Skip to content

Video-Assisted Surgery or Talc Pleurodesis in Treating Patients With Malignant Mesothelioma

Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic (VAT) Cytoreductive Pleurectomy Compared to Talc Pleurodesis in Patients With Suspected or Proven Malignant Mesothelioma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00821860
Acronym
MesoVATS
Enrollment
196
Registered
2009-01-14
Start date
2003-09-30
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2013-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malignant Mesothelioma, Metastatic Cancer

Keywords

epithelial mesothelioma, recurrent malignant mesothelioma, sarcomatous mesothelioma, malignant pleural effusion, stage IA malignant mesothelioma, stage IB malignant mesothelioma, stage II malignant mesothelioma, stage III malignant mesothelioma, stage IV malignant mesothelioma

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Video-assisted surgery to remove part of the tissue layer covering the inside of the chest cavity may be effective in treating pleural effusion and cause less damage to normal tissue. Talc pleurodesis may keep fluid from building up in the chest cavity. It is not yet known which therapy is more effective in treating pleural effusion caused by malignant mesothelioma. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying video-assisted surgery to see how well it works compared with talc pleurodesis in treating patients with malignant mesothelioma.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * Compare the effectiveness of video-assisted thoracoscopic cytoreductive pleurectomy vs talc pleurodesis, in terms of 1-year survival, in patients with suspected or proven malignant mesothelioma. Secondary * Compare the control of pleural effusion in these patients. * Compare procedure-related complications in these patients. * Compare the symptoms and quality of life of these patients at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. * Compare the length of hospital stay for these patients. * Compare the exercise tolerance of these patients at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. * Determine the cost to the health service, in terms of resources used for procedures, hospital bed usage, and cost of primary and secondary care over 12 months. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to risk (high vs low). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I (video-assisted thoracoscopic \[VAT\] cytoreductive pleurectomy): Patients undergo VAT cytoreductive pleurectomy either at the time of biopsy or after confirmation of biopsy results. * Arm II (talc pleurodesis): Patients undergo talc pleurodesis via an indwelling intercostal chest drain or via thoracoscopy either at the time of biopsy or after confirmation of biopsy results. Quality of life, complications, and resource use are assessed at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

Interventions

OTHERtalc

Talc pleurodesis

Talc pleurodesis via thoracoscopy

PROCEDUREtherapeutic videothoracoscopy

Video-assisted thoracoscopic pleurectomy

Sponsors

Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Confirmed or suspected mesothelioma * Any subtype allowed * Pleural effusion must be present PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * Clinically fit and suitable for video-assisted thoracoscopic cytoreductive pleurectomy * Prior malignancy allowed provided it no longer requires treatment AND patient has a confirmed diagnosis of mesothelioma PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * No prior attempted pleurodesis by any approach

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Survival at 1 year after treatment1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Complications, including need for more surgery, persistent air leak requiring pleural intubation for > 10 days, and hospital stay for > 12 days1 year
Symptoms and quality of life as assessed by the EuroQol questionnaire0, 1, 3, 6 12 months
Control of pleural effusion1 year
Exercise tolerance0, 1, 3, 6 12 months
Cost to the health service, in terms of resources used for procedures, hospital bed usage, and cost of primary and secondary care over 12 months0, 1, 3, 6 12 months
Length of hospital stay1 year

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026