Skip to content

STOPFLU: Is it Possible to Reduce the Number of Days Off in Office Work by Improved Hand-hygiene?

STOPFLU: Is it Possible to Reduce the Number of Days Off in Office Work by Improved Hand-hygiene?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00821509
Enrollment
683
Registered
2009-01-13
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2012-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroenteritis, Respiratory Infection

Keywords

virus infection, hygiene, transmission, intervention

Brief summary

Improved hand hygiene is known to reduce transmission of both respiratory (RTI) and gastrointestinal infections (GTI) under semi-closed conditions such as hospitals, day-care centres and schools. It is not known if similar interventions would have the desired effect in a regular office work. This study is aiming to investigate this possibility by recruiting volunteers from several companies in the Helsinki Region. The two intervention groups will receive detailed instructions e.g. for proper coughing and sneezing, and for regular cleaning of hands with either standard liquid soap or with alcohol-based gel rubbing. Third group will serve as the control and is advised not to change their previous behaviour in this respect. The participants will report weekly possible RTI or GTI symptoms and related days off through internet. The study is planned to run about 18 months to cover the seasonal variation of the epidemics of the causative different viruses.

Detailed description

It is common knowledge that both respiratory tract infections (RTI) and gastrointestinal infections (GTI) cause a large part of short periods of days off from work, day care and school. In addition, because of the generally mild nature of the diseases, especially adults often come to work in spite of symptoms, and may therefore initiate transmission of infection among their colleagues. The chain of events from exposure to a pathogenic virus to subsequent infection and staying home because of infectious disease is a very complicated one, and is affected by many factors potentially causing variation, such as the multitude of causative agents, different individual histories of infections, variability of inter-personal contacts in work and various working- team feelings -influenced thresholds for staying home etc. Therefore, we aim to recruit at least 24 operationally distinct volunteer groups, each including at least 50 persons, and to continue the intervention about 18 months. A virus transmission risk-index will be calculated for each group based on potential participant questionnaires enquiring, among other things, about numbers and ages of children, their possible out-of-home day care, personal properties such as smoking, chronic diseases, and potential differences in contacts during daily work. The 24 groups will be divided in groups of three most similar ones, and members each triplet then randomised in one the intervention groups or the control (see brief summary). Data collection is based on self-reporting through Monday-morning electronic reports using a standard form. The from is enquiring about possible exposure to persons suffering from RTI or GTI, and possible own symptoms of the same diseases during the preceding 7 day period (including weekends and other holidays). The form will require daily records offering all possible combinations of the following categories: healthy-with symptoms, working normally-day off, own disease-child ill-other reason for day off. Etiology of the symptoms will not be searched for on individual basis in this study but a connection to RTI virus epidemiology is built by a sentinel surveillance, where occupational health clinics located in the premises of the participating companies send a standard number of weekly specimens collected from employees visiting the clinic. For possible GTI outbreaks a standard outbreak investigation principle will be followed, including 3-5 specimens. from typical patients will be collected. Common causative agents of the diseases will be searched for using real-time PCR techniques.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHand washing

Instructions for proper coughing and sneezing, and for reduced hand shaking, frequent hand washing in office and at home

BEHAVIORALDisinfectant rubbing

Instructions for proper coughing and sneezing, and for reduced hand shaking; frequent rubbing of hands with alcohol containing disinfectant in office and at home

Sponsors

Finnish Work Environment Fund
CollaboratorOTHER
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
CollaboratorOTHER
Berner Oy
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Farmos Oy
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Kesko Oyj
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Nordea Bank Finland Plc
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Outokumpu
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Outokumpu Technogy Oyj
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Suomen Osuuskauppojen Keskuskunta (SOK)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
S-Pankki
CollaboratorOTHER
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Volunteers working in defined units

Exclusion criteria

* Persons with open wounds or chronic eczema in hands

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative Number of Reported Days-off Episodes in the Arm Due to Own Infectious Disease Over the Total Number of Follow-up Weeks in the ArmAt the end of the entire study period (16 months)Participants reported weekly through an internet questionnaire symptoms of respiratory tract (RTI) or gastrointestinal tract infections (GTI) as well as whether they were working (if expected) or not, daily for the previous calendar week. Individual weekly reports were combined in a single continuum and successive days with both symptoms and absence from work were designated as days-off episodes due to own infectious disease. Number of these episodes in each trial arm was calculated and for the respective proportion, was divided by the total number of weekly reports collected in the arm.
Cumulative Number of Reported Episodes of Infectious Disease in the Arm Over the Total Number of Follow-up Weeks in the ArmAt the end of the study period (16 months)Participants reported weekly through an internet questionnaire symptoms of respiratory tract (RTI) or gastrointestinal tract infections (GTI). Individual weekly reports were combined in a single continuum and successive days with either RTI or GTI symptoms were designated as disease episodes due. Numbers of RTI, GTI and either episodes in each trial arm were calculated, and for the respective proportion, were divided by the total number of weekly reports collected in the arm.

