Skip to content

A Comfort Survey of Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Patients Treated With 2 Drugs

A Comfort Survey of Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Patients Treated With Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5% Solution Once or Twice Daily Versus Timolol Maleate in Sorbate

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00823043
Enrollment
103
Registered
2009-01-15
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2009-07-31
Last updated
2015-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Open-angle Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension

Brief summary

The objective of the study was to evaluate whether timolol hemihydrate is more comfortable upon instillation than timolol maleate in sorbate. This was an observational study. Subjects with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were asked to complete a survey regarding their normal treatment. No treatment was prescribed.

Interventions

timolol hemihydrate 0.5% solution

timolol maleate in sorbate

Sponsors

Vistakon Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* willing to comply with investigator's and protocol's instructions * patients signature on the informed consent document * open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension * currently prescribed timolol hemihydrate (once a day (QD) or twice a day (BID))or timolol maleate in sorbate QD as monotherapy or as a part of 2-drug therapy in at least one eye

Exclusion criteria

* inability to understand the trial procedures * inability to give informed consent * inability to understand, read, or write English * best corrected visual acuity of 20/200 or worse in each eye * current moderate to severe infectious or inflammatory condition of the eye or eyelids including * current moderate to severe dry eye syndrome * current chronic use of ocular corticosteroids, ocular surgery or intraocular laser surgery to either eye in the prior 3 months * treated with 3 or more glaucoma medicines in both eye

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject Reported Burning/StingingUpon instillationSubjects reported burning/stinging after they put the drops in their eyes using the following scale: 0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=frequently, 4=always.
Subject Reported TearingUpon instillation.Subjects reported tearing after they put the drops in their eyes using the following scale:0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=frequently, 4=always.
Subject Reported Light SensitivityUpon instillationSubjects reported light hurt their eyes after they put the drops in their eyes using the following scale: 0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=frequently, 4=always.
Subject Reported Blurred VisionUpon instillationSubjects reported their vision was blurred after they put the drops in their eyes using the following scale: 0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=frequently, 4=always.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Total Subject Population
All subjects responding to survey
103
Total103

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal Subject Population
Age, Continuous70.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
68 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
35 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Subject Reported Blurred Vision

Subjects reported their vision was blurred after they put the drops in their eyes using the following scale: 0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=frequently, 4=always.

Time frame: Upon instillation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Timolol HemihydrateSubject Reported Blurred Vision0.7 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1
Timolol Maleate in SorbateSubject Reported Blurred Vision0.6 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1
p-value: 0.69t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Subject Reported Burning/Stinging

Subjects reported burning/stinging after they put the drops in their eyes using the following scale: 0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=frequently, 4=always.

Time frame: Upon instillation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Timolol HemihydrateSubject Reported Burning/Stinging1.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Timolol Maleate in SorbateSubject Reported Burning/Stinging2.4 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.4
p-value: <0.001t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Subject Reported Light Sensitivity

Subjects reported light hurt their eyes after they put the drops in their eyes using the following scale: 0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=frequently, 4=always.

Time frame: Upon instillation

Population: Analysis includes all subjects that answered this question. One subject from each arm did not answer this question.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Timolol HemihydrateSubject Reported Light Sensitivity0.5 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Timolol Maleate in SorbateSubject Reported Light Sensitivity0.4 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.9
p-value: 0.75t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Subject Reported Tearing

Subjects reported tearing after they put the drops in their eyes using the following scale:0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=frequently, 4=always.

Time frame: Upon instillation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Timolol HemihydrateSubject Reported Tearing0.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1
Timolol Maleate in SorbateSubject Reported Tearing1.6 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.6
p-value: 0.024t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026