Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of a Retinoid in the Treatment of Severe Chronic Hand Eczema

Efficacy and Safety of Alitretinoin in the Treatment of Severe Chronic Hand Eczema Refractory to Topical Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00817063
Acronym
HANDEL
Enrollment
599
Registered
2009-01-06
Start date
2009-01-08
Completion date
2012-04-26
Last updated
2020-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eczema

Keywords

retinoid treatment, fingertip dermatitis, hyperkeratotic hand eczema, vesicular hand eczema, pompholyx

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of alitretinoin in the treatment of severe chronic hand eczema that does not respond to treatment with potent topical steroids.

Detailed description

Chronic hand eczema (CHE)is a distressing disease that poses difficult problems for dermatologists. CHE leads to considerable work-absenteeism, disability and exclusion from labour market. Conventional treatments, including highly potent topical steroids, yield often unsatisfactory results. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of oral alitretinoin, a retinoid, in patients who have not responded to avoidance of causative factors, such as contact allergens and skin irritants, non-medicated skin care and highly potent topical steroids. Eligible patients are randomly assigned to receive alitretinoin or a placebo.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Patients receive matching placebo for up to 24 weeks

Patients receive alitretinoin 30mg one capsule daily for up to 24 weeks

Sponsors

Basilea Pharmaceutica
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Stiefel, a GSK Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* all types of chronic hand eczema, lasting for at least 6 months since initial diagnosis * rated as severe by the physician * unresponsive to highly potent topical corticosteroids, such as clobetasol

Exclusion criteria

* patients whose disease is adequately controlled by standard non-medicated therapy, including potent topical steroids, skin moisturizers, and avoidance of allergens and irritants * patients with known allergens and irritants, who have not made a reasonable effort to avoid the substances * patients with psoriasis lesions * active fungal, bacterial or viral infections of the hands * female patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding * female patients of childbearing potential who cannot use or will not commit to use two effective methods of contraception

