Skip to content

Ofatumumab Added to Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide vs Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide Combination in Relapsed Subjects With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

A Phase III, Open Label, Randomized Trial of Ofatumumab Added to Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide vs. Fludarabine-Cyclophosphamide Combination in Subjects With Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00824265
Enrollment
365
Registered
2009-01-16
Start date
2009-03-12
Completion date
2017-10-25
Last updated
2020-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic

Keywords

Relapsed, Oncology, Safety, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Ofatumumab, Efficacy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ofatumumab added to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide in patients with relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).

Detailed description

Fludarabine is currently approved for treatment of relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Studies have shown that drugs in combination with fludarabine have shown more effectiveness than fludarabine alone. The addition of ofatumumab to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide combination offers potentially a more effective therapy, without additional toxicity. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ofatumumab added to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia who have responded previously to therapy but later develop progressive disease and require additional therapy.

Interventions

DRUGOFC Infusion

Ofatumumab Cycle 1-Day 1 300mg, Cycle 1-Day 8 1000mg, then Cycles 2-6 Day 1 1000mg every 28 days, Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles

DRUGFC infusion

Fludarabine 25mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles, Cyclophosphamide 250mg/m2 Days 1-3 every 28 days for 6 cycles

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * confirmed and active CLL requiring treatment * at least one previous treatment for CLL and having achieved a complete or partial remission/response but after a period of 6 or more months, shows evidence of disease progression * fully active at a minimum or fully capable of selfcare and up and about more than 50% of waking hours * age 18yrs or older * signed written informed consent Key

Exclusion criteria

* diagnosis of refractory CLL (failure to achieve a complete or partial remission/response or disease progression within 6 months of last anti-CLL treatment * abnormal/inadequate blood values, liver and kidney function * certain heart problems, serious significant diseases, AIHA, other current cancers or within the last 5 years * active or chronic infections * use of drugs to suppress allergic or inflammatory responses (glucocorticoids) * CLL transformation * CLL central nervous system involvement * current participation in other clinical study * inability to comply with the protocol activities * lactating or pregnant women or female patients of child-bearing potential (or male patients with such partners) not willing to use adequate contraception

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drugPFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression (progressive disease,PD) and the date of death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Response, as Assessed by the IRCFrom randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drugTime to response is defined as the time from randomization to the first response. Complete Response/remission(CR) all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment: no lymphadenopathy(Ly) \> 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/spleenomegaly/constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>1500 per microliter(µL), platelets(PL) \>100,000/µL, hemoglobin(Hb) \>11 grams/deciliter(g/dL), lymphocytes(LC) \<4000/µL, bone marrow(BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. Incomplete bone marrow recovery(CRi): CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. Partial Remission/response(PR): \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL \>100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline(BL), Hb \>11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. Nodular PR(nPR): persistent nodules BM.
Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRCFrom time of initial response to disease progression or death, whichever came first (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug)DOR is defined as the time from the initial response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) to the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
Time to Progression, as Assessed by the IRCFrom randomization up to 5 years after the last dose of study drugTime to progression is defined as the time from the date of randomization to PD. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
Time to Next TherapyFrom the start of study drug until the start of the next anti-CLL therapy (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug)Time to next therapy is defined as the time from randomization until the start of the next-line of treatment. Data are presented for participants who took anti-cancer therapies and participants in the ITT population.
Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusCycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day1, follow up (FU) at 1Month (M) after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months)The ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, how the disease affects the daily living, and determines appropriate treatment and prognosis. ECOG performance status are measured at Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1 and Cycle 6 Day1. During follow period, 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months). Improvement is defined as a decrease from baseline by at least one step on the ECOG performance status scale (yes/no).
Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeScreening, Cycle1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and During at 1M after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months)Participants with no B-symptoms (B-Sy) (no night sweat, no weight loss, no fever and no extreme fatigue) and at least one indicated B-sy(night sweats, weight loss, fever or extreme fatigue) were presented at Screening, Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and during follow up period at 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months).
Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCFrom randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drugOR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response \[CR\], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery \[CRi\], partial response \[PR\], and nodular PR \[nPR\]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) \> 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) \>100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) \>11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) \<4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL \>100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb \>11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM.
Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the InvestigatorFrom randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drugOR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response \[CR\], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery \[CRi\], partial response \[PR\], and nodular PR \[nPR\]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) \> 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) \>100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) \>11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) \<4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL \>100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb \>11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM. Responder = CR + CRi + NPR + PR
Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRCFrom randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drugMRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.
Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by InvestigatorFrom randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drugMRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)From first dose of study medication to 60 Days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury.
Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time PointsFrom start of study drug until 60 days after the last dose of study medicationSerum samples for analysis of HAHA were collected at Baseline (Screening), after 3 cycles were compelted, after 1 M and 6 M post last dose. All samples were first tested in a screening step; positive samples from the screening were further evaluated in a confirmation test. The confirmed positive samples were reported as HAHA-positive.
Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA)From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)AIHA is a condition where the body's immune system fails to recognize red blood cells as self and begins destroying these red blood cells. The number of participants experienced AIHA are presented.
Overall Survival (OS)From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drugOverall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Each participant was followed at the time when the last IRC-assessed PFS events occurred. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact.
Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression Adverse EventsFrom first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)Participants with at least one Grade 3 or Grade 4 myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) are presented. Myelosuppression is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. AEs were graded according to NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade, version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).
Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the StudyFrom randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drugParticipants who received no transfusion and at least one transfusion during the study are presented. Participants who took any blood products or blood supportive care product are included.
Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgMBaseline, 1M and 6M follow upImmunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. Blood samples were collected from each participant and IgA, IgG, and IgM were measured at Baseline, and 1M and 6M after last dose during follow up period.
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three months up to 45 M during Follow-up PeriodCD5+ and CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (Baseline) on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during the treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month follow up up to 45 M. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. day 1 if available, otherwise, screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during Follow-up PeriodCD5- CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (baseline) at Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during follow up period. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. Day 1 if available otherwise screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseFrom randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drugBlood samples were collected for the assessment of the following prognostic markers at BL: immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region(IgVH) homology; Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70(ZAP70), VH3-21 usage; Cytogenetics (by fluorescent in situ hybridization \[FISH\]); beta 2 microglobulin. Cox-regression model was used to explore the relationship between progression-free survival and the following explanatory variables: treatment group, cytogenetics (analyzed by FISH included 6q-,11q-, +12q, 17p-, 13q-) , ZAP-70 (positive, negative or intermediate), VH3-21 usage (Yes and No), IgVH homology (\>98%, 97%-98% and \<97%), beta 2 microglobulin (\>3500 microgram per liter \[µg/L\] and \<=3500 µg/L). For each covariate, a hazard ratio \<1 indicates a lower risk on the first effect tested compared with the other effects tested. Cytogenetics Group (based on \>=20%)=cytogenetics (CY G).
Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.The EORTC QLQ-CLL16 is comprised of 16 questions that address 5 domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) important in CLL. There are 4 multi-item scales - fatigue (2 items), treatment side effects (\[TSE\], 4 items), disease symptoms (disease effects scale \[DES\], 4 items), and infection scale \[IS\] (4 items) - and single item scales (social activities \[Social Problems (SP) Scale\] and future health worries\[Future Health (FH) Scale\].). These are measured on a four point scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. These scores are transformed to give a rating from 0 - 100, where 0 =no symptoms or problems and 100 = a severe symptoms or problems. EORTC QLQ-CLL16 was assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value was obtained at randomization.
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitScreening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.EQ-5D is comprised of a 5-item health status measure and a visual analogue scale (VAS) and is used to generate two scores: the utility score and the thermometer score. The utility score measures mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Responses to each of the 5 health states are measured on a 3-point scale (level 1 = no problem; level 2 = some or moderate problem(s) and level 3 = unable, or extreme problems). Responses are typically converted into health utilities or valuations on a scale ranging from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). The thermometer score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A Negative health status describes health state worse than death.Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study drug dose date.
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreScreening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.EORTC QLQ-C30, a self-reported, cancer-specific instrument assessing 15 domains: physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning, pain,fatigue, nausea and vomiting, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhea, and dyspnea, financial difficulties and a global health status/quality of life (QOF). Functional and symptoms scales were measured on four point Likert scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. Pat. assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date. Clinically meaningful changes or minimally important differences (MIDs)have been previously established for the EORTC QLQ C30, and categorized as 'small' if the mean change in scores is 5-10 points, 'moderate' if 10-20 points, and 'large' if \>20points.
Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.The HCQ consists of a single question in which the participant is asked if he/she has experienced any change in his/her health overall since beginning the study. For HCQ, values from 1 to 9 were assigned to the 9 responses in the HCQ questionnaire, ranging from 1 for 'my health is a great deal better' to 9 for 'my health is a great deal worse' since the beginning of the study. Lower scores represent better conditions.
Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of OfatumumabCycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5,6Area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) over the dosing interval (AUC\[0-tau\]) was evaluated. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141).
Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of OfatumumabCycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma concentration of ofatumumab.Cmax and Ctrough were determined. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141).
Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of OfatumumabCycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycle 4Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4.
Number of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherFrom first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Maximum severity grades were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).

