Skip to content

Paracervical Block During Office Hysteroscopy

Paracervical Block During Office Hysteroscopy: A Randomized Double Blind Placebo-controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00811187
Enrollment
80
Registered
2008-12-18
Start date
2007-03-31
Completion date
2008-09-30
Last updated
2019-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Paracervical Block

Keywords

Hysteroscopy, Pain medication, Lidocaine, Office Procedures

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of paracervical block for pain relief in office hysteroscopy - particularly with the placement of the Essure device. Subjects will be randomized to receive either paracervical block or saline, and will have pain assessments performed throughout the procedure. Subjects and physicians will be blinded to group assignments.

Interventions

DRUGLidocaine paracervical block

5cc 1% lidocaine injection in each paracervical region

DRUGNormal Saline

5cc Normal Saline injection in each paracervical region

Sponsors

Montefiore Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women eligible and scheduled for office hysteroscopic placement of essure devices

Exclusion criteria

* Planned secondary procedures * Lidocaine allergy * Repeat procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of Pain on a 10-point Visual Analog Pain Scale During the Procedure.During ProcedureThis used a visual analog scale from 0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum) that was measured as centimeters. A higher score would indicate more pain, therefore, a worse outcome. Pain was assessed at each step that could potentially elicit pain, specifically when there was direct physical manipulation.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a investigator-sponsored single site clinical trial. Patients were recruited based on physician referral at Montefiore Medical Center from March 2007 to June 2008. Patients were excluded from participation if they had a known allergy to lidocaine.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 80 patients that met inclusion and exclusion criteria, only 74 completed either the lidocaine or saline placebo single-injection. Patients were randomized 1:1.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lidocaine Paracervical Block
10 cc of 1% Lidocaine injected in the paracervical region
40
Saline Placebo Injection
10 cc of Normal Saline as placebo injected in paracervical region
40
Total80

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyUnable to place device / procedure abort33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSaline Placebo InjectionLidocaine Paracervical BlockTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
40 Participants40 Participants80 Participants
Age, Continuous36.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
34.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
Region of Enrollment
United States
40 participants40 participants80 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
40 Participants40 Participants80 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 370 / 37
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 370 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 370 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Assessment of Pain on a 10-point Visual Analog Pain Scale During the Procedure.

This used a visual analog scale from 0 (minimum) to 10 (maximum) that was measured as centimeters. A higher score would indicate more pain, therefore, a worse outcome. Pain was assessed at each step that could potentially elicit pain, specifically when there was direct physical manipulation.

Time frame: During Procedure

Population: Intent to Treat Population (all participants assigned to lidocaine or saline).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lidocaine GroupAssessment of Pain on a 10-point Visual Analog Pain Scale During the Procedure.4.15 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Saline Placebo GroupAssessment of Pain on a 10-point Visual Analog Pain Scale During the Procedure.3.38 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.84
Comparison: A sample size calculation and power analysis was conducted using PS Power and Sample Size Calculations 2.1.30 (Vanderbilt University, Department of Biostatistics, Nashville, TN) to determine necessary sample size.p-value: <0.001Regression, Linear

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026