Skip to content

Randomized Comparison of xiEnce and visioN Coronary Stents in the sAme muLtivessel Patient With Chronic kiDnEy diSease

A Multicenter, Randomized Trial to Compare Xience and Vision Coronary Stents in the Same Multivessel Patient With Chronic Kidney Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00818792
Acronym
RENAL-DES
Enrollment
215
Registered
2009-01-08
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2013-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease, Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Percutaneous coronary intervention, Drug-eluting stent, Chronic kidney disease, Restenosis

Brief summary

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bare metal stent (BMS) in patients with renal insufficiency has shown unsatisfactory results. Indeed, drug-eluting stents (DES) might reduce the incidence of restenosis and therefore of target lesion revascularization procedures in these patients. We therefore designed a prospective, randomized, multicenter, not-sponsored study to directly compare the efficacy in the prevention of clinical restenosis of everolimus-eluting stent (Xience V) and bare-metal stent (Vision) (both 2nd-generation DES and BMS, respectively), both implanted in the same patient with multivessel disease and renal insufficiency in order to obviate for the multiple and unpredictable characteristics of this high-risk population.

Interventions

Comparison of bare-metal stent (Vision) and drug-eluting stent (Xience V)

Sponsors

European Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* chronic renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \<60 ml/min, in dialysis patients included) with at least two significant (\>70%) coronary lesions in two major coronary vessels.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \>85 years * left main coronary artery disease * saphenous vein graft disease * ST-elevation MI (\<3 days) * coronary vessel diameter \<2.5 or \> 4 mm * contraindication to long-term double antiplatelet therapy * CABG indication by consensus (cardiovascular team) * severe valvular heart disease * informed consent not obtained

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization9 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of death and myocardial infarctionin-hospital, 30 days, 9 and 12 months

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026