Countries

Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Germany, Greece, India, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants (par) were screened within 14 days prior to the start of study drug administration to determine eligibility.

Pre-assignment details

Eligible par were stratified by Stage (Binet A vs. B vs. C) and number of prior therapies (1-2 vs. ≥3). Par in each stratum were then centrally randomized in a 1:1 ratio to recive intravenous (IV) fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in combination with ofatumumab or IV fludarabine and cyclophosphamide alone.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects
Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide IV infusions for 6 cycles; each cycle comprised of 28 days. Participants received ofatumumab administered at 300 milligram (mg) on Day 1, 1000 mg on Day 8 of cycle 1 and 1000 mg on Day 1 of cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. Fludarabine was administered at 25 mg/meter squared \[m\^2\] and cyclophosphamide was administered at 250mg/m\^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycles (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status.
183
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT Subjects
Participants with relapsed CLL received IV infusions of fludarabine administered at 25 mg/m\^2 and cyclophosphamide administered at 250mg/m\^2 on Days 1-3 of each cycle (6 cycles). Participants were followed up one month post therapy and every 3 months for 5 years to evaluate survival and disease status.
182
Total365

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Follow-up Phasew/drew consent, no f/u, or MD choice1831
Survival Follow-up Phasew/drew consent, no f/u, or MD choice916
Treatment PhaseAdverse Event,non-fatal5052
Treatment PhaseLost to Follow-up11
Treatment PhasePhysician Decision612
Treatment PhaseProtocol Violation10
Treatment PhaseWithdrawal by Subject615

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOfatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsFludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsTotal
Age, Continuous61.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.82
61.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.21
61.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.53
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African Heritage
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Central/South Asian Heritage
13 Participants16 Participants29 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - East Asian Heritage
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - South East Asian Heritage
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - Arabic/North African Heritage
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
158 Participants153 Participants311 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
79 Participants66 Participants145 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
104 Participants116 Participants220 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
40 / 18142 / 178
other
Total, other adverse events
149 / 181123 / 178
serious
Total, serious adverse events
108 / 18186 / 178

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

PFS is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earlier of the date of disease progression (progressive disease,PD) and the date of death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL).

Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all participants randomized and received study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsProgression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)28.94 Months
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsProgression-free Survival (PFS), as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)18.83 Months
p-value: 0.003295% CI: [0.51, 0.88]Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+

CD5- CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (baseline) at Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during follow up period. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. Day 1 if available otherwise screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three month up to 45 M during Follow-up Period

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+18 M, FU126.1 cells/uLStandard Deviation 188.25
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Cycle 3 Day 139.5 cells/uLStandard Deviation 144.64
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+30 M, FU74.2 cells/uLStandard Deviation 58.82
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+33 M, FU41.8 cells/uLStandard Deviation 40.13
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+39 M, FU13.0 cells/uL
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+42 M, FU13.0 cells/uL
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Cycle 2 Day 1535.6 cells/uLStandard Deviation 133.75
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Screening4817.8 cells/uLStandard Deviation 20948.17
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Cycle 1 Day 15996.7 cells/uLStandard Deviation 22331.29
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Cycle 1 Day 15239.0 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1052.19
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Cycle 2 Day 1115.4 cells/uLStandard Deviation 403.09
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Cycle 4 Day 125.7 cells/uLStandard Deviation 92.88
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Cycle 5 Day 115.9 cells/uLStandard Deviation 77.11
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Cycle 6 Day 110.0 cells/uLStandard Deviation 29.85
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+3 M, FU40.1 cells/uLStandard Deviation 238.18
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+6 M, FU21.2 cells/uLStandard Deviation 58.16
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+9 M, FU85.7 cells/uLStandard Deviation 359.01
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+12 M, FU89.9 cells/uLStandard Deviation 226.06
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+15 M, FU67.3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 59.52
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+21 M, FU375.5 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1307.35
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+27 M, FU73.9 cells/uLStandard Deviation 60.4
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+36 M, FU107.3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 86.75
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+45 M, FU166.5 cells/uLStandard Deviation 222.74
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+48 M, FU6528.0 cells/uL
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+54 M, FU690.0 cells/uL
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+1 M, FU7.5 cells/uLStandard Deviation 19.54
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+24 M, FU74.0 cells/uLStandard Deviation 57.46
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Cycle 6 Day 1649.7 cells/uLStandard Deviation 3606.28
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Cycle 5 Day 1195.5 cells/uLStandard Deviation 945.34
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+6 M, FU50.7 cells/uLStandard Deviation 49.13
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+18 M, FU92.3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 69.14
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+1 M, FU863.8 cells/uLStandard Deviation 5001.84
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+30 M, FU129.5 cells/uLStandard Deviation 5303
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+33 M, FU1003.0 cells/uL
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+36 M, FU1506.0 cells/uL
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+3 M, FU172.0 cells/uLStandard Deviation 681.28
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+21 M, FU108.3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 95.86
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+24 M, FU104.5 cells/uLStandard Deviation 70.46
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Cycle 2 Day 1465.7 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1610.05
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+9 M, FU92.0 cells/uLStandard Deviation 101.16
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Screening6959.1 cells/uLStandard Deviation 39980.14
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+48 M, FU28.0 cells/uL
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+12 M, FU220.1 cells/uLStandard Deviation 698.57
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Cycle 1 Day 15351.7 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1377.56
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+27 M, FU187.5 cells/uLStandard Deviation 200.85
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Cycle 2 Day 15331.3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1177.18
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Cycle 3 Day 1179.7 cells/uLStandard Deviation 520.63
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+15 M, FU94.6 cells/uLStandard Deviation 70.17
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Cycle 4 Day 195.3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 369.19
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cell Counts, CD5- CD19+Cycle 1 Day 12041.3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 4418.63
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+

CD5+ and CD19+ cells were counted by flow cytometry at Screening (Baseline) on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 during the treatment period and after last dose of study drug at 1 M and then every three month follow up up to 45 M. Flow cytometry is a technique for counting and examining microscopic particles with an electronic detection apparatus. Baseline is defined as the assessment closest to but prior to first dose (e.g. day 1 if available, otherwise, screening). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Screening, Cycle 1 Day1, Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and after last dose at 1 M and then every three months up to 45 M during Follow-up Period

