Skip to content

Rapid Administration of Insulin in Sepsis

Rapid Administration of Insulin in Sepsis: A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00823108
Enrollment
20
Registered
2009-01-15
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2022-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Septic Shock

Keywords

GIK, septic shock, sepsis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if a glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) solution can be safely administered to patients with septic shock. GIK has been used in thousands of critically ill patients in research studies with very few safety concerns. However, there is a lack of data in regards to patients with septic shock. There are many reasons to believe that GIK would be beneficial in sepsis, including improving heart function and decreasing inflammation. This study will administer intravenous GIK for 12 hours continuously and monitor 10 subjects for 24 hours. A control arm will be used and 10 patients will receive the same monitoring but will not receive GIK.

Interventions

DRUGGIK

12 hour infusion of GIK solution

Sponsors

Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Suspected or confirmed infection; 2. Any two of four criteria of systemic inflammatory response: * Temperature \> 100.4° or \< 96.8° F * Heart rate \> 90 beats/minute * Respiratory rate \> 20 breaths/min. or PaCO2 \< 32 mm Hg * WBC \>12,000 or \< 4000 cells/µL or \> 10% bands 3. Initiation of quantitative resuscitation protocol in the ED; 4. Requirement of high dose vasopressors (defined as a cumulative vasopressor index = 4) to treat shock

Exclusion criteria

1. Age \<18 years; 2. Pregnancy; 3. Any primary diagnosis other than sepsis; 4. Established Do Not Resuscitate status or advanced directives restricting aggressive care or treating physician deems aggressive care unsuitable; 5. Known hyperkalemia (serum potassium \>5.5); 6. Dialysis-dependent renal failure; 7. Anticipated requirement for immediate surgery (within 24 hours); 8. Active participation in another interventional study; 9. Transferred from another hospital setting with sepsis therapy initiated; 10. Inability to obtain informed consent; 11. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (chest compression or defibrillation) prior to enrollment; 12. Active malignancy currently under treatment (chemo- or radiation therapy); 13. Known systemic allergy to insulin; 14. History of periodic paralysis associated with carbohydrate loading; 15. Receiving continuous intravenous inotropic support (including dobutamine, milrinone, amrinone, and levosimendan).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Absolute safety endpoint (explicit definitions)During infusion
Change in SOFA score, microcirculatory flowDuring infusion

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026