Skip to content

Rosiglitazone And Fenofibrate Additive Effects on Lipids (RAFAEL)

Rosiglitazone And Fenofibrate Additive Effects on Lipids (RAFAEL)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00819910
Acronym
RAFAEL
Enrollment
41
Registered
2009-01-09
Start date
2008-09-30
Completion date
2010-05-31
Last updated
2014-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertriglyceridemia in Type 4 Hyperlipidemia, Non Diabetic Subjects With Normoglycemia

Keywords

Type 4 hyperlipidemia, Rosiglitazone, Fenofibrate

Brief summary

The design of the study will be randomized, double blind trial, which will examine the effects of Rosiglitazone on the fasting triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and plasma concentrations of apolipoproteins A-I, A-II, and C-III as compared to Fenofibrate and placebo. This study will also assess the synergistic effect of Rosiglitazone and Fenofibrate on the same parameters. Data from this study will help clarify whether Rosiglitazone favorably impacts plasma lipid and lipoprotein concentrations through improving insulin sensitivity and glycemic control, or by directly influencing the synthesis of the apolipoproteins that are responsible for very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and HDL metabolism.

Detailed description

Treatment of patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) consists of reducing hyperglycemia through diet, exercise, oral drug therapy or insulin (1). The Thiazolidinedione (TZDs), which include Troglitazone (withdrawn by the FDA), Rosiglitazone, and Pioglitazone, correct hyperglycemia by increasing insulin sensitivity in both the liver (2, 3) and skeletal muscles (4,5). Although TZDs improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetic subjects, when these agents are administered to non-diabetic subjects they do not affect fasting plasma glucose levels. Nolan et al. (6) observed no effect on the plasma glucose levels of non-diabetic subjects treated with Troglitazone 200 mg twice daily. Clinical trials using TZDs in type 2 diabetic subjects have observed that these agents also favorably impact plasma lipid and lipoprotein concentrations. A recent study comparing the efficacy of adding Metformin (850 mg, once or twice daily) or Troglitazone (200 mg, once or twice daily) to Glyburide (10 mg, twice daily) on glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients (n=22), reported that after 4 months of treatment, Metformin did not induce significant changes in LDL-C, LDL size, HDL-C, Triglycerides or Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), but decreased C-reactive protein (CRP) by 33%. Interestingly, Troglitazone increased the size of LDL and the mean LDL-C level (+10%), but decreased the Triglyceride (-22%) and CRP (-60%) concentrations (7). Following eight weeks of treatment with Rosiglitazone (4mg, twice daily) in 243 type 2 diabetic patients, the mean HDL-C increased by 6% and TG by 2%. The increase in the LDL-C concentration (9%) was accompanied by a shift in small, dense LDL to large, buoyant LDL in 52% of the treated subjects. The shift in LDL size occurred independent of a significant Triglyceride reduction, which is in contrast to several studies reporting that increases in LDL size are significantly correlated with a decrease in the plasma concentrations of total and very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) Triglycerides (8-10). The mechanism involved in the plasma lipid and lipoprotein changes induced by TZDs remains unclear. It is possible that these agents indirectly alter plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels indirectly by improving insulin sensitivity and glycemic control, or directly by influencing lipoprotein synthesis and/or catabolism. In type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, hepatic synthesis of Triglycerides is increased and peripheral catabolism is decreased. The primary metabolic defect causing the hypertriglyceridemia is peripheral insensitivity to the action of insulin, accompanied by hyperinsulinemia. The insulin insensitivity inhibits the synthesis and activity of lipoprotein lipase and consequently impairs peripheral catabolism of Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (VLDL and Chylomicrons) (11-12). Since hepatocytes remain sensitive to the action of insulin, the hyperinsulinemia suppresses beta-oxidation and shunts free fatty acids entering the liver into the synthesis of Triglycerides. Therefore, hepatic production of Triglycerides (i.e. VLDL) is increased at the same time peripheral catabolism is impaired. The result is hypertriglyceridemia with a reciprocal decease in HDL-C concentration. By reducing insulin resistance and plasma insulin levels, TZDs would decrease hepatic Triglyceride production and enhance peripheral catabolism of Triglycerides, resulting in plasma reduction and a reciprocal increase in the HDL-C level. Recently, it has been recognized that circulating levels of Triglyceride and HDL-C are influenced by the activities of Peroxisome Proliferator Activator Receptors (PPARs). PPARs constitute a super family of nuclear hormone receptors and are ligand-activated transcription factors. When activated, they transmit signals from intra-cellular lipid-soluble factors (e.g. fatty acids, hormones, vitamins) to genes in the nucleus by binding to DNA at specific response elements (13). Three distinct PPARs, termed alpha, beta, and gamma modulate intracellular lipid and glucose metabolism through controlling gene expression when activated (14). Specifically when PPAR-alpha is activated, gene expression for the synthesis of ApoC-III, lipoprotein lipase, ApoA-I and ApoA-II are impacted. ApoC-III is a specific inhibitor of peripheral lipoprotein lipase and competes with ApoE for space on the surface of VLDL. Reduced amounts of ApoC-III will result in a larger representation of ApoE on the VLDL particle, and as a consequence, the ApoE mediated hydrolysis of Triglycerides is enhanced. Activation of PPAR-alpha leads to decrease production of ApoC-III, which in turn results in enhanced clearance of Triglycerides. Activation of PPAR-alpha also increases the synthesis of lipoprotein lipase, which increases Triglyceride catabolism. Gene expression for the synthesis of ApoA-I and ApoA-II is also enhanced by activation of PPAR-alpha, resulting in increase in HDL concentration. Fibric acid derivatives (Gemfibrozil and Fenofibrate) induce their Triglyceride lowering and HDL-C augmenting properties by binding to the PPAR-alpha nuclear receptor. TZDs are PPAR-gamma ligands that stimulate the gene expression of GLUT1 and GLUT4 (cellular glucose transport proteins) leading to increased insulin sensitivity in the target cells (15,16). The three PPAR receptors possess some degree of structural homology. Therefore, while TZDs have high affinity to PPAR-gamma, they may also bind to a lesser degree to PPAR-alpha or beta. Saliel and Olefsky (17) have determined in cell culture studies that Troglitazone can activate all three PPAR nuclear receptors. Lehmann et al. (18) observed in vitro that TZDs are high affinity ligands for PPAR-gamma yet also bind to PPAR-alpha (to a small degree). Binding PPAR-alpha would directly enhance the catabolism of Triglycerides (i.e. reduced ApoC-III plasma concentrations and increased lipoprotein lipase activity) and increase HDL-C plasma concentration through enhancing the expression of lipoprotein lipase and ApoA-I and ApoA-II. Therefore, administration of TZDs to non-diabetic normoglycemic individuals should not change plasma glucose concentrations, but by binding to PPAR-alpha it would result in decrease in the plasma concentration of ApoC-III, and an increase in ApoA-I and ApoA-II, with a subsequent rise in HDL-C and reduction in Triglyceride concentration. In a recent animal study assessing Rosiglitazone's mode of action on lipids using male Sprague-Dawley rats, serum total, free and HDL cholesterol concentrations were monitored. In rats given Rosiglitazone, serum Triglyceride levels decreased in a dose-dependent manner, dropping to less than 50% of that of the control rats at the highest dose tested (5 mg/kg/d). Serum glucose concentrations did not change after Rosiglitazone treatment, which is in agreement with previous studies showing that thiazolidinediones do not exert a hypoglycemic action in the normoglycemic, non-diabetic rat. (18)