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Responded as Per Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24Week 24 (end-of-treatment)The investigator assigned PGA grades according to a 5-point scale (clear \[not detectable\], almost clear \[less than 10% of affected hand surface\], mild disease \[less than 10% of affected hand surface\], moderate disease \[10% to 30% of affected hand surface\], severe disease \[\>30% of affected hand surface\]). PGA ratings were based on an integrated clinical picture of signs, symptoms, and the extent of disease. Symptoms included erythema, scaling, hyperkeratosis/lichenification, vesiculation, edema, fissures, and pruritus/pain. The PGA scale ranges from 0 (no symptom) to 4 (severe disease). Participants were considered as responders when they had a PGA of clear or almost clear.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Responded as Per Patient Global Assessment (PaGA) at End-of-treatmentWeek 24 (end-of-treatment)At Week 24 or at the end-of-treatment participants were asked by the investigator to grade their overall change from Baseline by selecting one of the following descriptions, which best matched their perception of overall treatment effect: cleared or almost cleared (at least 90% clearing), marked improvement (at least 75% clearing), moderate improvement (at least 50% clearing), mild improvement (at least 25% clearing), no change and worsening. Participants were considered as responders when the PaGa was cleared or almost cleared.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Extent of Disease at End-of-treatmentBaseline (Week 0) and Week 24 (end-of-treatment)The extent of disease was estimated as the percentage of hand area (with 100% defined as the palmar and dorsal aspects) affected by eczema at Baseline, and at the end of treatment). Extent of disease was estimated separately for the left and right hands, and the overall extent of disease for both hands was calculated as (Left+Right)/2. Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values. Percentage change from Baseline = (change from Baseline / Baseline value) \* 100.
Response Duration for Responding Participants at the End-of-therapyUp to 72 Weeks (including 24 weeks of treatment and 48 weeks of follow-up)Response Duration was defined as time from the end-of-therapy to the first diagnosis of mild, moderate, or severe CHE. Median and inter-quartile range has been presented.
Time to Relapse for Responding Participants at the End-of-therapyUp to 72 Weeks (including 24 weeks of treatment and 48 weeks of follow-up)Time to relapse was defined as the time from end-of-therapy to the first diagnosis of severe CHE. Median and inter-quartile range has been presented. The median was based on the very last participant having a follow-up period longer than expected, those explaining the high median.
Time to Response for Responding Participants at End-of-therapyUp to 72 Weeks (including 24 weeks of treatment and 48 weeks of follow-up)Time to response was defined as time from start of treatment to first PGA assessment of clear or almost clear. Median and inter-quartile range has been presented.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Treatment PeriodUp to Week 24 (end-of-treatment)An AE was defined as any adverse change from the participant's Baseline (pretreatment) clinical condition, including intercurrent illness, which occurred during the course of the clinical study after written informed consent had been given, whether considered related to treatment or not. A treatment-emergent AE was defined as any adverse change that occurred after treatment started and up to 7 days after last treatment. An SAE was any experience that suggested a significant hazard, contradiction, side effect or precaution. It was any adverse event that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeUp to Week 28Blood samples were collected for the assessment of laboratory parameters hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, reticulocytes, platelets, white blood cell, lymphocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, total bilirubin, bilirubin conjugated (direct), aspartate amino transferase (AST), alanine amino transferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine phosphokinase (CPK), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total protein, serum albumin, glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, sodium, potassium, chloride, serum calcium, serum phosphate, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/urea, uric acid, Free thyroxin and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) at Baseline and every 4 weeks of treatment period and Week 28 of follow up period. Data for participants with values outside the marked reference range are reported.
Number of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksUp to Week 24The BSI is a 53 item self-report scale used to measure nine primary symptom dimensions (somatization, obsessive-compulsive behavior, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism). Respondents rank each feeling item (e.g., your feelings being easily hurt) on a 5-point scale where, 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=moderately, 3=quite a bit, 4=extremely (0 indicates best outcome and 4 indicates worst outcome). The total score ranged from 0 (best outcome) to 212 (worse outcome). Participants with an increase above Baseline of 25% or more on any domain subscore in BSI-53, or with an increase above Baseline of \>=2 points or a score \>=3 on any BSI-53 item that reflects depression, suicidality, psychotic symptoms, and hostility/aggression, were to be referred to a psychiatrist within 2 weeks.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Modified Total Lesion Symptom Score (mTLSS) at the End-of-treatmentBaseline (Week 0) and Week 24 (end-of-treatment)A 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) was used to grade 7 signs or symptoms of CHE. The mTLSS was calculated as sum of assigned scores for the symptoms of erythema, scaling, lichenification/hyperkeratosis, vesiculation, edema, fissures and Pruritus/Pain. The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 21 (worst). Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values. Percentage change from Baseline = (change from Baseline / Baseline value) \* 100. Data for Week 24 last observation carried forward (LOCF) has been presented.
Number of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksUp to 28 WeeksParticipants meeting any of the following criteria were to be referred for specialist psychiatric evaluation within 2 weeks: PHQ-9 Score \>=15, Two Subsequent Scores of \>=10 and PHQ-9 Question 9 \>=1. The PHQ -9 was a standardized tests of mood/depression. This was a nine item measure with a response for each item between 0-3 where, 0=not at all, 1= several days, 2= more than half the days, 3= nearly everyday. Total scores on this measure range from 0-27, with 0 being a minimum indicating no depressive symptoms, and 27 being the maximum number and severity of depressive symptoms. Only categories with data available at the indicated time points have been presented. Categories with null values for all the arms have not been presented.
Change From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) Over 24 WeeksBaseline (Week 0) and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24HHIE-S assessed participants by handicap category: no handicap (0 to 8 points); mild/moderate handicap (10 to 24 points); severe handicap (26-40 points). Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values.
Change From Baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Over 24 WeeksBaseline (Week 0) and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24DHI assessed participants by handicap category: no handicap (0 to 14 points); mild handicap (16 to 34 points); moderate handicap (36 to 52 points); severe handicap (54 points). Increase from Baseline of \<6 points, 6 to \<12 points and 12 points. Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values.
Number of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksUp to Week 24Participants who developed tinnitus were monitored by use of the TOMI. The numbers of participants with pre-existing tinnitus, new tinnitus, increased/decreased loudness of tinnitus, or increased/decreased duration of tinnitus, pulsing quality of tinnitus were assessed.
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Over 72 WeeksBaseline (Week 0) and Week 72Bone mineral density scans of the left proximal femur (total hip) and anterior-posterior lumbar spine were obtained by use of DXA, at Baseline, at end of therapy, and 1 year (48 weeks) after end of therapy. In case of abnormality or surgery of the left hip, the right hip was to be used. If both hips were affected, the participant was not eligible for DXA. Vertebrae L1 to L4 had to be completely scanned. At least 3 vertebrae had to be free of any abnormalities potentially interfering with DXA analysis (eg, fractures, large osteophytes), otherwise the participant was not eligible for DXA. Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values. Percentage change from Baseline = (change from Baseline / Baseline value) \* 100. Least square means and 95% confidence interval has been presented.
Number of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesUp to Week 72X-ray evaluations was done at Baseline (Week 0), end of therapy and at follow up period (Week 72). X-ray evaluations was done for Lateral C-Spine, Lateral T-Spine and Calcaneous. The images were evaluated as optimal, readable (but not optimal) or not readable.
Number of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureUp to Week 24An adverse change was defined as a change from normal at Baseline to abnormal at end of therapy, or as a worsening from Baseline for either or both eyes. A missing adverse change was defined as missing results at Baseline and end of therapy, or missing result at Baseline and abnormal at end of therapy, or normal at Baseline and missing result at end of therapy, or abnormal at Baseline and missing result at end of therapy, for both eyes or one eye when the other eye was not concerned by an adverse change. Other changes from Baseline to end of therapy was considered as no adverse change. Optic disc, macula, and retinal periphery were assessed by fundoscopy after pupil dilation using tropicamide.
Number of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyUp to Week 24An adverse change was defined as a change from normal at Baseline to abnormal at end of therapy. A missing adverse change was defined as missing results at Baseline and end of therapy, or missing result at Baseline and abnormal at end of therapy, or normal at Baseline and missing result at end of therapy. Other changes from Baseline to end of therapy are considered as no adverse change. All puretone testing used a modified Hughson-Westlake procedure with 5 decibel (dB) step size.
Change From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 WeeksBaseline (Week 0) and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28The PHQ-9 was a standardized tests of mood/depression. This was a nine item measure with a response for each item between 0-3 where, 0=not at all, 1= several days, 2= more than half the days, 3= nearly every day. Total scores on this measure range from 0-27, with 0 being a minimum indicating no depressive symptoms, and 27 being the maximum number and severity of depressive symptoms. Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 599 participants were randomized, out of these 3 participants did not receive study medication, hence Intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of 596 participants which included all randomized participants who were dispensed medication.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 942 participants entered the run-in period for a maximum of 16 weeks who received class 1 corticosteroids for 2 weeks followed by corticosteroids of any potency. Out of 942 participants, 343 participants were run-in failures and hence 599 were randomized in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Alitretinoin 30 mg
Participants with severe CHE rated as refractory during the run-in period were randomized to receive 30 mg of alitretinoin oral soft capsule once daily up to 24 weeks.
298
Placebo
Participants with severe CHE rated as refractory during the run-in period were randomized to receive matching Placebo oral soft capsule once daily up to 24 weeks.
298
Total596

