Skip to content

The Use of Galantamine (Reminyl ER) in Patients With MIXed Dementia: Effects on Cognition and Quality of Life

The Use of Galantamine (Reminyl ER) in Patients With MIXed Dementia: Effects on Cognition and Quality of Life

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00814658
Enrollment
22
Registered
2008-12-25
Start date
2008-06-30
Completion date
2009-10-31
Last updated
2013-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dementia

Keywords

Dementia, Mixed Dementia, Galantamine, Reminyl ER, Nimodipine

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the combination of galantamine with nimodipine in patients with mixed dementia on cognition and quality of life.

Detailed description

A double-blind (neither the patient nor the physician know the name of the study drug), 6-month, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the combination of galantamine with nimodipine in patients with mixed dementia on cognition and quality of life. The target dose of galantamine is 24 mg/day and nimodipine will be taken in fixed doses of 90 mg/day. Primary outcomes will be measured by a computerized battery of neuropsychological tests and Quality of Life (QoL) scores. Secondary outcomes will be measured by ADAS-cog, Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Mixed dementia (Alzheimer's Disease (AD) associated with cerebrovascular disease) is one of the most common causes of dementia, which remain largely underdiagnosed. Little is known about specific treatments for this condition. Ischemic lesions by themselves seem to play an important role in cognitive impairment, even in the presence of AD pathology. Hypotheses: - Galantamine 16-24 mg/day in combination with nimodipine 90 mg/day is superior to galantamine monotherapy (16-24 mg/day) in improving or stabilizing cognition in patients with AD associated with cerebrovascular disease (mixed dementia), as measured by the CNTB at 6 months. - Galantamine 16-24 mg/day in combination with nimodipine 90 mg/day is superior to galantamine monotherapy (16-24 mg/day) on QoL measures in this population as measured by QoL - AD at 6 months. Group 1: galantamine oral 8mg/day for a month, 16mg/day for 4 weeks and after 24mg/day until end of study plus nimodipine oral 30mg tid during all study. Group 2: Group 1: galantamine oral 8mg/day for a month, 16mg/day for 4 weeks and after 24mg/day until end of study plus placebo oral 30mg tid during all study.

Interventions

DRUGGalantamine

Galantamine 8 mg/day for one month, followed by 4 weeks of galantamine 16 mg/day. If necessary and well tolerated, dosage of galantamine will be increased to 24 mg/day.

DRUGNimodipine

Nimodipine 30 mg 3 times a day (tid).

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo three times a day (tid).

