 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 149 / 181 | 123 / 178 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 108 / 181 | 86 / 178 |
Outcome results
Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression (progressive disease,PD) and the date of death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL).
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all participants randomized and received study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) | 28.94 Months |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) | 18.83 Months |
Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+
CD5- CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (baseline) at Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during follow up period. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. Day 1 if available otherwise screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during Follow-up Period
Population: Safety Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 18 M, FU | 126.1 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 188.25 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 39.5 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 144.64 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 30 M, FU | 74.2 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 58.82 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 33 M, FU | 41.8 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 40.13 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 39 M, FU | 13.0 cells/uL | — |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 42 M, FU | 13.0 cells/uL | — |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Cycle 2 Day 15 | 35.6 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 133.75 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Screening | 4817.8 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 20948.17 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Cycle 1 Day 1 | 5996.7 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 22331.29 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Cycle 1 Day 15 | 239.0 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 1052.19 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 115.4 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 403.09 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 25.7 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 92.88 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 15.9 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 77.11 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Cycle 6 Day 1 | 10.0 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 29.85 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 3 M, FU | 40.1 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 238.18 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 6 M, FU | 21.2 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 58.16 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 9 M, FU | 85.7 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 359.01 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 12 M, FU | 89.9 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 226.06 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 15 M, FU | 67.3 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 59.52 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 21 M, FU | 375.5 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 1307.35 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 27 M, FU | 73.9 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 60.4 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 36 M, FU | 107.3 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 86.75 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 45 M, FU | 166.5 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 222.74 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 48 M, FU | 6528.0 cells/uL | — |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 54 M, FU | 690.0 cells/uL | — |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 1 M, FU | 7.5 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 19.54 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 24 M, FU | 74.0 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 57.46 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Cycle 6 Day 1 | 649.7 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 3606.28 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 195.5 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 945.34 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 6 M, FU | 50.7 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 49.13 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 18 M, FU | 92.3 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 69.14 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 1 M, FU | 863.8 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 5001.84 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 30 M, FU | 129.5 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 5303 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 33 M, FU | 1003.0 cells/uL | — |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 36 M, FU | 1506.0 cells/uL | — |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 3 M, FU | 172.0 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 681.28 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 21 M, FU | 108.3 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 95.86 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 24 M, FU | 104.5 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 70.46 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 465.7 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 1610.05 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 9 M, FU | 92.0 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 101.16 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Screening | 6959.1 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 39980.14 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 48 M, FU | 28.0 cells/uL | — |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 12 M, FU | 220.1 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 698.57 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Cycle 1 Day 15 | 351.7 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 1377.56 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 27 M, FU | 187.5 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 200.85 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Cycle 2 Day 15 | 331.3 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 1177.18 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 179.7 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 520.63 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | 15 M, FU | 94.6 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 70.17 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 95.3 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 369.19 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+ | Cycle 1 Day 1 | 2041.3 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 4418.63 |
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+
CD5+ and CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (Baseline) on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during the treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month follow up up to 45 M. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. day 1 if available, otherwise, screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three months up to 45 M during Follow-up Period
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | Cycle 1 Day 15 | 2656.9 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 6418.02 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 54 M FU | 189849.0 cells/uL | — |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | Cycle 2 Day 15 | 513.7 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 1717.65 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 790.0 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 2953.42 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 24 M, FU | 1244.6 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 1300.01 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 402.1 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 1768.74 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 21 M, FU | 3830.8 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 8989.02 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 142.6 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 472.24 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 27 M, FU | 1877.4 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 2117.84 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | Cycle 6 Day 1 | 109.8 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 398.77 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 30 M, FU | 5029.7 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 8266.9 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 1 M, FU | 163.5 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 685.41 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 3 M, FU | 671.3 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 2786.99 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 2057.4 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 5525.72 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 6 M, FU | 1591.6 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 8857.22 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 33 M, FU | 14166.8 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 20166.09 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 9 M, FU | 910.5 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 2495.85 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | Cycle 1 Day 1 | 43180.6 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 48784.64 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 12 M, FU | 2303.2 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 6675.7 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 36 M, FU | 1187.0 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 1407.79 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 15 M, FU | 3325.8 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 8006.48 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 18 M, FU | 1607.5 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 2935.82 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 39 M, FU | 557.0 cells/uL | — |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 42 M, FU | 1640.0 cells/uL | — |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 45 M, FU | 4689.0 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 1493.41 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 48 M FU | 27755.0 cells/uL | — |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 15 M, FU | 3072.7 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 9038.23 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 10318.8 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 21453.15 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 1 M, FU | 5514.3 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 17369.97 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 18 M, FU | 4549.8 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 8839.23 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 27 M, FU | 6128.0 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 9161.38 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 21 M, FU | 5236.9 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 10537.31 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | Cycle 1 Day 15 | 9244.0 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 19610.62 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 24 M, FU | 7843.3 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 11897.55 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 30 M, FU | 6515.5 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 5916.36 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 33 M, FU | 5208.0 cells/uL | — |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 36 M, FU | 8184.0 cells/uL | — |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 48 M FU | 29155.0 cells/uL | — |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | Cycle 2 Day 15 | 6874.4 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 20632.64 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 6423.6 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 19725.57 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 2643.2 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 8092.22 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 2838.6 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 8314.08 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | Cycle 6 Day 1 | 3862.7 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 13312.14 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 3 M, FU | 2604.9 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 9229.9 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 6 M, FU | 2275.6 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 5118 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 9 M, FU | 3408.4 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 7438.45 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | 12 M, FU | 2876.5 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 6252.53 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+ | Cycle 1 Day 1 | 53208.7 cells/uL | Standard Deviation 70944.56 |
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit
EQ-5D is comprised of a 5-item health status measure and a visual analogue scale (VAS) and is used to generate two scores: the utility score and the thermometer score. The utility score measures mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Responses to each of the 5 health states are measured on a 3-point scale (level 1 = no problem; level 2 = some or moderate problem(s) and level 3 = unable, or extreme problems). Responses are typically converted into health utilities or valuations on a scale ranging from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). The thermometer score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A Negative health status describes health state worse than death.Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study drug dose date.
