Skip to content

Study of LX1031 in Subjects With Non-Constipating Irritable Bowel Syndrome

A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple-Dose Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of Orally Administered LX1031 in Subjects With Non-Constipating Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00813098
Enrollment
155
Registered
2008-12-22
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2010-08-31
Last updated
2010-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of LX1031 versus a placebo control in subjects with non-constipating irritable bowel syndrome.

Interventions

DRUGLX1031 High Dose

A high dose of LX1031; daily oral intake for 28 days

DRUGLX1031 Low Dose

A low dose of LX1031; daily oral intake for 28 days.

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo dosing with daily oral intake

Sponsors

Lexicon Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males and females aged 18-70 years old * Documented diagnosis of IBS (IBS-diarrhea or IBS-mixed) based upon Rome III criteria * Abdominal pain/discomfort at least 2 days per week during the screening and run-in periods * Normal structural evaluation of the colon within 5 years prior to screening * Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to discontinue current drug therapy for IBS, except for bulking agents, through the duration of the study * Use of anticholinergic antidepressants, opioid pain medications, or any drugs that affect bowel motility * Lactose intolerance * Major psychological disorder * Significant nicotine or caffeine use (\>10 cigarettes and/or six 8 ounce cups of coffee per day, respectively)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjects Who Experienced Relief of IBS Pain and Discomfort at Week 4Week 4The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects experiencing relief of IBS pain and discomfort at Week 4 as measured by the response to the question,In the past 7 days have you had adequate relief of your irritable bowel syndrome pain and discomfort?

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Proportion of Days Per Week When Experiencing Urgency to DefecateBaseline to Week 4To assess sensation of urgency to defecate on a daily basis, subjects recorded in their daily diary a response to the following question,Have you felt or experienced a sense of urgency to pass stool today? The mean score (proportion of days per week when the subject experienced an urge to defecate) for Week 4 was subtracted from the baseline mean score to determine the mean change from baseline.
Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Consistency ScoresBaseline to Week 4Stool consistency was evaluated using the 7-point Bristol Stool Scale in which a score of 1 indicates separate hard lumps, 2 indicates sausage shaped but lumpy, 3 indicates sausage-like with cracks on the surface, 4 indicates sausage-like but smooth and soft, 5 indicates soft blobs with clear cut edges, 6 indicates fluffy pieces with ragged edges, and 7 indicates watery with no solid pieces. The mean score for Week 4 was subtracted from the baseline mean score to obtain the mean change from baseline.
Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool FrequencyBaseline to Week 4Subjects recorded the number of times they passed stool on a daily basis in the daily diary. The mean for Week 4 was subtracted from the baseline mean to obtain the mean change from baseline in stool frequency.
Change From Baseline at Week 4 on the Severity of BloatingBaseline to Week 4Subjects recorded in the daily diary the level of bloating they felt on a daily basis using a 100 mm visual analog scale (with 0 being not at all and 100 mm being worst possible). The mean score for Week 4 was subtracted from the baseline mean score to obtain the mean change from baseline in severity of bloating.
Change From Baseline at Week 4 on the Global Improvement Score.Baseline to Week 4The IBS Global Improvement Scale (IBS-GAI) asks Compared to the way you felt before you entered the study, have your IBS symptoms over the past 7 days been: 1-substantially worse, 2-moderately worse, 3-slightly worse, 4-no change, 5-slightly improved, 6-moderately improved, 7-substantially improved? The mean score for Week 4 was subtracted from the mean baseline score to obtain the mean change from baseline on the Global Improvement Score.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a multi-center trial in the United States, with 36 investigators participating.

Pre-assignment details

There was a 14-day Run-in period before randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
High Dose
A high dose of LX1031; daily oral intake for 28 days
43
Low Dose
A low dose of LX1031; daily oral intake for 28 days
44
Placebo
Matching placebo dosing with daily oral intake
47
Total134

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event241
Overall StudyInability to complete study procedures100
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up010
Overall StudyPrincipal Investigator decision010
Overall StudyProtocol Violation001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject010
Overall StudyWithdrew Consent010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHigh DoseLow DosePlaceboTotal
Age Continuous48.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.24
46.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.34
48.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
47.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
IB Sub-type
IBS-D
34 participant35 participant35 participant104 participant
IB Sub-type
IBS-M
9 participant9 participant12 participant30 participant
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
6 participants3 participants1 participants10 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 participants1 participants1 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
37 participants40 participants44 participants121 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
43 participants44 participants47 participants134 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants36 Participants7 Participants77 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants8 Participants40 Participants57 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 4911 / 5413 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 490 / 540 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Subjects Who Experienced Relief of IBS Pain and Discomfort at Week 4

The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects experiencing relief of IBS pain and discomfort at Week 4 as measured by the response to the question,In the past 7 days have you had adequate relief of your irritable bowel syndrome pain and discomfort?

