Skip to content

Breathe for Hot Flashes Randomized Controlled Trial

Breathe-intervention for Hot Flashes, Associated Outcomes, and Interference

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00819182
Enrollment
218
Registered
2009-01-08
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2013-02-28
Last updated
2016-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hot Flashes

Keywords

Menopause, Breast Cancer, Hot Flash, Night Sweats

Brief summary

Background: Paced respiration has been internationally recommended for vasomotor symptom management despite limited empirical evidence. Objective: To evaluate efficacy of a paced respiration intervention against a sham comparator breathing control and usual care control for vasomotor and other menopausal symptoms. Design: A 16-week, 3-group, partially blinded, controlled trial with 2:2:1 randomization and stratification by group (breast cancer, no cancer), Midwestern city and surrounding area. Participants: 218 randomized women (96 breast cancer survivors, 122 menopausal women without cancer) recruited through community mailings and registries. Interventions: Training, home practice support, and instructions to use the breathing at the time of each hot flash were delivered via compact disc with printed booklet (paced respiration intervention) or digital videodisc with printed booklet (fast shallow breathing control). Usual care control received a letter regarding group assignment. Main Measures: Hot flash frequency, severity, and bother (primary), hot flash interference in daily life, perceived control over hot flashes, and mood and sleep disturbances (secondary). Intervention performance, adherence, and adverse events were assessed.

Interventions

Breathing exercise

BEHAVIORALSham comparator: fast shallow breathing

sham breathing exercise

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Indiana University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* At least 18 years of age * Reporting daily hot flashes and desirous of hot flash treatment * Peri- or post menopausal * Living within a 60-mile radius of Indianapolis or willing to drive to the center for all study visits * Able to read, write, and speak English * in good general health In addition: * Breast Cancer survivors will have a known diagnosis of non-metastatic disease * No history of other cancers * Be at least four weeks post-completion of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy

Exclusion criteria

* Known psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairments * Participation in our previous pilot study evaluating our control condition * Self-reported difficulties with normal everyday breathing * Meet criteria at baseline for number of subjective and/or objective hot flashes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hot Flash Severity16 weeksSelf-reported rating using a scale from 0 (not at all severe) to 10 (extremely severe). Calculated as 24 hour averages at 16 week timepoint.
Hot Flash Bother16 weeksSelf-reported rating using a scale from 0 (not at all bothersome) to 10 (extremely bothersome). Calculated as 24 hour averages at 16 week timepoint.
Hot Flash Frequency16 weeksProspective, real-time electronic diary used by participants for a minimum of 24 hours to a maximum of 7 days. Duration of use was determined by participant choice.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sleep Disturbance16 weeksSelf-report using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index which is composed of 19-items to assess sleep quality and disturbances during the past week. Scores range from 0-21 with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality and more sleep disturbance.
Mood Disturbance16 weeksSelf-report using the well-validated Profile of Mood States-Short Form questionnaire. Six subscales are computed. Total scores are computed using the formula Depression-Dejection + Tension-Anxiety + Anger-Hostility + Fatigue-Inertia + Confusion-Bewilderment + (24 - Vigor-Activity). Total scores range from 0 to 124 with higher scores indicating higher mood disturbance.
Hot Flash Related Daily Interference16 weeksSelf-report using well-validated, standardized questionnaire. Subject rated interference on scale items from 0 to 10. Total score range was 0-100 with higher scores indicating greater interference with daily life.
Perceived Control Over Hot Flashes16 weeksSelf-report using well-validated, standardized questionnaire composed of 15 items with response option ratings of 1-4. Scores were summed with potential range of 15-60. Lower scores indicated less control over hot flashes; higher scores indicate higher perceived control over hot flashes.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intervention Performance2 weeksPhysiological recordings of number of breaths per minute to verify correct performance of paced respiration for this participant group only. Assessment was conducted in a single visit scheduled 2 weeks post-randomization for the paced respiration group.
Intervention Adherence16 weeksNumber of breathing practice sessions per participant over the 16 week study period.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment occurred from April 1, 2009 to February 1, 2011. Participants were recruited by mass mailings to community-dwelling women and registry participants. Additionally, recruitment occurred in breast cancer and high-risk clinics in the Midwest.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Paced Respiration
The paced respiration intervention group received a compact disc with paper booklet. The booklet reinforced instructions on the first audio track for how to accomplish a target breath rate of 6-8 breaths per minute, practice twice per day for 15 minutes, and apply the breathing at the onset of each hot flash. Women were instructed to do slow, deep, abdominal breathing in through the nose and out through the mouth as per international recommendations. They were also instructed to practice twice per day for 15 minutes as per the small, laboratory-based studies. The second and third tracks contained specially composed, digitally recorded music to help entrain the breath rate and structure the length of practice.
88
Fast, Shallow Breathing
The fast, shallow comparator group received a digital videodisc with paper booklet. The booklet reinforced voice-over and video demonstration to practice twice per day and apply the fast shallow breathing at the onset of each flash.
86
Usual Care
The usual care group received an investigator-signed letter explaining they were not selected to receive any study materials during the 16-week follow-up. These participants received paced respiration materials by mail after study completion.
44
Total218