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAbnormality of Laboratory Test21
Overall StudyAdministrative104
Overall StudyAdverse Event3213
Overall StudyDeath11
Overall StudyEarly Improvement194
Overall StudyFailure to Return1312
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy3386
Overall StudyProtocol Violation38
Overall StudyViolation of Selection at Entry74
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1737

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalAlitretinoin 30 mg
Age, Continuous47.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.96
47.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.75
47.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.55
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
15 Participants21 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
35 Participants54 Participants19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants20 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
238 Participants501 Participants263 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
149 Participants282 Participants133 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
149 Participants314 Participants165 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 2962 / 298
other
Total, other adverse events
108 / 29636 / 298
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 2963 / 298

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Responded as Per Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24

The investigator assigned PGA grades according to a 5-point scale (clear \[not detectable\], almost clear \[less than 10% of affected hand surface\], mild disease \[less than 10% of affected hand surface\], moderate disease \[10% to 30% of affected hand surface\], severe disease \[\>30% of affected hand surface\]). PGA ratings were based on an integrated clinical picture of signs, symptoms, and the extent of disease. Symptoms included erythema, scaling, hyperkeratosis/lichenification, vesiculation, edema, fissures, and pruritus/pain. The PGA scale ranges from 0 (no symptom) to 4 (severe disease). Participants were considered as responders when they had a PGA of clear or almost clear.

Time frame: Week 24 (end-of-treatment)

Population: ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Who Responded as Per Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24Clear58 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Who Responded as Per Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24Almost clear60 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Who Responded as Per Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24Total118 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Responded as Per Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24Clear14 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Responded as Per Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24Almost clear30 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Responded as Per Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) at Week 24Total44 Participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.55, 5.62]Chi-squared, Corrected
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [18, 31.7]Chi-squared, Corrected
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Over 24 Weeks

DHI assessed participants by handicap category: no handicap (0 to 14 points); mild handicap (16 to 34 points); moderate handicap (36 to 52 points); severe handicap (54 points). Increase from Baseline of \<6 points, 6 to \<12 points and 12 points. Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Over 24 WeeksWeek 12-0.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 3.78
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Over 24 WeeksWeek 240.7 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 5.72
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Over 24 WeeksWeek 4-0.3 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Over 24 WeeksWeek 200.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.34
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Over 24 WeeksWeek 160.1 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.38
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Over 24 WeeksWeek 8-0.5 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.68
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Over 24 WeeksWeek 240.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Over 24 WeeksWeek 8-0.1 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Over 24 WeeksWeek 12-0.1 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Over 24 WeeksWeek 16-0.1 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Over 24 WeeksWeek 20-0.1 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Over 24 WeeksWeek 40.3 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) Over 24 Weeks

