Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of the Long-Term Effects of Contact Lens Care Systems

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00813761
Enrollment
473
Registered
2008-12-23
Start date
2008-09-01
Completion date
2009-08-01
Last updated
2018-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two marketed contact lens care solutions in regards to comfort and ocular health.

Interventions

control contact lens to be worn daily for approximately 7 months for entire length of study.

DEVICEProclear contact lens

control contact lens to be worn for entire length of study.

lens solution for overnight lens disinfection

DEVICEClear Care Cleaning and Disinfecting Solution

lens solution for overnight lens disinfection

Sponsors

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be at least 18 years old. * Signed Informed Consent and Investigator to record this on Case Report Form (CRF) in appropriate space. * Require a visual correction in both eyes (monovision allowed but not monofit). * Have a contact lens spherical distance requirement between +6.00D and -9.00D in both eyes. * Astigmatism of 1.00D or less in the better eye and 1.50D or less in the other eye. * Be correctable to a visual acuity of 20/30 (6/9) or better in each eye. * Have normal eyes with no evidence of abnormality or disease.

Exclusion criteria

* Requires concurrent ocular medication. * Any systemic illness which would contraindicate lens wear or the medical treatment of which would affect vision or successful lens wear. * Clinically significant corneal edema, corneal vascularisation, tarsal abnormalities, bulbar injection or any other abnormality of the cornea that would contraindicate contact lens wear. * Worn lenses on an extended wear basis in the last 3 months. * Diabetic. * Infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or an immunosuppressive disease (e.g., HIV). * Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) or rigid gas-permeable (RGP) lens wear in the previous 8 weeks. * Has had refractive surgery. Has had eye injury/surgery within 8 weeks immediately prior to enrolment for this study. * Abnormal lacrimal secretions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tarsal Roughness24 weeksThe roughness of the inner lining of the eyelids, measured on a 0 to 7 scale. 0=Smooth, 1=Slightly uneven, 2=Uneven surface, 3=Uneven surface with loss of transparency & superficial vessels, 4=Small papillae, poor transparency, 5=Papillae greater than 0.5mm in size, no transparency, 6=Papillae greater than 0.5mm in size, vessels inside papillae, 7=Large papillae
Limbal Redness24 weeksRedness at the transition zone between the white of the eye and the clear window of the eye, the cornea, on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe
Bulbar Redness24 weeksRedness of the blood vessels in the tissues overlaying the white of the eye, on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe
Lower Tarsal Redness24 weeksRedness of the blood vessels in the inner lining of the lower eyelid, on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe
Upper Tarsal Redness24 weeksRedness of the blood vessels in the inner lining of the upper eyelid, on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe
Average Daily Wear Time24 weeksAverage hours per day that contact lens were worn.
Average Daily Comfortable Wear Time24 weeksAverage hours per day that contact lens were worn comfortably.
Lens Comfort24 weeksLens comfort at time of month 6 visit, using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10=excellent.
Frequency of Eye Discomfort24 weeksSubjective measure of typical daily eye discomfort reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.
Frequency of Daily Lens Dryness24 weeksSubjective measure of typical daily contact lens dryness reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.
Frequency of Eye Burning/Stinging24 weeksSubjective measure of typical daily eye burning and stinging reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.
Frequency of Itching24 weeksSubjective measure of typical daily eye burning and stinging reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.
Frequency of Tearing24 weeksSubjective measure of typical daily tearing related to lens wear reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.
Average Corneal Fluorescein Type Staining24 weeksstaining measured over five sectors of the cornea and classified as a type of staining on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Micropunctate, 2=Macropunctate, 3=Coalesced Macropunctate, 4=Patch.
Average Corneal Fluorescein Staining Area24 weekscorneal staining measured over 5 areas, averaged, and graded as a single score average on a scale of 0 to 10, 0=0%, 1=10%, 2=20%, 3=30%, 4=40%, 5=50%, 6=60%, 7=70%, 8=80%, 9=90%, 10=100%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wearing Time and Comfortable Wearing Time24 weeksMean of physiological outcomes for those subjects who are identified as susceptible versus non-susceptible for Solution Induced Corneal Staining (SICS). Average wearing time and average comfortable wearing time.
Physiological Responses24 weeksMean of physiological outcomes for those subjects who are identified as susceptible versus non-susceptible for Solution Induced Corneal Staining (SICS). Physiological findings are done through a slit lamp examination and are known as biomicroscopy measurements. Measures are given in terms of average score with a minimum of zero and a worse grade the higher the value with a range of 0 to 4, (tarsal roughness is 0-7 scale).
Intensity of Physiological Outcomes24 weeksMean of physiological outcomes for those subjects who are identified as susceptible versus non-susceptible to Solution Induced Corneal Staining (SICS). These measures are related to intensity of outcomes, i.e. discomfort, burning, dryness, etc. with lower scores being better on a scale of 1-5.

