Skip to content

Antiarrhythmic Therapy Versus Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Sinus Rhythm Maintenance in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Atrial Fibrillation - Randomized Comparison of Antiarrhythmic Therapy vs. Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (SHAARC)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00821353
Enrollment
90
Registered
2009-01-13
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2013-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation, Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, RF ablation, Antiarrhythmic drugs

Brief summary

Paroxysmal or chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) develops in about 20- 25% of adult patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and represents an important complication in the clinical course of the disease, with adverse long-term consequences on functional status and outcome. Therefore, aggressive therapeutic strategies are indicated to restore and maintain sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with HCM. Nevertheless, pharmacologic prevention of AF recurrence is challenging because of the limited long-term efficacy and potentially hazardous side effects of available treatment options. Currently radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of AF is successfully used in clinical practice. However, comparison of the efficacy and safety of these two therapeutic options has not been done up till now in randomized manner in this group of patients. Thus, the aim of the present study is to compare the efficacy and safety of RFCA vs. antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with HCM and AF.

Interventions

RF catheter ablation

One of AA drugs (preferably Amiodarone) and cardioversion in cases of chronic AF

Sponsors

National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and paroxysmal or chronic atrial fibrillation

Exclusion criteria

* Severe hear failure (NYHA IV) * Left ventricular ejection fraction \<0.30 * Left atrial diameter \>65 mm * Age \> 70 years * Contraindication to anticoagulation with warfarin * Presence of a mechanical prosthetic valve * Presence of left atrial thrombus on TEE or CT * Woman currently pregnant * Renal failure (GFR \< 30 ml/min) * Hepatic failure * Untreated hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism * LVOT gradient \> 50 mmHg

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Efficacy: Freedom from atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter (>1 min) on or off antiarrhythmic medications.1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Changes in total symptomatic and asymptomatic AF burden.1 year
Incidence of complications.1 year
Changes in exercise capacity assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing.1 year
Changes in level of Nt-pro-BNP.1 year
Changes in symptom severity and quality of life.1 year
Changes in left atrial diameter and left ventricular function.1 year

Countries

Poland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026