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+Cycle 1 Day 152656.9 cells/uLStandard Deviation 6418.02
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+54 M FU189849.0 cells/uL
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+Cycle 2 Day 15513.7 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1717.65
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+Cycle 3 Day 1790.0 cells/uLStandard Deviation 2953.42
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+24 M, FU1244.6 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1300.01
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+Cycle 4 Day 1402.1 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1768.74
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+21 M, FU3830.8 cells/uLStandard Deviation 8989.02
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+Cycle 5 Day 1142.6 cells/uLStandard Deviation 472.24
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+27 M, FU1877.4 cells/uLStandard Deviation 2117.84
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+Cycle 6 Day 1109.8 cells/uLStandard Deviation 398.77
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+30 M, FU5029.7 cells/uLStandard Deviation 8266.9
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+1 M, FU163.5 cells/uLStandard Deviation 685.41
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+3 M, FU671.3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 2786.99
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+Cycle 2 Day 12057.4 cells/uLStandard Deviation 5525.72
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+6 M, FU1591.6 cells/uLStandard Deviation 8857.22
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+33 M, FU14166.8 cells/uLStandard Deviation 20166.09
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+9 M, FU910.5 cells/uLStandard Deviation 2495.85
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+Cycle 1 Day 143180.6 cells/uLStandard Deviation 48784.64
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+12 M, FU2303.2 cells/uLStandard Deviation 6675.7
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+36 M, FU1187.0 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1407.79
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+15 M, FU3325.8 cells/uLStandard Deviation 8006.48
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+18 M, FU1607.5 cells/uLStandard Deviation 2935.82
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+39 M, FU557.0 cells/uL
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+42 M, FU1640.0 cells/uL
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+45 M, FU4689.0 cells/uLStandard Deviation 1493.41
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+48 M FU27755.0 cells/uL
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+15 M, FU3072.7 cells/uLStandard Deviation 9038.23
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+Cycle 2 Day 110318.8 cells/uLStandard Deviation 21453.15
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+1 M, FU5514.3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 17369.97
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+18 M, FU4549.8 cells/uLStandard Deviation 8839.23
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+27 M, FU6128.0 cells/uLStandard Deviation 9161.38
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+21 M, FU5236.9 cells/uLStandard Deviation 10537.31
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+Cycle 1 Day 159244.0 cells/uLStandard Deviation 19610.62
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+24 M, FU7843.3 cells/uLStandard Deviation 11897.55
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+30 M, FU6515.5 cells/uLStandard Deviation 5916.36
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+33 M, FU5208.0 cells/uL
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+36 M, FU8184.0 cells/uL
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+48 M FU29155.0 cells/uL
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+Cycle 2 Day 156874.4 cells/uLStandard Deviation 20632.64
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+Cycle 3 Day 16423.6 cells/uLStandard Deviation 19725.57
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+Cycle 4 Day 12643.2 cells/uLStandard Deviation 8092.22
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+Cycle 5 Day 12838.6 cells/uLStandard Deviation 8314.08
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+Cycle 6 Day 13862.7 cells/uLStandard Deviation 13312.14
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+3 M, FU2604.9 cells/uLStandard Deviation 9229.9
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+6 M, FU2275.6 cells/uLStandard Deviation 5118
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+9 M, FU3408.4 cells/uLStandard Deviation 7438.45
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+12 M, FU2876.5 cells/uLStandard Deviation 6252.53
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Cell Counts, CD5+ and CD19+Cycle 1 Day 153208.7 cells/uLStandard Deviation 70944.56
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated Visit

EQ-5D is comprised of a 5-item health status measure and a visual analogue scale (VAS) and is used to generate two scores: the utility score and the thermometer score. The utility score measures mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Responses to each of the 5 health states are measured on a 3-point scale (level 1 = no problem; level 2 = some or moderate problem(s) and level 3 = unable, or extreme problems). Responses are typically converted into health utilities or valuations on a scale ranging from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). The thermometer score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A Negative health status describes health state worse than death.Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study drug dose date.

Time frame: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS, 24 M, FU8.8 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, Cycle 4 Day 10.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, 1 M, FU0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, 3 M, FU0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, 6 M, FU0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, 9 M, FU0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT. 12 M, FU0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, 15 M, FU0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, 18 M, FU0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, 21 M, FU0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, 24 M, FU0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS Cycle 4 Day 16.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.68
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS, 1 M, FU5.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.73
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS, 3 M, FU5.7 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.92
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS, 6 M, FU8.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.84
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS, 9 M, FU8.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.33
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS. 12 M, FU7.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.93
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS, 15 M, FU8.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.52
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS, 18 M, FU9.4 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.86
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS, 21 M, FU8.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.42
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS, 9 M, FU11.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.59
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS, 1 M, FU5.9 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.83
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS, 24 M, FU15.2 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.88
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, 24 M, FU0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, Cycle 4 Day 10.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS, 18 M, FU11.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.4
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS Cycle 4 Day 15.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.64
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, 3 M, FU0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS. 12 M, FU10.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.21
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, 6 M, FU0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, 1 M, FU0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, 9 M, FU0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS, 3 M, FU9.6 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.88
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT. 12 M, FU0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS, 15 M, FU13.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.06
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, 15 M, FU0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS, 6 M, FU11.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.08
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, 18 M, FU0.0 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitVAS, 21 M, FU11.3 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.16
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) as Assessed by EuroQoL Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) Score at Indicated VisitUT, 21 M, FU0.1 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score

EORTC QLQ-C30, a self-reported, cancer-specific instrument assessing 15 domains: physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning, pain,fatigue, nausea and vomiting, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhea, and dyspnea, financial difficulties and a global health status/quality of life (QOF). Functional and symptoms scales were measured on four point Likert scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. Pat. assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline is the most recent, non-missing value prior to or on the first study treatment dose date. Clinically meaningful changes or minimally important differences (MIDs)have been previously established for the EORTC QLQ C30, and categorized as 'small' if the mean change in scores is 5-10 points, 'moderate' if 10-20 points, and 'large' if \>20points.