HHIE-S assessed participants by handicap category: no handicap (0 to 8 points); mild/moderate handicap (10 to 24 points); severe handicap (26-40 points). Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) Over 24 WeeksWeek 4-0.0 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) Over 24 WeeksWeek 8-0.1 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) Over 24 WeeksWeek 12-0.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) Over 24 WeeksWeek 16-0.1 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) Over 24 WeeksWeek 20-0.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) Over 24 WeeksWeek 24-0.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) Over 24 WeeksWeek 20-0.1 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) Over 24 WeeksWeek 4-0.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) Over 24 WeeksWeek 16-0.1 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) Over 24 WeeksWeek 8-0.1 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) Over 24 WeeksWeek 24-0.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) Over 24 WeeksWeek 12-0.1 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 Weeks

The PHQ-9 was a standardized tests of mood/depression. This was a nine item measure with a response for each item between 0-3 where, 0=not at all, 1= several days, 2= more than half the days, 3= nearly every day. Total scores on this measure range from 0-27, with 0 being a minimum indicating no depressive symptoms, and 27 being the maximum number and severity of depressive symptoms. Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28

Population: Safety population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 WeeksWeek 8-0.6 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.35
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 WeeksWeek 16-0.9 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 WeeksWeek 28-0.6 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 WeeksWeek 20-1.0 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 WeeksWeek 12-0.9 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.27
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 WeeksWeek 24-0.8 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
Alitretinoin 30 mgChange From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 WeeksWeek 4-0.3 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 WeeksWeek 24-0.6 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.59
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 WeeksWeek 28-0.6 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 WeeksWeek 4-0.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 WeeksWeek 8-0.6 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 WeeksWeek 12-0.9 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 WeeksWeek 16-0.9 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.79
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Score Over 28 WeeksWeek 20-1.2 Score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
Secondary

Number of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 Weeks

Participants meeting any of the following criteria were to be referred for specialist psychiatric evaluation within 2 weeks: PHQ-9 Score \>=15, Two Subsequent Scores of \>=10 and PHQ-9 Question 9 \>=1. The PHQ -9 was a standardized tests of mood/depression. This was a nine item measure with a response for each item between 0-3 where, 0=not at all, 1= several days, 2= more than half the days, 3= nearly everyday. Total scores on this measure range from 0-27, with 0 being a minimum indicating no depressive symptoms, and 27 being the maximum number and severity of depressive symptoms. Only categories with data available at the indicated time points have been presented. Categories with null values for all the arms have not been presented.

Time frame: Up to 28 Weeks

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 20, PHQ-9 Question 9 >=11 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 8, Referred to a Psychiatrist1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 8, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist3 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 12, Two Subsequent Scores of >=100 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 24, PHQ-9 Score >=151 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 24, Two Subsequent Scores of >=100 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 28, PHQ-9 Question 9 >=12 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 28, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist3 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 4, PHQ-9 Score >=152 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 4, Two Subsequent Scores of >=103 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 4, PHQ-9 Question 9 >=13 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 4, Referred to a Psychiatrist3 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 4, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 8, Two Subsequent Scores of >=101 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 8, PHQ-9 Question 9 >=14 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 12, PHQ-9 Question 9 >=12 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 12, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist2 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 16, PHQ-9 Score >=151 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 16, PHQ-9 Question 9 >=12 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 16, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist2 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 20, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 24, PHQ-9 Question 9 >=11 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 24, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist2 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 28, PHQ-9 Score >=152 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 28, Two Subsequent Scores of >=102 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 28, Two Subsequent Scores of >=100 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 4, Referred to a Psychiatrist2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 8, PHQ-9 Question 9 >=11 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 8, Referred to a Psychiatrist1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 12, Two Subsequent Scores of >=101 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 8, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 20, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 12, PHQ-9 Question 9 >=10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 28, PHQ-9 Score >=150 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 24, PHQ-9 Score >=150 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 12, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 24, Two Subsequent Scores of >=101 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 24, PHQ-9 Question 9 >=12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 28, PHQ-9 Question 9 >=10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 16, PHQ-9 Score >=150 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 28, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 4, PHQ-9 Score >=150 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 16, PHQ-9 Question 9 >=10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 24, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 4, PHQ-9 Question 9 >=13 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 16, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 4, Two Subsequent Scores of >=102 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 4, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 20, PHQ-9 Question 9 >=10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Meeting the Referral Criteria of Psychiatric Evaluation Over 28 WeeksWeek 8, Two Subsequent Scores of >=102 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 Weeks

The BSI is a 53 item self-report scale used to measure nine primary symptom dimensions (somatization, obsessive-compulsive behavior, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism). Respondents rank each feeling item (e.g., your feelings being easily hurt) on a 5-point scale where, 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=moderately, 3=quite a bit, 4=extremely (0 indicates best outcome and 4 indicates worst outcome). The total score ranged from 0 (best outcome) to 212 (worse outcome). Participants with an increase above Baseline of 25% or more on any domain subscore in BSI-53, or with an increase above Baseline of \>=2 points or a score \>=3 on any BSI-53 item that reflects depression, suicidality, psychotic symptoms, and hostility/aggression, were to be referred to a psychiatrist within 2 weeks.

