Skip to content

Can Presumptive Anthelminthic Treatment Delay the Progression of HIV in ART-naïve Patients in Rural Africa?

Can Anthelminthic Treatment Delay the Progression of HIV? Randomised Open-label Trial Testing Presumptive Anthelminthic Treatment on Progression of HIV in ART-naïve HIV-positive Patients in a Rural African Setting With Presumed High Prevalence of Helminth Infections.

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00817713
Enrollment
295
Registered
2009-01-06
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2010-09-30
Last updated
2011-02-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Helminthiasis, HIV Infections

Keywords

Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Helminthiasis, treatment naive, co-infection, immune modulation

Brief summary

This study focuses on one of the major health issues of Sub-Saharan Africa: multi-parasitism and co-infections. In particular this study aims to elucidate the interaction of helminths with HIV. There is good reason to suspect a detrimental effect of helminth infection on the course of HIV infection. We hypothesize, that treatment of helminths in HIV- and helminth co-infected individuals leads to a reduction of HIV viral load. With a lower HIV RNA level one would expect a slower decline of CD4 cells and hence also a slower progression of the disease. Ideally this would lead to a prolongation of the chronic phase of HIV infection and to a delay in the time when anti-retroviral treatment needs to be started.

Detailed description

\* Background: On the basis of immunological considerations and in vitro trials on co-infections there is strong reason to suspect a detrimental effect of helminth infection on the course of HIV. The immunological answer very efficiently evoked by helminth infection is aimed at hijacking and suppressing the immune system in order to suit the requirements of the specific helminth. This permits helminths to cause chronic infection, often persisting over years and allowing some infecting worms to grow to several centimetres of length within their host. However, this immune modulation also affects non-related antigens (for example HIV) which would actually require a different line of immunological action. Some clinical trials have been able to confirm this detrimental effect of helminths on HIV infection, while other trials failed to do so. A recent Cochrane review on clinical trials with HIV and helminth co-infection found an overall slight reduction of HIV viral load if helminth infection was treated. However there was no measurable effect on CD4 count or clinical staging of HIV. This might be explained by the fact that these trials were very heterogeneous in their set-up and were run for too short a time (max 6 months) to allow sufficient answers to these questions. According to mathematical models, even a relatively modest reduction of HIV RNA by 0.5 log could delay the need to start combined antiretroviral therapy by about 3.5 years and potentially prolong the symptom-free phase of HIV-infection by nearly 1 year. On a population scale this could lead to substantial savings with regard to drug and clinical costs and on an individual level to an invaluable gain in drug-free and ideally also symptom-free life years. * Objective: To assess the impact of presumptive anthelminthic treatment on HIV progression in patients infected with HIV in a rural setting with presumed high prevalence of helminth infection. * Methods: Randomised open-label trial of presumptive triple anthelminthic treatment in HIV positive patients not yet requiring anti-retroviral treatment.

Interventions

DRUGPraziquantel, Ivermectin, Albendazole

Standard HIV care plus triple anthelminthic treatment * Praziquantel 2400mg single dose * Ivermectin 12 mg, single dose * Albendazole 400mg, 2 doses in 1 day All drugs given at baseline, after 6 months and after 12 months.

Sponsors

Ifakara Health Research and Development Centre
CollaboratorOTHER
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
CollaboratorOTHER
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HIV-positive patients * most recent CD4-count \> 250 c/μl (latest within the previous 7 months) * anti-retroviral treatment naïve * age \>18 years * provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant and lactating women in the first week of lactation * Symptoms of severe anemia (or haemoglobin \<5g/dl within the precious 3 months) * Symptoms of chronic diarrhea (defined as \>= 3 stools per day of loose consistency for more than 2 weeks) * Patients on treatment for tuberculosis * WHO clinical stage 3 disease and CD4-count \<350 c/μl * WHO clinical stage 4 disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in HIV viral load between intervention and control armone year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in CD4 counts between intervention and control armone year
Difference in time to meet criteria for the initiation of anti-retroviral treatmentone year
occurrence of severe adverse eventsone year

Countries

Tanzania

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026