Time frame: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS, 24 M, FU | 8.8 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.5 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, Cycle 4 Day 1 | 0.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, 1 M, FU | 0.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, 3 M, FU | 0.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, 6 M, FU | 0.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, 9 M, FU | 0.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT. 12 M, FU | 0.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, 15 M, FU | 0.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.23 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, 18 M, FU | 0.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, 21 M, FU | 0.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, 24 M, FU | 0.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS Cycle 4 Day 1 | 6.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.68 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS, 1 M, FU | 5.6 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.73 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS, 3 M, FU | 5.7 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.92 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS, 6 M, FU | 8.2 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.84 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS, 9 M, FU | 8.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.33 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS. 12 M, FU | 7.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.93 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS, 15 M, FU | 8.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.52 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS, 18 M, FU | 9.4 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.86 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS, 21 M, FU | 8.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.42 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS, 9 M, FU | 11.9 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.59 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS, 1 M, FU | 5.9 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.83 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS, 24 M, FU | 15.2 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.88 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, 24 M, FU | 0.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, Cycle 4 Day 1 | 0.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS, 18 M, FU | 11.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.4 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS Cycle 4 Day 1 | 5.6 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.64 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, 3 M, FU | 0.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.23 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS. 12 M, FU | 10.3 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.21 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, 6 M, FU | 0.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, 1 M, FU | 0.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, 9 M, FU | 0.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS, 3 M, FU | 9.6 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.88 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT. 12 M, FU | 0.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS, 15 M, FU | 13.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.06 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, 15 M, FU | 0.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS, 6 M, FU | 11.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.08 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, 18 M, FU | 0.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | VAS, 21 M, FU | 11.3 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.16 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit | UT, 21 M, FU | 0.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score
EORTC QLQ-C30, a self-reported, cancer-specific instrument assessing 15 domains: physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning, pain,fatigue, nausea and vomiting, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhea, and dyspnea, financial difficulties and a global health status/quality of life (QOF). Functional and symptoms scales were measured on four point Likert scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. Pat. assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date. Clinically meaningful changes or minimally important differences (MIDs)have been previously established for the EORTC QLQ C30, and categorized as 'small' if the mean change in scores is 5-10 points, 'moderate' if 10-20 points, and 'large' if \>20points.
Time frame: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, 18 M, FU | -7.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.11 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting, 6 M, FU | -2.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.12 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, 21 M, FU | -3.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.36 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea. 12 M, FU | -3.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.75 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, 24 M, FU | -3.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.53 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning, 18 M, FU | 5.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.94 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, Cycle 4 Day 1 | 3.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.25 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation. 12 M, FU | -0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.13 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, 1 M, FU | -0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.4 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning, 21 M, FU | 5.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.43 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, 3 M, FU | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.74 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain Cycle 4 Day 1 | -3.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.64 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, 6 M, FU | 1.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.95 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, 15 M, FU | -1.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.57 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, 9 M, FU | -0.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.58 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain, 3 M, FU | -3.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.13 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning. 12 M, FU | -2.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.17 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, 18 M, FU | -1.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.67 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, 21 M, FU | -2.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.88 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning, 24 M, FU | 7.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.02 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea, 1 M, FU | -1.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.6 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain, 6 M, FU | -5.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.54 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea, 3 M, FU | -3.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.4 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, Cycle 4 Day 1 | 2.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.46 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, 21 M, FU | -1.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.93 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain, 9 M, FU | -4.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.86 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, 24 M, FU | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.23 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue Cycle 4 Day 1 | -4.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.37 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, Cycle 4 Day 1 | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.72 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain. 12 M, FU | -3.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.43 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain, 15 M, FU | -2.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.08 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, 3 M, FU | 1.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.49 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea, 9 M, FU | -2.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.03 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, 24 M, FU | 1.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.83 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea, 18 M, FU | -3.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.81 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain, 18 M, FU | -3.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.39 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea, 21 M, FU | -3.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.92 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue, 1 M, FU | -7.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.16 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea, 24 M, FU | -2.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.39 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain, 21 M, FU | -5.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.74 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning Cycle 4 Day 1 | 4.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.91 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, 24 M, FU | -2.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.02 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning, 1 M, FU | 5.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.26 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain, 24 M, FU | -1.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.25 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning, 3 M, FU | 5.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.93 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue, 3 M, FU | -5.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.01 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning, 6 M, FU | 4.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.57 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning Cycle 4 Day 1 | 1.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.5 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea, 15 M, FU | -2.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.77 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, 1 M, FU | -3.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.87 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning, 3 M, FU | 0.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.66 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue, 9 M, FU | -8.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.8 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue, 6 M, FU | -8.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.64 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning, 6 M, FU | 3.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.41 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue, 24 M, FU | -9.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.01 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue. 12 M, FU | -6.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.28 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning, 9 M, FU | 3.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.3 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties, 3 M, FU | -4.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.3 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue, 15 M, FU | -7.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.83 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties, 6 M, FU | -5.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.61 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties Cycle 4 Day 1 | -4.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.98 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties, 18 M, FU | -4.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.39 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting Cycle 4 Day 1 | 2.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.06 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia, 18 M, FU | -7.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.32 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting, 9 M, FU | -1.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.81 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning, 15 M, FU | 3.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.65 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting. 12 M, FU | -2.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.52 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning, 18 M, FU | 4.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.65 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting, 15 M, FU | -3.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.45 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting, 18 M, FU | -3.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.03 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea Cycle 4 Day 1 | -4.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.85 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting, 21 M, FU | -4.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.37 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting, 24 M, FU | -2.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.69 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning, 21 M, FU | 4.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.14 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain, 1 M, FU | -2.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.02 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status Cycle 4 Day 1 | 6.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.46 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue, 18 M, FU | -7.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.25 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status, 1 M, FU | 6.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.23 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning, 1 M, FU | 0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.52 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning. 12 M, FU | 2.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.98 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, 1 M, FU | -0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.02 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status, 3 M, FU | 5.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.45 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue, 21 M, FU | -9.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.44 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning, 24 M, FU | 5.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.44 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea, 6 M, FU | -2.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.92 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status, 6 M, FU | 7.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.57 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status, 9 M, FU | 7.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.24 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties, 1 M, FU | -5.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.57 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status, 21 M, FU | 10.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.26 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status. 12 M, FU | 7.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.64 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status, 24 M, FU | 12.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.28 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, 6 M, FU | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.38 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning Cycle 4 Day 1 | 1.