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: Safety population. Only those participants meeting the criteria of referring to psychiatrist were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 28, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist8 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 4, Referred to a Psychiatrist47 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 4, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist14 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 8, Referred to a Psychiatrist19 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 8, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist23 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 12, Referred to a Psychiatrist10 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 12, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist21 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 16, Referred to a Psychiatrist11 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 16, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist11 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 20, Referred to a Psychiatrist6 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 20, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist10 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 24, Referred to a Psychiatrist10 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 24, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist25 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 28, Referred to a Psychiatrist2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 20, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 28, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist16 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 16, Referred to a Psychiatrist4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 4, Referred to a Psychiatrist34 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 24, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist30 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 4, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist24 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 16, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 8, Referred to a Psychiatrist10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 24, Referred to a Psychiatrist9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 8, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 20, Referred to a Psychiatrist1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 12, Referred to a Psychiatrist9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 28, Referred to a Psychiatrist1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Referred or Not Referred to a Psychiatrist as Per Brief Summary Inventory (BSI) 53 Questionnaire up to 24 WeeksWeek 12, Not Referred to a Psychiatrist12 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 Weeks

Participants who developed tinnitus were monitored by use of the TOMI. The numbers of participants with pre-existing tinnitus, new tinnitus, increased/decreased loudness of tinnitus, or increased/decreased duration of tinnitus, pulsing quality of tinnitus were assessed.

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksAmount of TimeTinnitus PresentChanged,Yeslessoften1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksPersistent TInnitus since treatment, yes16 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksType of Tinnitus, Ringing11 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksType of Tinnitus, Buzzing3 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksType of Tinnitus, Hissing1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksType of Tinnitus, Whistle1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksType of Tinnitus, Hum3 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksType of Tinnitus, Other0 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus - Pulsing Quality, Yes3 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus Location, Left Ear only2 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus Location, Right Ear only4 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus Location, Both ears7 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus Location, Inside head2 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus Location, Other0 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus Louder on right side of head5 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus Louder on left side of head2 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus Equal on both side of head7 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksSlightly loud tinnitus3 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksModerately loud tinnitus6 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHow much of Time Tinnitus Present, Occasionally4 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHow much of Time Tinnitus Present,Some of the Time3 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHow much of Time Tinnitus Present,Most of the Time5 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHow much of Time Tinnitus Present,Always3 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHow much of a Problem is Tinnitus, Slight5 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHow much of a Problem is Tinnitus, Moderate2 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHow much of a Problem is Tinnitus, Big1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHas the Sound of Tinnitus Changed, Yes1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHas Loudness of Tinnitus Changed,Yes,Louder Now1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHas Loudness of Tinnitus Changed,Yes,Quieter Now1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksAmount of TimeTinnitus PresentChanged,Yesmoreoften1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus Louder on left side of head0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHow much of a Problem is Tinnitus, Slight1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksPersistent TInnitus since treatment, yes5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus Equal on both side of head3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksType of Tinnitus, Ringing2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHas Loudness of Tinnitus Changed,Yes,Louder Now0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksType of Tinnitus, Buzzing0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksSlightly loud tinnitus0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksType of Tinnitus, Hissing0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHow much of a Problem is Tinnitus, Moderate0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksType of Tinnitus, Whistle1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksModerately loud tinnitus1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksType of Tinnitus, Hum0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksAmount of TimeTinnitus PresentChanged,Yesmoreoften0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksType of Tinnitus, Other2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHow much of Time Tinnitus Present, Occasionally3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus - Pulsing Quality, Yes0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHow much of a Problem is Tinnitus, Big0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus Location, Left Ear only0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHow much of Time Tinnitus Present,Some of the Time0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus Location, Right Ear only1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHas Loudness of Tinnitus Changed,Yes,Quieter Now0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus Location, Both ears1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHow much of Time Tinnitus Present,Most of the Time0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus Location, Inside head2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHas the Sound of Tinnitus Changed, Yes0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus Location, Other1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksHow much of Time Tinnitus Present,Always1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksTinnitus Louder on right side of head1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Responding to Tinnitus Ototoxicity Monitoring Interview (TOMI) Questionnaire Over 24 WeeksAmount of TimeTinnitus PresentChanged,Yeslessoften1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Responded as Per Patient Global Assessment (PaGA) at End-of-treatment

At Week 24 or at the end-of-treatment participants were asked by the investigator to grade their overall change from Baseline by selecting one of the following descriptions, which best matched their perception of overall treatment effect: cleared or almost cleared (at least 90% clearing), marked improvement (at least 75% clearing), moderate improvement (at least 50% clearing), mild improvement (at least 25% clearing), no change and worsening. Participants were considered as responders when the PaGa was cleared or almost cleared.

