Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of LX1031 versus a placebo control in subjects with non-constipating irritable bowel syndrome.
Interventions
A high dose of LX1031; daily oral intake for 28 days
A low dose of LX1031; daily oral intake for 28 days.
Matching placebo dosing with daily oral intake
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Males and females aged 18-70 years old * Documented diagnosis of IBS (IBS-diarrhea or IBS-mixed) based upon Rome III criteria * Abdominal pain/discomfort at least 2 days per week during the screening and run-in periods * Normal structural evaluation of the colon within 5 years prior to screening * Ability to provide written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Inability to discontinue current drug therapy for IBS, except for bulking agents, through the duration of the study * Use of anticholinergic antidepressants, opioid pain medications, or any drugs that affect bowel motility * Lactose intolerance * Major psychological disorder * Significant nicotine or caffeine use (\>10 cigarettes and/or six 8 ounce cups of coffee per day, respectively)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Subjects Who Experienced Relief of IBS Pain and Discomfort at Week 4 | Week 4 | The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects experiencing relief of IBS pain and discomfort at Week 4 as measured by the response to the question,In the past 7 days have you had adequate relief of your irritable bowel syndrome pain and discomfort? |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Proportion of Days Per Week When Experiencing Urgency to Defecate | Baseline to Week 4 | To assess sensation of urgency to defecate on a daily basis, subjects recorded in their daily diary a response to the following question,Have you felt or experienced a sense of urgency to pass stool today? The mean score (proportion of days per week when the subject experienced an urge to defecate) for Week 4 was subtracted from the baseline mean score to determine the mean change from baseline. |
| Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Consistency Scores | Baseline to Week 4 | Stool consistency was evaluated using the 7-point Bristol Stool Scale in which a score of 1 indicates separate hard lumps, 2 indicates sausage shaped but lumpy, 3 indicates sausage-like with cracks on the surface, 4 indicates sausage-like but smooth and soft, 5 indicates soft blobs with clear cut edges, 6 indicates fluffy pieces with ragged edges, and 7 indicates watery with no solid pieces. The mean score for Week 4 was subtracted from the baseline mean score to obtain the mean change from baseline. |
| Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Frequency | Baseline to Week 4 | Subjects recorded the number of times they passed stool on a daily basis in the daily diary. The mean for Week 4 was subtracted from the baseline mean to obtain the mean change from baseline in stool frequency. |
| Change From Baseline at Week 4 on the Severity of Bloating | Baseline to Week 4 | Subjects recorded in the daily diary the level of bloating they felt on a daily basis using a 100 mm visual analog scale (with 0 being not at all and 100 mm being worst possible). The mean score for Week 4 was subtracted from the baseline mean score to obtain the mean change from baseline in severity of bloating. |
| Change From Baseline at Week 4 on the Global Improvement Score. | Baseline to Week 4 | The IBS Global Improvement Scale (IBS-GAI) asks Compared to the way you felt before you entered the study, have your IBS symptoms over the past 7 days been: 1-substantially worse, 2-moderately worse, 3-slightly worse, 4-no change, 5-slightly improved, 6-moderately improved, 7-substantially improved? The mean score for Week 4 was subtracted from the mean baseline score to obtain the mean change from baseline on the Global Improvement Score. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This was a multi-center trial in the United States, with 36 investigators participating.
Pre-assignment details
There was a 14-day Run-in period before randomization.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| High Dose A high dose of LX1031; daily oral intake for 28 days | 43 |
| Low Dose A low dose of LX1031; daily oral intake for 28 days | 44 |
| Placebo Matching placebo dosing with daily oral intake | 47 |
| Total | 134 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Inability to complete study procedures | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Principal Investigator decision | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrew Consent | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | High Dose | Low Dose | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | 48.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.24 | 46.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.34 | 48.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 | 47.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 |
| IB Sub-type IBS-D | 34 participant | 35 participant | 35 participant | 104 participant |
| IB Sub-type IBS-M | 9 participant | 9 participant | 12 participant | 30 participant |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 0 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 6 participants | 3 participants | 1 participants | 10 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 0 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants | 2 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 37 participants | 40 participants | 44 participants | 121 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 43 participants | 44 participants | 47 participants | 134 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 34 Participants | 36 Participants | 7 Participants | 77 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 9 Participants | 8 Participants | 40 Participants | 57 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 11 / 49 | 11 / 54 | 13 / 52 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 49 | 0 / 54 | 0 / 52 |
Outcome results
Subjects Who Experienced Relief of IBS Pain and Discomfort at Week 4
The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects experiencing relief of IBS pain and discomfort at Week 4 as measured by the response to the question,In the past 7 days have you had adequate relief of your irritable bowel syndrome pain and discomfort?