Sponsors

Janssen-Cilag Farmaceutica Ltda.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients should fulfill DSM-IV criteria for dementia (APA, 1994) * Patients should fulfill criteria for AD with cerebrovascular disease according to NINDS-AIREN criteria (Román et al., 1993) * The severity of dementia should be mild to moderate, as defined by MMSE score between 10 and 26 (inclusive) * Patients (and their legally acceptable representatives) must have signed an informed consent document indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* History of neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's disease, Pick's disease or Huntington's chorea, Down's syndrome, Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease. Patients who have mild extrapyramidal signs, for which no treatment is required, are not excluded from the trial * History of liver or renal insufficiency * significant cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurological, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances in the past 6 months * Patients who have previously received M1 agonists or cholinesterase inhibitors (tacrine, donepezil, metrifonate, rivastigmine) for treatment of Alzheimer's disease, no matter if approved or experimental can be included in this trial provided there was at least a washout period of 60 days prior to the screening assessments * History of drug or alcohol abuse within the last year or prior prolonged history * History of severe drug allergy or hypersensitivity * including recorded hypersensitivity to cholinesterase inhibitors, choline agonists or similar agents, or bromide * Subjects who have previously been enrolled in other galantamine trials.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores, Based on the Caregiver's Opinion, at Baseline, Week 8, Week 24Baseline, Week 8, Week 24The Quality of Life assessment scale for patients with Alzheimer's disease (QoL-AD), according to the opinion of the caregiver is a 13-item scale with four possible scores for each question (score 1: poor and score 4: excellent). It evaluates the opinion of the caregiver about the patient's quality of life. Total score ranges from 13 to 52. Higher scores represent a better outcome.
Reaction Time for Word Recognition and Learning Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24Baseline, Week 8, Week 24The reaction time for word recognition and learning test is a computerized attention test that evaluates the patient's reaction time. This test is similar to the Face Recognition test procedure using Words. The recognition procedure was repeated three times to evaluate a learning effect. The reaction time, assessed per patient, was averaged at each time point for each patient e.g., at baseline, Week 8 and Week 24. This test is part of the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB).
The Quality of Life Assessment for Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 24Baseline, Week 8, Week 24The Quality of Life assessment scale for caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease (QoL-AD) is a 13-item scale with four possible scores for each question (score 1: poor and score 4: excellent). It evaluates the caregivers own perceived quality of life. Total score ranges from 13 to 52. Higher scores represent a better outcome.
The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 24Baseline, Week 8, Week 24The Quality of Life assessment scale for patients with Alzheimer's disease (QoL-AD) is a 13-item scale with four possible scores for each question (score 1: poor and score 4: excellent). Total score ranges from 13 to 52. Higher scores represent a better outcome.
Reaction Time for Simple Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24Baseline, Week 8, Week 24The Simple Reaction Time is a computerized attention test that evaluates the patient's reaction time. The number one was presented in the center of the computer screen and the patient had to press this number in the response box as quickly as possible. The reaction time, assessed 100 times per patient, was averaged at each time point for each patient e.g., at baseline, Week 8 and Week 24. The patient's finger was put over button one before the test begun. This test is part of the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB).
Reaction Time for Two-choice Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24Baseline, Week 8, Week 24The Two-choice reaction time test is a computerized attention test in which the numbers one or five were presented in the center of the computer screen in a random order. The patient had to press the correspondent button in the response box as quickly as possible. The patient's right finger was put over the button five and the left finger over button one before the test begun. The reaction time, assessed 100 times per patient, was averaged at each time point for each patient e.g., at baseline, Week 8 and Week 24.This test is part of the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB).
Reaction Time for Face Recognition Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24Baseline, Week 8, Week 24The face recognition test is a computerized attention test in which ten unfamiliar faces were presented simultaneously on the computer screen for ten seconds to be remembered. After that, a single face was shown and the patient had to press the button one if he/she remembered or, otherwise, button five. It consisted of a random presentation of ten pre-exposed faces and ten new faces as distracters. The reaction time, assessed per patient, was averaged at each time point for each patient e.g., at baseline, Weeks 8 and 24. This test is part of the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) is a scale to assess treatment response in patients with mental disorders. The Clinical Global Impression Improvement scale (CGI-I) requires the clinician to rate how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state. A patient's illness is compared to change over time and rated as: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, or very much worse.
The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24Baseline, Week 8, Week 24The NPI evaluates 12 neuropsychiatric domains: delusions, hallucinations, dysphoria, anxiety, aggression, euphoria, dis-inhibition, irritability/lability, apathy, aberrant motor activity, eating disorders, and night-time behavior disturbances. For present domains, the severity and frequency of the behavior are determined. Frequency is rated 1 (rarely) to 4 (very often) and Severity is scored 1 (mild) to 3 (severe). The product scores vary from 1 (mild and rarely) to 12 (very often and severe). Total scores vary from 0 (no present domain) to 144 (all domains are present, are often and severe).
The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24Baseline, Week 8, Week 24The ADAS-Cog is a psychometric instrument that evaluates memory, attention, reasoning, language, orientation and praxis using an 11-point Assessment Scale. It has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum severity score of 70, and a higher score indicates more impairment.

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

22 patients were enrolled in the study, but one (1) patient was excluded from the study because the patient has died before study medication use. Therefore, the study was formed by 21 patients that used at least 1 study medication dose and had at least 1 evaluation after started use (Intention to Treat (ITT) population).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Galantamine + Nimodipine
Galantamine 8 mg/day for one month + nimodipine 30 mg 3 times a day (tid), followed by 4 weeks of galantamine 16 mg/day + nimodipine 30 mg tid. If necessary and well tolerated, dosage of galantamine will be increased to 24 mg/day + nimodipine 30 mg tid.
9
Galantamine + Placebo
Galantamine 8 mg/day and placebo three times a day (tid) for 4 weeks, followed by 4 weeks of galantamine 16 mg/day and placebo tid. If necessary and well tolerated, galantamine dosage may be increased to 24 mg/day, together with placebo tid.
12
Total21

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event33
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGalantamine + NimodipineGalantamine + PlaceboTotal
Age Continuous78.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
74.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
76.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants10 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 910 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 91 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Reaction Time for Face Recognition Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

The face recognition test is a computerized attention test in which ten unfamiliar faces were presented simultaneously on the computer screen for ten seconds to be remembered. After that, a single face was shown and the patient had to press the button one if he/she remembered or, otherwise, button five. It consisted of a random presentation of ten pre-exposed faces and ten new faces as distracters. The reaction time, assessed per patient, was averaged at each time point for each patient e.g., at baseline, Weeks 8 and 24. This test is part of the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