Time frame: Week 24 (end-of-treatment)

Population: ITT Population.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants Who Responded as Per Patient Global Assessment (PaGA) at End-of-treatment117 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Responded as Per Patient Global Assessment (PaGA) at End-of-treatment41 Participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.71, 6.07]Chi-squared, Corrected
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [18.7, 32.3]Chi-squared, Corrected
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of Bones

X-ray evaluations was done at Baseline (Week 0), end of therapy and at follow up period (Week 72). X-ray evaluations was done for Lateral C-Spine, Lateral T-Spine and Calcaneous. The images were evaluated as optimal, readable (but not optimal) or not readable.

Time frame: Up to Week 72

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants who had X-ray evaluations were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesBaseline, Calcaneous, Not Readable1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesEnd of Therapy, Calcaneous, Readable40 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesBaseline,Lateral T-Spine,Not Readable15 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesEnd of Therapy, Calcaneous, Not Readable8 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesEnd of Therapy,Lateral C-Spine,Optimal80 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Lateral C-Spine, Optimal39 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesBaseline,Lateral C-Spine,Readable171 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Lateral C-Spine, Readable151 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesEnd of Therapy,Lateral C-Spine,Readable162 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Lateral C-Spine, Not Readable0 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesBaseline, Calcaneous, Optimal195 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Lateral C-Spine, Missing54 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesEnd of Therapy,Lateral C-Spine, Not Readable2 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Lateral T-Spine, Readable183 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesBaseline,Lateral T-Spine,Readable229 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Lateral T-Spine, Not Readable7 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesEnd of Therapy, Lateral T-Spine, Readable232 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Lateral T-Spine, Missing54 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesBaseline, Calcaneous, Readable48 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Calcaneous, Optimal141 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesEnd of Therapy, Lateral T-Spine, Not Readable12 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Calcaneous, Not Readable6 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesBaseline,Lateral C-Spine, Optimal73 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Calcaneous, Missing54 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesEnd of Therapy, Calcaneous, Optimal196 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Calcaneous, Readable43 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Lateral C-Spine, Optimal38 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Calcaneous, Readable50 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesBaseline,Lateral C-Spine,Readable158 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesBaseline,Lateral T-Spine,Readable234 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesBaseline,Lateral T-Spine,Not Readable9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesBaseline, Calcaneous, Optimal191 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesBaseline, Calcaneous, Readable51 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesBaseline, Calcaneous, Not Readable1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesEnd of Therapy,Lateral C-Spine,Optimal87 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesEnd of Therapy,Lateral C-Spine,Readable146 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesEnd of Therapy,Lateral C-Spine, Not Readable10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesEnd of Therapy, Lateral T-Spine, Readable229 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesEnd of Therapy, Lateral T-Spine, Not Readable14 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesEnd of Therapy, Calcaneous, Optimal182 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesEnd of Therapy, Calcaneous, Readable44 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesEnd of Therapy, Calcaneous, Not Readable17 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesBaseline,Lateral C-Spine, Optimal85 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Lateral C-Spine, Readable134 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Lateral C-Spine, Not Readable1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Lateral C-Spine, Missing70 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Lateral T-Spine, Readable168 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Lateral T-Spine, Not Readable5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Lateral T-Spine, Missing70 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Calcaneous, Optimal119 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Calcaneous, Not Readable4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adequecy of Images Assessed by X-ray Evaluation of BonesWeek 72, Calcaneous, Missing70 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest Frequency

An adverse change was defined as a change from normal at Baseline to abnormal at end of therapy. A missing adverse change was defined as missing results at Baseline and end of therapy, or missing result at Baseline and abnormal at end of therapy, or normal at Baseline and missing result at end of therapy. Other changes from Baseline to end of therapy are considered as no adverse change. All puretone testing used a modified Hughson-Westlake procedure with 5 decibel (dB) step size.

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants who had audiologic evaluations were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyParticipants with adverse change, Yes4 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyBaseline, Missing1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyBaseline, Normal57 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyEnd of Therapy, Normal48 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyParticipants with adverse change, Missing14 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyEnd of Therapy, Abnormal75 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyBaseline, Abnormal91 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyEnd of Therapy, Missing26 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyParticipants with adverse change, No131 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyEnd of Therapy, Missing21 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyParticipants with adverse change, No125 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyParticipants with adverse change, Yes10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyParticipants with adverse change, Missing12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyBaseline, Normal69 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyBaseline, Abnormal75 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyBaseline, Missing3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyEnd of Therapy, Normal55 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Audiological Change as Assessed by Puretone Audiogram at Highest FrequencyEnd of Therapy, Abnormal71 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Treatment Period