Interventions

DRUGRosiglitazone

Rosiglitazone 8mg daily for 12 weeks

DRUGPlacebo (Rosiglitazone)

Placebo (Rosiglitazone) 8mg daily for 12 weeks

DRUGPlacebo (Fenofibrate)

Placebo (Fenofibrate) 145 mg daily for 12 weeks

DRUGFenofibrate

Fenofibrate 145 mg daily for 12 weeks

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Ahmad Slim
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Fasting plasma glucose \<100 mg/dl 2. Fasting LDL \<160 mg/dl and Triglyceride \<400 mg/dl.

Exclusion criteria

1. Congestive heart failure 2. Evidence of renal impairment (serum creatinine\> 1.4mg/dL) 3. Liver disease (ALT and/or AST above the upper level of normal) 4. Known diabetes mellitus or impaired fasting glucose (fasting glucose ≥ 100mg/dL) 5. LDL of ≥160mg/dL and/or triglycerides of ≥400mg/dL 6. Pregnant or breast feeding women 7. Prior history of an acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction or revascularization procedures in the past 8. Life-threatening disease with a survival prognosis \<3 years 9. Inability to take rosiglitazone and/or fenofibrate 10. Already on statin therapy or have been on statin therapy in the last 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Triglyceride (TG) Levels Post Treatment12 weeks from initial visit (day 0) to final visit (12 weeks)The reported percent change is the difference between TG levels obtained on initial visit (day 0) and TG levels obtained at final visit (week 12) as per protocol

