Skip to content

Investigation of Transvenous Versus Epicardial Left Ventricular Stimulation Technique

INvestigation of TRansvenous Versus EPIcarDial Left Ventricular Stimulation Technique

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00819117
Acronym
INTREPID
Enrollment
20
Registered
2009-01-08
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2009-10-31
Last updated
2019-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

Epicardial leads, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that epicardial and transvenous left ventricular leads are safe and effective for cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients implanted with a CRT device.

Detailed description

This clinical trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel, open study designed to compare epicardial left ventricular pacing to transvenous left ventricular pacing for delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy. After a pre-implant baseline evaluation, patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of two groups: * Control group: resynchronization via a transvenous left ventricular lead (TVN CRT); * Treatment group: resynchronization via an epicardial left ventricular lead (EPI CRT). All patients taking part in this study will undergo the implantation of a CRT device with or without ICD back-up (depending on the physician's decision), with right atrial and right ventricular transvenous leads. Patients will attend protocol scheduled visits before implant (pre-implant baseline evaluation), and post-implant: before hospital discharge, 6 weeks post-implant (optional visit), 3 months (optional visit), and 6 months after implant, time of study termination.

Interventions

DEVICECardiac Resynchronization Therapy implant

Device implant with appropriate leads

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have an approved indication for implantation of an CRT device (ESC guidelines , including any update); * Have a stable pharmacological therapy.

Exclusion criteria

* Have a contra-indication to general anesthesia; * Have a scheduled cardiac surgery; * Have had a recent myocardial infarction, unstable angina or cardiac revascularization (PTCA or CABG) within 1 month of enrollment; * Have a life expectancy of less than 6 months; * Are unable to provide informed consent; * Are unable to comply with the follow-up schedule and tests; * Are minor (age below 18 years); * Are pregnant or are planning for pregnancy in the next 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The efficacy will be evaluated by comparing the pacing thresholds at 6 months between the two groups. The safety will be evaluated by comparing the survival from lead-related complications at 6 months between the two groups.6 months follow up after implant

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026