An AE was defined as any adverse change from the participant's Baseline (pretreatment) clinical condition, including intercurrent illness, which occurred during the course of the clinical study after written informed consent had been given, whether considered related to treatment or not. A treatment-emergent AE was defined as any adverse change that occurred after treatment started and up to 7 days after last treatment. An SAE was any experience that suggested a significant hazard, contradiction, side effect or precaution. It was any adverse event that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Time frame: Up to Week 24 (end-of-treatment)

Population: Safety Population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Treatment PeriodAny AEs216 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Treatment PeriodAny SAEs7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Treatment PeriodAny AEs155 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Treatment PeriodAny SAEs3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular Pressure

An adverse change was defined as a change from normal at Baseline to abnormal at end of therapy, or as a worsening from Baseline for either or both eyes. A missing adverse change was defined as missing results at Baseline and end of therapy, or missing result at Baseline and abnormal at end of therapy, or normal at Baseline and missing result at end of therapy, or abnormal at Baseline and missing result at end of therapy, for both eyes or one eye when the other eye was not concerned by an adverse change. Other changes from Baseline to end of therapy was considered as no adverse change. Optic disc, macula, and retinal periphery were assessed by fundoscopy after pupil dilation using tropicamide.

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants who had ophthalmological evaluations were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureBaseline, Missing0 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureEnd of Therapy, Normal152 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureParticipants with an Adverse Change, Yes0 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureEnd of Therapy, Abnormal1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureBaseline, Normal177 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureEnd of Therapy, Missing27 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureParticipants with an Adverse Change, No152 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureWorsened from Baseline, No2 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureBaseline, Abnormal3 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureWorsened from Baseline, Missing1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureParticipants with an Adverse Change, Missing28 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureWorsened from Baseline, Missing0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureParticipants with an Adverse Change, No146 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureParticipants with an Adverse Change, Yes1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureParticipants with an Adverse Change, Missing39 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureBaseline, Normal183 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureBaseline, Abnormal1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureEnd of Therapy, Normal146 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureEnd of Therapy, Abnormal1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureEnd of Therapy, Missing39 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureWorsened from Baseline, No1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Adverse Ophthalmological Change as Assessed by Fundus Photography - Intraocular PressureBaseline, Missing2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference Range

Blood samples were collected for the assessment of laboratory parameters hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, reticulocytes, platelets, white blood cell, lymphocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, total bilirubin, bilirubin conjugated (direct), aspartate amino transferase (AST), alanine amino transferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine phosphokinase (CPK), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total protein, serum albumin, glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, sodium, potassium, chloride, serum calcium, serum phosphate, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/urea, uric acid, Free thyroxin and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) at Baseline and every 4 weeks of treatment period and Week 28 of follow up period. Data for participants with values outside the marked reference range are reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 28

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeLDH, maximum post Baseline0 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeReticulocyte Count, Absolute,maximum post Baseline17 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeCPK, maximum post Baseline28 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeEosinophils, Absolute, maximum post Baseline12 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeCholesterol, Total, maximum post Baseline17 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeLymphocytes, maximum post Baseline1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeTriglyceride, maximum post Baseline16 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeBilirubin Total, maximum post Baseline0 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeGlucose, maximum post Baseline5 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeReticulocyte, maximum post Baseline8 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangePotassium, maximum post Baseline1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeALP, maximum post Baseline1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeLymphocytes,Absolute, maximum post Baseline0 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeCreatinine, maximum post Baseline1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeAST, maximum post Baseline6 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeBUN, maximum post Baseline1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeWhite Blood Cells, maximum post Baseline1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeFree T4 - Thyroxine, maximum post Baseline1 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeALT, maximum post Baseline7 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeTSH, maximum post Baseline6 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeEosinophils, maximum post Baseline29 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeLDL Calculated, maximum post Baseline102 Participants
Alitretinoin 30 mgNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeCalcium, maximum post Baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeLDL Calculated, maximum post Baseline62 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeReticulocyte, maximum post Baseline6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeReticulocyte Count, Absolute,maximum post Baseline8 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeWhite Blood Cells, maximum post Baseline1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeLymphocytes, maximum post Baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeLymphocytes,Absolute, maximum post Baseline1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeEosinophils, maximum post Baseline39 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeEosinophils, Absolute, maximum post Baseline20 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeBilirubin Total, maximum post Baseline3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeALP, maximum post Baseline1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeAST, maximum post Baseline6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeALT, maximum post Baseline11 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeLDH, maximum post Baseline1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeCPK, maximum post Baseline27 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeCholesterol, Total, maximum post Baseline4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeTriglyceride, maximum post Baseline2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeGlucose, maximum post Baseline4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangePotassium, maximum post Baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeCalcium, maximum post Baseline1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeCreatinine, maximum post Baseline1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeBUN, maximum post Baseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeFree T4 - Thyroxine, maximum post Baseline3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Maximum Post Baseline Laboratory Values Outside the Marked Reference RangeTSH, maximum post Baseline10 Participants
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Extent of Disease at End-of-treatment