Countries

United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited in both the US and UK and were screened, randomized, and assigned to a study arm.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 473 subjects were attempted to be enrolled. There were 27 disqualified, 2 due to incorrect care system, 1 due to non-compliance, and 24 due to non-compliance from investigator, leaving 446 subjects recruited to participate.Of those remaining, 21 failed to meet inclusion or were excluded for a total of 425 subjects who started the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Clear Care LCS
Subjects assigned to Clear Care lens care solution
208
ReNU MPS
Subjects assigned to ReNU multi purpose solution
217
Total425

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Phase 1 (Baseline to 4 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up0031
Phase 1 (Baseline to 4 Weeks)poor comfort1151
Phase 1 (Baseline to 4 Weeks)poor vision0030
Phase 1 (Baseline to 4 Weeks)Pregnancy2000
Phase 1 (Baseline to 4 Weeks)Protocol Violation1110
Phase 1 (Baseline to 4 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject0100
Phase 2 (4 Weeks to 24 Weeks)Adverse Event2300
Phase 2 (4 Weeks to 24 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up3021
Phase 2 (4 Weeks to 24 Weeks)Poor comfort1403
Phase 2 (4 Weeks to 24 Weeks)Poor vision1110
Phase 2 (4 Weeks to 24 Weeks)Protocol Violation0101
Phase 2 (4 Weeks to 24 Weeks)Randomization strata filled9060

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicClear Care LCSReNU MPSTotal
Age, Continuous33.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
33.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
33.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
19 participants19 participants38 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
189 participants198 participants387 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
154 Participants150 Participants304 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
54 Participants67 Participants121 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1210 / 1030 / 1150 / 107
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1210 / 1030 / 1151 / 107

Outcome results

Primary

Average Corneal Fluorescein Staining Area

corneal staining measured over 5 areas, averaged, and graded as a single score average on a scale of 0 to 10, 0=0%, 1=10%, 2=20%, 3=30%, 4=40%, 5=50%, 6=60%, 7=70%, 8=80%, 9=90%, 10=100%.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Average Corneal Fluorescein Staining Area0.27 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Average Corneal Fluorescein Staining Area0.99 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Primary

Average Corneal Fluorescein Type Staining

staining measured over five sectors of the cornea and classified as a type of staining on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Micropunctate, 2=Macropunctate, 3=Coalesced Macropunctate, 4=Patch.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Average Corneal Fluorescein Type Staining0.16 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Average Corneal Fluorescein Type Staining0.36 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.02
Primary

Average Daily Comfortable Wear Time

Average hours per day that contact lens were worn comfortably.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Average Daily Comfortable Wear Time11.96 HoursStandard Error 0.29
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Average Daily Comfortable Wear Time11.39 HoursStandard Error 0.29
Primary

Average Daily Wear Time

Average hours per day that contact lens were worn.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Average Daily Wear Time13.57 HoursStandard Error 0.23
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Average Daily Wear Time13.30 HoursStandard Error 0.23
Primary