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.27 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status, 15 M, FU | 7.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.4 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties, 9 M, FU | -6.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.54 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning, 3 M, FU | 0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.19 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status, 18 M, FU | 9.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.03 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning, 6 M, FU | 4.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.49 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning, 1 M, FU | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.83 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning, 9 M, FU | 4.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.21 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea. 12 M, FU | -3.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.52 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning. 12 M, FU | 2.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.46 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia, 21 M, FU | -8.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.15 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, 15 M, FU | -1.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.97 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia, 24 M, FU | -1.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.3 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties. 12 M, FU | -6.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.93 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning, 15 M, FU | 3.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.84 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, 1 M, FU | -0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.14 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning, 18 M, FU | 7.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.09 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, 21 M, FU | -1.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.65 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning, 21 M, FU | 5.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.82 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties, 15 M, FU | -8.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.69 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning, 24 M, FU | 5.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.54 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, 3 M, FU | -2.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.33 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning Cycle 4 Day 1 | 3.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.3 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties, 21 M, FU, | -10.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.34 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning, 1 M, FU | 0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.98 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, 6 M, FU | -3.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.32 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning, 3 M, FU | 0.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.76 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning, 9 M | 3.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.95 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning, 6 M, FU | 3.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.04 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, 9 M, FU | -1.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.71 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning, 9 M, FU | 2.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.84 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties, 24 M, FU | -6.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.93 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning. 12 M, FU | 3.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.04 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, 15 M, FU | -1.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.29 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning, 15 M, FU | 6.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.3 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, 18 M, FU | -0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.49 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning, 18 M, FU | 6.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.78 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, Cycle 4 Day 1 | 0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.6 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning, 21 M, FU | 6.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.83 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, 9 M, FU | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.56 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning, 24 M, FU | 7.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.6 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning. 12 M, FU | 3.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.11 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia Cycle 4 Day 1 | -3.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.07 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, 6 M, FU | -6.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia, 1 M, FU | -5.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.04 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting, 1 M, FU | 1.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.85 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia, 3 M, FU | -6.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.64 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, 9 M, FU | -3.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.38 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia, 6 M, FU | -5.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.18 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, 18 M, FU | -0.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia, 9 M, FU | -3.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.53 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss. 12 M, FU | -4.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.76 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia. 12 M, FU | -6.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.91 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting, 3 M, FU | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.9 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia, 15 M, FU | -5.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.02 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, 15 M, FU | -3.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.13 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning, 15 M, FU | 5.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.54 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, 3 M, FU | -0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.77 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties, 15 M, FU | -9.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.91 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, 3 M, FU | -7.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.22 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning. 12 M, FU | -1.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.36 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, 24 M, FU | -1.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.25 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, Cycle 4 Day 1 | 0.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.6 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, 9 M, FU | 0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.18 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, 15 M, FU | -3.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.11 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, 18 M, FU | -1.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.32 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, 3 M, FU | 1.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.98 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, 6 M, FU | -3.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.64 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, 9 M, FU | -2.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.97 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea. 12 M, FU | -2.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.12 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, 15 M, FU | -4.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.62 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, 18 M, FU | -1.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.18 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, 24 M, FU | -0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.75 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea Cycle 4 Day 1 | -4.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.41 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea, 6 M, FU | -7.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.17 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning, 6 M, FU | 8.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.34 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning, 9 M | 6.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.52 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning. 12 M, FU | 8.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.92 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning, 15 M, FU | 6.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.15 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning, 18 M, FU | 6.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.35 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning, 21 M, FU | 7.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.56 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning, 24 M, FU | 7.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.16 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue Cycle 4 Day 1 | -6.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.66 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue, 1 M, FU | -4.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.64 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue, 3 M, FU | -9.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.83 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue, 15 M, FU | -8.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.61 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue, 18 M, FU | -6.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.15 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue, 21 M, FU | -9.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.34 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties, 1 M, FU | -5.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.07 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties, 9 M, FU | -8.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.44 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties. 12 M, FU | -9.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.71 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties, 18 M, FU | -12.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.04 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties, 21 M, FU, | -11.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.02 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties, 24 M, FU | -12.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.57 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting Cycle 4 Day 1 | 3.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.37 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting, 1 M, FU | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.22 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting, 3 M, FU | -2.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.49 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting, 6 M, FU | -2.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.36 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting, 15 M, FU | -2.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.76 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting, 21 M, FU | 1.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.72 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting, 24 M, FU | -0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.9 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain, 1 M, FU | -5.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.31 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain, 3 M, FU | -2.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.44 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain, 6 M, FU | -6.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.59 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain, 9 M, FU | -4.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.12 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain, 15 M, FU | -3.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain, 18 M, FU | 0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.05 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain, 21 M, FU | -0.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.82 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain, 24 M, FU | -3.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.67 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning, 1 M, FU | -0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.15 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning, 3 M, FU | 0.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.68 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning, 6 M, FU | 5.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.01 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning, 9 M, FU | 6.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.25 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning, 18 M, FU | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.09 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status Cycle 4 Day 1 | 6.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.54 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status, 1 M, FU | 6.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.32 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status, 3 M, FU | 12.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.15 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status, 6 M, FU | 13.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.01 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status, 9 M, FU | 11.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.35 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status. 12 M, FU | 12.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.77 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status, 15 M, FU | 12.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.29 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning. 12 M, FU | 3.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.78 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, 15 M, FU | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.58 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, 18 M, FU | -0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.67 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, 21 M, FU | -1.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.84 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, 1 M, FU | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.92 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, 3 M, FU | -0.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.01 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, 6 M, FU | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.22 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation. 12 M, FU | 0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.24 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, Cycle 4 Day 1 | -1.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.65 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, 1 M, FU | -3.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.52 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, 6 M, FU | -12.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.05 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, 9 M, FU | -9.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.25 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss. 12 M, FU | -6.