Skip to content

Intensive Glycemic Control for Congestive Heart Failure Exacerbation

Intensive Glycemic Control for Congestive Heart Failure Exacerbation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00812253
Enrollment
74
Registered
2008-12-22
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2018-01-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Congestive Heart Failure, Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Heart failure, Hyperglycemia, Hospital, Diabetes Mellitus

Brief summary

Patients with heart failure often have high blood sugar (glucose).

Detailed description

Patients with heart failure often have high blood sugar. High glucose contributes to severe hospital complications and even death. Studies suggest that heart failure patients who have high glucose or diabetes do not live as long as patients with normal glucose. In this study, we will determine whether normalizing blood sugars using intravenous insulin short-term will improve outcomes in patients hospitalized for congestive heart failure. We enrolled patients with severe heart failure and randomly assigned them into 2 groups. We used intravenous (given through the vein) insulin to lower blood sugar levels in group 1, and insulin injections in group 2. We determined whether intravenous insulin improved hospital length of stay, rates of readmission, inflammatory markers, and cardiovascular tests that predict mortality in patients with heart failure.

Interventions

Half of subjects will receive insulin through the intravenous route while the other half will receive 4 injections per day.

Half of subjects will receive insulin through the intravenous route while the other half will receive 4 injections per day.

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
Kathleen Dungan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 and above * Admitted (less than 48 hours) to the OSU Ross Heart Hospital with worsening heart failure * Hyperglycemia or diabetes. Hyperglycemia is defined as blood glucose greater than 150 mg/dL on at least 2 occasions separated by at least 4 hours apart, insulin use, or HbA1c \>6.5%.

Exclusion criteria

* Type 1 diabetes * Receiving comfort care measures only * Hospital stay expected to be less than 2 days * Pregnancy * Prisoners * Participation in the study on prior hospitalizations * Acute myocardial infarction within 3 months * End stage renal or liver disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital Length of StayDaysDuration of hospitalization in days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospital Readmission30 daysAll-cause hospital readmission at 30 days after discharge
Heart Rate Variability72 hoursHigh frequency (HF) Heart rate variability (HRV). HRV was assessed with a Bionex system (Mindware, Gahanna, OH). The electrocardiogram was performed in the standard lead II configuration and impedance cardiography was performed using a standard tetrapolar arrangement. Measures were performed at baseline and each morning (0800-1000 hour) during and following the intervention for 7 minutes each. Software (Mindware, Gahanna, OH) was used to derive HF HRV. The middle five minutes of the recordings were scored minute by minute and the first suitable1 minute period was used for calculation. Five minute epochs were not feasible due to an unexpectedly high frequency of ectopy. One minute intervals allow calculation of HF (parasympathetic tone) but not low frequency (combination of sympathetic and parasympathetic tone).
Change in Quality of Life30 dayChange in Quality of Life questionnaire measured from baseline (enrollment) to 30 days following discharge. The questionnaire is a self-administered disease-specific questionnaire for patients with HF, comprising 21 items rated on six-point Likert scales, representing different degrees of impact of HF on health related quality of life, from 0 (none) to 5 (very much). It provides a total score (range 0-105, from best to worst HRQoL),
Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)72 hoursBrain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was measured at day 3
Cardiac Output72 hoursCardiac output measured using impedance cardiography at 72 hours.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intravenous (IV) Insulin
Intravenous (IV) insulin: In patients assigned to IV insulin, SQ basal insulin was discontinued and IV insulin was started at 21:00 on the day of enrollment. Patients continued to receive subcutaneous prandial insulin. All patients receiving IV insulin were managed using our hospital's universal nursing run guideline, which has a target glucose of 6.1-8.3 mmol/l. Patients were transitioned from the infusion after 48 hours using approximately 70% of the estimated basal insulin infusion requirement with 4 hours of overlap.
26
Subcutaneous (SQ) Insulin
Basal bolus insulin (4 injections per day) In subjects who were insulin naïve, the total daily dose of insulin was calculated as 0.4 or 0.5 unit/kg if the enrollment glucose was \<11.1 mmol/l or \>11.1 mmol/l respectively. In subjects who were not insulin naive, the total insulin dose was calculated as 100% or 120% of the total daily insulin dose at admission in subjects with an enrollment glucose of \<11.1 mmol/l or \>11.1 mmol/l respectively. Basal and prandial insulin were administered in approximately equal total daily doses with correction dosing and adjustments based upon a published algorithm. The target glucose range was 5.6-8.3 mmol/l.
39
Total65