Population: Intent to Treat population, which consisted of all participants who used at least 1 study medication dose, had at least 1 evaluation after started use, and with evaluable data at each measurement time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)Reaction Time for Face Recognition Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 243124.00 millisecondsStandard Deviation 1461.46
Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)Reaction Time for Face Recognition Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 242684.45 millisecondsStandard Deviation 1315.44
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)Reaction Time for Face Recognition Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 242262.50 millisecondsStandard Deviation 803.3
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)Reaction Time for Face Recognition Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 242734.25 millisecondsStandard Deviation 1252.62
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)Reaction Time for Face Recognition Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 242357.80 millisecondsStandard Deviation 1919.72
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)Reaction Time for Face Recognition Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 243099.38 millisecondsStandard Deviation 1823.8
Primary

Reaction Time for Simple Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

The Simple Reaction Time is a computerized attention test that evaluates the patient's reaction time. The number one was presented in the center of the computer screen and the patient had to press this number in the response box as quickly as possible. The reaction time, assessed 100 times per patient, was averaged at each time point for each patient e.g., at baseline, Week 8 and Week 24. The patient's finger was put over button one before the test begun. This test is part of the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

Population: Intent to Treat population, which consisted of all participants who used at least 1 study medication dose, had at least 1 evaluation after started use, and with evaluable data at each measurement time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)Reaction Time for Simple Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 241024.06 millisecondsStandard Deviation 1307.97
Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)Reaction Time for Simple Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24729.18 millisecondsStandard Deviation 394.88
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)Reaction Time for Simple Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24466.60 millisecondsStandard Deviation 297.53
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)Reaction Time for Simple Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24671.33 millisecondsStandard Deviation 298.38
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)Reaction Time for Simple Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24467.60 millisecondsStandard Deviation 336.69
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)Reaction Time for Simple Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24584.44 millisecondsStandard Deviation 320.37
Primary

Reaction Time for Two-choice Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

The Two-choice reaction time test is a computerized attention test in which the numbers one or five were presented in the center of the computer screen in a random order. The patient had to press the correspondent button in the response box as quickly as possible. The patient's right finger was put over the button five and the left finger over button one before the test begun. The reaction time, assessed 100 times per patient, was averaged at each time point for each patient e.g., at baseline, Week 8 and Week 24.This test is part of the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

Population: Intent to Treat population, which consisted of all participants who used at least 1 study medication dose, had at least 1 evaluation after started use, and with evaluable data at each measurement time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)Reaction Time for Two-choice Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 241919.72 millisecondsStandard Deviation 1801.13
Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)Reaction Time for Two-choice Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 241096.75 millisecondsStandard Deviation 617.45
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)Reaction Time for Two-choice Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24852.70 millisecondsStandard Deviation 480.79
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)Reaction Time for Two-choice Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 241187.78 millisecondsStandard Deviation 637.6
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)Reaction Time for Two-choice Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24727.60 millisecondsStandard Deviation 375.03
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)Reaction Time for Two-choice Reaction Time Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 241116.25 millisecondsStandard Deviation 540.91
Primary

Reaction Time for Word Recognition and Learning Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

The reaction time for word recognition and learning test is a computerized attention test that evaluates the patient's reaction time. This test is similar to the Face Recognition test procedure using Words. The recognition procedure was repeated three times to evaluate a learning effect. The reaction time, assessed per patient, was averaged at each time point for each patient e.g., at baseline, Week 8 and Week 24. This test is part of the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

Population: Intent to Treat population, which consisted of all participants who used at least 1 study medication dose, had at least 1 evaluation after started use, and with evaluable data at each measurement time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)Reaction Time for Word Recognition and Learning Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 242022.17 millisecondsStandard Deviation 672.08
Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)Reaction Time for Word Recognition and Learning Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 242978.77 millisecondsStandard Deviation 1867.62
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)Reaction Time for Word Recognition and Learning Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 241966.40 millisecondsStandard Deviation 1252.1
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)Reaction Time for Word Recognition and Learning Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 242379.83 millisecondsStandard Deviation 984.52
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)Reaction Time for Word Recognition and Learning Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 241722.00 millisecondsStandard Deviation 1174.22
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)Reaction Time for Word Recognition and Learning Test at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 243038.81 millisecondsStandard Deviation 1243.79
Primary

The Quality of Life Assessment for Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

The Quality of Life assessment scale for caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease (QoL-AD) is a 13-item scale with four possible scores for each question (score 1: poor and score 4: excellent). It evaluates the caregivers own perceived quality of life. Total score ranges from 13 to 52. Higher scores represent a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

Population: Intent to Treat population, which consisted of all participants who used at least 1 study medication dose, had at least 1 evaluation after started use, and with evaluable data at each measurement time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)The Quality of Life Assessment for Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2434.00 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.98
Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)The Quality of Life Assessment for Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2436.50 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)The Quality of Life Assessment for Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2432.00 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.03
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)The Quality of Life Assessment for Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2433.56 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.84
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Quality of Life Assessment for Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2436.60 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.56
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Quality of Life Assessment for Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2434.88 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.83
Primary