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.59 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, 15 M, FU | -9.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.19 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, 18 M, FU | -9.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.12 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, 21 M, FU | -7.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.7 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Appetite Loss, 24 M, FU | -12.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.68 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, Cycle 4 Day 1 | 2.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.39 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, 1 M, FU | 3.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.87 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, 3 M, FU | 2.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.69 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, 6 M, FU | 2.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.99 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Cognitive Functioning, 9 M, FU | 2.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.61 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, 21 M, FU | 0.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.17 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea, 1 M, FU | -2.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.67 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea, 3 M, FU | -1.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.53 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, 21 M, FU | -3.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.26 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Constipation, 24 M, FU | -3.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.56 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, Cycle 4 Day 1 | -2.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.54 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Diarrhoea, 1 M, FU | 0.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.28 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea, 9 M, FU | -6.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.55 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea, 18 M, FU | -2.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.22 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea, 21 M, FU | -1.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.3 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea, 24 M, FU | -4.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.53 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning Cycle 4 Day 1 | 5.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.59 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning, 1 M, FU | 7.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.08 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Emotional Functioning, 3 M, FU | 7.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.9 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea. 12 M, FU | -4.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.87 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Dyspnoea, 15 M, FU | -2.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.66 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue, 6 M, FU | -12.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.43 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue. 12 M, FU | -10.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.44 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue, 9 M, FU | -9.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.56 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties Cycle 4 Day 1 | -6.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.93 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Fatigue, 24 M, FU | -11.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.3 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties, 3 M, FU | -9.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.4 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting, 9 M, FU | -1.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.08 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting. 12 M, FU | -1.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.35 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Nausea and Vomiting, 18 M, FU | -2.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.02 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain Cycle 4 Day 1 | -4.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.43 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Pain. 12 M, FU | -3.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.01 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia, 18 M, FU | -15.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.58 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning Cycle 4 Day 1 | 0.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.81 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning. 12 M, FU | 3.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.52 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning, 15 M, FU | 2.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.46 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning, 21 M, FU | 2.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.88 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Physical Functioning, 24 M, FU | 3.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.57 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status, 18 M, FU | 10.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status, 21 M, FU | 12.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.53 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Global Health Status, 24 M, FU | 12.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.31 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning Cycle 4 Day 1 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.83 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning, 1 M, FU | -0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.53 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning, 3 M, FU | 0.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.94 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning, 6 M, FU | 5.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.54 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning, 9 M, FU | 6.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.6 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia, 21 M, FU | -10.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.64 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia, 24 M, FU | -13.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.95 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning, 15 M, FU | 1.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.13 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning, 18 M, FU | -0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.95 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning, 21 M, FU | 2.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.74 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Role Functioning, 24 M, FU | 3.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.1 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning Cycle 4 Day 1 | -0.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.5 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning, 1 M, FU | 0.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.93 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning, 3 M, FU | 4.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.29 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning, 6 M, FU | 6.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.24 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning, 9 M, FU | 4.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.46 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning. 12 M, FU | 3.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.95 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning, 15 M, FU | 1.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.61 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning, 18 M, FU | 2.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.69 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning, 21 M, FU | 4.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.72 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Social Functioning, 24 M, FU | 7.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.56 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia Cycle 4 Day 1 | -8.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.94 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia, 1 M, FU | -11.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.78 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia, 3 M, FU | -13.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.07 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia, 6 M, FU | -17.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.88 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia, 9 M, FU | -13.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.04 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia. 12 M, FU | -10.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.33 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Insomnia, 15 M, FU | -17.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.52 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score | Financial Difficulties, 6 M, FU | -8.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.89 |
Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)
The EORTC QLQ-CLL16 is comprised of 16 questions that address 5 domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) important in CLL. There are 4 multi-item scales - fatigue (2 items), treatment side effects (\[TSE\], 4 items), disease symptoms (disease effects scale \[DES\], 4 items), and infection scale \[IS\] (4 items) - and single item scales (social activities \[Social Problems (SP) Scale\] and future health worries\[Future Health (FH) Scale\].). These are measured on a four point scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. These scores are transformed to give a rating from 0 - 100, where 0 =no symptoms or problems and 100 = a severe symptoms or problems. EORTC QLQ-CLL16 was assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value was obtained at randomization.
Time frame: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.
Population: Participants
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, 21 M, FU | -16.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.7 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS, 1 M, FU | -5.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.16 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, 24 M, FU | -21.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.58 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, 6 M, FU | -9.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.99 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, Cycle 4 Day 1 | 0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.65 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS, 3 M, FU | -4.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.3 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, 1 M, FU | 2.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.79 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, 3 M, FU | 0.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.42 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale. 12 M, FU | -7.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.06 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, 6 M, FU | -1.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.46 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS, 6 M, FU | -7.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.94 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, 9 M, FU | -1.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.81 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, 9 M, FU | -8.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.7 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS. 12 M, FU | 0.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.22 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS, 9 M, FU | -6.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.08 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, 15 M, FU | 0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.56 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, 18 M, FU | -2.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.04 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES. 12 M, FU | -10.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.64 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, 21 M, FU | -2.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.13 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS, 15 M, FU | -7.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.57 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, 24 M, FU | -0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.85 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, 15 M, FU | -8.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.08 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale Cycle 4 Day 1 | 1.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.44 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS, 21 M, FU | -10.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.28 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale, 1 M, FU | 3.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.51 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, Cycle 4 Day 1 | -8.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.08 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale, 3 M, FU | -1.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.04 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS, 24 M, FU | -8.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.19 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale, 6 M, FU | -5.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.73 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, 18 M, FU | -8.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.53 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale, 9 M, FU | -5.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.15 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, Cycle 4 Day 1 | -11.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.89 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale, 15 M, FU | -6.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.21 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS. 12 M, FU | -7.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.26 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale, 18 M, FU | -7.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.57 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, 1 M, FU | -15.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.04 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale, 21 M, FU | -8.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.07 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, 21 M, FU | -8.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.48 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale, 24 M, FU | -11.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.27 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, 3 M, FU | -14.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.96 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, Cycle 4 Day 1 | -4.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.15 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, 1 M, FU | -9.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.18 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, 1 M, FU | -5.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.09 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, 6 M, FU | -13.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.98 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, 3 M, FU | -3.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.41 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, 24 M, FU | -7.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.93 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, 6 M, FU | -6.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.25 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, 9 M, FU | -15.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.65 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, 9 M, FU | -4.