Skip to content

A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With Herceptin (Trastuzumab) and Xeloda (Capecitabine) in Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

A Single Arm Open-label, Phase II Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With Trastuzumab and Capecitabine as First-line Treatment of Patients With HER2-positive Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00811135
Enrollment
88
Registered
2008-12-18
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2016-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

This single arm study will assess the efficacy and safety of Avastin in combination with Herceptin and Xeloda as first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Patients will receive 3-weekly treatment cycles of Herceptin (8mg/kg iv on day 1 of first cycle, followed by 6mg/kg iv maintenance dose on day 1 of subsequent cycles), Xeloda (1000mg/m2 bid po on days 1-14 of each treatment cycle) and Avastin (15mg/kg on day 2 of first treatment cycle,and on day 1 of each subsequent cycle).The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is \<100 individuals.

Interventions

DRUGbevacizumab [Avastin]

15mg/kg iv on day 2 of first 3-week cycle,and on day 1 of subsequent cycles

DRUGcapecitabine [Xeloda]

1000mg/m2 bid po on days 1-14 of each 3-week cycle

8mg/kg iv loading dose on day 1 of first 3-week cycle, followed by 6mg/kg iv maintenance dose on day 1 of subsequent cycles

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients, \>=18 years of age; * breast cancer with measurable locally recurrent or metastatic lesions; * candidate for chemotherapy; * HER2-positive disease; * ECOG PS of \<=2.

Exclusion criteria

* previous anticancer therapy for metastatic breast cancer; * previous radiotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (except for adjuvant radiotherapy \>=6 months before enrollment); * chronic daily treatment with corticosteroids (\>=10mg/day), aspirin (\>325 mg/day) or clopidogrel (\>75mg/day); * other primary tumor within last 5 years, except for adequately treated cervical cancer in situ, squamous or basal cell skin cancer; * uncontrolled hypertension or significant cardiovascular disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)Screening until disease progression (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)Tumor response was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), Version 1.0. BOR was defined as the best response recorded for a participant from the start of treatment until disease progression/recurrence. Percentage of participants with a BOR of confirmed CR or PR (responders) was reported. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level; PR: at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. Confirmed responses were those which were confirmed by a repeat assessment, performed 4 weeks after the criteria for response first met.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Screening until disease progression (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)PFS was defined as the time from enrollment to time of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Progression: at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Number of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)Screening until death (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)OS was defined as the time from enrollment to death from any cause where enrollment was defined as successfully passed screening visit, enrolled in the study and received first dose of study treatment.
Overall Survival (OS)Screening until death (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)OS was defined as the time from enrollment to death from any cause where enrollment was defined as successfully passed screening visit, enrolled in the study and received first dose of study treatment. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Number of Participants With Disease Progression or DeathScreening until disease progression (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time to Progression (TTP)Screening until disease progression (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)TTP was defined as the time from enrollment to first documented disease progression (at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions).
Number of Participants With ResponseScreening until disease progression (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)Participants who had CR or PR were considered as responders. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level; PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD.
Duration of Response (DR)Screening until disease progression (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)DR was defined as the time from the first recorded response (CR/PR) to the date of first documented progression or death. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. Progression: at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. DR was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Number of Participants With Time to Progression (TTP)Screening until disease progression (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)TTP was defined as the time from enrollment to first documented disease progression (at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions). TTP was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.

Countries

Denmark, France, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Screening details were taken 28 days prior to baseline. There were 88 participants included from 23 centers.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Capecitabine
Participants received IV trastuzumab (8 mg/kg) for first cycle and then 6 mg/kg for subsequent cycles followed by bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on Day 1 of each treatment cycles along with capecitabine administered orally to participants at a dose of 1000 mg/m\^2 BID on Days 1 to 14 of each treatment cycle until disease progression, unmanageable toxicity or participant request for discontinuation. Treatment cycles were of 3 weeks.
88
Total88

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdministrative/Other Unspecified11
Overall StudyAdverse Event/Intercurrent Illness8
Overall StudyDeath3
Overall StudyOngoing59
Overall StudyProtocol Violation2
Overall StudyRefused Treatment1
Overall StudyViolation of Selection Criteria1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTrastuzumab + Bevacizumab + Capecitabine
Age, Continuous53.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.94
Sex: Female, Male
Female
87 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
81 / 88
serious
Total, serious adverse events
20 / 88

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)

Tumor response was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), Version 1.0. BOR was defined as the best response recorded for a participant from the start of treatment until disease progression/recurrence. Percentage of participants with a BOR of confirmed CR or PR (responders) was reported. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level; PR: at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. Confirmed responses were those which were confirmed by a repeat assessment, performed 4 weeks after the criteria for response first met.

Time frame: Screening until disease progression (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + CapecitabinePercentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)75.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Response (DR)

DR was defined as the time from the first recorded response (CR/PR) to the date of first documented progression or death. CR: disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. Progression: at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. DR was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.

Time frame: Screening until disease progression (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + CapecitabineDuration of Response (DR)12.7 months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Disease Progression or Death

Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Time frame: Screening until disease progression (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + CapecitabineNumber of Participants With Disease Progression or Death70 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from enrollment to death from any cause where enrollment was defined as successfully passed screening visit, enrolled in the study and received first dose of study treatment.

Time frame: Screening until death (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + CapecitabineNumber of Participants With Overall Survival (OS)40 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Response

Participants who had CR or PR were considered as responders. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level; PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD.

Time frame: Screening until disease progression (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + CapecitabineNumber of Participants With Response66 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP was defined as the time from enrollment to first documented disease progression (at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions). TTP was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.

Time frame: Screening until disease progression (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + CapecitabineNumber of Participants With Time to Progression (TTP)62 participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from enrollment to death from any cause where enrollment was defined as successfully passed screening visit, enrolled in the study and received first dose of study treatment. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.

Time frame: Screening until death (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + CapecitabineOverall Survival (OS)31.8 months
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from enrollment to time of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Progression: at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.

Time frame: Screening until disease progression (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + CapecitabineProgression Free Survival (PFS)14.2 months
Secondary

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP was defined as the time from enrollment to first documented disease progression (at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions).

Time frame: Screening until disease progression (assessed at screening, every 6 weeks up to Week 36, thereafter every 9 weeks during treatment period, and then every 3 months during follow-up, up to approximately 4 years)

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Trastuzumab + Bevacizumab + CapecitabineTime to Progression (TTP)14.5 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026