Skip to content

Evaluation of Two Silicone Hydrogel Lenses Over a One Month Period

Evaluation of Two Silicone Hydrogel Lenses Over a One Month Period

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00810511
Enrollment
213
Registered
2008-12-18
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
2009-01-31
Last updated
2023-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Brief summary

The purpose of this trial is to compare two different contact lenses during 4 weeks of wear.

Interventions

Silicone hydrogel contact lens

Silicone hydrogel contact lens

Sponsors

CIBA VISION
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Current soft contact lens wearer who wear their habitual lenses for no less than 10 hours a day, 5 days a week * Have a need for correction in both eyes and be correctable to at least 20/40 distance vision in each eye while wearing trial lenses * Replace lenses on a weekly or longer schedule * Other protocol inclusion/

Exclusion criteria

may apply

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comfort at End of DayAfter 4 weeks of wearEvaluated by the subject as a single, retrospective evaluation of 4-week wear time. Measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lotrafilcon A
Investigational, spherical, silicone hydrogel contact lenses
107
Comfilcon A
Commercially marketed, spherical, silicone hydrogel contact lenses
106
Total213

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Studydeath in the family01
Overall Studydeposits on contact lens01
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy91
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicComfilcon ALotrafilcon ATotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
10 Participants11 Participants21 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
96 Participants96 Participants192 Participants
Age, Continuous31.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
30.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
31.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
Region of Enrollment
United States
106 participants107 participants213 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
84 Participants84 Participants168 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants23 Participants45 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1070 / 106
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1070 / 106

Outcome results

Primary

Comfort at End of Day

Evaluated by the subject as a single, retrospective evaluation of 4-week wear time. Measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent.

Time frame: After 4 weeks of wear

Population: One subject in the Lotrafilcon A arm was excluded from efficacy analysis due to a protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lotrafilcon AComfort at End of Day6.5 Scale of 1-10Standard Deviation 2.4
Comfilcon AComfort at End of Day6.9 Scale of 1-10Standard Deviation 2.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026