Rectal Prolapse
Conditions
Keywords
ODS, stapled transanal rectal resection
Brief summary
This randomized study was designed to compare the 2 year clinical and functional results with the STARR procedure using a new curved cutter stapler or the same operation done with 2 traditional circular staplers.
Detailed description
From January to November 2006, 80 women were selected, with clinical examination, constipation score, colonoscopy, anorectal manometry, and perineography and randomly assigned to 2 groups: 40 patients underwent stapled transanal rectal resection with two staplers PPH-01 (Ethicon Endosurgery Inc, Pomezia, Italy) (STARR group) and 40 had the same operation with new, curved multi-fire stapler Contour R Transtar TM (TRANSTAR group). Patients were followed up with clinical examination, constipation score, and perineography.
Interventions
stapled transanal rectal resection
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Rectal prolapse * Rectocele * ODS score \> 15 * Continence score \< 3 * Resting pressure \> 40 mm/Hg
Exclusion criteria
* Previous anorectal surgery * Ods score \< 15 * Continence score \> 3 * Resting pressure \< 40 * Concomitant pelvic floor diseases * Psychiatric diseases * Absolute contraindications to surgery
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| incidence of recurrences | 2 years |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| outcomes on symptoms and defecography | 2 years |
Countries
Italy