Time frame: Week 4
Population: Per protocol population; Last observation carried forward.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| High Dose | Subjects Who Experienced Relief of IBS Pain and Discomfort at Week 4 | 23 Participants |
| Low Dose | Subjects Who Experienced Relief of IBS Pain and Discomfort at Week 4 | 18 Participants |
| Placebo | Subjects Who Experienced Relief of IBS Pain and Discomfort at Week 4 | 20 Participants |
Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Proportion of Days Per Week When Experiencing Urgency to Defecate
To assess sensation of urgency to defecate on a daily basis, subjects recorded in their daily diary a response to the following question,Have you felt or experienced a sense of urgency to pass stool today? The mean score (proportion of days per week when the subject experienced an urge to defecate) for Week 4 was subtracted from the baseline mean score to determine the mean change from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Population: Per protocol population; Last observation carried forward.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Dose | Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Proportion of Days Per Week When Experiencing Urgency to Defecate | -0.32 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.367 |
| Low Dose | Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Proportion of Days Per Week When Experiencing Urgency to Defecate | -0.26 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.252 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Proportion of Days Per Week When Experiencing Urgency to Defecate | -0.33 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.369 |
Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Consistency Scores
Stool consistency was evaluated using the 7-point Bristol Stool Scale in which a score of 1 indicates separate hard lumps, 2 indicates sausage shaped but lumpy, 3 indicates sausage-like with cracks on the surface, 4 indicates sausage-like but smooth and soft, 5 indicates soft blobs with clear cut edges, 6 indicates fluffy pieces with ragged edges, and 7 indicates watery with no solid pieces. The mean score for Week 4 was subtracted from the baseline mean score to obtain the mean change from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Population: Per protocol population; Last observation carried forward.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Dose | Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Consistency Scores | -1.11 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.92 |
| Low Dose | Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Consistency Scores | -0.30 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.877 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Consistency Scores | -0.56 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.187 |
Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Frequency
Subjects recorded the number of times they passed stool on a daily basis in the daily diary. The mean for Week 4 was subtracted from the baseline mean to obtain the mean change from baseline in stool frequency.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Population: Per protocol population; Last observation carried forward.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Dose | Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Frequency | -0.75 Number of daily stools | Standard Deviation 1.021 |
| Low Dose | Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Frequency | -0.52 Number of daily stools | Standard Deviation 0.921 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Stool Frequency | -0.62 Number of daily stools | Standard Deviation 0.97 |
Change From Baseline at Week 4 on the Global Improvement Score.
The IBS Global Improvement Scale (IBS-GAI) asks Compared to the way you felt before you entered the study, have your IBS symptoms over the past 7 days been: 1-substantially worse, 2-moderately worse, 3-slightly worse, 4-no change, 5-slightly improved, 6-moderately improved, 7-substantially improved? The mean score for Week 4 was subtracted from the mean baseline score to obtain the mean change from baseline on the Global Improvement Score.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Population: Per protocol population; Last observation carried forward.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Dose | Change From Baseline at Week 4 on the Global Improvement Score. | 1.56 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.501 |
| Low Dose | Change From Baseline at Week 4 on the Global Improvement Score. | 1.33 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.459 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline at Week 4 on the Global Improvement Score. | 1.47 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.666 |
Change From Baseline at Week 4 on the Severity of Bloating
Subjects recorded in the daily diary the level of bloating they felt on a daily basis using a 100 mm visual analog scale (with 0 being not at all and 100 mm being worst possible). The mean score for Week 4 was subtracted from the baseline mean score to obtain the mean change from baseline in severity of bloating.
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Population: Per protocol population; Last observation carried forward.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Dose | Change From Baseline at Week 4 on the Severity of Bloating | -18.68 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.922 |
| Low Dose | Change From Baseline at Week 4 on the Severity of Bloating | -15.13 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.469 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline at Week 4 on the Severity of Bloating | -15.48 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.855 |