Skip to content

Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury With Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy

Treatment of Moderate to Mild Cognitive Dysfunction Caused by Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) With Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00810615
Enrollment
50
Registered
2008-12-18
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2011-01-31
Last updated
2018-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Injury, Chronic

Keywords

chronic TBI, cognitive function, PTSD, HBO, hyperbaric, oxygen, chronic brain injury

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) improves the cognitive function of OIF/OEF individuals who have chronic mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI). Cognitive function includes such things as thinking, remembering, recognition, concentration ability and perception. Traumatic brain injury is common with head injuries caused by blows to the head, nearby explosions, or concussion. Subjects will be assigned to an intervention or sham arm. Computer based cognitive tests will be used as outcome measures. Subjects are enrolled by invitation only.

Detailed description

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) did a comprehensive review of the literature focusing on TBI, stroke and cerebral palsy in Sep 2003. The study design and goals were based on the AHRQ recommendations for future hyperbaric oxygen for TBI research. This report stated, The most important gap in the evidence is a lack of a good quality time-series study or controlled trial of the effects of HBOT on cognition, memory, and functional status in patients with deficits due to mild and moderate chronic TBI. The AHRQ Evidence Report further stated, Lack of agreement on the dosage of HBOT and the duration of treatment is an important barrier to conducting good-quality clinical studies…Good-quality dose-ranging studies of HBOT for brain injury can be done, based on the model used by pharmaceutical manufacturers and the FDA. It is likely that the dosage of HBOT needs to be individualized based on the patient's age, clinical condition, and other factors. Although there are many anecdotal cases of TBI improvement with HBO, this case is backed with non-subjective data. The biological basis for why breathing 100% oxygen under pressurized conditions improves chronic neurological trauma remains unclear. There is some evidence that chronic TBI effects are related to the demyelization effect linked to the expression of a specific protease, calpain. This protease is also seen in demyelination delayed effects of carbon monoxide poisoning which is slowed by treatment with HBO. The idling neuron theory advocated in neurological studies suggest that HBO may increase metabolic performance of chronically impaired neurons that were marginally capable, enabling restoration of full function leading in turn to increased integrative plasticity. HBO has been shown to increase recruitment of stem cells from the bone marrow, suggesting that HBO may increase the rate at which damaged neuronal tissue can be reconstituted de novo. The proposed research will treat 25 subjects using HBO (2.4 ATA breathing 100% oxygen) and 25 subjects in a sham HBO treatment (1.3 ATA breathing air). Computer-based cognitive testing and the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for Military (PCL-M) will be administered pre- and post-HBOT as well as at intervals throughout the treatment. The cognitive test results and stem cell results will be analyzed within each subject at the various treatment points as well as cohort groups between each treatment leg. Cognitive test scores will also be compared to cognitive test population reference bases matched for gender and age. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2003 report also stated, If there is a 1 percent chance that the treatment works, a rational decision maker would try it-there is a potential gain and no potential loss. On the other hand, if there are proven harms, and their severity and frequency are well described, the probability that the treatment works would have to be higher before most people would try it

Interventions

OTHERHyperbaric oxygen @ 2.4 ATA

Subject will breath 100% oxygen at 2.4 Atmospheres Absolute (ATA) in three 30 minute periods separated by 10 minutes of breathing air at 2.4 ATA. Hyperbaric exposures will be done up to 5 times per week with a total number of 30 exposures.

