Skip to content

Comparison Between the Fastrach and CTrach Laryngeal Mask Airway

Comparison Between the Fastrach and CTrach Laryngeal Mask Airway for Intubation of Patients With a Mallampati Score 3 or 4

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00814775
Enrollment
43
Registered
2008-12-25
Start date
2008-08-31
Completion date
2010-06-30
Last updated
2016-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation

Keywords

Laryngeal mask, Difficult intubation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the Fastrach and the CTrach Laryngeal mask airway to achieve placement of a breathing tube in the windpipe of patients where this may be difficult.

Detailed description

Participant will be randomly assigned to receive one of 2 conventional airway devices - the Fastrach Laryngeal Mask Airway or the CTrach Laryngeal Mask Airway. This study will compare the time required for successful intubation between the two devices. Postoperative visit will be performed to assess the participant's clinical condition and to receive participant's feed back.

Interventions

DEVICEFastrach Laryngeal Mask

Intubation of difficult airway using Fastrach Laryngeal Mask

DEVICECTrach Laryngeal Mask

CTrach Laryngeal Mask intubation

Sponsors

The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with an ASA score of 1-3. 2. Scheduled for elective surgical procedure 3. Age 18 and above 4. Patients with Mallampati airway classification scores III and IV

Exclusion criteria

1. Current pregnancy 2. Patients undergoing brain aneurysm clipping brain arteriovenous malformation surgery or vascular surgery procedures 3. Patients with obstructive sleep apnea or with a history of difficult ventilation 4. Mouth opening less than 3 cm. 5. Patients with indication for awake fiberoptic intubation or with a history of difficult intubation 6. Patients with cancer of the neck or the upper airway 7. Emergent surgery, patients requiring rapid sequence induction 8. Patients with severe gastroesophageal reflux 9. Patients with severe cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic or renal co-morbidities. 10. Patients unable to consent their participation in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To Compare the Time Required for Successful Intubation Between the Fastrach and CTrach LMA Devices in Patients With a Mallampati Score III and IV Without Use of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopyfrom start of intubation to successfully intubated
To Compare the Time Required for Successful Intubation Between the Fastrach and CTrach LMA Devices in Patients With a Mallampati Score III and IV Use of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy60 seconds

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fastrach
Fastrach Laryngeal Mask Airway intubation Fastrach Laryngeal Mask: Intubation of difficult airway using Fastrach Laryngeal Mask
23
CTrach
Intubation of difficult airway using CTrach Laryngeal Mask CTrach Laryngeal Mask: CTrach Laryngeal Mask intubation
20
Total43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFastrachCTrachTotal
Age, Continuous58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants9 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants11 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 230 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 230 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

To Compare the Time Required for Successful Intubation Between the Fastrach and CTrach LMA Devices in Patients With a Mallampati Score III and IV Use of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy

Time frame: 60 seconds

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
FastrachTo Compare the Time Required for Successful Intubation Between the Fastrach and CTrach LMA Devices in Patients With a Mallampati Score III and IV Use of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy35 seconds
CTrachTo Compare the Time Required for Successful Intubation Between the Fastrach and CTrach LMA Devices in Patients With a Mallampati Score III and IV Use of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy40 seconds
p-value: 0.4595% CI: [0.38, 1.54]Regression, Cox
Primary

To Compare the Time Required for Successful Intubation Between the Fastrach and CTrach LMA Devices in Patients With a Mallampati Score III and IV Without Use of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy

Time frame: from start of intubation to successfully intubated

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
FastrachTo Compare the Time Required for Successful Intubation Between the Fastrach and CTrach LMA Devices in Patients With a Mallampati Score III and IV Without Use of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy41 seconds
CTrachTo Compare the Time Required for Successful Intubation Between the Fastrach and CTrach LMA Devices in Patients With a Mallampati Score III and IV Without Use of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy40 seconds
p-value: 0.7295% CI: [0.55, 2.37]Regression, Cox

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026