Time frame: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, 18 M, FU-7.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.11
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting, 6 M, FU-2.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.12
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, 21 M, FU-3.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.36
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea. 12 M, FU-3.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.75
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, 24 M, FU-3.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.53
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning, 18 M, FU5.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.94
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, Cycle 4 Day 13.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.25
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation. 12 M, FU-0.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.13
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, 1 M, FU-0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.4
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning, 21 M, FU5.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.43
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, 3 M, FU0.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.74
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain Cycle 4 Day 1-3.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.64
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, 6 M, FU1.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.95
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, 15 M, FU-1.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.57
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, 9 M, FU-0.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.58
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain, 3 M, FU-3.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.13
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning. 12 M, FU-2.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.17
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, 18 M, FU-1.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.67
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, 21 M, FU-2.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.88
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning, 24 M, FU7.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.02
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea, 1 M, FU-1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.6
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain, 6 M, FU-5.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.54
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea, 3 M, FU-3.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.4
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, Cycle 4 Day 12.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.46
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, 21 M, FU-1.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.93
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain, 9 M, FU-4.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.86
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, 24 M, FU0.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.23
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue Cycle 4 Day 1-4.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.37
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, Cycle 4 Day 10.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.72
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain. 12 M, FU-3.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.43
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain, 15 M, FU-2.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.08
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, 3 M, FU1.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.49
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea, 9 M, FU-2.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.03
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, 24 M, FU1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.83
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea, 18 M, FU-3.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.81
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain, 18 M, FU-3.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.39
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea, 21 M, FU-3.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.92
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue, 1 M, FU-7.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.16
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea, 24 M, FU-2.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.39
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain, 21 M, FU-5.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.74
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning Cycle 4 Day 14.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.91
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, 24 M, FU-2.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.02
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning, 1 M, FU5.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.26
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain, 24 M, FU-1.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.25
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning, 3 M, FU5.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.93
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue, 3 M, FU-5.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.01
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning, 6 M, FU4.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.57
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning Cycle 4 Day 11.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.5
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea, 15 M, FU-2.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.77
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, 1 M, FU-3.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.87
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning, 3 M, FU0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.66
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue, 9 M, FU-8.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.8
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue, 6 M, FU-8.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.64
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning, 6 M, FU3.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.41
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue, 24 M, FU-9.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.01
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue. 12 M, FU-6.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.28
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning, 9 M, FU3.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties, 3 M, FU-4.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.3
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue, 15 M, FU-7.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.83
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties, 6 M, FU-5.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.61
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties Cycle 4 Day 1-4.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.98
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties, 18 M, FU-4.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.39
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting Cycle 4 Day 12.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.06
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia, 18 M, FU-7.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.32
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting, 9 M, FU-1.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.81
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning, 15 M, FU3.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.65
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting. 12 M, FU-2.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.52
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning, 18 M, FU4.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.65
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting, 15 M, FU-3.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.45
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting, 18 M, FU-3.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.03
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea Cycle 4 Day 1-4.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.85
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting, 21 M, FU-4.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.37
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting, 24 M, FU-2.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.69
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning, 21 M, FU4.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.14
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain, 1 M, FU-2.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.02
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status Cycle 4 Day 16.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.46
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue, 18 M, FU-7.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.25
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status, 1 M, FU6.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.23
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning, 1 M, FU0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.52
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning. 12 M, FU2.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.98
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, 1 M, FU-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.02
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status, 3 M, FU5.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.45
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue, 21 M, FU-9.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.44
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning, 24 M, FU5.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.44
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea, 6 M, FU-2.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.92
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status, 6 M, FU7.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.57
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status, 9 M, FU7.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.24
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties, 1 M, FU-5.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.57
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status, 21 M, FU10.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.26
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status. 12 M, FU7.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.64
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status, 24 M, FU12.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.28
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, 6 M, FU0.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.38
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning Cycle 4 Day 11.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.27
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status, 15 M, FU7.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.4
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties, 9 M, FU-6.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.54
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning, 3 M, FU0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.19
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status, 18 M, FU9.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.03
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning, 6 M, FU4.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.49
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning, 1 M, FU-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.83
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning, 9 M, FU4.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.21
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea. 12 M, FU-3.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.52
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning. 12 M, FU2.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.46
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia, 21 M, FU-8.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.15
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, 15 M, FU-1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.97
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia, 24 M, FU-1.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.3
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties. 12 M, FU-6.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.93
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning, 15 M, FU3.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.84
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, 1 M, FU-0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.14
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning, 18 M, FU7.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.09
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, 21 M, FU-1.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.65
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning, 21 M, FU5.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.82
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties, 15 M, FU-8.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.69
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning, 24 M, FU5.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.54
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, 3 M, FU-2.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.33
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning Cycle 4 Day 13.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.3
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties, 21 M, FU,-10.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.34
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning, 1 M, FU0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.98
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, 6 M, FU-3.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.32
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning, 3 M, FU0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.76
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning, 9 M3.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.95
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning, 6 M, FU3.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.04
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, 9 M, FU-1.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.71
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning, 9 M, FU2.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.84
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties, 24 M, FU-6.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.93
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning. 12 M, FU3.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.04
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, 15 M, FU-1.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.29
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning, 15 M, FU6.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.3
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, 18 M, FU-0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.49
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning, 18 M, FU6.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.78
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, Cycle 4 Day 10.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.6
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning, 21 M, FU6.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.83
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, 9 M, FU0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.56
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning, 24 M, FU7.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.6
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning. 12 M, FU3.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.11
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia Cycle 4 Day 1-3.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.07
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, 6 M, FU-6.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia, 1 M, FU-5.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.04
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting, 1 M, FU1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.85
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia, 3 M, FU-6.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.64
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, 9 M, FU-3.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.38
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia, 6 M, FU-5.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.18
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, 18 M, FU-0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia, 9 M, FU-3.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.53
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss. 12 M, FU-4.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.76
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia. 12 M, FU-6.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.91
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting, 3 M, FU0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.9
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia, 15 M, FU-5.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.02
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, 15 M, FU-3.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.13
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning, 15 M, FU5.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.54
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, 3 M, FU-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.77
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties, 15 M, FU-9.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.91
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, 3 M, FU-7.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.22
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning. 12 M, FU-1.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.36
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, 24 M, FU-1.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.25
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, Cycle 4 Day 10.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.6
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, 9 M, FU0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.18
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, 15 M, FU-3.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.11
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, 18 M, FU-1.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.32
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, 3 M, FU1.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.98
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, 6 M, FU-3.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.64
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, 9 M, FU-2.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.97
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea. 12 M, FU-2.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.12
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, 15 M, FU-4.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.62
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, 18 M, FU-1.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.18
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, 24 M, FU-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.75
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea Cycle 4 Day 1-4.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.41
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea, 6 M, FU-7.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.17
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning, 6 M, FU8.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.34
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning, 9 M6.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.52
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning. 12 M, FU8.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.92
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning, 15 M, FU6.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.15
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning, 18 M, FU6.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.35
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning, 21 M, FU7.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.56
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning, 24 M, FU7.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.16
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue Cycle 4 Day 1-6.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.66
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue, 1 M, FU-4.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.64
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue, 3 M, FU-9.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.83
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue, 15 M, FU-8.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.61
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue, 18 M, FU-6.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.15
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue, 21 M, FU-9.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.34
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties, 1 M, FU-5.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.07
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties, 9 M, FU-8.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.44
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties. 12 M, FU-9.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.71
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties, 18 M, FU-12.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.04
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties, 21 M, FU,-11.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.02
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties, 24 M, FU-12.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.57
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting Cycle 4 Day 13.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.37
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting, 1 M, FU0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.22
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting, 3 M, FU-2.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.49
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting, 6 M, FU-2.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.36
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting, 15 M, FU-2.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.76
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting, 21 M, FU1.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.72
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting, 24 M, FU-0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain, 1 M, FU-5.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.31
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain, 3 M, FU-2.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.44
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain, 6 M, FU-6.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.59
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain, 9 M, FU-4.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.12
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain, 15 M, FU-3.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain, 18 M, FU0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.05
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain, 21 M, FU-0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.82
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain, 24 M, FU-3.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.67
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning, 1 M, FU-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.15
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning, 3 M, FU0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.68
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning, 6 M, FU5.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.01
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning, 9 M, FU6.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.25
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning, 18 M, FU0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.09
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status Cycle 4 Day 16.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.54
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status, 1 M, FU6.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.32
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status, 3 M, FU12.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.15
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status, 6 M, FU13.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.01
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status, 9 M, FU11.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.35
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status. 12 M, FU12.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.77
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status, 15 M, FU12.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.29
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning. 12 M, FU3.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.78
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, 15 M, FU0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.58
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, 18 M, FU-0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.67
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, 21 M, FU-1.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.84
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, 1 M, FU0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.92
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, 3 M, FU-0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.01
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, 6 M, FU0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.22
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation. 12 M, FU0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.24
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, Cycle 4 Day 1-1.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.65
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, 1 M, FU-3.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.52
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, 6 M, FU-12.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.05
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, 9 M, FU-9.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.25
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss. 12 M, FU-6.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.59
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, 15 M, FU-9.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.19
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, 18 M, FU-9.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.12
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, 21 M, FU-7.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.7
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreAppetite Loss, 24 M, FU-12.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.68
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, Cycle 4 Day 12.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.39
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, 1 M, FU3.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.87
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, 3 M, FU2.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.69
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, 6 M, FU2.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.99
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreCognitive Functioning, 9 M, FU2.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.61
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, 21 M, FU0.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.17
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea, 1 M, FU-2.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.67
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea, 3 M, FU-1.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.53
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, 21 M, FU-3.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.26
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreConstipation, 24 M, FU-3.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.56
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, Cycle 4 Day 1-2.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.54
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDiarrhoea, 1 M, FU0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.28
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea, 9 M, FU-6.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.55
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea, 18 M, FU-2.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.22
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea, 21 M, FU-1.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.3
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea, 24 M, FU-4.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.53
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning Cycle 4 Day 15.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.59
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning, 1 M, FU7.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.08
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreEmotional Functioning, 3 M, FU7.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.9
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea. 12 M, FU-4.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.87
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreDyspnoea, 15 M, FU-2.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.66
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue, 6 M, FU-12.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.43
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue. 12 M, FU-10.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.44
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue, 9 M, FU-9.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.56
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties Cycle 4 Day 1-6.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.93
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFatigue, 24 M, FU-11.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.3
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties, 3 M, FU-9.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.4
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting, 9 M, FU-1.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.08
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting. 12 M, FU-1.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.35
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreNausea and Vomiting, 18 M, FU-2.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.02
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain Cycle 4 Day 1-4.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.43
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePain. 12 M, FU-3.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.01
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia, 18 M, FU-15.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.58
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning Cycle 4 Day 10.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.81
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning. 12 M, FU3.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.52
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning, 15 M, FU2.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.46
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning, 21 M, FU2.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.88
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScorePhysical Functioning, 24 M, FU3.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.57
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status, 18 M, FU10.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status, 21 M, FU12.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.53
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreGlobal Health Status, 24 M, FU12.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.31
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning Cycle 4 Day 10.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.83
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning, 1 M, FU-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.53
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning, 3 M, FU0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.94
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning, 6 M, FU5.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.54
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning, 9 M, FU6.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.6
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia, 21 M, FU-10.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.64
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia, 24 M, FU-13.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.95
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning, 15 M, FU1.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.13
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning, 18 M, FU-0.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.95
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning, 21 M, FU2.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.74
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreRole Functioning, 24 M, FU3.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.1
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning Cycle 4 Day 1-0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.5
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning, 1 M, FU0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.93
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning, 3 M, FU4.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.29
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning, 6 M, FU6.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.24
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning, 9 M, FU4.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.46
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning. 12 M, FU3.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.95
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning, 15 M, FU1.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.61
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning, 18 M, FU2.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.69
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning, 21 M, FU4.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.72
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreSocial Functioning, 24 M, FU7.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.56
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia Cycle 4 Day 1-8.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.94
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia, 1 M, FU-11.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.78
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia, 3 M, FU-13.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.07
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia, 6 M, FU-17.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.88
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia, 9 M, FU-13.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.04
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia. 12 M, FU-10.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.33
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreInsomnia, 15 M, FU-17.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.52
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChange From Baseline in the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) ScoreFinancial Difficulties, 6 M, FU-8.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.89
Secondary

