Skip to content

Analgesic Ointment on Temporomandibular Joint and Masticatory Muscle Pain

Effect of an Analgesic Ointment on the Relief of Temporomandibular Joint and Masticatory Muscle Pain: a Randomized, Double Blinded, Placebo-controlled Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00812604
Enrollment
55
Registered
2008-12-22
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2008-09-30
Last updated
2014-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Temporomandibular Disorders

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of using topical cream of Ping On Ointment and using Vaseline cream in the treatment of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and masticatory muscle pain, in order to establish the true efficacy of Ping On Ointment. Both Ping On Ointment and Vaseline are considered intervention.

Detailed description

Aims: To compare the effectiveness of using topical cream of Ping On Ointment and using Vaseline cream in the treatment of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and masticatory muscle pain, in order to establish the true efficacy of Ping On Ointment. Methods: In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, 55 subjects with TMJ and/or masticatory pain (Group 1 patients according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorder (RDC/TMD) received Ping On Ointment for 4 weeks; or placebo for 4 weeks. Subjects were evaluated with standard measures of efficacy: pain intensity measured by visual analogue scale and maximal comfortable mandibular opening, at baseline and again after 4 weeks of treatment.

Interventions

DRUGPing On Ointment

Ping On Ointment

Placebo

Sponsors

The University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Self report of facial ache or pain in the muscles of mastication, the TMJ, or the region in front of ear or inside the ear 2. Positive clinical diagnosis of TMDs. The TMD diagnosis is classified using axis I of the research diagnostic criteria ( RDC) for TMDs. The RDC diagnosis consists of joint pain at rest ( spontaneous pain) and evoked pain (hyperalgesia) on palpation of the TMJ, TMJ reduction consists of reciprocal clicking or joint noise with mandibular movement examination. 3. For joint pain complaint, subjects will be required to have a self-report of at least 1 month of daily or nearly-daily pain. 4. Subjects with myogenic pain will be included if they meet inclusion and

Exclusion criteria

since patients with TMDs are known to exhibit muscle pain secondary to their joint dysfunction.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Efficacy in the Treatment of TMJ and Muscle Pain4 weeksThe efficacy in the treatment of TMJ and muscle pain is measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS). The VAS consists of a 100 mm line, anchored with the extremes of pain intensity represented as no pain ( 0 mm) and worst pain possible ( 100 mm).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Mandibular Function.4 weeksThe mandibular function, the maximal comfortable mandibular opening measured in millimeters at the subjects's maximum incisor to incisor mouth opening using a ruler.

Countries

China

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ping On Ointment Group
Ping On Ointment was used
28
Placebo Group
Vaseline with minor trace of Ping On Ointment was used
27
Total55

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo GroupPing On Ointment GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
27 Participants28 Participants55 Participants
Age, Continuous43.96 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.127
47.14 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.296
45.51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.401
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
27 participants28 participants55 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants19 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants9 Participants20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 230 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 230 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

The Efficacy in the Treatment of TMJ and Muscle Pain

The efficacy in the treatment of TMJ and muscle pain is measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS). The VAS consists of a 100 mm line, anchored with the extremes of pain intensity represented as no pain ( 0 mm) and worst pain possible ( 100 mm).

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ping On Ointment GroupThe Efficacy in the Treatment of TMJ and Muscle Pain21.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.07
Placebo GroupThe Efficacy in the Treatment of TMJ and Muscle Pain40.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.44
Secondary

The Mandibular Function.

The mandibular function, the maximal comfortable mandibular opening measured in millimeters at the subjects's maximum incisor to incisor mouth opening using a ruler.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ping On Ointment GroupThe Mandibular Function.4.435 mmStandard Deviation 6.68
Placebo GroupThe Mandibular Function.0.818 mmStandard Deviation 3.404

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026