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-treatment Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Levels12 weeks from initial visit (day 0) to final visit (12 weeks)The reported percent change is the difference between HDL levels obtained on initial visit (day 0) and HDL levels obtained at final visit (week 12) as per protocol
Post-treatment Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Levels12 weeks from initial visit (day 0) to final visit (12 weeks)The reported percent change is the difference between LDL levels obtained on initial visit (day 0) and LDL levels obtained at final visit (week 12) as per protocol
Post-treatment Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo AI), Apolipoprotein A-II (Apo AII) and Apolipoprotein C-III (Apo CIII) Levels12 weeks from initial visit (day 0) to final visit (12 weeks)Post-treatment median change in Apo AI, Apo AII and Apo CIII levels reported in mg/dL with Interquartile ranges provided
Mean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final Visit12 weeks from initial visit (day 0) to final visit (12 weeks)The mean Levels of AST and ALT measured at initial visit (Day 0) and final visit (Week 12) annotated as AST 1, AST 12, and ALT 1 and ALT 12, respectively.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rosiglitazone/Fenofibrate Therapy Daily
Rosiglitazone 8mg once daily and Fenofibrate 145mg once daily for 12 weeks
7
Fenofibrate + Placebo
Fenofibrate 145mg once daily for 12 weeks and Placebo (Rosiglitazone 8mg once daily)
9
Rosiglitazone + Placebo
Rosiglitazone 8mg once daily and Placebo ( Fenofibrate 145mg once daily)
8
Placebo Therapy Daily
Placebo (Rosiglitazone 8mg once daily) and placebo (Fenofibrate 145 mg once daily) for 12 weeks
10
Total34

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0021
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1110

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFenofibrate + PlaceboRosiglitazone + PlaceboRosiglitazone/Fenofibrate Therapy DailyPlacebo Therapy DailyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants7 Participants6 Participants4 Participants23 Participants
Age, Continuous61.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
57.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
54.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
57.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Region of Enrollment
United States
9 participants8 participants7 participants10 participants34 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants3 Participants4 Participants4 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants5 Participants3 Participants6 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 104 / 102 / 106 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 102 / 101 / 100 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in Triglyceride (TG) Levels Post Treatment

The reported percent change is the difference between TG levels obtained on initial visit (day 0) and TG levels obtained at final visit (week 12) as per protocol

Time frame: 12 weeks from initial visit (day 0) to final visit (12 weeks)

Population: Mean percent change post treatment ( unit %). TG was measured using mg/dL units

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rosiglitazone + PlaceboPercent Change in Triglyceride (TG) Levels Post Treatment7.4 % changeStandard Deviation 48.9
Fenofibrate + PlaceboPercent Change in Triglyceride (TG) Levels Post Treatment-2.2 % changeStandard Deviation 26
Rosiglitazone +FenofibratePercent Change in Triglyceride (TG) Levels Post Treatment20 % changeStandard Deviation 36.5
Placebo Therapy DailyPercent Change in Triglyceride (TG) Levels Post Treatment7.6 % changeStandard Deviation 51
Secondary

Mean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final Visit

The mean Levels of AST and ALT measured at initial visit (Day 0) and final visit (Week 12) annotated as AST 1, AST 12, and ALT 1 and ALT 12, respectively.

Time frame: 12 weeks from initial visit (day 0) to final visit (12 weeks)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rosiglitazone + PlaceboMean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final VisitAST 1 (aspartate aminotransferase [10-35 U/L])24.00 mg/dlStandard Deviation 11.091
Rosiglitazone + PlaceboMean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final VisitAST 12 (aspartate aminotransferase [15-37 U/L])30.29 mg/dlStandard Deviation 9.81
Rosiglitazone + PlaceboMean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final VisitALT 1 (alanine aminotransferase [6-60 U/L])28.14 mg/dlStandard Deviation 13.957
Rosiglitazone + PlaceboMean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final VisitALT 12 (alanine aminotransferase [6-60 U/L])27.43 mg/dlStandard Deviation 10.358
Fenofibrate + PlaceboMean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final VisitAST 12 (aspartate aminotransferase [15-37 U/L])26.50 mg/dlStandard Deviation 7.964
Fenofibrate + PlaceboMean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final VisitALT 1 (alanine aminotransferase [6-60 U/L])25.88 mg/dlStandard Deviation 15.394
Fenofibrate + PlaceboMean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final VisitALT 12 (alanine aminotransferase [6-60 U/L])26.38 mg/dlStandard Deviation 11.916
Fenofibrate + PlaceboMean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final VisitAST 1 (aspartate aminotransferase [10-35 U/L])25.25 mg/dlStandard Deviation 7.517
Rosiglitazone +FenofibrateMean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final VisitALT 1 (alanine aminotransferase [6-60 U/L])24.10 mg/dlStandard Deviation 10.429
Rosiglitazone +FenofibrateMean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final VisitAST 12 (aspartate aminotransferase [15-37 U/L])19.70 mg/dlStandard Deviation 2.584
Rosiglitazone +FenofibrateMean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final VisitALT 12 (alanine aminotransferase [6-60 U/L])21.10 mg/dlStandard Deviation 8.647
Rosiglitazone +FenofibrateMean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final VisitAST 1 (aspartate aminotransferase [10-35 U/L])24.30 mg/dlStandard Deviation 5.87
Placebo Therapy DailyMean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final VisitALT 12 (alanine aminotransferase [6-60 U/L])14.88 mg/dlStandard Deviation 3.523
Placebo Therapy DailyMean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final VisitAST 12 (aspartate aminotransferase [15-37 U/L])17.88 mg/dlStandard Deviation 6.139
Placebo Therapy DailyMean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final VisitAST 1 (aspartate aminotransferase [10-35 U/L])19.88 mg/dlStandard Deviation 5.249
Placebo Therapy DailyMean Levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) at Initial Visit and Final VisitALT 1 (alanine aminotransferase [6-60 U/L])20.88 mg/dlStandard Deviation 6.643
Secondary