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up20
Overall StudyProtocol Violation11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntravenous (IV) InsulinSubcutaneous (SQ) InsulinTotal
Age, Continuous61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
HbA1c8.4 Percentage of hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
7.7 Percentage of hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
8.0 Percentage of hemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
Preserved ejection fraction
Preserved Ejection Fraction
6 participants11 participants17 participants
Preserved ejection fraction
Reduced Ejection Fraction
20 participants28 participants48 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
26 participants39 participants65 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants13 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants26 Participants44 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 263 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 260 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Hospital Length of Stay

Duration of hospitalization in days

Time frame: Days

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Intravenous (IV) InsulinHospital Length of Stay7 days
Subcutaneous (SQ) InsulinHospital Length of Stay8 days
Secondary

Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was measured at day 3

Time frame: 72 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Intravenous (IV) InsulinBrain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)794 pg/ml
Subcutaneous (SQ) InsulinBrain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)356 pg/ml
Secondary

Cardiac Output

Cardiac output measured using impedance cardiography at 72 hours.

Time frame: 72 hours

Population: Patients without data due to medical devices, conditions that preclude measurement of PEP such as arrhythmias, or technical problems.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intravenous (IV) InsulinCardiac Output10.3 liter/minStandard Deviation 9.3
Subcutaneous (SQ) InsulinCardiac Output8.6 liter/minStandard Deviation 3.5
Secondary

Change in Quality of Life

Change in Quality of Life questionnaire measured from baseline (enrollment) to 30 days following discharge. The questionnaire is a self-administered disease-specific questionnaire for patients with HF, comprising 21 items rated on six-point Likert scales, representing different degrees of impact of HF on health related quality of life, from 0 (none) to 5 (very much). It provides a total score (range 0-105, from best to worst HRQoL),

Time frame: 30 day

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Intravenous (IV) InsulinChange in Quality of Life-22.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22
Subcutaneous (SQ) InsulinChange in Quality of Life-22.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.3
Secondary

Heart Rate Variability

High frequency (HF) Heart rate variability (HRV). HRV was assessed with a Bionex system (Mindware, Gahanna, OH). The electrocardiogram was performed in the standard lead II configuration and impedance cardiography was performed using a standard tetrapolar arrangement. Measures were performed at baseline and each morning (0800-1000 hour) during and following the intervention for 7 minutes each. Software (Mindware, Gahanna, OH) was used to derive HF HRV. The middle five minutes of the recordings were scored minute by minute and the first suitable1 minute period was used for calculation. Five minute epochs were not feasible due to an unexpectedly high frequency of ectopy. One minute intervals allow calculation of HF (parasympathetic tone) but not low frequency (combination of sympathetic and parasympathetic tone).

Time frame: 72 hours

Population: Subjects with medical devices, conditions that preclude measurement of HRV such as arrhythmias, or technical problems could not be analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Intravenous (IV) InsulinHeart Rate Variability5.1 ms^2
Subcutaneous (SQ) InsulinHeart Rate Variability20.7 ms^2
Secondary

Hospital Readmission

All-cause hospital readmission at 30 days after discharge

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Intravenous (IV) InsulinHospital ReadmissionReadmitted7 participants
Intravenous (IV) InsulinHospital ReadmissionNot readmitted19 participants
Subcutaneous (SQ) InsulinHospital ReadmissionReadmitted15 participants
Subcutaneous (SQ) InsulinHospital ReadmissionNot readmitted24 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026