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.22 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH. 12 M, FU | -14.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.8 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE. 12 M, FU | -5.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.44 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS, 18 M, FU | -7.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.03 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, 15 M, FU | -4.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.92 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, 15 M, FU | -14.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.14 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, 18 M, FU | -4.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.1 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | Fatigue Scale (FS), Cycle 4 Day 1 | -7.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.57 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, 21 M, FU | -4.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.63 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, 18 M, FU | -15.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.69 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, 24 M, FU | -5.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.52 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, 3 M, FU | -8.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.48 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, 24 M, FU | -6.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.12 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, 9 M, FU | -12.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.04 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS, 15 M, FU | -9.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.04 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, 9 M, FU | -13.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.43 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, 1 M, FU | 2.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.06 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, 15 M, FU | 0.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.79 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale. 12 M, FU | -7.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.47 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, Cycle 4 Day 1 | -9.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.16 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, 1 M, FU | -9.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.89 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, 6 M, FU | -11.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.05 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES. 12 M, FU | -10.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.09 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, 15 M, FU | -10.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.91 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, 18 M, FU | -11.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.79 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, 21 M, FU | -11.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.6 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, 24 M, FU | -13.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.18 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | Fatigue Scale (FS), Cycle 4 Day 1 | -7.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.16 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS, 1 M, FU | -6.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.74 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS, 3 M, FU | -8.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.14 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS, 6 M, FU | -12.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.98 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS, 9 M, FU | -10.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.95 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS. 12 M, FU | -8.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.75 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS, 18 M, FU | -3.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.34 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS, 21 M, FU | -8.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.27 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FS, 24 M, FU | -8.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.48 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, Cycle 4 Day 1 | -10.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.76 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, 1 M, FU | -11.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.56 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, 3 M, FU | -14.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 32.06 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, 6 M, FU | -17.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.57 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH. 12 M, FU | -14.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.63 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, 15 M, FU | -14.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 34.13 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, 18 M, FU | -18.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.72 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, 21 M, FU | -15.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.12 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | FH, 24 M, FU | -17.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.51 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, Cycle 4 Day 1 | -1.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.23 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, 3 M, FU | 0.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.99 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, 6 M, FU | -0.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.4 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, 9 M, FU | 1.4 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.45 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS. 12 M, FU | 2.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.92 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, 18 M, FU | 0.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.04 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, 21 M, FU | 2.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.09 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | IS, 24 M, FU | 0.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.34 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale Cycle 4 Day 1 | 0.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.94 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale, 1 M, FU | 0.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.22 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale, 3 M, FU | -4.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.75 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale, 6 M, FU | -10.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.56 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale, 9 M, FU | -11.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.45 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale, 15 M, FU | -13.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.05 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale, 18 M, FU | -8.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 40.4 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale, 21 M, FU | -7.5 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 37.92 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | SP Scale, 24 M, FU | -8.7 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 36.15 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, Cycle 4 Day 1 | -4.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.78 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, 1 M, FU | -3.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.08 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, 3 M, FU | -4.3 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.03 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, 6 M, FU | -4.8 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.96 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, 9 M, FU | -5.1 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.38 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE. 12 M, FU | -3.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.94 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, 15 M, FU | -4.2 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.73 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, 18 M, FU | -3.6 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.18 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | TSE, 21 M, FU | -4.0 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.91 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16) | DES, 3 M, FU | -10.9 scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.07 |
Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC
DOR is defined as the time from the initial response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) to the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
Time frame: From time of initial response to disease progression or death, whichever came first (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug)
Population: ITT Population. Par with unknown or missing responses were considered as non-responders, only responders were included in this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC | 29.63 Months |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC | 24.90 Months |
Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab
Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma concentration of ofatumumab.Cmax and Ctrough were determined. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141).
Time frame: Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5
Population: PK Population: Participants for whom a pharmacokinetic sample was obtained were analyzed, only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed(represented by n=X in the category titles)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab | Cmax cycle 1, week 1 | 61.355 Micrograms per milliliter |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab | Cmax cycle 1, week 2 | 241.192 Micrograms per milliliter |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab | Cmax cycle 4 | 312.745 Micrograms per milliliter |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab | Ctrough cycle 1, week 1 | 3.551 Micrograms per milliliter |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab | Ctrough cycle 1, week 2 | 9.496 Micrograms per milliliter |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab | Ctrough cycle 2 | 24.281 Micrograms per milliliter |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab | Ctrough cycle 3 | 25.632 Micrograms per milliliter |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab | Ctrough cycle 4 | 58.640 Micrograms per milliliter |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab | Ctrough cycle 5 | 70.398 Micrograms per milliliter |
Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumab
Area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) over the dosing interval (AUC\[0-tau\]) was evaluated. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141).
Time frame: Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5,6
Population: PK Population: Participants for whom a pharmacokinetic sample was obtained were analyzed, only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed(represented by n=X in the category titles)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumab | cycle 1, week 1 | 3554.910 hour*nanogram/mililiter (h*ng/mL) |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumab | cycle 1, week 2 | 34109.67 hour*nanogram/mililiter (h*ng/mL) |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumab | cycle 2 | 67069.79 hour*nanogram/mililiter (h*ng/mL) |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumab | cycle 3 | 84620.05 hour*nanogram/mililiter (h*ng/mL) |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumab | cycle 4 | 89091.35 hour*nanogram/mililiter (h*ng/mL) |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumab | cycle 5 | 96829.23 hour*nanogram/mililiter (h*ng/mL) |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumab | cycle 6 | 104798.0 hour*nanogram/mililiter (h*ng/mL) |
Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM
Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. Blood samples were collected from each participant and IgA, IgG, and IgM were measured at Baseline, and 1M and 6M after last dose during follow up period.
Time frame: Baseline, 1M and 6M follow up
Population: Safety Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | Cycle 1 Day 1, IgG | 8.7 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 5.22 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 9 M, FU, IgM | 0.8 Gram per liter | — |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | Cycle 1 Day 1, IgM | 0.6 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 1.36 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 9 M, FU, IgG | 15.2 Gram per liter | — |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 1 M, FU, IgA | 1.0 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 30 M, FU, IgA | 1.3 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 1.17 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 1 M, FU, IgG | 7.9 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 4.05 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 30 M, FU, IgG | 4.7 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 1 M, FU, IgM | 0.5 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 1.16 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 6 M, FU, IgA | 1.0 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 30 M, FU, IgM | 0.4 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 6 M, FU, IgG | 7.8 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 3.97 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | Cycle 1 Day 1, IgA | 1.0 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 6 M, FU, IgM | 0.4 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 9 M, FU, IgA | 0.9 Gram per liter | — |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 6 M, FU, IgM | 1.1 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 1.98 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 9 M, FU, IgA | 0.9 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 0.21 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 9 M, FU, IgG | 8.8 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 6.87 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 9 M, FU, IgM | 0.2 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 0.04 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 18 M, FU, IgA | 2.4 Gram per liter | — |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 18 M, FU, IgG | 9.1 Gram per liter | — |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 18 M, FU, IgM | 1.0 Gram per liter | — |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | Cycle 1 Day 1, IgA | 0.9 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 0.68 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | Cycle 1 Day 1, IgG | 8.2 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 3.86 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | Cycle 1 Day 1, IgM | 0.8 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 1.77 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 1 M, FU, IgA | 1.0 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 1 M, FU, IgG | 7.9 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 3.38 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 6 M, FU, IgA | 1.0 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 6 M, FU, IgG | 8.9 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 4.31 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM | 1 M, FU, IgM | 0.8 Gram per liter | Standard Deviation 1.88 |
Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)
The HCQ consists of a single question in which the participant is asked if he/she has experienced any change in his/her health overall since beginning the study. For HCQ, values from 1 to 9 were assigned to the 9 responses in the HCQ questionnaire, ranging from 1 for 'my health is a great deal better' to 9 for 'my health is a great deal worse' since the beginning of the study. Lower scores represent better conditions.