Changes in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)

The EORTC QLQ-CLL16 is comprised of 16 questions that address 5 domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) important in CLL. There are 4 multi-item scales - fatigue (2 items), treatment side effects (\[TSE\], 4 items), disease symptoms (disease effects scale \[DES\], 4 items), and infection scale \[IS\] (4 items) - and single item scales (social activities \[Social Problems (SP) Scale\] and future health worries\[Future Health (FH) Scale\].). These are measured on a four point scale where 1 = not at all and 4 = very much. These scores are transformed to give a rating from 0 - 100, where 0 =no symptoms or problems and 100 = a severe symptoms or problems. EORTC QLQ-CLL16 was assessed at Screening; Cycle 4 Day 1 and during follow-up 1 M and every 3 M up to 24 months. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Baseline value was obtained at randomization.

Time frame: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.

Population: Participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, 21 M, FU-16.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.7
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS, 1 M, FU-5.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.16
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, 24 M, FU-21.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.58
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, 6 M, FU-9.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.99
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, Cycle 4 Day 10.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.65
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS, 3 M, FU-4.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.3
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, 1 M, FU2.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.79
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, 3 M, FU0.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.42
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale. 12 M, FU-7.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.06
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, 6 M, FU-1.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.46
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS, 6 M, FU-7.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.94
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, 9 M, FU-1.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.81
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, 9 M, FU-8.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.7
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS. 12 M, FU0.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.22
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS, 9 M, FU-6.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.08
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, 15 M, FU0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.56
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, 18 M, FU-2.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.04
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES. 12 M, FU-10.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.64
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, 21 M, FU-2.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.13
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS, 15 M, FU-7.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.57
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, 24 M, FU-0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.85
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, 15 M, FU-8.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.08
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale Cycle 4 Day 11.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.44
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS, 21 M, FU-10.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.28
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale, 1 M, FU3.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.51
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, Cycle 4 Day 1-8.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.08
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale, 3 M, FU-1.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.04
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS, 24 M, FU-8.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.19
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale, 6 M, FU-5.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.73
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, 18 M, FU-8.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.53
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale, 9 M, FU-5.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.15
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, Cycle 4 Day 1-11.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.89
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale, 15 M, FU-6.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.21
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS. 12 M, FU-7.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.26
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale, 18 M, FU-7.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.57
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, 1 M, FU-15.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.04
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale, 21 M, FU-8.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.07
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, 21 M, FU-8.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.48
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale, 24 M, FU-11.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.27
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, 3 M, FU-14.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.96
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, Cycle 4 Day 1-4.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.15
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, 1 M, FU-9.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.18
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, 1 M, FU-5.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.09
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, 6 M, FU-13.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.98
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, 3 M, FU-3.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.41
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, 24 M, FU-7.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.93
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, 6 M, FU-6.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.25
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, 9 M, FU-15.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.65
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, 9 M, FU-4.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.22
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH. 12 M, FU-14.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.8
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE. 12 M, FU-5.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.44
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS, 18 M, FU-7.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.03
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, 15 M, FU-4.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.92
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, 15 M, FU-14.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.14
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, 18 M, FU-4.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)Fatigue Scale (FS), Cycle 4 Day 1-7.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.57
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, 21 M, FU-4.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.63
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, 18 M, FU-15.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.69
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, 24 M, FU-5.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.52
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, 3 M, FU-8.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.48
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, 24 M, FU-6.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.12
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, 9 M, FU-12.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.04
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS, 15 M, FU-9.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.04
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, 9 M, FU-13.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.43
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, 1 M, FU2.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.06
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, 15 M, FU0.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.79
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale. 12 M, FU-7.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.47
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, Cycle 4 Day 1-9.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.16
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, 1 M, FU-9.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.89
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, 6 M, FU-11.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.05
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES. 12 M, FU-10.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.09
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, 15 M, FU-10.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.91
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, 18 M, FU-11.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.79
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, 21 M, FU-11.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.6
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, 24 M, FU-13.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.18
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)Fatigue Scale (FS), Cycle 4 Day 1-7.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.16
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS, 1 M, FU-6.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.74
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS, 3 M, FU-8.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.14
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS, 6 M, FU-12.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.98
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS, 9 M, FU-10.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.95
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS. 12 M, FU-8.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.75
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS, 18 M, FU-3.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.34
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS, 21 M, FU-8.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.27
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FS, 24 M, FU-8.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.48
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, Cycle 4 Day 1-10.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.76
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, 1 M, FU-11.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.56
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, 3 M, FU-14.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.06
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, 6 M, FU-17.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.57
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH. 12 M, FU-14.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.63
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, 15 M, FU-14.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.13
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, 18 M, FU-18.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.72
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, 21 M, FU-15.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.12
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)FH, 24 M, FU-17.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.51
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, Cycle 4 Day 1-1.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.23
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, 3 M, FU0.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.99
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, 6 M, FU-0.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.4
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, 9 M, FU1.4 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.45
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS. 12 M, FU2.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.92
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, 18 M, FU0.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.04
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, 21 M, FU2.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.09
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)IS, 24 M, FU0.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.34
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale Cycle 4 Day 10.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.94
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale, 1 M, FU0.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.22
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale, 3 M, FU-4.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.75
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale, 6 M, FU-10.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.56
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale, 9 M, FU-11.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.45
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale, 15 M, FU-13.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.05
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale, 18 M, FU-8.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.4
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale, 21 M, FU-7.5 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.92
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)SP Scale, 24 M, FU-8.7 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.15
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, Cycle 4 Day 1-4.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.78
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, 1 M, FU-3.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.08
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, 3 M, FU-4.3 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.03
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, 6 M, FU-4.8 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.96
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, 9 M, FU-5.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.38
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE. 12 M, FU-3.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.94
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, 15 M, FU-4.2 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.73
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, 18 M, FU-3.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.18
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)TSE, 21 M, FU-4.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.91
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsChanges in Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures and Scores for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 16 Item Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL 16)DES, 3 M, FU-10.9 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.07
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC

DOR is defined as the time from the initial response (CR, CRi, nPR, or PR) to the first documented sign of PD or death due to any cause. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Time frame: From time of initial response to disease progression or death, whichever came first (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug)

Population: ITT Population. Par with unknown or missing responses were considered as non-responders, only responders were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsDuration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC29.63 Months
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsDuration of Response (DOR), as Assessed by the IRC24.90 Months
p-value: 0.087895% CI: [0.56, 1.05]Log Rank
Secondary

Maximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of Ofatumumab

Blood samples were collected to assess the plasma concentration of ofatumumab.Cmax and Ctrough were determined. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141).

Time frame: Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5

Population: PK Population: Participants for whom a pharmacokinetic sample was obtained were analyzed, only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed(represented by n=X in the category titles)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMaximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of OfatumumabCmax cycle 1, week 161.355 Micrograms per milliliter
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMaximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of OfatumumabCmax cycle 1, week 2241.192 Micrograms per milliliter
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMaximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of OfatumumabCmax cycle 4312.745 Micrograms per milliliter
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMaximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of OfatumumabCtrough cycle 1, week 13.551 Micrograms per milliliter
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMaximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of OfatumumabCtrough cycle 1, week 29.496 Micrograms per milliliter
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMaximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of OfatumumabCtrough cycle 224.281 Micrograms per milliliter
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMaximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of OfatumumabCtrough cycle 325.632 Micrograms per milliliter
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMaximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of OfatumumabCtrough cycle 458.640 Micrograms per milliliter
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMaximum Concentration (Cmax) and Observed Drug Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of OfatumumabCtrough cycle 570.398 Micrograms per milliliter
Secondary

Mean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumab

Area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) over the dosing interval (AUC\[0-tau\]) was evaluated. Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4 (Days 1, 8, and 85). In addition, predose samples were collected prior to ofatumumab administration at Cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 (Days 29, 57, 113, and 141).

