Skip to content

Trial of Non Invasive Ventilation for Respiratoy Distress Syndrome

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Pressure as a Primary Mode for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00821119
Enrollment
200
Registered
2009-01-13
Start date
2007-08-31
Completion date
2009-09-30
Last updated
2013-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prematurity, Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Keywords

non invasive ventilation, mechanical ventilation, pulmonary morbidity, preterm infant, Respiratory distress syndrome, nasal intermittent positive pressure, nasal continuous positive pressure, bronchopulmonary dysplasia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the hypothesis that nasal intermittent positive pressure(NIPP), used as a primary mode of ventilation in preterm infants with RDS, will decrease the need for conventional endotracheal ventilation when compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure.(NCPAP)

Detailed description

Respiratory distress syndrome(RDS) and its sequelae, bronchopulmonary dysplasia(BPD) are complications of prematurity.The pathogenesis of BPD is multifactorial and one of the most important risk factors is the ventilator-induced lung injury caused by invasive respiratory support. The two modes of non-invasive ventilation, NIPP and specially NCPAP, have been used frequently in the respiratory care of preterm infants in neonatal units.NCPAP is currently a common practice for the treatment of RDS . NIPP has been found to be more effective than NCPAP in apnea of prematurity and immediately after extubation in preterm infants,decreasing the need of endotracheal ventilation. Alternative techniques of non-invasive ventilation has been suggested in some studies to decrease respiratory morbidities associated with prematurity.This non-invasive approach could be used initially as a primary mode of ventilation for infants with RDS in a effort to decrease lung injury and BPD.Studies are needed to compare the effectiveness of these therapies.

Interventions

Nasal intermittent positive airway pressure will be compared are the nasal continuous positive pressure as an initial ventilatory mode in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome

Sponsors

Instituto Materno Infantil Prof. Fernando Figueira
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to 1 Days
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* preterm infants with RDS * assigned to non invasive ventilation

Exclusion criteria

* preterm on endotracheal ventilation * severe congenital pulmonary or cardiovascular malformation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for Endotracheal Ventilation in the First 72 hs of Lifefirst 72 hs of lifenumber of participants that needed endotracheal ventilation (failed non invasive ventilation) in the first 72 hours of life
Mechanical Ventilation Within the First 72h of Life in the Two Study Groups.(NIPPV vs NCPAP)first 3 days of life(72hours)The primary outcome of the study was the need for intubation within the first 72 hours (h) of life.The need for intubation was made by the attending neonatologist, according to the strict protocol of intubation for ventilation, used in the neonatal Unit

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasiaat 36 weeks gestational ageThe incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia was calculated based on the number of infants surviving to 36 weeks postmenstrual age and diagnosed with bronchopulmonary dysplasia, according to the definiton of bronchopulmonary dysplasia currently used in the neonatal Unit.

Countries

Brazil

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The started study date of recruitment was March 2008 in a single center. One of the biggest hospital in the northeast of brazil with an inborn tertiary NICU

Pre-assignment details

Infants were excluded for any of the following reasons: major congenital anomalies, presence of cardiovascular instability, intubation at admission to the NICU, consent not provided or refused and unavailability of a ventilator. there were 423 eligible infants and 223 excluded, 200 participated in the study

Participants by arm

ArmCount
1 - NCPAP
preterm infants with nasal continuous positive pressure as the mode of respiratory support
100
2- NIPP
preterm with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as a primary mode of respiratory support
100
Total200

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic2- NIPP1 - NCPAPTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
100 Participants100 Participants200 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age Continuous29 weeks of gestation
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
30.1 weeks of gestation
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
30 weeks of gestation
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
100 participants100 participants200 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
49 Participants51 Participants100 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
51 Participants49 Participants100 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1000 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1000 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

Mechanical Ventilation Within the First 72h of Life in the Two Study Groups.(NIPPV vs NCPAP)

The primary outcome of the study was the need for intubation within the first 72 hours (h) of life.The need for intubation was made by the attending neonatologist, according to the strict protocol of intubation for ventilation, used in the neonatal Unit

Time frame: first 3 days of life(72hours)

Population: We estimated a 20% absolute reduction in the need of using endotraqueal ventilation with the early use of NIPPV. A sample size of 100 infants per group was calculated with a power of 80% and an alpha error of 5%.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NCPAPMechanical Ventilation Within the First 72h of Life in the Two Study Groups.(NIPPV vs NCPAP)34 participants
NIPPVMechanical Ventilation Within the First 72h of Life in the Two Study Groups.(NIPPV vs NCPAP)25 participants
Comparison: Based on previous data from our NICU, 40 - 45% of our preterm infants administered early NCPAP for RDS needed intubation and mechanical ventilation within the first 72h of life. We estimated a 20% absolute reduction in the need of using ETT ventilation with the early use of NIPPV. A sample size of 100 infants per group was calculated with a power of 80% and an alpha error of 5%.p-value: 0.0595% CI: [0.48, 1.14]risk ratio (RR)
Primary

Need for Endotracheal Ventilation in the First 72 hs of Life

number of participants that needed endotracheal ventilation (failed non invasive ventilation) in the first 72 hours of life

Time frame: first 72 hs of life

Population: 40 - 45% of our previous preterm infants on NCPAP for RDS needed intubation and mechanical ventilation within the first 72h of life. We estimated a 20% absolute reduction in the need of using ETT ventilation with the early use of NIPPV. A sample size of 100 infants per group was calculated with a power of 80% and an alpha error of 5%.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
NCPAPNeed for Endotracheal Ventilation in the First 72 hs of Life34 participants 0
NIPPVNeed for Endotracheal Ventilation in the First 72 hs of Life25 participants 0
Comparison: Based on previous data from our NICU, 40 - 45% of our preterm infants administered early NCPAP for RDS needed intubation and mechanical ventilation within the first 72h of life. We estimated a 20% absolute reduction in the need of using ETT ventilation with the early use of NIPPV. A sample size of 100 infants per group was calculated with a power of 80% and an alpha error of 5%.~The analysis was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.p-value: <0.0595% CI: [0.48, 1.14]risk ratio (RR)
Secondary

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

The incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia was calculated based on the number of infants surviving to 36 weeks postmenstrual age and diagnosed with bronchopulmonary dysplasia, according to the definiton of bronchopulmonary dysplasia currently used in the neonatal Unit.

Time frame: at 36 weeks gestational age

Population: The number of preterm infants surviving to 36 weeks postmenstrual age were eligible for analysis

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NCPAPBronchopulmonary Dysplasia20 participants
NIPPVBronchopulmonary Dysplasia22 participants
Comparison: The study was not powered for this outcome. However this analysis was done with this limitationp-value: <0.0595% CI: [0.62, 1.78]risk ratio (RR)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026