Skip to content

Pilot Study of a Raltegravir Based NRTI Sparing Regimen

A Pilot Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of a Raltegravir Based NRTI Sparing Regimen

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00814879
Enrollment
60
Registered
2008-12-25
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2013-11-30
Last updated
2016-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, AIDS, HIV Infections, Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Keywords

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, AIDS, Anti-Infective Agents, Antiretroviral, Antiviral Agents, Atazanavir, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, HIV, HIV Protease Inhibitors, NRTI, Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors, Raltegravir, Resistance, treatment experienced

Brief summary

This pilot study will provide data on the safety and efficacy of the combination of Raltegravir (RAL) 400mg BID + Atazanavir (ATV) 300 mg BID in Antiretroviral (ARV)-experienced subjects that have a suppressed HIV viral load on a Ritonavir (RTV) boosted Protease Inhibitor (PI) based regimen who are then switched to a regimen of RAL 400mg BID +ATV 300mg BID.

Detailed description

The purpose of this pilot study is to compare the virological efficacy, as measured by the proportion of patients with plasma HIV-RNA below the limit of detection (\<50 copies/mL), of two ARV regimens; patients are randomized to remain on regimens containing N(t)RTI(s) + PI/r or switch to Raltegravir + ATV but without N(t)RTI(s). Study Arms: 1. N(t)RTI(s) based backbone + PI/r 2. Raltegravir (RAL) 400mg BID + atazanavir (ATV) 300 mg BID Antiretroviral (ARV) treatment guidelines currently recommend ARV regimens containing a Nucleos(t)ide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors \[N(t)RTI(s)\] based backbone with a Non Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (NNRTI) or ritonavir boosted Protease Inhibitor (PI/r).(1) However, significant toxicity has been associated with N(t)RTI(s) and PI/r containing regimens. N(t)RTI(s) can cause lipoatrophy, lipid elevations, renal toxicity, neuropathy and lactic acidosis.(1) These toxicities have required clinicians and HIV-infected individuals to use alternative ARV regimens that do not use N(t)RTI(s). PIs are known to cause gastrointestinal side effects, dyslipidemia, and fat maldistribution (lipodystrophy).(1) The DHHS HIV treatment guidelines recommend that PIs should be given with a low dose of ritonavir (RTV). RTV is a PI that has an inhibitory effect on cytochrome P-450 3A4 isoenzyme which metabolizes most PIs. The addition of RTV serves as a pharmacokinetic booster by increasing PI drug concentrations.(1) However, RTV is known to increase PI side effects, elevate lipid levels and has significant drug-drug interactions with many medications given to HIV+ individuals.(1) These RTV drug interactions can complicate the medical care of an HIV-infected individual. Raltegravir (RAL) is a recently FDA approved antiretroviral agent that inhibits HIV replication by blocking the integration of HIV proviral DNA into the host cell chromosomal DNA. RAL does not exhibit cross resistance to other ARV classes and thus has been initially used in HIV-infected individuals that are infected with drug resistant HIV strains. Recently published data on the use of RAL(2,3)in HIV-infected subjects with known ARV drug resistance or those without ARV drug resistance4 demonstrates that RAL is a potent agent, suppressing HIV viral loads in the majority of subjects and having excellent CD4 cell responses.(2-4) RAL is metabolized through glucuronidation by the uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) enzyme pathway.(5)ATV is a known inhibitor of this enzyme pathway. ATV will increase RAL levels,(5) however, the current DHHS HIV treatment guidelines do not recommend a change in the dose of RAL if given with ATV as persons receiving ATV and RAL have demonstrated good tolerability of the combination and low side effect profiles.(1-3,5) The availability of RAL provides an opportunity to examine alternative ARV strategies that may be equally efficacious and less toxic than those currently recommended in HIV treatment guidelines. Such combinations might include RAL+ATV regimen without a concomitant N(t)RTI(s) based backbone and/or the inclusion of RTV. However, there is little data available to date regarding such a combination. HIV care providers have already begun to use the combination of RAL+ unboosted ATV as the patients they care for are intolerant of RTV or have had major side effects/toxicity with N(t)NRTIs. More investigation is required to determine if RAL+ATV is an efficacious and safe alternative to RTV boosted PI based ARV strategies. Before a RAL based strategy that does not include N(t)RTIs or RTV can be compared to other ARV class strategies for long-term efficacy outcomes, preliminary data on a RAL+ATV based regimen is needed. This pilot study will provide data on the safety and efficacy of the combination of RAL 400mg BID + ATV 300 mg BID in ARV-experienced subjects that have a suppressed HIV viral load on a RTV boosted PI based regimen who are then switched to a regimen of RAL 400mg BID +ATV 300mg BID.