OTHERSham treatment

Sponsors

San Antonio Military Medical Center
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* neurology diagnosis of mild to moderate TBI * injury sustained during OIF/OEF military activities * perception of cognitive dysfunction following their injury * stable mental status for at least two months * stable psychotropic medication history for at least one month * ability to perform computer based cognitive testing (must be capable using a mouse and PDA pointer and readily view the displays) * TBI occurrence since 7 October 2001 * ability to consent

Exclusion criteria

* medical conditions that prevent subject from participating in hyperbaric environments * previous hyperbaric oxygen treatments since being diagnosed with TBI * history of alcohol abuse * history of drug abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code Sub RecallBaseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure seriesBrainCheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 6 to 135. The scores in this section represent results of the code sub recall subtest.
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Go-NoGo Reaction TimeBaseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure seriesBraincheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate higher accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 41 to 174. The scores in this section represent results of the Go-NoGo reaction time subtest.
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Matching To SampleBaseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure seriesBrainCheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 6 to 50. The scores in this section represent results of the matching to sample subtest.
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Verbal MemoryBaseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure seriesThe Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) battery was developed at the University of Pittsburgh. It has a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 89.4% in discriminating between concussion and non-concussion groups. It consists of a medical history questionnaire regarding concussions and resultant symptoms including loss of consciousness, memory loss, confusion, headache, seizure activity, emotional state, and sleep patterns. There are four subtests given and scored by computer. These include verbal and visual memory, visual motor speed, and response time. The composite scores are specifically designed to determine changes within the individual, better or worse, over time. The verbal memory score demonstrates improvement as the score increases. The score range was 36.8 to 98.6.
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Military Version (PCL-M) Scoresbaseline compared to the change at post hyperbaric exposures (30) series and the six weeks post hyperbaric exposure seriesThe PCL-M is a self reported test in which a list of 17 problems and complaints are offered to the individual to score on a 1 to 5 scale with 1 designating not at all, 2= a little bit, 3= moderately, 4= quite a bit and 5 designating extremely. A sample complaint would be repeated, disturbing dreams of a stressful military experience. Hence there is a possible total score range from 17 to 85. For military members, a score of 50 or above is indicative of PTSD. A change from baseline of 5-9 represents a reliable change and change of 10 or greater is a significant change.
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Visual MemoryBaseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure seriesThe Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) battery was developed at the University of Pittsburgh. It has a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 89.4% in discriminating between concussion and non-concussion groups. It consists of a medical history questionnaire regarding concussions and resultant symptoms including loss of consciousness, memory loss, confusion, headache, seizure activity, emotional state, and sleep patterns. There are four subtests given and scored by computer. These include verbal and visual memory, visual motor speed, and response time. The composite scores are specifically designed to determine changes within the individual, better or worse, over time. The visual memory score demonstrates improvement as the score increases. The score range was 31.2 to 92.7.
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Processing SpeedBaseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure seriesThe Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) battery was developed at the University of Pittsburgh. It has a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 89.4% in discriminating between concussion and non-concussion groups. It consists of a medical history questionnaire regarding concussions and resultant symptoms including loss of consciousness, memory loss, confusion, headache, seizure activity, emotional state, and sleep patterns. There are four subtests given and scored by computer. These include verbal and visual memory, visual motor speed, and response time. The composite scores are specifically designed to determine changes within the individual, better or worse, over time. The Processing Speed score demonstrates improvement as the score increases. The score range was 9.7 to 52.4.
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Reaction TimeBaseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure seriesThe Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) battery was developed at the University of Pittsburgh. It has a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 89.4% in discriminating between concussion and non-concussion groups. It consists of a medical history questionnaire regarding concussions and resultant symptoms including loss of consciousness, memory loss, confusion, headache, seizure activity, emotional state, and sleep patterns. There are four subtests given and scored by computer. These include verbal and visual memory, visual motor speed, and response time. The composite scores are specifically designed to determine changes within the individual, better or worse, over time. The reaction time score demonstrates improvement as the score decreases. The score range was 0.42 to 1.84.
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Simple Reaction TimeBaseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure seriesBraincheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate higher accuracy in each of the subtest. The simple reaction time range is 30 to 255.
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code SubstitutionBaseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure seriesBraincheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate higher accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 9 to 66. The scores in this section represent results of the code substitution subtest.
Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Procedural Reaction TimeBaseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure seriesBraincheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate higher accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 25 to 118. The scores in this section represent results of the procedural reaction time.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stem Cells: CD_34six weeks post hyperbaric exposure seriesA non-parametric regression 14 using the Theil estimator was fit to the observed data in order to demonstrate general trends for relations between measures of cognitive functioning and increased stem cells.
Functional MRIsix weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment occurred from Nov 2008 - Nov 2010. Candidate subjects with a diagnosis of chronic truamatic brain injury (TBI) were identified by DoD neurologists. Those interested were screened for inclusion/exclusion criteria. 103 candidates were screened. 22 did not qualify; 31 were deferred (psychotropic medication or mental status unstable).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sham Treatment
Subjects breathed air at less than 1.3 Atmospheres Absolute (ATA) in three 30 minute periods separated by 10 minutes of breathing air at less that 1.3 ATA. Hyperbaric exposures were done up to 5 times per week with a total number of 30 exposures. Pressurization time was seven minutes to a depth of 11 feet of sea water (fsw) or 1.3 ATA. The chamber pressure was slowly decreased over 10 minutes to 6 fsw (1.2 ATA). The final depressurization to surface was done over a 10 minute period. To simulate the treatment 2.4 ATA pressurization, pressurizations and depressurizations were done using venting techniques that would be nearly identical with the noise and temperature as that experienced with the treatment leg. The inside observers simulated pressure equalization measures (Valsalva) every 10 to 30 seconds and breathed oxygen by mask (required in the 2.4 ATA pressure to prevent decompression sickness)at the same frequency as if they were in the treatment exposure pressure.
25
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA
Subject breathed 100% oxygen at 2.4 Atmospheres Absolute (ATA) in three 30 minute periods separated by 10 minutes of breathing air at 2.4 ATA. Hyperbaric exposures were done up to 5 times per week with a total number of 30 exposures. Pressurization time was seven minutes to a depth of 45 feet of sea water (fsw) or 2.4 ATA. The final depressurization to surface was done over a 10 minute period. Inside observers used pressure equalization measures (Valsalva) every 10 to 30 seconds and breathed oxygen by mask (required in the 2.4 ATA pressure to prevent decompression sickness) three times (10/15/5 minute durations)during the exposure.
25
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATASham TreatmentTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
25 Participants25 Participants50 Participants
Age, Continuous28.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
28.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
28.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants25 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants24 Participants48 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 2510 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code Sub Recall

BrainCheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 6 to 135. The scores in this section represent results of the code sub recall subtest.

Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

Population: One subject withdrawal from each group due to personal reasons

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code Sub RecallBaseline29.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.63
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code Sub RecallPost hyperbaric exposure 6 week follow up throughp47.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.02
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code Sub RecallBaseline36.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.77
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code Sub RecallPost hyperbaric exposure 6 week follow up throughp44.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.07
Primary

Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code Substitution

Braincheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate higher accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 9 to 66. The scores in this section represent results of the code substitution subtest.

Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

Population: One subject withdrawal from each group due to personal reasons

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code SubstitutionBaeline39.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.08
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code SubstitutionPost hyperbaric exposure 6 week follow up throughp43.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.56
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code SubstitutionBaeline37.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.74
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Code SubstitutionPost hyperbaric exposure 6 week follow up throughp40.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.1
Primary

Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Go-NoGo Reaction Time

Braincheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate higher accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 41 to 174. The scores in this section represent results of the Go-NoGo reaction time subtest.

Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

Population: One subject withdrawal from each group due to personal reasons

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Go-NoGo Reaction TimeBaseline119.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.03
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Go-NoGo Reaction TimePost hyperbaric exposure 6 week follow up throughp131.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.43
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Go-NoGo Reaction TimeBaseline116.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.33
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Go-NoGo Reaction TimePost hyperbaric exposure 6 week follow up throughp129.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.67
Primary

Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Matching To Sample

BrainCheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 6 to 50. The scores in this section represent results of the matching to sample subtest.

Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

Population: One subject withdrawal from each group due to personal reasons

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Matching To SampleBaseline20.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Matching To SamplePost hyperbaric exposure 6 week follow up throughp28.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.63
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Matching To SamplePost hyperbaric exposure 6 week follow up throughp24.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.08
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Matching To SampleBaseline23.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.86
Primary

Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Procedural Reaction Time

Braincheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate higher accuracy in each of the subtest. The range is 25 to 118. The scores in this section represent results of the procedural reaction time.

Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

Population: One subject withdrawal from each group due to personal reasons

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Procedural Reaction TimeBaseline81.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.82
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Procedural Reaction TimePost hyperbaric exposure 6 week follow up throughp85.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.16
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Procedural Reaction TimeBaseline81.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.66
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Procedural Reaction TimePost hyperbaric exposure 6 week follow up throughp86.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.63
Primary

Computer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Simple Reaction Time

Braincheckers is a PDA version of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) supported by the Army Medical Research and Materiel Command in 2000. It was validated against ANAM for the individual tests used. Throughput is defined as correct responses per minute of time available to respond. Higher scores indicate higher accuracy in each of the subtest. The simple reaction time range is 30 to 255.

Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

Population: One subject withdrawal from each group due to personal reasons

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Simple Reaction TimeBaseline142.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 60.68
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Simple Reaction TimeSix weeks post hyperbaric exposure series174.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 57.75
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Simple Reaction TimeBaseline135.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 61.48
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - BrainCheckers Simple Reaction TimeSix weeks post hyperbaric exposure series171.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 54.66
Primary

Computer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Processing Speed

The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) battery was developed at the University of Pittsburgh. It has a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 89.4% in discriminating between concussion and non-concussion groups. It consists of a medical history questionnaire regarding concussions and resultant symptoms including loss of consciousness, memory loss, confusion, headache, seizure activity, emotional state, and sleep patterns. There are four subtests given and scored by computer. These include verbal and visual memory, visual motor speed, and response time. The composite scores are specifically designed to determine changes within the individual, better or worse, over time. The Processing Speed score demonstrates improvement as the score increases. The score range was 9.7 to 52.4.

Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

Population: one subject withdrawal from each group due to personal reasons

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Processing SpeedSix weeks post hyperbaric exposure series36.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.47
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Processing SpeedBaseline30.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Processing SpeedSix weeks post hyperbaric exposure series33.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Processing SpeedBaseline29.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.61
Primary

Computer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Reaction Time

The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) battery was developed at the University of Pittsburgh. It has a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 89.4% in discriminating between concussion and non-concussion groups. It consists of a medical history questionnaire regarding concussions and resultant symptoms including loss of consciousness, memory loss, confusion, headache, seizure activity, emotional state, and sleep patterns. There are four subtests given and scored by computer. These include verbal and visual memory, visual motor speed, and response time. The composite scores are specifically designed to determine changes within the individual, better or worse, over time. The reaction time score demonstrates improvement as the score decreases. The score range was 0.42 to 1.84.

Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

Population: one subject withdrawal from each group due to personal reasons

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Reaction TimeBaseline0.739 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.322
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Reaction TimeSix weeks post hyperbaric exposure series0.677 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.186
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Reaction TimeBaseline0.725 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.199
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Reaction TimeSix weeks post hyperbaric exposure series0.712 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.266
Primary

Computer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Verbal Memory

The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) battery was developed at the University of Pittsburgh. It has a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 89.4% in discriminating between concussion and non-concussion groups. It consists of a medical history questionnaire regarding concussions and resultant symptoms including loss of consciousness, memory loss, confusion, headache, seizure activity, emotional state, and sleep patterns. There are four subtests given and scored by computer. These include verbal and visual memory, visual motor speed, and response time. The composite scores are specifically designed to determine changes within the individual, better or worse, over time. The verbal memory score demonstrates improvement as the score increases. The score range was 36.8 to 98.6.

Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

Population: one subject withdrawal from each group due to personal reasons

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Verbal MemoryBaseline70.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.05
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Verbal Memorysix weeks post hyperbaric exposure series78.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.087
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Verbal MemoryBaseline74.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.03
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Verbal Memorysix weeks post hyperbaric exposure series75.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.23
Primary

Computer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Visual Memory

The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) battery was developed at the University of Pittsburgh. It has a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 89.4% in discriminating between concussion and non-concussion groups. It consists of a medical history questionnaire regarding concussions and resultant symptoms including loss of consciousness, memory loss, confusion, headache, seizure activity, emotional state, and sleep patterns. There are four subtests given and scored by computer. These include verbal and visual memory, visual motor speed, and response time. The composite scores are specifically designed to determine changes within the individual, better or worse, over time. The visual memory score demonstrates improvement as the score increases. The score range was 31.2 to 92.7.

Time frame: Baseline and six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Visual Memorysix weeks post hyperbaric exposure series64.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.19
Sham TreatmentComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Visual MemoryBaseline56.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.86
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Visual Memorysix weeks post hyperbaric exposure series66.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.72
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAComputer Cognitive Test Scores - ImPACT Visual MemoryBaseline59.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.17
Primary

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Military Version (PCL-M) Scores

The PCL-M is a self reported test in which a list of 17 problems and complaints are offered to the individual to score on a 1 to 5 scale with 1 designating not at all, 2= a little bit, 3= moderately, 4= quite a bit and 5 designating extremely. A sample complaint would be repeated, disturbing dreams of a stressful military experience. Hence there is a possible total score range from 17 to 85. For military members, a score of 50 or above is indicative of PTSD. A change from baseline of 5-9 represents a reliable change and change of 10 or greater is a significant change.

Time frame: baseline compared to the change at post hyperbaric exposures (30) series and the six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

Population: Per protocol. The study was a pilot.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Sham TreatmentPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Military Version (PCL-M) ScoresBaseline measurement48.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.59
Sham TreatmentPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Military Version (PCL-M) ScoresPost 30 hyperbaric exposures-10.125 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.759
Sham TreatmentPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Military Version (PCL-M) Scores6 Week Follow-up-8.292 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.96
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Military Version (PCL-M) ScoresBaseline measurement50.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.53
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Military Version (PCL-M) ScoresPost 30 hyperbaric exposures-8.875 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.789
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Military Version (PCL-M) Scores6 Week Follow-up-8.625 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.761
Comparison: ANCOVA, baseline measurement was considered as a covariate and group (sham or 2.4 ATA), treatment (15 treatments, 30 treatments, and 6 weeks) as well as the interaction between group and treatment were considered as the independent variables.p-value: 0.05ANCOVA
Secondary

Functional MRI

Time frame: six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

Secondary

Stem Cells: CD_34

A non-parametric regression 14 using the Theil estimator was fit to the observed data in order to demonstrate general trends for relations between measures of cognitive functioning and increased stem cells.

Time frame: six weeks post hyperbaric exposure series

Post Hoc

PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Four or More Concussive Events

The purpose of a pilot study is to identify potential subgroups who may respond to treatment. The various composite scores were ranked and separated by subject and within groups for those who improved and those who did not. This allowed the application relative risk analysis using MedCalc (http://www.medcalc.org) to identify potential subgroups. Relative Risk of Improvement (RROI) was calculated against the concussion history items. Main categories were the number of concussive events, whether the subject had multiple non-concussive events or not, if there were two concussive events within a 48 hour period, the time expired from the last concussion to consent, the etiology of the event, and loss of consciousness. A concussive event was defined as one immediately followed with symptoms. This outcome measure analyzed PCL-M score decreases of 10 or more (significantly improved) in individuals who experienced four or more concussive events.