Bulbar Redness

Redness of the blood vessels in the tissues overlaying the white of the eye, on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Bulbar Redness0.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Bulbar Redness0.56 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Primary

Frequency of Daily Lens Dryness

Subjective measure of typical daily contact lens dryness reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Frequency of Daily Lens Dryness0.66 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Frequency of Daily Lens Dryness0.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Primary

Frequency of Eye Burning/Stinging

Subjective measure of typical daily eye burning and stinging reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Frequency of Eye Burning/Stinging0.31 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Frequency of Eye Burning/Stinging0.31 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.04
Primary

Frequency of Eye Discomfort

Subjective measure of typical daily eye discomfort reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Frequency of Eye Discomfort0.36 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Frequency of Eye Discomfort0.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Primary

Frequency of Itching

Subjective measure of typical daily eye burning and stinging reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Frequency of Itching0.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Frequency of Itching0.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Primary

Frequency of Tearing

Subjective measure of typical daily tearing related to lens wear reported at month 6 visit using a scale of 0 to 3. 0=Never, 1=Infrequently, 2=Frequently, 3=Constantly.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Frequency of Tearing0.16 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Frequency of Tearing0.15 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Primary

Lens Comfort

Lens comfort at time of month 6 visit, using a scale of 0 to 10, where 10=excellent.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Lens Comfort8.63 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Lens Comfort8.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Primary

Limbal Redness

Redness at the transition zone between the white of the eye and the clear window of the eye, the cornea, on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Limbal Redness0.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Limbal Redness0.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Primary

Lower Tarsal Redness

Redness of the blood vessels in the inner lining of the lower eyelid, on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Lower Tarsal Redness0.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Lower Tarsal Redness0.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Primary

Tarsal Roughness

The roughness of the inner lining of the eyelids, measured on a 0 to 7 scale. 0=Smooth, 1=Slightly uneven, 2=Uneven surface, 3=Uneven surface with loss of transparency & superficial vessels, 4=Small papillae, poor transparency, 5=Papillae greater than 0.5mm in size, no transparency, 6=Papillae greater than 0.5mm in size, vessels inside papillae, 7=Large papillae

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Tarsal Roughness0.75 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Tarsal Roughness0.87 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Primary

Upper Tarsal Redness

Redness of the blood vessels in the inner lining of the upper eyelid, on a scale of 0 to 4. 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Subjects included in analysis were those who completed the study and had complete data available for statistical analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Upper Tarsal Redness0.48 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Upper Tarsal Redness0.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.03
Secondary

Intensity of Physiological Outcomes

Mean of physiological outcomes for those subjects who are identified as susceptible versus non-susceptible to Solution Induced Corneal Staining (SICS). These measures are related to intensity of outcomes, i.e. discomfort, burning, dryness, etc. with lower scores being better on a scale of 1-5.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: All subjects, enrolled, randomized, and completed the study. Subjects where identified as 'stainers' or 'non-stainers' and outcomes were reported per this stratification.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Itching1.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Burning/Stinging2.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Tearing2.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Dryness2.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Discomfort/Pain2.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Dryness2.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Itching1.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Tearing1.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Burning/Stinging2.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Discomfort/Pain2.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
ReNU MPS (Stainers)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Dryness2.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
ReNU MPS (Stainers)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Discomfort/Pain2.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
ReNU MPS (Stainers)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Burning/Stinging2.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
ReNU MPS (Stainers)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Itching2.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
ReNU MPS (Stainers)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Tearing2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
ReNU MPS (Non-Stainers)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Itching1.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
ReNU MPS (Non-Stainers)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Burning/Stinging1.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
ReNU MPS (Non-Stainers)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Discomfort/Pain2.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
ReNU MPS (Non-Stainers)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Dryness2.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
ReNU MPS (Non-Stainers)Intensity of Physiological OutcomesIntensity of Tearing1.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.79
Secondary

Physiological Responses

Mean of physiological outcomes for those subjects who are identified as susceptible versus non-susceptible for Solution Induced Corneal Staining (SICS). Physiological findings are done through a slit lamp examination and are known as biomicroscopy measurements. Measures are given in terms of average score with a minimum of zero and a worse grade the higher the value with a range of 0 to 4, (tarsal roughness is 0-7 scale).