Time frame: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 6 M, FU | 2.6 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.76 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 2.6 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.62 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 1 M, FU | 3.0 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.05 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 3 M, FU | 3.0 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.11 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 9 M, FU | 2.5 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.78 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 12 M, FU | 2.5 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 15 M, FU | 2.2 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.57 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 18 M, FU | 2.4 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.67 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 21 M, FU | 2.3 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 24 M, FU | 2.3 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.76 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 18 M, FU | 2.7 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.01 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 12 M, FU | 2.5 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.78 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 2.8 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.59 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 24 M, FU | 2.6 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.89 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 1 M, FU | 3.2 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 15 M, FU | 2.3 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.68 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 3 M, FU | 2.8 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.86 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 6 M, FU | 2.6 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.82 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 21 M, FU | 2.3 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.52 |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ) | 9 M, FU | 2.4 Unit on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.57 |
Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study
Participants who received no transfusion and at least one transfusion during the study are presented. Participants who took any blood products or blood supportive care product are included.
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Population: Safety Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study | At least one transfusion | 125 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study | No transfusions | 56 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study | No transfusions | 79 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study | At least one transfusion | 99 Participants |
Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC
MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 39 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 12 M, FU | 16 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | Cycle 1 Day 1 | 0 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 15 M, FU | 14 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 42 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 18 M, FU | 12 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 45 M, FU | 1 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 21 M, FU | 9 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 54 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | Screening | 0 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 24 M, FU | 8 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 48 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 27 M, FU | 8 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 3 M, FU | 21 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 30 M, FU | 8 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 51 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 33 M, FU | 3 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 36 M, FU | 5 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 6 M, FU | 25 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 9 M, FU | 20 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 33 M, FU | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 54 M, FU | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 36 M, FU | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 3 M, FU | 7 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 39 M, FU | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 45 M, FU | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 48 M, FU | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 51 M, FU | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 6 M, FU | 6 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 9 M, FU | 4 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 12 M, FU | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 15 M, FU | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 18 M, FU | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 21 M, FU | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 24 M, FU | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 27 M, FU | 0 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | 30 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC | Screening | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator
MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 27 M, FU | 14 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 12 M, FU | 31 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | Screening | 0 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 30 M, FU | 12 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 15 M, FU | 23 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 39 M, FU | 6 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 18 M, FU | 20 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 42 M, FU | 7 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 6 M, FU | 48 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 45 M, FU | 6 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 36 M, FU | 9 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 48 M, FU | 6 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 33 M, FU | 8 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 51 M, FU | 5 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 21 M, FU | 16 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 54 M, FU | 4 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 9 M, FU | 35 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 57 M, FU | 3 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 24 M, FU | 13 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 60 M, FU | 3 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 3 M, FU | 39 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 60 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | Screening | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 3 M, FU | 15 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 6 M, FU | 11 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 9 M, FU | 6 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 12 M, FU | 3 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 33 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 18 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 21 M, FU | 3 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 24 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 27 M, FU | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 36 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 30 M, FU | 3 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 39 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 42 M, FU | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 45 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 48 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 51 M, FU | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 54 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 57 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator | 15 M, FU | 2 Participants |
Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points
Serum samples for analysis of HAHA were collected at Baseline (Screening), after 3 cycles were compelted, after 1 M and 6 M post last dose. All samples were first tested in a screening step; positive samples from the screening were further evaluated in a confirmation test. The confirmed positive samples were reported as HAHA-positive.
Time frame: From start of study drug until 60 days after the last dose of study medication
Population: Safety Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points | Screening Visit, n= 179,177 | 8 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points | Cycle 4 Day 1, n= 151,130 | 0 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points | 1 M, FU, n= 148,132 | 0 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points | 6 M, FU, n= 130, 99 | 2 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points | 30 M, FU, n= 2, 0 | 0 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points | 1 M, FU, n= 148,132 | 2 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points | 3 M, FU, n= 0,1 | 0 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points | Screening Visit, n= 179,177 | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points | 9 M, FU, n= 0, 2 | 0 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points | Cycle 4 Day 1, n= 151,130 | 2 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points | 6 M, FU, n= 130, 99 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury.
Time frame: From first dose of study medication to 60 Days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)
Population: Safety Population: Participants who received at least one dose of a study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) | AE | 170 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) | SAE | 108 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) | AE | 153 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) | SAE | 86 Participants |
Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression Adverse Events
Participants with at least one Grade 3 or Grade 4 myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) are presented. Myelosuppression is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. AEs were graded according to NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade, version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).
Time frame: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)
Population: Safety Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression Adverse Events | 126 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression Adverse Events | 118 Participants |
Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA)
AIHA is a condition where the body's immune system fails to recognize red blood cells as self and begins destroying these red blood cells. The number of participants experienced AIHA are presented.
Time frame: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)
Population: Safety Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA) | 3 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA) | 2 Participants |
Number of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or Higher
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Maximum severity grades were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).
Time frame: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)
Population: Safety Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or Higher | AE | 19 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or Higher | SAE | 25 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or Higher | SAE | 21 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or Higher | AE | 11 Participants |
Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
The ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, how the disease affects the daily living, and determines appropriate treatment and prognosis. ECOG performance status are measured at Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1 and Cycle 6 Day1. During follow period, 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months). Improvement is defined as a decrease from baseline by at least one step on the ECOG performance status scale (yes/no).