The extent of disease was estimated as the percentage of hand area (with 100% defined as the palmar and dorsal aspects) affected by eczema at Baseline, and at the end of treatment). Extent of disease was estimated separately for the left and right hands, and the overall extent of disease for both hands was calculated as (Left+Right)/2. Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values. Percentage change from Baseline = (change from Baseline / Baseline value) \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24 (end-of-treatment)

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alitretinoin 30 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Extent of Disease at End-of-treatment-46.56 Percent changeStandard Deviation 53.746
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline in Extent of Disease at End-of-treatment-24.20 Percent changeStandard Deviation 48.214
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-31, -13.73]Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Modified Total Lesion Symptom Score (mTLSS) at the End-of-treatment

A 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) was used to grade 7 signs or symptoms of CHE. The mTLSS was calculated as sum of assigned scores for the symptoms of erythema, scaling, lichenification/hyperkeratosis, vesiculation, edema, fissures and Pruritus/Pain. The total score ranged from 0 (best) to 21 (worst). Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values. Percentage change from Baseline = (change from Baseline / Baseline value) \* 100. Data for Week 24 last observation carried forward (LOCF) has been presented.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24 (end-of-treatment)

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Alitretinoin 30 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Modified Total Lesion Symptom Score (mTLSS) at the End-of-treatment-53.99 Percent changeStandard Deviation 40.16
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline in Modified Total Lesion Symptom Score (mTLSS) at the End-of-treatment-29.86 Percent changeStandard Deviation 37.83
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-30.4, -17.85]Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Over 72 Weeks

Bone mineral density scans of the left proximal femur (total hip) and anterior-posterior lumbar spine were obtained by use of DXA, at Baseline, at end of therapy, and 1 year (48 weeks) after end of therapy. In case of abnormality or surgery of the left hip, the right hip was to be used. If both hips were affected, the participant was not eligible for DXA. Vertebrae L1 to L4 had to be completely scanned. At least 3 vertebrae had to be free of any abnormalities potentially interfering with DXA analysis (eg, fractures, large osteophytes), otherwise the participant was not eligible for DXA. Baseline was defined at Week 0. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the individual post-baseline values. Percentage change from Baseline = (change from Baseline / Baseline value) \* 100. Least square means and 95% confidence interval has been presented.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 72

Population: Safety Population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Alitretinoin 30 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Over 72 WeeksLumbar Spine BMD0.385 Percent change
Alitretinoin 30 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Over 72 WeeksFemur BMD0.435 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Over 72 WeeksLumbar Spine BMD-0.104 Percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Over 72 WeeksFemur BMD-0.063 Percent change
Comparison: Lumbar Spine BMDp-value: 0.17995% CI: [-0.226, 1.204]ANCOVA
Comparison: Femur BMDp-value: 0.08995% CI: [-0.077, 1.071]ANCOVA
Secondary

Response Duration for Responding Participants at the End-of-therapy

Response Duration was defined as time from the end-of-therapy to the first diagnosis of mild, moderate, or severe CHE. Median and inter-quartile range has been presented.

Time frame: Up to 72 Weeks (including 24 weeks of treatment and 48 weeks of follow-up)

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Alitretinoin 30 mgResponse Duration for Responding Participants at the End-of-therapy8.3 Weeks
PlaceboResponse Duration for Responding Participants at the End-of-therapy16.9 Weeks
p-value: 0.047Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Relapse for Responding Participants at the End-of-therapy

Time to relapse was defined as the time from end-of-therapy to the first diagnosis of severe CHE. Median and inter-quartile range has been presented. The median was based on the very last participant having a follow-up period longer than expected, those explaining the high median.

Time frame: Up to 72 Weeks (including 24 weeks of treatment and 48 weeks of follow-up)

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Alitretinoin 30 mgTime to Relapse for Responding Participants at the End-of-therapy83.0 Weeks
PlaceboTime to Relapse for Responding Participants at the End-of-therapyNA Weeks
p-value: 0.068Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Response for Responding Participants at End-of-therapy

Time to response was defined as time from start of treatment to first PGA assessment of clear or almost clear. Median and inter-quartile range has been presented.

Time frame: Up to 72 Weeks (including 24 weeks of treatment and 48 weeks of follow-up)

Population: ITT population. Only those participant who responded to PGA assessment at the end of therapy was analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Alitretinoin 30 mgTime to Response for Responding Participants at End-of-therapy65.0 Days
PlaceboTime to Response for Responding Participants at End-of-therapy117.0 Days
p-value: <0.001Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026