Time frame: Baseline values compared to 30 post hyperbaric exposure or 6 week follow-up

Population: Participants with significant improvement (PCL-M composite scores demonstrating a decrease by 10 or greater) or participants not meeting this criterion.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sham TreatmentPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Four or More Concussive Events2 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Four or More Concussive Events0 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA ImprovedPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Four or More Concussive Events2 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Not ImprovedPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Four or More Concussive Events0 participants
Comparison: Relative Risk of Improvement in 2.4 ATA group vs. Sham in subjects with four or more significant events (blast or impact resulting in concussion symptoms) per Concussion History. PCL-M with significant improvement defined as a score decrease 10 or more.
Post Hoc

PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Multiple Non-concussive Blast and/or Impact Exposures.

The purpose of a pilot study is to identify potential subgroups who may respond to treatment. The various composite scores were ranked and separated by subject and within groups for those who improved and those who did not. This allowed the application relative risk analysis using MedCalc (http://www.medcalc.org) to identify potential subgroups. Relative Risk of Improvement (RROI) was calculated for the number of concussive events, whether the subject had multiple non-concussive events or not, if there were two concussive events within a 48 hour period, the time expired from the last concussion to consent, the etiology of the event, and loss of consciousness. Many subjects had multiple blast and/or impact events without a concussion (asymptomatic), but had a flight or flight (danger response) experience. This outcome measure analyzed PCL-M score decreases of 10 or more (significantly improved) in individuals who experienced multiple non-concussive blast and/or impact events.

Time frame: Baseline values compared to 30 post hyperbaric exposure or 6 week follow-up

Population: Participants with significant improvement (PCL-M composite scores demonstrating a decrease by 10 or greater) or participants not meeting this criterion who had multiple blast and/or impact event that did not result in a concussion (asymptomatic), but had a flight or flight (danger response) experience.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sham TreatmentPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Multiple Non-concussive Blast and/or Impact Exposures.11 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Multiple Non-concussive Blast and/or Impact Exposures.5 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA ImprovedPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Multiple Non-concussive Blast and/or Impact Exposures.2 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Not ImprovedPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Multiple Non-concussive Blast and/or Impact Exposures.9 participants
Post Hoc

PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Only One Concussive Event

The purpose of a pilot study is to identify potential subgroups who may respond to treatment. The various composite scores were ranked and separated by subject and within groups for those who improved and those who did not. This allowed the application relative risk analysis using MedCalc (http://www.medcalc.org) to identify potential subgroups. Relative Risk of Improvement (RROI) was calculated against the concussion history items. Main categories were the number of concussive events, whether the subject had multiple non-concussive events or not, if there were two concussive events within a 48 hour period, the time expired from the last concussion to consent, the etiology of the event, and loss of consciousness. A concussive event was defined as one immediately followed with symptoms. This outcome measure analyzed PCL-M score decreases of 10 or more (significantly improved) in the individuals who experienced only one concussive event.

Time frame: Baseline values compared to 30 post hyperbaric exposure or 6 week follow-up

Population: Participants with significant improvement (PCL-M composite scores demonstrating a decrease by 10 or greater) or participants not meeting this criterion.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sham TreatmentPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Only One Concussive Event4 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Only One Concussive Event2 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA ImprovedPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Only One Concussive Event4 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Not ImprovedPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Only One Concussive Event7 participants
Comparison: Relative Risk of Improvement in 2.4 ATA group vs. Sham in subjects with one significant event (blast or impact resulting in concussion symptoms) per Concussion History. PCL-M with significant improvement defined as a score decrease 10 or more.
Post Hoc

PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Three Concussive Events

The purpose of a pilot study is to identify potential subgroups who may respond to treatment. The various composite scores were ranked and separated by subject and within groups for those who improved and those who did not. This allowed the application relative risk analysis using MedCalc (http://www.medcalc.org) to identify potential subgroups. Relative Risk of Improvement (RROI) was calculated against the concussion history items. Main categories were the number of concussive events, whether the subject had multiple non-concussive events or not, if there were two concussive events within a 48 hour period, the time expired from the last concussion to consent, the etiology of the event, and loss of consciousness. A concussive event was defined as one immediately followed with symptoms. This outcome measure analyzed PCL-M score decreases of 10 or more (significantly improved) in individuals who experienced three concussive events.