Time frame: Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day1, follow up (FU) at 1Month (M) after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months)
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 60 M, FU | 3 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 16 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 19 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 20 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Cycle 6 Day 1 | 26 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 1 M, FU | 31 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 3 M, FU | 31 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 12 M, FU | 30 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 15 M, FU | 23 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 18 M, FU | 23 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 21 M, FU | 22 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 24 M, FU | 20 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 27 M, FU | 15 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 30 M, FU | 14 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 33 M, FU | 15 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 42 M, FU | 11 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 45 M, FU | 8 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 48 M, FU | 8 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 51 M, FU | 7 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 54 M, FU | 7 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 57 M, FU | 3 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 15 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 6 M, FU | 30 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 9 M, FU | 31 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 36 M, FU | 12 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 39 M, FU | 12 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 60 M, FU | 3 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Cycle 2 Day 1 | 13 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Cycle 4 Day 1 | 13 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Cycle 3 Day 1 | 13 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 42 M, FU | 6 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 3 M, FU | 21 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Cycle 5 Day 1 | 15 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 45 M, FU | 4 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Cycle 6 Day 1 | 16 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 39 M, FU | 7 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 1 M, FU | 22 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 48 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 6 M, FU | 18 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 12 M, FU | 20 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 51 M, FU | 3 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 15 M, FU | 18 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 36 M, FU | 7 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 18 M, FU | 18 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 54 M, FU | 2 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 21 M, FU | 16 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 9 M, FU | 23 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 24 M, FU | 15 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 57 M, FU | 3 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 27 M, FU | 13 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 33 M, FU | 7 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | 30 M, FU | 8 Participants |
Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time
Participants with no B-symptoms (B-Sy) (no night sweat, no weight loss, no fever and no extreme fatigue) and at least one indicated B-sy(night sweats, weight loss, fever or extreme fatigue) were presented at Screening, Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and during follow up period at 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months).
Time frame: Screening, Cycle1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and During at 1M after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months)
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 18 M, FU, no B-sy | 93 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 1 Day 1, no B-sy | 64 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 5 Day 1, one B-sy | 14 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 9 M, FU, no B-sy | 116 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 6 Day 1, no B-sy | 111 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 6 Day 1, one B-sy | 9 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 1 M, FU, no B-sy | 141 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 1 M, FU, one B-sy | 20 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 3 M, FU, no B-sy | 136 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 9 M, FU, one B-sy | 13 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 12 M, FU, no B-sy | 108 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 12 M, FU, one B-sy | 11 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 15 M, FU, no B-sy | 98 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 15 M, FU, one B-sy | 5 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Screening, no B-sy | 63 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 18 M, FU, one B-sy | 5 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 24 M, FU, one B-sy | 1 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 27 M, FU, no B-sy | 71 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 27 M, FU, one B-syn | 4 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 33 M, FU, one B-sy | 3 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 36 M, FU, one B-sy | 2 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 39 M, FU, no B-sy | 49 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 39 M, FU, one B-sy | 3 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 42 M, FU, no B-sy | 45 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 42 M, FU, one B-sy | 0 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 45 M, FU, no B-sy | 41 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 45 M, FU, one B-sy | 0 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 48 M, FU, no B-sy | 36 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 51 M, FU, one B-sy | 0 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 54 M, FU, no B-sy | 30 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Screening, one B-sy | 120 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 1 Day 1, one B-sy | 115 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 2 Day 1,no B-sy | 116 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 2 Day 1, one B-sy | 52 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 3 Day 1, no B-sy | 131 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 3 Day 1, one B-sy | 34 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 4 Day 1, no B-sy | 129 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 4 Day 1, one B-sy | 25 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 5 Day 1, no B-sy | 120 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 3 M, FU, one B-sy | 17 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 6 M, FU, no B-sy | 123 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 6 M, FU, one B-sy | 15 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 21 M, FU, no B-sy | 87 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 21 M, FU, one B-sy | 7 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 24 M, FU, no B-sy | 79 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 30 M, FU, no B-sy | 68 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 30 M, FU, one B-sy | 2 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 33 M, FU, no B-sy | 63 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 36 M, FU, no B-sy | 56 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 48 M, FU, one B-sy | 1 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 51 M, FU, no B-sy | 32 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 54 M, FU, one B-sy | 0 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 57 M, FU, no B-sy | 26 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 57 M, FU, one B-sy | 0 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 60 M, FU, no B-sy | 24 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 60 M, FU, one B-sy | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 51 M, FU, one B-sy | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Screening, no B-sy | 59 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Screening, one B-sy | 121 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 51 M, FU, no B-sy | 11 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 1 Day 1, no B-sy | 68 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 5 Day 1, no B-sy | 97 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 5 Day 1, one B-sy | 21 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 24 M, FU, one B-sy | 4 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 27 M, FU, one B-syn | 3 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 6 Day 1, no B-sy | 82 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 1 Day 1, one B-sy | 111 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 6 Day 1, one B-sy | 13 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 54 M, FU, no B-sy | 10 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 1 M, FU, no B-sy | 116 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 2 Day 1,no B-sy | 108 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 1 M, FU, one B-sy | 29 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 30 M, FU, no B-sy | 33 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 9 M, FU, no B-sy | 87 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 2 Day 1, one B-sy | 62 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 9 M, FU, one B-sy | 9 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 57 M, FU, one B-sy | 0 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 12 M, FU, no B-sy | 74 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 3 Day 1, no B-sy | 116 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 12 M, FU, one B-sy | 13 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 30 M, FU, one B-sy | 2 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 15 M, FU, no B-sy | 63 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 3 Day 1, one B-sy | 40 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 15 M, FU, one B-sy | 8 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 54 M, FU, one B-sy | 0 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 18 M, FU, no B-sy | 58 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 4 Day 1, no B-sy | 107 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 18 M, FU, one B-sy | 6 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 21 M, FU, one B-sy | 5 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 24 M, FU, no B-sy | 48 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 33 M, FU, no B-sy | 27 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | Cycle 4 Day 1, one B-sy | 25 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 27 M, FU, no B-sy | 41 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 33 M, FU, one B-sy | 2 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 3 M, FU, no B-sy | 105 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 36 M, FU, no B-sy | 23 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 60 M, FU, one B-sy | 0 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 36 M, FU, one B-sy | 0 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 3 M, FU, one B-sy | 14 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 39 M, FU, no B-sy | 18 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 48 M, FU, no B-sy | 13 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 39 M, FU, one B-sy | 0 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 6 M, FU, no B-sy | 96 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 42 M, FU, no B-sy | 16 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 57 M, FU, no B-sy | 9 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 42 M, FU, one B-sy | 0 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 6 M, FU, one B-sy | 11 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 45 M, FU, no B-sy | 14 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 48 M, FU, one B-sy | 0 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 45 M, FU, one B-sy | 1 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 21 M, FU, no B-sy | 55 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time | 60 M, FU, no B-sy | 9 Participants |
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Each participant was followed at the time when the last IRC-assessed PFS events occurred. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact.
