Skip to content

Outcome Following Phacoemulsification Versus Small Incision Cataract Surgery (SICS)

Comparison of Phacoemulsification Versus Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery (SICS) : A Randomized Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00821223
Enrollment
420
Registered
2009-01-13
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2010-05-31
Last updated
2010-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Quality of Life, Visual Outcomes

Keywords

phacoemulsification, manual small incision cataract surgery, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, quality of vision

Brief summary

Hypothesis : Phacoemulsification is superior to SICS with regards to: * Immediate unaided high and low contrast visual performance * Its impact on quality of life.

Detailed description

Phacoemulsification procedure * Infiniti Vision System with Software 2.03 or higher, OZil handpiece (HP) * Anaesthesia: topical * Incision: temporal clear corneal 2.2 mm single plane * CCC and hydrodissection, sculpting and division using step by step chop in situ and lateral separation, I/A. * Single-piece AcrySof IOL (SN60WF) in the bag SICS procedure * Anaesthesia: peribulbar * Incision: superior scleral tunnel 6.5 to 7 mm * CCC and hydrodissection * Nuclear expression: blumenthal technique using anterior chamber maintainer, manual cortical clean-up * Single-piece PMMA (MZ60BD) in the bag

Interventions

PROCEDUREphacoemulsification and SICS

SICS with rigid IOL implantation Phaco with foldable IOL implantation

PROCEDUREmanual small incision surgery
PROCEDUREphacoemulsification

cataract surgery

Sponsors

Iladevi Cataract and IOL Research Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Prospective subjects should be diagnosed with senile cataract. Subject must require extraction of cataract in one eye followed by implantation of an AcrySof (SN60WF) or PMMA (MZ60BD) posterior chamber intraocular lens. * Pupil dilation equal or greater to 7 mm after mydriasis. * Patients undergoing cataract surgery for the first eye. * Visual prognosis equal or greater to 6/12.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with history of ocular pathology, glaucoma, uveitis, high myopia, PEX, or corneal pathology. * Patients with traumatic, subluxated and posterior polar cataract. * Patients who had previously ocular surgery in the past 6 months prior to the screening visit. * Patients with diabetic retinopathy. * Patients who are not suitable for follow-up visits. * Patients with Fuchs' Dystrophy, Macular Degeneration, Ocular Surface Disease that will interfere with normal recovery. * Any patients with significant intra-operative complications will be removed from the overall analysis of the results. All patient data should still be recorded, even if from the excluded patient group.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
immediate unaided and aided visual acuityimmediate and mid term (12 months)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Assessment of unaided and aided low contrast sensitivity3 and 12 months
Intra-operative complications immediate post-operative day corneal edema anterior chamber inflammationday 1, 1 week
To assess improvement in quality of life3 and 12 months

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026