Stress Urinary Incontinence
Conditions
Keywords
stress urinary incontinence, urodynamics, randomized clinical trial, surgery
Brief summary
To test the value of preoperatively performed urodynamics with regard to outcome of surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and to examine whether not performing urodynamics preoperatively is more cost effective than performing urodynamics preoperatively using the non-inferiority assumption.
Interventions
midureteral sling
midureteral sling or conservative; medication, physiotherapy
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Symptoms of stress urinary incontinence and/or mixed urinary incontinence, predominantly stress incontinence * Signs of stress urinary incontinence on physical examination or voiding-diary * Patient is a candidate for surgical treatment (as based on history and physical examination) * Patient has attended at least 3 months of physiotherapy * Patient accepts randomisation * Patient is capable to fill out bladder diary's, pad tests and questionnaires * Patient understands the Dutch written and spoken language * ASA 1 or 2
Exclusion criteria
* Previous incontinence surgery * Mixed urinary incontinence, urge component is predominant * Prolapse \>= 1cm beyond the hymen on Valsalva in supine position * Postvoid urinary residual \> 150ml * Present urinary tract infection * The need for additional pelvic surgery (prolapse and/or hysterectomy) * Patient is or wants to become pregnant * Prior pelvic radiotherapy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Non inferiority of the improvement of the urinary distress inventory one year after treatment. | one year |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Cure of incontinence as measured with voiding diary. Complications of surgery for stress urinary incontinence, in particular re-operations and overactive bladder symptoms. Quality of life as measured by RAND-36, Euroqol and IIQ. | 2 years |
Countries
Netherlands