Skip to content

Intermittent Sedation Versus Daily Interruption of Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Randomized Trial Comparing Intermittent Sedation and Daily Interruption of Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00824239
Enrollment
60
Registered
2009-01-16
Start date
2008-09-30
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2012-06-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mechanical Ventilation

Keywords

critical care, sedation, Mechanically ventilated patients

Brief summary

Sedation is very important in critical care. Critically ill patients are submitted to many stressor factors that have potential to affect longterm outcomes. However, oversedation is associated with increased morbidity, including increased time of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay and longterm psychological complications. Daily interruption of sedation is associated with less time under mechanical ventilation and less posttraumatic stress disorder. Intermittent sedation, when compared with continuous sedation, is also associated with decreased time of mechanical ventilation. The aim of this study is to compare intermittent sedation with daily interruption. Our primary endpoint is free-days of mechanical ventilation in 28 days.

Detailed description

A comparison of intermittent sedation - keeping analgesia with fentanyl and midazolam or propofol as boluses if agitation (SAS 5 or more) after adequate analgesia - and daily interruption of sedation - analgesia with fentanyl and sedation wiht midazolam or propofol continuously with daily interruptions every morning until patients awake and can follow simple commands. Sedation is restarted in half previous dosage if agitation (SAS 5 or more) occur.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIntermittent sedation

Patients under intermittent sedation stay without any continuous sedation since intubation and/or admission but receive analgesics as needed and sedatives only when agitated (SAS of 5 or more).

Patients under daily interruption of sedation stay on continuous sedation with midazolam and fentanyl and are submitted to a daily interruption of sedation to a neurological evaluation until they reach a SAS of 4 or more, then continuous sedation is re-started in the half previous dosage.

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients under mechanical ventilation with less of 24 hours and a expectative of stay intubated for more than 24 hours

Exclusion criteria

* Intubation secondary to a neurological cause * Pregnant women * Severe asthma or COPD decompensation * Palliative care

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Ventilator free-days28 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time of stayICU, hospitalar
Self-extubation28 days
Mortality28 days
Incidence of posttraumatic stress disorder6 months
Unplanned withdrawal of catheters28 days
Reintubation2 days after extubation

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026