Interventions

DRUGRaltegravir

400 mg BID

DRUGAtazanavir

300 mg BID

OTHERStandard treatment regimen

N(t)RTI(s) based backbone plus ritonavir boosted PI

Sponsors

Bristol-Myers Squibb
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HIV-1 positive * On stable ARV-therapy for a minimum of 4 months with a HIV viral load of \< 50 copies * Currently on a N(t)RTI(s) based backbone + PI/r * No prior history of PI drug resistance (by historical genotype or phenotype) * Aged \> 18 years of age * Written informed consent * Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must be using an adequate method of contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study and for up to 8 weeks after the last dose of investigational product, in such a manner that the risk of pregnancy is minimized.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior exposure to Raltegravir or Elvitegravir * A detectable HIV viral load \>50 copies within the last 4 months * An ARV change within the last 4 months * History of PI drug resistance * Prior virologic failure on an ATV containing regimen * Prior history of intolerance to ATV * Pregnant or nursing mothers * Pre-existing grade 3 or above laboratory toxicity except for lipids: * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \< 750 cells/mL. * Hemoglobin \< 8.0 g/dL. * Platelet count \< 50 000 cells/mL. * AST, ALT and alkaline phosphatase \> 5 x ULN. * Serum bilirubin \> 5 x ULN. * calculated creatinine clearance of \<50mL/min/1.73m2 * Patients with chronic active hepatitis B infection defined by positive serum Hbs antigen * Use of any prohibited medications and/or the use of proton pump inhibitors in ATV plus RAL containing regimens) * Patients with current alcohol or illicit substance use that in judgment of investigator makes study adherence unlikely

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients Reaching Virologic Failure at Week 48.48 WeeksVirologic failure was defined by protocol as a plasma HIV RNA \>50 c/mL on 2 consecutive occasions \>7 days apart or \> 10 000 c/mL on one occasion (in the absence of an intercurrent infection or recent immunization).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With < 400 Copies HIV RNA/mL at Week 4848 weeks
CD4+ Cell CountWeeks 24
Cholesterolbaseline, week 24, week 48Total cholersterol (mg/dL)
Mean Change in Total Bilirubin (mg/dL) From Baselinebaseline and 48 weeksmean change in total bilirubin from baseline

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 60 patients were randomized in this pilot study; 30 in each arm. Two patients randomized to stay on their N(t)NRTIs+PIr regimen were randomization failures as the patients did not for return for their baseline visit.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
N(t)NRTI + Plr
N(t)RTI(s) based backbone & PI/r Standard treatment regimen: N(t)RTI(s) based backbone plus ritonavir boosted PI
28
RAL + ATV
Raltegravir (RAL) 400mg BID + atazanavir (ATV) 300 mg BID Raltegravir: 400 mg BID Atazanavir: 300 mg BID
30
Total58

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
By Week 24Cancer Diagnosis10
By Week 24Incarceration01
By Week 48Death01
By Week 48Lost to Follow-up22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicN(t)NRTI + PlrTotalRAL + ATV
Age, Continuous48.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
48.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
48.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants15 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
21 Participants41 Participants20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
28 participants58 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants11 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants47 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
26 / 2825 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 286 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients Reaching Virologic Failure at Week 48.

Virologic failure was defined by protocol as a plasma HIV RNA \>50 c/mL on 2 consecutive occasions \>7 days apart or \> 10 000 c/mL on one occasion (in the absence of an intercurrent infection or recent immunization).

Time frame: 48 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
N(t)RTI(s) + PI/rNumber of Patients Reaching Virologic Failure at Week 48.2 participants
RAL + ATVNumber of Patients Reaching Virologic Failure at Week 48.3 participants
Secondary

CD4+ Cell Count

Time frame: Weeks 24

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
N(t)RTI(s) + PI/rCD4+ Cell Count599.4 cells/mm^3Standard Deviation 276.1
RAL + ATVCD4+ Cell Count710.0 cells/mm^3Standard Deviation 37.8
Secondary

CD4+ Cell Count

Time frame: Week 48

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
N(t)RTI(s) + PI/rCD4+ Cell Count596.6 cells/mm^3Standard Deviation 289.1
RAL + ATVCD4+ Cell Count665.9 cells/mm^3Standard Deviation 365.4
Secondary

Cholesterol

Total cholersterol (mg/dL)

Time frame: baseline, week 24, week 48

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
N(t)RTI(s) + PI/rCholesterolWeek 48167.41 mg/dLStandard Deviation 41.19
N(t)RTI(s) + PI/rCholesterolWeek 24168.07 mg/dLStandard Deviation 43.77
N(t)RTI(s) + PI/rCholesterolBaseline166.25 mg/dLStandard Deviation 41.58
RAL + ATVCholesterolWeek 24169.65 mg/dLStandard Deviation 41.39
RAL + ATVCholesterolBaseline178.83 mg/dLStandard Deviation 46.97
RAL + ATVCholesterolWeek 48174.48 mg/dLStandard Deviation 37.12
Secondary

Mean Change in Total Bilirubin (mg/dL) From Baseline

mean change in total bilirubin from baseline

Time frame: baseline and 48 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
N(t)RTI(s) + PI/rMean Change in Total Bilirubin (mg/dL) From Baseline-0.15 mg/dLStandard Deviation 0.85
RAL + ATVMean Change in Total Bilirubin (mg/dL) From Baseline0.37 mg/dLStandard Deviation 1.39
Secondary

Number of Patients With < 400 Copies HIV RNA/mL at Week 48

Time frame: 48 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
N(t)RTI(s) + PI/rNumber of Patients With < 400 Copies HIV RNA/mL at Week 4822 participants
RAL + ATVNumber of Patients With < 400 Copies HIV RNA/mL at Week 4821 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026