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPaced RespirationFast, Shallow BreathingTotalUsual Care
Age, Continuous53.44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.84
51.93 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.81
52.86 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.62
53.52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.68
Breast Cancer History
Breast Cancer Survivor
38 Participants38 Participants96 Participants20 Participants
Breast Cancer History
Menopausal Women with No Cancer History
50 Participants48 Participants122 Participants24 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
85 Participants86 Participants215 Participants44 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Hot Flash Bother4.52 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.72
4.78 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.72
4.66 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.64
4.69 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.32
Hot Flash Frequency7.02 Hot flashes per 24 hr
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.32
6.43 Hot flashes per 24 hr
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.96
6.84 Hot flashes per 24 hr
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.12
7.31 Hot flashes per 24 hr
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.04
Hot Flash Related Daily Interference3.99 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.35
4.58 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.46
4.32 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.43
4.51 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.61
Hot Flash Severity4.50 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
5.23 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.58
5.17 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.53
5.40 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.26
Mood Disturbance40.08 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.77
47.17 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.03
43.03 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.86
39.50 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.47
Perceived Control Over Hot Flashes37.38 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.68
37.48 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
37.57 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
37.95 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.64
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
23 Participants21 Participants56 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
61 Participants62 Participants155 Participants32 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
88 participants86 participants218 participants44 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
88 Participants86 Participants218 Participants44 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sleep Disturbance7.38 Global sleep quality score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.23
8.59 Global sleep quality score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.59
7.99 Global sleep quality score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
8.14 Global sleep quality score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.66

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 880 / 860 / 44
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 880 / 860 / 44

Outcome results

Primary

Hot Flash Bother

Self-reported rating using a scale from 0 (not at all bothersome) to 10 (extremely bothersome). Calculated as 24 hour averages at 16 week timepoint.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Analysis based on all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paced RespirationHot Flash Bother3.89 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
Fast, Shallow BreathingHot Flash Bother4.22 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
Usual CareHot Flash Bother4.76 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
Primary

Hot Flash Frequency

Prospective, real-time electronic diary used by participants for a minimum of 24 hours to a maximum of 7 days. Duration of use was determined by participant choice.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Analysis based on all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paced RespirationHot Flash Frequency3.48 Hot flashes per 24 hrStandard Deviation 3.45
Fast, Shallow BreathingHot Flash Frequency3.95 Hot flashes per 24 hrStandard Deviation 4.19
Usual CareHot Flash Frequency4.76 Hot flashes per 24 hrStandard Deviation 3.54
Primary

Hot Flash Severity

Self-reported rating using a scale from 0 (not at all severe) to 10 (extremely severe). Calculated as 24 hour averages at 16 week timepoint.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Analysis based on all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paced RespirationHot Flash Severity4.33 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.06
Fast, Shallow BreathingHot Flash Severity4.65 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.07
Usual CareHot Flash Severity5.20 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Secondary

Hot Flash Related Daily Interference

Self-report using well-validated, standardized questionnaire. Subject rated interference on scale items from 0 to 10. Total score range was 0-100 with higher scores indicating greater interference with daily life.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Analysis based on all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paced RespirationHot Flash Related Daily Interference2.75 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
Fast, Shallow BreathingHot Flash Related Daily Interference3.41 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.54
Usual CareHot Flash Related Daily Interference3.93 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.15
Secondary

Mood Disturbance

Self-report using the well-validated Profile of Mood States-Short Form questionnaire. Six subscales are computed. Total scores are computed using the formula Depression-Dejection + Tension-Anxiety + Anger-Hostility + Fatigue-Inertia + Confusion-Bewilderment + (24 - Vigor-Activity). Total scores range from 0 to 124 with higher scores indicating higher mood disturbance.

Time frame: 16 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paced RespirationMood Disturbance38.26 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.79
Fast, Shallow BreathingMood Disturbance40.13 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.32
Usual CareMood Disturbance43.48 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.37
Secondary

Perceived Control Over Hot Flashes

Self-report using well-validated, standardized questionnaire composed of 15 items with response option ratings of 1-4. Scores were summed with potential range of 15-60. Lower scores indicated less control over hot flashes; higher scores indicate higher perceived control over hot flashes.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Analysis based on all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paced RespirationPerceived Control Over Hot Flashes42.67 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.51
Fast, Shallow BreathingPerceived Control Over Hot Flashes42.69 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.69
Usual CarePerceived Control Over Hot Flashes39.60 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.73
Secondary

Sleep Disturbance

Self-report using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index which is composed of 19-items to assess sleep quality and disturbances during the past week. Scores range from 0-21 with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality and more sleep disturbance.

Time frame: 16 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paced RespirationSleep Disturbance6.81 Global Sleep Disturbance ScoreStandard Deviation 3.37
Fast, Shallow BreathingSleep Disturbance7.66 Global Sleep Disturbance ScoreStandard Deviation 3.15
Usual CareSleep Disturbance8.23 Global Sleep Disturbance ScoreStandard Deviation 3.82
Other Pre-specified

Intervention Adherence

Number of breathing practice sessions per participant over the 16 week study period.

Time frame: 16 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paced RespirationIntervention Adherence109.83 Total practice sessions in 16 weeksStandard Deviation 67.76
Fast, Shallow BreathingIntervention Adherence133.93 Total practice sessions in 16 weeksStandard Deviation 78.27
Other Pre-specified

Intervention Performance

Physiological recordings of number of breaths per minute to verify correct performance of paced respiration for this participant group only. Assessment was conducted in a single visit scheduled 2 weeks post-randomization for the paced respiration group.

Time frame: 2 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paced RespirationIntervention Performance7.35 Breaths Per MinuteStandard Deviation 2.45
Other Pre-specified

Intervention Performance

Physiological recordings of number of breaths per minute to verify correct performance of paced respiration for this participant group only. Assessment was conducted at the week 16 post-randomization timepoint.

Time frame: 16 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Paced RespirationIntervention Performance6.97 Breaths Per MinuteStandard Deviation 1.92

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026