Skip to content

Comparison in Need for Bank Blood Between Patients Undergoing Total Hip Surgery That Either Receive Their Own Blood Back or Not

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Retransfusion of Intra-operatively Collected Filtered Whole Blood in Total Hip Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00822588
Enrollment
227
Registered
2009-01-14
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2010-06-30
Last updated
2012-10-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Blood Transfusion, Blood Transfusion, Autologous

Brief summary

The study is a prospective, controlled, randomised and assessor blind study that investigate if the need for bank blood transfusion could be reduced in patients, undergoing primary or revision total hip replacement surgery, who receive their own blood back with the medical device Sangvia. A comparison in need for bank blood will be made between patients that either receive their own blood back or not.

Interventions

DEVICESangvia® System

Sangvia® Intra- and Post-op System

Sponsors

Wellspect HealthCare
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Provision of informed consent * Scheduled for primary or secondary, cemented or non-cemented, total hip arthroplasty * Classified as ASA Physical Status Classification System class P1, P2 or P3 according to the American Society of Anaesthesiology.

Exclusion criteria

* Involvement in the planning and conduct of the study (applies to both Astra Tech staff or staff at the study site) * Previous enrollment or randomisation of treatment in the present study * Expected or confirmed participation in another clinical study, that may interfere with the present study, during the study period * Suspected severe non-compliance to protocol as judged by the investigator * Current symptoms of haemophilia * Current symptoms of hyperkalaemia * Current symptoms of systemic infection or local infection in the operation field * Current symptoms of impaired renal function including creatinine/clearance levels above the normal reference values * History of or presence of malignant disease with propensity for systemic spread during the last 5 years * Current or expected use of cytotoxic drugs * Current untreated anaemia (e.g. sickle cell anaemia), i.e. Hb concentration \< 11 g/dl (7 mmol/l) * Use of recombinant erythopoetin * Use of aprotinin and/or fibrin sealant * Use of other autologous blood transfusion than that with the Sangvia® system (e.g. CellSaver, pre-donation, acute normovolemic haemodilution etc.) * Women of childbearing age * Fractures * Revision/secondary total hip surgery with expected serious bone grafting

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants in Need for Bank Blood TransfusionAt dischargeBank blood transfusions were given in both groups after assessment of independent assessor, by using a transfusion trigger. All transfusions were recorded in a transfusion log and summarized at discharge. The total number of patients per group in need for any bank blood transfusion was compared. The participant were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 6 days (SD 3 days)

Countries

Austria, Netherlands, Norway, Spain

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sangvia
Autologous blood transfusion with Sangvia device (routinely)
106
No Sangvia
No autologous blood transfusion.
110
Total216

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSangviaNo SangviaTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
62 Participants61 Participants123 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
44 Participants49 Participants93 Participants
Age Continuous67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Region of Enrollment
Austria
12 participants13 participants25 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
82 participants86 participants168 participants
Region of Enrollment
Norway
7 participants6 participants13 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
5 participants5 participants10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
76 Participants70 Participants146 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants40 Participants70 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 1069 / 110
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 1067 / 110

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants in Need for Bank Blood Transfusion

Bank blood transfusions were given in both groups after assessment of independent assessor, by using a transfusion trigger. All transfusions were recorded in a transfusion log and summarized at discharge. The total number of patients per group in need for any bank blood transfusion was compared. The participant were followed for the duration of hospital stay, an average of 6 days (SD 3 days)

Time frame: At discharge

Population: Per protocol group. Major protocol deviations were excluded: Incorrect treatment, no treatment or exclusion criteria fulfilled.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SangviaNumber of Participants in Need for Bank Blood Transfusion9 Participants
No SangviaNumber of Participants in Need for Bank Blood Transfusion13 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 25, 2026