Countries

Finland

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Occupational health clinics of 6 corporations in the Helsinki region contacted in 2008; 21 study clusters identified with at least. 50 employees in common office work in each; Active recruitment by personal invitation to all members of the identified clusters (N=1270)in early January 2009 by emails including a designated risk interview (see below)

Pre-assignment details

Based on the cumulated acute infection risk (day-care of children, age, smoking, chronic CV- or lung disease, frequent business travel etc.)in each cluster the clusters were ranked according to the calculated risk index, and out of the 7 cluster triplets with most similar index, one was randomly allocated to each of the three study arms

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hand Washing
Instructions for proper coughing and sneezing, and for reduced hand shaking; frequent hand washing in office and at home
257
Disinfectant Rubbing
Instructions for proper coughing and sneezing, and for reduced hand shaking; frequent rubbing of hands with alcohol containing disinfectant in office and at home
202
Control
No change in hygiene behaviour
224
Total683

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject121134

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHand WashingDisinfectant RubbingControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
257 Participants202 Participants224 Participants683 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
257 participants202 participants224 participants683 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
185 Participants153 Participants163 Participants501 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
72 Participants49 Participants61 Participants182 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2570 / 2020 / 224
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2570 / 2020 / 224

Outcome results

Primary

Cumulative Number of Reported Days-off Episodes in the Arm Due to Own Infectious Disease Over the Total Number of Follow-up Weeks in the Arm

Participants reported weekly through an internet questionnaire symptoms of respiratory tract (RTI) or gastrointestinal tract infections (GTI) as well as whether they were working (if expected) or not, daily for the previous calendar week. Individual weekly reports were combined in a single continuum and successive days with both symptoms and absence from work were designated as days-off episodes due to own infectious disease. Number of these episodes in each trial arm was calculated and for the respective proportion, was divided by the total number of weekly reports collected in the arm.

Time frame: At the end of the entire study period (16 months)

Population: Number of participants given is the number at the onset. There were both lost-to-follow-up and new recruits. The analysis is, however, based on episodes of days-off in entire arm during the entire follow-up time rather than on individual participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Hand WashingCumulative Number of Reported Days-off Episodes in the Arm Due to Own Infectious Disease Over the Total Number of Follow-up Weeks in the Arm625 sick-leave episodes
Disinfectant RubbingCumulative Number of Reported Days-off Episodes in the Arm Due to Own Infectious Disease Over the Total Number of Follow-up Weeks in the Arm418 sick-leave episodes
ControlCumulative Number of Reported Days-off Episodes in the Arm Due to Own Infectious Disease Over the Total Number of Follow-up Weeks in the Arm405 sick-leave episodes
Comparison: According to the null hypothesis the proportion of weeks with an onset of days-off period in neither of the intervention arms was different from that of control. No in advance power calculations were done.p-value: 0.004proportion test
Primary

Cumulative Number of Reported Episodes of Infectious Disease in the Arm Over the Total Number of Follow-up Weeks in the Arm

Participants reported weekly through an internet questionnaire symptoms of respiratory tract (RTI) or gastrointestinal tract infections (GTI). Individual weekly reports were combined in a single continuum and successive days with either RTI or GTI symptoms were designated as disease episodes due. Numbers of RTI, GTI and either episodes in each trial arm were calculated, and for the respective proportion, were divided by the total number of weekly reports collected in the arm.

Time frame: At the end of the study period (16 months)

Population: Number of participants given is the number at the onset. There were both lost-to-follow-up and new recruits. The analysis is, however, based on episodes of days-off in entire arm during the entire follow-up time rather than on individual participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Hand WashingCumulative Number of Reported Episodes of Infectious Disease in the Arm Over the Total Number of Follow-up Weeks in the Arm1451 Disease episodes
Disinfectant RubbingCumulative Number of Reported Episodes of Infectious Disease in the Arm Over the Total Number of Follow-up Weeks in the Arm1288 Disease episodes
ControlCumulative Number of Reported Episodes of Infectious Disease in the Arm Over the Total Number of Follow-up Weeks in the Arm1214 Disease episodes
Comparison: According to the null hypothesis the proportion of weeks with an onset of an infectious disease period in neither of the intervention arms was different from that of control. No in advance power calculations were done.p-value: 0.04proportion test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026