Time frame: Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycles 2,3,4,5,6

Population: PK Population: Participants for whom a pharmacokinetic sample was obtained were analyzed, only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed(represented by n=X in the category titles)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumabcycle 1, week 13554.910 hour*nanogram/mililiter (h*ng/mL)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumabcycle 1, week 234109.67 hour*nanogram/mililiter (h*ng/mL)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumabcycle 267069.79 hour*nanogram/mililiter (h*ng/mL)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumabcycle 384620.05 hour*nanogram/mililiter (h*ng/mL)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumabcycle 489091.35 hour*nanogram/mililiter (h*ng/mL)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumabcycle 596829.23 hour*nanogram/mililiter (h*ng/mL)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Area Under the Time-concentration Curve (AUC) Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) of Ofatumumabcycle 6104798.0 hour*nanogram/mililiter (h*ng/mL)
Secondary

Mean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM

Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Low levels indicate immuno-suppression. Blood samples were collected from each participant and IgA, IgG, and IgM were measured at Baseline, and 1M and 6M after last dose during follow up period.

Time frame: Baseline, 1M and 6M follow up

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgMCycle 1 Day 1, IgG8.7 Gram per literStandard Deviation 5.22
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM9 M, FU, IgM0.8 Gram per liter
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgMCycle 1 Day 1, IgM0.6 Gram per literStandard Deviation 1.36
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM9 M, FU, IgG15.2 Gram per liter
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM1 M, FU, IgA1.0 Gram per literStandard Deviation 0.79
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM30 M, FU, IgA1.3 Gram per literStandard Deviation 1.17
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM1 M, FU, IgG7.9 Gram per literStandard Deviation 4.05
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM30 M, FU, IgG4.7 Gram per literStandard Deviation 0.33
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM1 M, FU, IgM0.5 Gram per literStandard Deviation 1.16
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM6 M, FU, IgA1.0 Gram per literStandard Deviation 0.77
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM30 M, FU, IgM0.4 Gram per literStandard Deviation 0.26
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM6 M, FU, IgG7.8 Gram per literStandard Deviation 3.97
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgMCycle 1 Day 1, IgA1.0 Gram per literStandard Deviation 0.74
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM6 M, FU, IgM0.4 Gram per literStandard Deviation 0.5
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM9 M, FU, IgA0.9 Gram per liter
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM6 M, FU, IgM1.1 Gram per literStandard Deviation 1.98
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM9 M, FU, IgA0.9 Gram per literStandard Deviation 0.21
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM9 M, FU, IgG8.8 Gram per literStandard Deviation 6.87
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM9 M, FU, IgM0.2 Gram per literStandard Deviation 0.04
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM18 M, FU, IgA2.4 Gram per liter
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM18 M, FU, IgG9.1 Gram per liter
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM18 M, FU, IgM1.0 Gram per liter
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgMCycle 1 Day 1, IgA0.9 Gram per literStandard Deviation 0.68
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgMCycle 1 Day 1, IgG8.2 Gram per literStandard Deviation 3.86
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgMCycle 1 Day 1, IgM0.8 Gram per literStandard Deviation 1.77
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM1 M, FU, IgA1.0 Gram per literStandard Deviation 0.77
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM1 M, FU, IgG7.9 Gram per literStandard Deviation 3.38
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM6 M, FU, IgA1.0 Gram per literStandard Deviation 0.76
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM6 M, FU, IgG8.9 Gram per literStandard Deviation 4.31
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean Level of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Antibodies IgA, IgG, and IgM1 M, FU, IgM0.8 Gram per literStandard Deviation 1.88
Secondary

Mean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)

The HCQ consists of a single question in which the participant is asked if he/she has experienced any change in his/her health overall since beginning the study. For HCQ, values from 1 to 9 were assigned to the 9 responses in the HCQ questionnaire, ranging from 1 for 'my health is a great deal better' to 9 for 'my health is a great deal worse' since the beginning of the study. Lower scores represent better conditions.

Time frame: Screening, Cycle 3 Day 1, and 1 M and every 3 month post last dose up to 24 month.

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)6 M, FU2.6 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.76
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)Cycle 4 Day 12.6 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)1 M, FU3.0 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.05
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)3 M, FU3.0 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.11
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)9 M, FU2.5 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.78
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)12 M, FU2.5 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)15 M, FU2.2 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.57
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)18 M, FU2.4 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.67
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)21 M, FU2.3 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)24 M, FU2.3 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.76
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)18 M, FU2.7 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.01
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)12 M, FU2.5 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.78
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)Cycle 4 Day 12.8 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)24 M, FU2.6 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)1 M, FU3.2 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)15 M, FU2.3 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.68
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)3 M, FU2.8 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.86
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)6 M, FU2.6 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)21 M, FU2.3 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.52
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsMean of Health Change Questionnaire (HCQ)9 M, FU2.4 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.57
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the Study

Participants who received no transfusion and at least one transfusion during the study are presented. Participants who took any blood products or blood supportive care product are included.

Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the StudyAt least one transfusion125 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the StudyNo transfusions56 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the StudyNo transfusions79 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Received no Transfusion or at Least One Transfusion During the StudyAt least one transfusion99 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC

MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.

Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC39 M, FU2 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC12 M, FU16 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRCCycle 1 Day 10 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC15 M, FU14 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC42 M, FU2 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC18 M, FU12 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC45 M, FU1 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC21 M, FU9 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC54 M, FU2 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRCScreening0 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC24 M, FU8 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC48 M, FU2 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC27 M, FU8 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC3 M, FU21 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC30 M, FU8 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC51 M, FU2 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC33 M, FU3 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC36 M, FU5 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC6 M, FU25 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC9 M, FU20 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC33 M, FU1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC54 M, FU1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC36 M, FU1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC3 M, FU7 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC39 M, FU1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC45 M, FU1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC48 M, FU1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC51 M, FU1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC6 M, FU6 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC9 M, FU4 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC12 M, FU1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC15 M, FU1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC18 M, FU1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC21 M, FU1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC24 M, FU1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC27 M, FU0 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRC30 M, FU2 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessed by IRCScreening0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator

MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment at the time the participant achieved a confirmed CR. MRD analysis was performed for the participants who were suspected of achieving a primary endpoint CR. MDR was performed by flow cytometry on a bone marrow or peripheral blood sample taken at least 2 months after final treatment. MRD negative was defined as less than one CLL cell per 10000 leukocytes.

Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator27 M, FU14 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator12 M, FU31 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by InvestigatorScreening0 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator30 M, FU12 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator15 M, FU23 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator39 M, FU6 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator18 M, FU20 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator42 M, FU7 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator6 M, FU48 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator45 M, FU6 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator36 M, FU9 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator48 M, FU6 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator33 M, FU8 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator51 M, FU5 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator21 M, FU16 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator54 M, FU4 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator9 M, FU35 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator57 M, FU3 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator24 M, FU13 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator60 M, FU3 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator3 M, FU39 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator60 M, FU2 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by InvestigatorScreening1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator3 M, FU15 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator6 M, FU11 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator9 M, FU6 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator12 M, FU3 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator33 M, FU2 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator18 M, FU2 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator21 M, FU3 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator24 M, FU2 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator27 M, FU1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator36 M, FU2 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator30 M, FU3 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator39 M, FU2 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator42 M, FU1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator45 M, FU2 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator48 M, FU2 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator51 M, FU1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator54 M, FU2 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator57 M, FU2 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants Who Were Negative for MRD Assessed by Investigator15 M, FU2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points

Serum samples for analysis of HAHA were collected at Baseline (Screening), after 3 cycles were compelted, after 1 M and 6 M post last dose. All samples were first tested in a screening step; positive samples from the screening were further evaluated in a confirmation test. The confirmed positive samples were reported as HAHA-positive.