Time frame: Baseline values compared to 30 post hyperbaric exposure or 6 week follow-up

Population: Participants with significant improvement (PCL-M composite scores demonstrating a decrease by 10 or greater) or participants not meeting this criterion.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sham TreatmentPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Three Concussive Events3 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Three Concussive Events2 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA ImprovedPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Three Concussive Events4 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Not ImprovedPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Three Concussive Events2 participants
Comparison: Relative Risk of Improvement in 2.4 ATA group vs. Sham in subjects with three significant events (blast or impact resulting in concussion symptoms) per Concussion History. PCL-M with significant improvement defined as a score decrease 10 or more.
Post Hoc

PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Two Concussive Events

The purpose of a pilot study is to identify potential subgroups who may respond to treatment. The various composite scores were ranked and separated by subject and within groups for those who improved and those who did not. This allowed the application relative risk analysis using MedCalc (http://www.medcalc.org) to identify potential subgroups. Relative Risk of Improvement (RROI) was calculated against the concussion history items. Main categories were the number of concussive events, whether the subject had multiple non-concussive events or not, if there were two concussive events within a 48 hour period, the time expired from the last concussion to consent, the etiology of the event, and loss of consciousness. A concussive event was defined as one immediately followed with symptoms. This outcome measure analyzed PCL-M score decreases of 10 or more (significantly improved) in individuals who experienced two concussive events.

Time frame: Baseline values compared to 30 post hyperbaric exposure or 6 week follow-up

Population: Participants with significant improvement (PCL-M composite scores demonstrating a decrease by 10 or greater) or participants not meeting this criterion.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sham TreatmentPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Two Concussive Events6 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Two Concussive Events5 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA ImprovedPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Two Concussive Events3 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Not ImprovedPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, All Participants With Two Concussive Events2 participants
Comparison: Relative Risk of Improvement in 2.4 ATA group vs. Sham in subjects with two significant events (blast or impact resulting in concussion symptoms) per Concussion History. PCL-M with significant improvement defined as a score decrease 10 or more.
Post Hoc

PCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, Measuring Time to Consent From the Last Concussion in Subjects With Multiple Concussions.

The purpose of a pilot study is to identify potential subgroups who may respond to treatment. The various composite scores were ranked and separated by subject and within groups for those who improved and those who did not. This allowed the application relative risk analysis using MedCalc (http://www.medcalc.org) to identify potential subgroups. Relative Risk of Improvement (RROI) was calculated for the number of concussive events, whether the subject had multiple non-concussive events or not, if there were two concussive events within a 48 hour period, the time expired from the last concussion to consent, the etiology of the event, and loss of consciousness. This outcome measure analyzed PCL-M score decreases of 10 or more (significantly improved) with consent within one year from the last concussion in subjects who had multiple concussions.

Time frame: Baseline values compared to 30 post hyperbaric exposure or 6 week follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Sham TreatmentPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, Measuring Time to Consent From the Last Concussion in Subjects With Multiple Concussions.1 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATAPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, Measuring Time to Consent From the Last Concussion in Subjects With Multiple Concussions.3 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA ImprovedPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, Measuring Time to Consent From the Last Concussion in Subjects With Multiple Concussions.3 participants
Hyperbaric Oxygen 2.4 ATA Not ImprovedPCL-M Relative Risk of Improvement of 2.4 ATA Exposures vs. Sham, Measuring Time to Consent From the Last Concussion in Subjects With Multiple Concussions.2 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026