Time frame: Week 4

Population: Per protocol population; Last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
High DoseSubjects Who Experienced Relief of IBS Pain and Discomfort at Week 423 Participants
Low DoseSubjects Who Experienced Relief of IBS Pain and Discomfort at Week 418 Participants
PlaceboSubjects Who Experienced Relief of IBS Pain and Discomfort at Week 420 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Proportion of Days Per Week When Experiencing Urgency to Defecate

To assess sensation of urgency to defecate on a daily basis, subjects recorded in their daily diary a response to the following question,Have you felt or experienced a sense of urgency to pass stool today? The mean score (proportion of days per week when the subject experienced an urge to defecate) for Week 4 was subtracted from the baseline mean score to determine the mean change from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

Population: Per protocol population; Last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High DoseChange From Baseline at Week 4 in Proportion of Days Per Week When Experiencing Urgency to Defecate-0.32 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.367
Low DoseChange From Baseline at Week 4 in Proportion of Days Per Week When Experiencing Urgency to Defecate-0.26 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.252
PlaceboChange From Baseline at Week 4 in Proportion of Days Per Week When Experiencing Urgency to Defecate-0.33 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.369
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Consistency Scores

Stool consistency was evaluated using the 7-point Bristol Stool Scale in which a score of 1 indicates separate hard lumps, 2 indicates sausage shaped but lumpy, 3 indicates sausage-like with cracks on the surface, 4 indicates sausage-like but smooth and soft, 5 indicates soft blobs with clear cut edges, 6 indicates fluffy pieces with ragged edges, and 7 indicates watery with no solid pieces. The mean score for Week 4 was subtracted from the baseline mean score to obtain the mean change from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

Population: Per protocol population; Last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High DoseChange From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Consistency Scores-1.11 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Low DoseChange From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Consistency Scores-0.30 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.877
PlaceboChange From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Consistency Scores-0.56 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.187
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Frequency

Subjects recorded the number of times they passed stool on a daily basis in the daily diary. The mean for Week 4 was subtracted from the baseline mean to obtain the mean change from baseline in stool frequency.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

Population: Per protocol population; Last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High DoseChange From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Frequency-0.75 Number of daily stoolsStandard Deviation 1.021
Low DoseChange From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Frequency-0.52 Number of daily stoolsStandard Deviation 0.921
PlaceboChange From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Frequency-0.62 Number of daily stoolsStandard Deviation 0.97
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 4 on the Global Improvement Score.

The IBS Global Improvement Scale (IBS-GAI) asks Compared to the way you felt before you entered the study, have your IBS symptoms over the past 7 days been: 1-substantially worse, 2-moderately worse, 3-slightly worse, 4-no change, 5-slightly improved, 6-moderately improved, 7-substantially improved? The mean score for Week 4 was subtracted from the mean baseline score to obtain the mean change from baseline on the Global Improvement Score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

Population: Per protocol population; Last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High DoseChange From Baseline at Week 4 on the Global Improvement Score.1.56 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.501
Low DoseChange From Baseline at Week 4 on the Global Improvement Score.1.33 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.459
PlaceboChange From Baseline at Week 4 on the Global Improvement Score.1.47 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.666
Secondary

Change From Baseline at Week 4 on the Severity of Bloating

Subjects recorded in the daily diary the level of bloating they felt on a daily basis using a 100 mm visual analog scale (with 0 being not at all and 100 mm being worst possible). The mean score for Week 4 was subtracted from the baseline mean score to obtain the mean change from baseline in severity of bloating.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

Population: Per protocol population; Last observation carried forward.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
High DoseChange From Baseline at Week 4 on the Severity of Bloating-18.68 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.922
Low DoseChange From Baseline at Week 4 on the Severity of Bloating-15.13 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.469
PlaceboChange From Baseline at Week 4 on the Severity of Bloating-15.48 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.855

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026