The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

The Quality of Life assessment scale for patients with Alzheimer's disease (QoL-AD) is a 13-item scale with four possible scores for each question (score 1: poor and score 4: excellent). Total score ranges from 13 to 52. Higher scores represent a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

Population: Intent to Treat population, which consisted of all participants who used at least 1 study medication dose, had at least 1 evaluation after started use, and with evaluable data at each measurement time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2433.56 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.59
Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2432.67 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.02
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2435.60 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.71
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2433.11 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.68
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2436.60 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.23
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2433.86 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.27
Primary

The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores, Based on the Caregiver's Opinion, at Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

The Quality of Life assessment scale for patients with Alzheimer's disease (QoL-AD), according to the opinion of the caregiver is a 13-item scale with four possible scores for each question (score 1: poor and score 4: excellent). It evaluates the opinion of the caregiver about the patient's quality of life. Total score ranges from 13 to 52. Higher scores represent a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

Population: Intent to Treat population, which consisted of all participants who used at least 1 study medication dose, had at least 1 evaluation after started use, and with evaluable data at each measurement time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores, Based on the Caregiver's Opinion, at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2428.33 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.62
Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores, Based on the Caregiver's Opinion, at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2429.33 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.08
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores, Based on the Caregiver's Opinion, at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2427.80 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.36
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores, Based on the Caregiver's Opinion, at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2429.78 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.69
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores, Based on the Caregiver's Opinion, at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2429.80 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.76
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Quality of Life Assessment for Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (QoL- AD) Total Scores, Based on the Caregiver's Opinion, at Baseline, Week 8, Week 2429.13 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
Secondary

The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

The ADAS-Cog is a psychometric instrument that evaluates memory, attention, reasoning, language, orientation and praxis using an 11-point Assessment Scale. It has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum severity score of 70, and a higher score indicates more impairment.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

Population: Intent to Treat population, which consisted of all participants who used at least 1 study medication dose, had at least 1 evaluation after started use, and with evaluable data at each measurement time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 2430.40 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.81
Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 2428.20 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.06
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 2425.10 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.21
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 2431.03 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.45
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 2425.02 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.75
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 2427.70 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.16
Secondary

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) is a scale to assess treatment response in patients with mental disorders. The Clinical Global Impression Improvement scale (CGI-I) requires the clinician to rate how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state. A patient's illness is compared to change over time and rated as: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, or very much worse.

Time frame: Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24

Population: Intent to Treat population, which consisted of all participants who used at least 1 study medication dose, had at least 1 evaluation after started use, and with evaluable data at each measurement time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Minimally worse1 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Much improved1 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24No change4 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Much worse0 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Minimally improved1 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Very much improved0 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Very much worse0 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Very much improved0 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24No change4 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Very much worse0 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Much improved1 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Much worse0 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Minimally worse0 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Minimally improved5 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Minimally worse1 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Minimally improved2 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Much worse0 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Very much worse0 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Very much improved0 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24No change2 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Much improved0 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24No change2 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Very much improved0 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Much improved1 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Minimally improved6 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Minimally worse0 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Much worse0 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Very much worse0 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Minimally improved2 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24No change1 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Minimally worse1 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Much improved1 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Much worse0 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Very much improved0 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Very much worse0 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Very much improved0 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24No change5 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Very much worse0 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Much improved0 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Minimally improved3 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Minimally worse0 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Much worse0 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Very much improved0 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Minimally improved3 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Much worse0 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24No change1 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Very much worse0 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Minimally worse0 participants
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Much improved1 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Much worse0 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Very much worse0 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Minimally worse1 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Very much improved0 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Minimally improved4 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24No change1 participants
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) at Week 4, Week 8, Week 16, and Week 24Much improved2 participants
Secondary

The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 24

The NPI evaluates 12 neuropsychiatric domains: delusions, hallucinations, dysphoria, anxiety, aggression, euphoria, dis-inhibition, irritability/lability, apathy, aberrant motor activity, eating disorders, and night-time behavior disturbances. For present domains, the severity and frequency of the behavior are determined. Frequency is rated 1 (rarely) to 4 (very often) and Severity is scored 1 (mild) to 3 (severe). The product scores vary from 1 (mild and rarely) to 12 (very often and severe). Total scores vary from 0 (no present domain) to 144 (all domains are present, are often and severe).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, Week 24

Population: Intent to Treat population, which consisted of all participants who used at least 1 study medication dose, had at least 1 evaluation after started use, and with evaluable data at each measurement time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Baseline)The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 2424.0 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.72
Galantamine + Placebo (Baseline)The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 2426.92 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.66
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 8)The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 2420.20 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.67
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 8)The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 2422.11 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.93
Galantamine + Nimodipine (Week 24)The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 2415.00 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.55
Galantamine + Placebo (Week 24)The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) at Baseline, Week 8, and Week 2419.75 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.58

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026