Time frame: From start of study drug until 60 days after the last dose of study medication

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time PointsScreening Visit, n= 179,1778 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time PointsCycle 4 Day 1, n= 151,1300 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points1 M, FU, n= 148,1320 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points6 M, FU, n= 130, 992 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points30 M, FU, n= 2, 00 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points1 M, FU, n= 148,1322 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points3 M, FU, n= 0,10 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time PointsScreening Visit, n= 179,1771 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points9 M, FU, n= 0, 20 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time PointsCycle 4 Day 1, n= 151,1302 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With a Human Anti-human Antibody (HAHA) Positive Result at Indicated Time Points6 M, FU, n= 130, 990 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury.

Time frame: From first dose of study medication to 60 Days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)

Population: Safety Population: Participants who received at least one dose of a study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)AE170 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)SAE108 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)AE153 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)SAE86 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression Adverse Events

Participants with at least one Grade 3 or Grade 4 myelosuppression (anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) are presented. Myelosuppression is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. AEs were graded according to NCI common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade, version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).

Time frame: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression Adverse Events126 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With at Least One Grade 3/Grade 4 Myelosuppression Adverse Events118 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA)

AIHA is a condition where the body's immune system fails to recognize red blood cells as self and begins destroying these red blood cells. The number of participants experienced AIHA are presented.

Time frame: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA)3 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Autoimmune Hemolytic Anaemia (AIHA)2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or Higher

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an event of possible drug-induced liver injury. Maximum severity grades were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe; 4, life-threatening/disabling; 5, death).

Time frame: From first dose of study medication to 60 days after the last dose of study medication (for an AE), or up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug or until the time of the next anti-CLL therapy (for SAE)

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherAE19 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherSAE25 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherSAE21 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Drug Related Infections Reported as AEs and SAEs of Maximum Severity of Grade 3 or HigherAE11 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

The ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, how the disease affects the daily living, and determines appropriate treatment and prognosis. ECOG performance status are measured at Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1 and Cycle 6 Day1. During follow period, 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months). Improvement is defined as a decrease from baseline by at least one step on the ECOG performance status scale (yes/no).

Time frame: Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day1, follow up (FU) at 1Month (M) after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 month up to 5 year (up to 60 months)

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status60 M, FU3 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusCycle 3 Day 116 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusCycle 4 Day 119 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusCycle 5 Day 120 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusCycle 6 Day 126 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status1 M, FU31 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status3 M, FU31 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status12 M, FU30 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status15 M, FU23 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status18 M, FU23 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status21 M, FU22 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status24 M, FU20 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status27 M, FU15 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status30 M, FU14 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status33 M, FU15 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status42 M, FU11 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status45 M, FU8 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status48 M, FU8 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status51 M, FU7 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status54 M, FU7 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status57 M, FU3 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusCycle 2 Day 115 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status6 M, FU30 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status9 M, FU31 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status36 M, FU12 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status39 M, FU12 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status60 M, FU3 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusCycle 2 Day 113 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusCycle 4 Day 113 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusCycle 3 Day 113 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status42 M, FU6 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status3 M, FU21 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusCycle 5 Day 115 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status45 M, FU4 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusCycle 6 Day 116 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status39 M, FU7 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status1 M, FU22 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status48 M, FU2 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status6 M, FU18 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status12 M, FU20 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status51 M, FU3 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status15 M, FU18 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status36 M, FU7 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status18 M, FU18 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status54 M, FU2 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status21 M, FU16 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status9 M, FU23 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status24 M, FU15 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status57 M, FU3 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status27 M, FU13 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status33 M, FU7 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status30 M, FU8 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time

Participants with no B-symptoms (B-Sy) (no night sweat, no weight loss, no fever and no extreme fatigue) and at least one indicated B-sy(night sweats, weight loss, fever or extreme fatigue) were presented at Screening, Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and during follow up period at 1 M after study drug therapy, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months).

Time frame: Screening, Cycle1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day1, Cycle 3 Day1, Cycle 4 Day1, Cycle 5 Day1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and During at 1M after study drug therapy, 3M, then every 3 M up to 5 year (up to 60 months)

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time18 M, FU, no B-sy93 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 1 Day 1, no B-sy64 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 5 Day 1, one B-sy14 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time9 M, FU, no B-sy116 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 6 Day 1, no B-sy111 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 6 Day 1, one B-sy9 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time1 M, FU, no B-sy141 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time1 M, FU, one B-sy20 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time3 M, FU, no B-sy136 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time9 M, FU, one B-sy13 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time12 M, FU, no B-sy108 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time12 M, FU, one B-sy11 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time15 M, FU, no B-sy98 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time15 M, FU, one B-sy5 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeScreening, no B-sy63 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time18 M, FU, one B-sy5 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time24 M, FU, one B-sy1 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time27 M, FU, no B-sy71 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time27 M, FU, one B-syn4 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time33 M, FU, one B-sy3 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time36 M, FU, one B-sy2 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time39 M, FU, no B-sy49 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time39 M, FU, one B-sy3 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time42 M, FU, no B-sy45 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time42 M, FU, one B-sy0 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time45 M, FU, no B-sy41 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time45 M, FU, one B-sy0 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time48 M, FU, no B-sy36 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time51 M, FU, one B-sy0 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time54 M, FU, no B-sy30 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeScreening, one B-sy120 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 1 Day 1, one B-sy115 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 2 Day 1,no B-sy116 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 2 Day 1, one B-sy52 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 3 Day 1, no B-sy131 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 3 Day 1, one B-sy34 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 4 Day 1, no B-sy129 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 4 Day 1, one B-sy25 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 5 Day 1, no B-sy120 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time3 M, FU, one B-sy17 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time6 M, FU, no B-sy123 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time6 M, FU, one B-sy15 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time21 M, FU, no B-sy87 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time21 M, FU, one B-sy7 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time24 M, FU, no B-sy79 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time30 M, FU, no B-sy68 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time30 M, FU, one B-sy2 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time33 M, FU, no B-sy63 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time36 M, FU, no B-sy56 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time48 M, FU, one B-sy1 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time51 M, FU, no B-sy32 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time54 M, FU, one B-sy0 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time57 M, FU, no B-sy26 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time57 M, FU, one B-sy0 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time60 M, FU, no B-sy24 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time60 M, FU, one B-sy1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time51 M, FU, one B-sy1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeScreening, no B-sy59 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeScreening, one B-sy121 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time51 M, FU, no B-sy11 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 1 Day 1, no B-sy68 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 5 Day 1, no B-sy97 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 5 Day 1, one B-sy21 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time24 M, FU, one B-sy4 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time27 M, FU, one B-syn3 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 6 Day 1, no B-sy82 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 1 Day 1, one B-sy111 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 6 Day 1, one B-sy13 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time54 M, FU, no B-sy10 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time1 M, FU, no B-sy116 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 2 Day 1,no B-sy108 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time1 M, FU, one B-sy29 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time30 M, FU, no B-sy33 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time9 M, FU, no B-sy87 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 2 Day 1, one B-sy62 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time9 M, FU, one B-sy9 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time57 M, FU, one B-sy0 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time12 M, FU, no B-sy74 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 3 Day 1, no B-sy116 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time12 M, FU, one B-sy13 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time30 M, FU, one B-sy2 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time15 M, FU, no B-sy63 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 3 Day 1, one B-sy40 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time15 M, FU, one B-sy8 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time54 M, FU, one B-sy0 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time18 M, FU, no B-sy58 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 4 Day 1, no B-sy107 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time18 M, FU, one B-sy6 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time21 M, FU, one B-sy5 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time24 M, FU, no B-sy48 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time33 M, FU, no B-sy27 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the TimeCycle 4 Day 1, one B-sy25 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time27 M, FU, no B-sy41 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time33 M, FU, one B-sy2 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time3 M, FU, no B-sy105 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time36 M, FU, no B-sy23 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time60 M, FU, one B-sy0 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time36 M, FU, one B-sy0 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time3 M, FU, one B-sy14 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time39 M, FU, no B-sy18 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time48 M, FU, no B-sy13 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time39 M, FU, one B-sy0 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time6 M, FU, no B-sy96 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time42 M, FU, no B-sy16 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time57 M, FU, no B-sy9 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time42 M, FU, one B-sy0 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time6 M, FU, one B-sy11 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time45 M, FU, no B-sy14 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time48 M, FU, one B-sy0 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time45 M, FU, one B-sy1 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time21 M, FU, no B-sy55 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsNumber of Participants With no B-Symptoms or at Least One B-symptoms Over the Time60 M, FU, no B-sy9 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Each participant was followed at the time when the last IRC-assessed PFS events occurred. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact.

Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

Population: ITT Population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsOverall Survival (OS)62.65 Months
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsOverall Survival (OS)46.23 Months
p-value: 0.142795% CI: [0.59, 1.09]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the Investigator

OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response \[CR\], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery \[CRi\], partial response \[PR\], and nodular PR \[nPR\]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) \> 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) \>100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) \>11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) \<4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL \>100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb \>11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM. Responder = CR + CRi + NPR + PR

Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the InvestigatorCR45 Percentage of participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the InvestigatornPR2 Percentage of participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the InvestigatorCRi12 Percentage of participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the InvestigatorPR107 Percentage of participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the InvestigatorStable disease9 Percentage of participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the InvestigatorProgressive Disease0 Percentage of participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the InvestigatorMissing8 Percentage of participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the InvestigatorResponder166 Percentage of participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the InvestigatorResponder149 Percentage of participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the InvestigatorPR113 Percentage of participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the InvestigatorStable disease21 Percentage of participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the InvestigatorCR24 Percentage of participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the InvestigatorMissing9 Percentage of participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the InvestigatorCRi4 Percentage of participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the InvestigatornPR8 Percentage of participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best OR, as Assessed by the InvestigatorProgressive Disease3 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.0166Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRC

OR is defined as the number of participants achieving an objective response (complete response \[CR\], CR with incomplete bone marrow recovery \[CRi\], partial response \[PR\], and nodular PR \[nPR\]). CR (all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment): no lymphadenopathy (Ly) \> 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/ splenomegaly/ constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>1500 per microliter (µL), platelets (PL) \>100,000/µL, hemoglobin (Hb) \>11 grams/deciliter (g/dL), lymphocytes (LC) \<4000/µL, bone marrow (BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. CRi: CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. PR: \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL \>100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline (BL), Hb \>11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. nPR: persistent nodules BM.

Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCCRi2 Percentage of participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCMissing1 Percentage of participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCPR55 Percentage of participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCProgressive Disease0 Percentage of participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCStable disease11 Percentage of participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCnPR0 Percentage of participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCCR27 Percentage of participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCNot Evaluable4 Percentage of participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCCRi1 Percentage of participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCnPR0 Percentage of participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCProgressive Disease0 Percentage of participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCNot Evaluable2 Percentage of participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCMissing2 Percentage of participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCPR59 Percentage of participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCStable disease28 Percentage of participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPercentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response (OR), as Assessed by the IRCCR7 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.0003Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Prognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical Response

Blood samples were collected for the assessment of the following prognostic markers at BL: immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region(IgVH) homology; Zeta-Chain-Associated Protein Kinase 70(ZAP70), VH3-21 usage; Cytogenetics (by fluorescent in situ hybridization \[FISH\]); beta 2 microglobulin. Cox-regression model was used to explore the relationship between progression-free survival and the following explanatory variables: treatment group, cytogenetics (analyzed by FISH included 6q-,11q-, +12q, 17p-, 13q-) , ZAP-70 (positive, negative or intermediate), VH3-21 usage (Yes and No), IgVH homology (\>98%, 97%-98% and \<97%), beta 2 microglobulin (\>3500 microgram per liter \[µg/L\] and \<=3500 µg/L). For each covariate, a hazard ratio \<1 indicates a lower risk on the first effect tested compared with the other effects tested. Cytogenetics Group (based on \>=20%)=cytogenetics (CY G).

Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseB2 Microglobulin G 1: <= 3500 ug/L22 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseCY G 1: 6q- or +12q or 13q-38 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseIgVH Homology, 97%-98%5 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseVH3-21 Usage Flag: No93 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseVH3-21 Usage Flag: Yes6 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseIgVH Homology, <97%13 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseZAP70, G1 Positive60 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseCY G 1: no aberration27 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseIgVH Homology, >98%80 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseZAP70 G 1, Negative14 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseCY G 1: 11q-29 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseZAP70 G 1, Intermediate27 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseCY G 1: 17p-6 Participants
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseB2 Microglobulin G 1: > 3500 microgram/liter (μg/L79 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseZAP70, G1 Positive65 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseB2 Microglobulin G 1: <= 3500 ug/L26 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseCY G 1: 11q-19 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseCY G 1: 6q- or +12q or 13q-48 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseVH3-21 Usage Flag: Yes4 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseIgVH Homology, >98%78 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseB2 Microglobulin G 1: > 3500 microgram/liter (μg/L78 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseCY G 1: 17p-9 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseCY G 1: no aberration27 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseVH3-21 Usage Flag: No96 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseIgVH Homology, <97%15 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseIgVH Homology, 97%-98%7 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseZAP70 G 1, Negative13 Participants
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsPrognostic and Biological Markers Correlating With Clinical ResponseZAP70 G 1, Intermediate23 Participants
Secondary

Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Ofatumumab

Blood samples were collected from participants who received ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide predose and 0.5 h after the end of the ofatumumab infusion at treatment Cycle 1 and Cycle 4.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Week 1, Cycle 1 Week 2, Cycle 4

Population: PK Population: Participants for whom a pharmacokinetic sample was obtained were analyzed, only participants available at the specified time points were analyzed(represented by n=X in the category titles)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsTime of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Ofatumumabcycle 1, week 16.106 Hour
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsTime of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Ofatumumabcycle 1, week 25.004 Hour
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsTime of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) of Ofatumumabcycle 44.878 Hour
Secondary

Time to Next Therapy

Time to next therapy is defined as the time from randomization until the start of the next-line of treatment. Data are presented for participants who took anti-cancer therapies and participants in the ITT population.

Time frame: From the start of study drug until the start of the next anti-CLL therapy (up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug)

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsTime to Next Therapy29.68 Months
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsTime to Next Therapy21.03 Months
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsTime to Next Therapy52.96 Months
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsTime to Next Therapy40.08 Months
p-value: 0.114395% CI: [0.55, 1.08]Log Rank
p-value: 0.010995% CI: [0.48, 0.94]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC

Time to progression is defined as the time from the date of randomization to PD. PD requires at least one of the following: lymphadenopathy, appearance of any new lesion such as enlargerd lymph nodes (\>1.5 cm) spleen or liver or other infiltrates or an increase by 50% or more in the greatest diameter of any previous site; an increase by 50% or more in the previously noted enlargement of the liver or spleen, an increase by 50% or more in the numbers of blood lymphocytes with at least 5000 lymphocytes per microliter, transformation to a more aggressive histology, or occurrence of cytopenia attributable to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after the last dose of study drug

Population: ITT Population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsTime to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC42.12 Months
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsTime to Progression, as Assessed by the IRC26.78 Months
p-value: 0.003695% CI: [0.45, 0.87]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Response, as Assessed by the IRC

Time to response is defined as the time from randomization to the first response. Complete Response/remission(CR) all the criteria at least 2 months after last treatment: no lymphadenopathy(Ly) \> 1.5 cm/ hepatomegaly/spleenomegaly/constitutional symptoms; neutrophils \>1500 per microliter(µL), platelets(PL) \>100,000/µL, hemoglobin(Hb) \>11 grams/deciliter(g/dL), lymphocytes(LC) \<4000/µL, bone marrow(BM) sample must be normocellular for age, \<30% LC, no lymphoid nodule. Incomplete bone marrow recovery(CRi): CR criteria, persistent anemia/thrombocytopenia/neutropenia unrelated to CLL but related to drug toxicity. Partial Remission/response(PR): \>=50% decrease in LC, Ly, size of liver and spleen and at least one of the following results: PL \>100,000/µL or 50% improvement over Baseline(BL), Hb \>11 g/dL or 50% improvement over BL. Nodular PR(nPR): persistent nodules BM.

Time frame: From randomization up to 5 years after last dose of study drug

Population: ITT Population. Participants with unknown or missing responses were considered as non-responders. Only responders were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ofatumumab + Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsTime to Response, as Assessed by the IRC0.99 Months
Fludarabine + Cyclophosphamide_ ITT SubjectsTime to Response, as Assessed by the IRC0.99 Months
p-value: 0.44995% CI: [0.85, 1.37]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026