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Population: ITT Population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Overall Survival (OS) | 62.65 Months |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Overall Survival (OS) | 46.23 Months |
Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator
OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response \[CR\], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery \[CRi\], partial response \[PR\], and nodular PR \[nPR\]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) \> 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) \>100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) \>11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) \<4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL \>100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb \>11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM. Responder = CR + CRi + NPR + PR
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator | CR | 45 Percentage of participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator | nPR | 2 Percentage of participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator | CRi | 12 Percentage of participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator | PR | 107 Percentage of participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator | Stable disease | 9 Percentage of participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator | Progressive Disease | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator | Missing | 8 Percentage of participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator | Responder | 166 Percentage of participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator | Responder | 149 Percentage of participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator | PR | 113 Percentage of participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator | Stable disease | 21 Percentage of participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator | CR | 24 Percentage of participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator | Missing | 9 Percentage of participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator | CRi | 4 Percentage of participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator | nPR | 8 Percentage of participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator | Progressive Disease | 3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC
OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response \[CR\], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery \[CRi\], partial response \[PR\], and nodular PR \[nPR\]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) \> 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) \>100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) \>11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) \<4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL \>100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb \>11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM.
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC | CRi | 2 Percentage of participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC | Missing | 1 Percentage of participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC | PR | 55 Percentage of participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC | Progressive Disease | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC | Stable disease | 11 Percentage of participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC | nPR | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC | CR | 27 Percentage of participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC | Not Evaluable | 4 Percentage of participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC | CRi | 1 Percentage of participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC | nPR | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC | Progressive Disease | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC | Not Evaluable | 2 Percentage of participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC | Missing | 2 Percentage of participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC | PR | 59 Percentage of participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC | Stable disease | 28 Percentage of participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC | CR | 7 Percentage of participants |
Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of the following prognostic markers at BL: immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region(IgVH) homology; Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70(ZAP70), VH3-21 usage; Cytogenetics (by fluorescent in situ hybridization \[FISH\]); beta 2 microglobulin. Cox-regression model was used to explore the relationship between progression-free survival and the following explanatory variables: treatment group, cytogenetics (analyzed by FISH included 6q-,11q-, +12q, 17p-, 13q-) , ZAP-70 (positive, negative or intermediate), VH3-21 usage (Yes and No), IgVH homology (\>98%, 97%-98% and \<97%), beta 2 microglobulin (\>3500 microgram per liter \[µg/L\] and \<=3500 µg/L). For each covariate, a hazard ratio \<1 indicates a lower risk on the first effect tested compared with the other effects tested. Cytogenetics Group (based on \>=20%)=cytogenetics (CY G).
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | B2 Microglobulin G 1: <= 3500 ug/L | 22 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | CY G 1: 6q- or +12q or 13q- | 38 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | IgVH Homology, 97%-98% | 5 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | VH3-21 Usage Flag: No | 93 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | VH3-21 Usage Flag: Yes | 6 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | IgVH Homology, <97% | 13 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | ZAP70, G1 Positive | 60 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | CY G 1: no aberration | 27 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | IgVH Homology, >98% | 80 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | ZAP70 G 1, Negative | 14 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | CY G 1: 11q- | 29 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | ZAP70 G 1, Intermediate | 27 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | CY G 1: 17p- | 6 Participants |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | B2 Microglobulin G 1: > 3500 microgram/liter (μg/L | 79 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | ZAP70, G1 Positive | 65 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | B2 Microglobulin G 1: <= 3500 ug/L | 26 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | CY G 1: 11q- | 19 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | CY G 1: 6q- or +12q or 13q- | 48 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | VH3-21 Usage Flag: Yes | 4 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | IgVH Homology, >98% | 78 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | B2 Microglobulin G 1: > 3500 microgram/liter (μg/L | 78 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | CY G 1: 17p- | 9 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | CY G 1: no aberration | 27 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | VH3-21 Usage Flag: No | 96 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | IgVH Homology, <97% | 15 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | IgVH Homology, 97%-98% | 7 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | ZAP70 G 1, Negative | 13 Participants |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response | ZAP70 G 1, Intermediate | 23 Participants |
Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Ofatumumab
Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4.
Time frame: Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycle 4
Population: PK Population: Participants for whom a pharmacokinetic sample was obtained were analyzed, only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed(represented by n=X in the category titles)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Ofatumumab | cycle 1, week 1 | 6.106 Hour |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Ofatumumab | cycle 1, week 2 | 5.004 Hour |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Ofatumumab | cycle 4 | 4.878 Hour |
Time to Next Therapy
Time to next therapy is defined as the time from randomization until the start of the next-line of treatment. Data are presented for participants who took anti-cancer therapies and participants in the ITT population.
Time frame: From the start of study drug until the start of the next anti-CLL therapy (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug)
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Time to Next Therapy | 29.68 Months |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Time to Next Therapy | 21.03 Months |
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Time to Next Therapy | 52.96 Months |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Time to Next Therapy | 40.08 Months |
Time to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC
Time to progression is defined as the time from the date of randomization to PD. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug
Population: ITT Population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Time to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC | 42.12 Months |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Time to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC | 26.78 Months |
Time to Response, as Assessed by the IRC
Time to response is defined as the time from randomization to the first response. Complete Response/remission(CR) all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment: no lymphadenopathy(Ly) \> 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/spleenomegaly/constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>1500 per microliter(µL), platelets(PL) \>100,000/µL, hemoglobin(Hb) \>11 grams/deciliter(g/dL), lymphocytes(LC) \<4000/µL, bone marrow(BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. Incomplete bone marrow recovery(CRi): CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. Partial Remission/response(PR): \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL \>100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline(BL), Hb \>11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. Nodular PR(nPR): persistent nodules BM.
Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug
Population: ITT Population. Participants with unknown or missing responses were considered as non-responders. Only responders were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Time to Response, as Assessed by the IRC | 0.99 Months |
| Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects | Time to Response, as Assessed by the IRC | 0.99 Months |