Post-treatment Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo AI), Apolipoprotein A-II (Apo AII) and Apolipoprotein C-III (Apo CIII) Levels

Post-treatment median change in Apo AI, Apo AII and Apo CIII levels reported in mg/dL with Interquartile ranges provided

Time frame: 12 weeks from initial visit (day 0) to final visit (12 weeks)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Rosiglitazone + PlaceboPost-treatment Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo AI), Apolipoprotein A-II (Apo AII) and Apolipoprotein C-III (Apo CIII) LevelsApo AI-1.00 % Change
Rosiglitazone + PlaceboPost-treatment Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo AI), Apolipoprotein A-II (Apo AII) and Apolipoprotein C-III (Apo CIII) LevelsApo CIII0.30 % Change
Rosiglitazone + PlaceboPost-treatment Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo AI), Apolipoprotein A-II (Apo AII) and Apolipoprotein C-III (Apo CIII) LevelsApo AII10.25 % Change
Fenofibrate + PlaceboPost-treatment Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo AI), Apolipoprotein A-II (Apo AII) and Apolipoprotein C-III (Apo CIII) LevelsApo AI13 % Change
Fenofibrate + PlaceboPost-treatment Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo AI), Apolipoprotein A-II (Apo AII) and Apolipoprotein C-III (Apo CIII) LevelsApo CIII-4.35 % Change
Fenofibrate + PlaceboPost-treatment Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo AI), Apolipoprotein A-II (Apo AII) and Apolipoprotein C-III (Apo CIII) LevelsApo AII3.4 % Change
Rosiglitazone +FenofibratePost-treatment Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo AI), Apolipoprotein A-II (Apo AII) and Apolipoprotein C-III (Apo CIII) LevelsApo AII7.2 % Change
Rosiglitazone +FenofibratePost-treatment Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo AI), Apolipoprotein A-II (Apo AII) and Apolipoprotein C-III (Apo CIII) LevelsApo AI1 % Change
Rosiglitazone +FenofibratePost-treatment Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo AI), Apolipoprotein A-II (Apo AII) and Apolipoprotein C-III (Apo CIII) LevelsApo CIII-5.3 % Change
Placebo Therapy DailyPost-treatment Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo AI), Apolipoprotein A-II (Apo AII) and Apolipoprotein C-III (Apo CIII) LevelsApo AI5 % Change
Placebo Therapy DailyPost-treatment Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo AI), Apolipoprotein A-II (Apo AII) and Apolipoprotein C-III (Apo CIII) LevelsApo CIII-2.3 % Change
Placebo Therapy DailyPost-treatment Percent Change in Apolipoprotein A-I (Apo AI), Apolipoprotein A-II (Apo AII) and Apolipoprotein C-III (Apo CIII) LevelsApo AII-3.5 % Change
Secondary

Post-treatment Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Levels

The reported percent change is the difference between HDL levels obtained on initial visit (day 0) and HDL levels obtained at final visit (week 12) as per protocol

Time frame: 12 weeks from initial visit (day 0) to final visit (12 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rosiglitazone + PlaceboPost-treatment Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Levels1.9 % changeStandard Deviation 24.6
Fenofibrate + PlaceboPost-treatment Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Levels14.5 % changeStandard Deviation 21.6
Rosiglitazone +FenofibratePost-treatment Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Levels5.8 % changeStandard Deviation 16.4
Placebo Therapy DailyPost-treatment Percent Change in High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Levels1.7 % changeStandard Deviation 10.5
Secondary

Post-treatment Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Levels

The reported percent change is the difference between LDL levels obtained on initial visit (day 0) and LDL levels obtained at final visit (week 12) as per protocol

Time frame: 12 weeks from initial visit (day 0) to final visit (12 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rosiglitazone + PlaceboPost-treatment Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Levels-0.5 % changeStandard Deviation 27.4
Fenofibrate + PlaceboPost-treatment Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Levels2.6 % changeStandard Deviation 29.3
Rosiglitazone +FenofibratePost-treatment Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Levels37.3 % changeStandard Deviation 141.6
Placebo Therapy DailyPost-treatment Percent Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Levels13.7 % changeStandard Deviation 47.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026