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: All subjects, enrolled, randomized, and completed the study. Subjects where identified as 'stainers' or 'non-stainers' and outcomes were reported by this stratification.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Physiological ResponsesUpper Tarsal Hyperemia0.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Physiological ResponsesLower Tarsal Hyperemia0.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Physiological ResponsesTarsal Roughness0.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.74
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Physiological ResponsesCorneal Staining0.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Physiological ResponsesLimbal Hyperemia0.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Physiological ResponsesBulbar Hyperemia0.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Physiological ResponsesLower Tarsal Hyperemia0.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Physiological ResponsesBulbar Hyperemia0.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Physiological ResponsesCorneal Staining0.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Physiological ResponsesLimbal Hyperemia0.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Physiological ResponsesUpper Tarsal Hyperemia0.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Physiological ResponsesTarsal Roughness0.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
ReNU MPS (Stainers)Physiological ResponsesLower Tarsal Hyperemia0.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
ReNU MPS (Stainers)Physiological ResponsesLimbal Hyperemia0.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
ReNU MPS (Stainers)Physiological ResponsesTarsal Roughness0.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
ReNU MPS (Stainers)Physiological ResponsesBulbar Hyperemia0.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
ReNU MPS (Stainers)Physiological ResponsesUpper Tarsal Hyperemia0.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
ReNU MPS (Stainers)Physiological ResponsesCorneal Staining0.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
ReNU MPS (Non-Stainers)Physiological ResponsesTarsal Roughness0.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
ReNU MPS (Non-Stainers)Physiological ResponsesUpper Tarsal Hyperemia0.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
ReNU MPS (Non-Stainers)Physiological ResponsesCorneal Staining0.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
ReNU MPS (Non-Stainers)Physiological ResponsesLimbal Hyperemia0.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
ReNU MPS (Non-Stainers)Physiological ResponsesLower Tarsal Hyperemia0.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
ReNU MPS (Non-Stainers)Physiological ResponsesBulbar Hyperemia0.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Secondary

Wearing Time and Comfortable Wearing Time

Mean of physiological outcomes for those subjects who are identified as susceptible versus non-susceptible for Solution Induced Corneal Staining (SICS). Average wearing time and average comfortable wearing time.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: All subjects, enrolled, randomized, and completed the study. Subjects where identified as 'stainers' or 'non-stainers' and outcomes were reported per this stratification.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Wearing Time and Comfortable Wearing TimeAverage Wearing Time14.06 hoursStandard Deviation 2.24
Clear Care Lens Cleaning Solution (LCS)Wearing Time and Comfortable Wearing TimeAverage Comfortable Wearing Time12.42 hoursStandard Deviation 3.17
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Wearing Time and Comfortable Wearing TimeAverage Comfortable Wearing Time11.93 hoursStandard Deviation 3.47
ReNU Multi Purpose Solution (MPS)Wearing Time and Comfortable Wearing TimeAverage Wearing Time13.63 hoursStandard Deviation 2.55
ReNU MPS (Stainers)Wearing Time and Comfortable Wearing TimeAverage Wearing Time13.49 hoursStandard Deviation 2.67
ReNU MPS (Stainers)Wearing Time and Comfortable Wearing TimeAverage Comfortable Wearing Time11.35 hoursStandard Deviation 3.35
ReNU MPS (Non-Stainers)Wearing Time and Comfortable Wearing TimeAverage Comfortable Wearing Time11.75 hoursStandard Deviation 3.67
ReNU MPS (Non-Stainers)Wearing Time and Comfortable Wearing TimeAverage Wearing Time13.33 hoursStandard Deviation 2.28

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026