Skip to content

A Study of Tocilizumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Current Non-Biologic DMARDs

An Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effect on Disease Activity of Tocilizumab in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis on Background Non-biologic DMARDs Who Have an Inadequate Response to Current Non-biologic DMARDs.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00810277
Enrollment
14
Registered
2008-12-18
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
2010-05-26
Last updated
2017-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This single arm study will assess the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis who have an inadequate response to current non-biologic DMARDs. Patients will receive iv infusions of tocilizumab 8mg/kg every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions, either as monotherapy or in combination with their current non-biologic DMARDs.

Interventions

DRUGtocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]

8mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for 24 weeks

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients, \>=18 years of age; * moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis; * inadequate response to current non-biologic DMARDs

Exclusion criteria

* rheumatic autoimmune disease or inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis; * previous treatment with other biologics.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to Week 24An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both serious as well as non-serious AEs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease Activity Score (DAS28)Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24DAS28 was calculated from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) using 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (mm/hour) or C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/dL), and general health (GH) status (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale \[VAS\] where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 was calculated using following formulas: DAS28-ESR = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*GH of disease activity; DAS28-CRP = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36\*ln(10\*CRP+1) + 0.014\*GH of disease activity. DAS28-ESR was adopted to calculate DAS28 if effective ESR data was available; otherwise DAS28-CRP was adopted to calculate DAS28. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28 \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 \<2.6 = clinical remission.
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) or CRP (mg/dL), and general health (GH) status (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale \[VAS\] where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 was calculated using following formulas: DAS28-ESR = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*GH of disease activity; DAS28-CRP = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36\*ln(10\*CRP+1) + 0.014\*GH of disease activity. DAS28-ESR was adopted to calculate DAS28 if effective ESR data was available; otherwise DAS28-CRP was adopted to calculate DAS28. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28 \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 \<2.6 = clinical remission.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%), 50%, and 70% improvement respectively, in tender or swollen joint counts and in 3 of the following criteria: (1) Participant's assessment of pain (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no pain and 100=unbearable pain); (2) Participant's assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity); (3) Investigator's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity); (4) Participant's assessment of functional disability via health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) (measured using 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do).
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) LevelBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued the StudyUp to Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Level Elevation More Than 1.5 Times Upper Limit of NormalUp to Week 24Normal range of ALT is 7 to 56 units per liter (U/L) of serum. Normal range of AST is 5 to 40 units per liter (U/L) of serum.
Percentage of Participants With Lipid Level ElevationsWeek 24Low density lipoprotein (LDL) level was categorized as 'Optimal (less than \[\<\] 100 milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\])', 'Near Optimal/Above Optimal (100-129 mg/dL)', 'Borderline High (130-159 mg/dL)', 'High (160-189 mg/dL)', and 'Very high (190 mg/dL)'. High density lipoprotein (HDL) level was categorized as 'Acceptable (40-59 mg/dL)', 'High (\>=60 mg/dL)'. Total cholesterol (TC) level was categorized as 'Desirable (\<200 mg/dL)', 'Borderline High (200-239 mg/dL)', 'High (\>=240 mg/dL)'.
Neutrophil CountBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is the rate at which red blood cells sediment in a period of one hour.

Countries

Finland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tocilizumab
Participants received tocilizumab at a dose of 8 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) via intravenous infusion every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks.
14
Total14

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTocilizumab
Age, Continuous53.86 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.662
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both serious as well as non-serious AEs.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24

Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs92.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs7.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study. 'n'=number of participants evaluable for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabC-Reactive Protein (CRP) LevelBaseline (n=14)35.81 milligram per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 19.459
TocilizumabC-Reactive Protein (CRP) LevelWeek 4 (n=14)1.29 milligram per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.994
TocilizumabC-Reactive Protein (CRP) LevelWeek 8 (n=13)1.43 milligram per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.91
TocilizumabC-Reactive Protein (CRP) LevelWeek 12 (n=12)1.16 milligram per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.7
TocilizumabC-Reactive Protein (CRP) LevelWeek 16 (n=13)2.42 milligram per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 3.486
TocilizumabC-Reactive Protein (CRP) LevelWeek 20 (n=13)1.10 milligram per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 0.648
TocilizumabC-Reactive Protein (CRP) LevelWeek 24 (n=13)2.96 milligram per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 3.577
Secondary

Disease Activity Score (DAS28)

DAS28 was calculated from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) using 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (mm/hour) or C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/dL), and general health (GH) status (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale \[VAS\] where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 was calculated using following formulas: DAS28-ESR = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*GH of disease activity; DAS28-CRP = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36\*ln(10\*CRP+1) + 0.014\*GH of disease activity. DAS28-ESR was adopted to calculate DAS28 if effective ESR data was available; otherwise DAS28-CRP was adopted to calculate DAS28. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28 \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 \<2.6 = clinical remission.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study. 'n'=number of participants evaluable for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score (DAS28)DAS28 ESR: Baseline (n=14)5.9896986 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0636917
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score (DAS28)DAS28 ESR: Week 4 (n=14)2.852859 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3154333
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score (DAS28)DAS28 ESR: Week 8 (n=13)2.1529895 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0578132
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score (DAS28)DAS28 ESR: Week 12 (n=12)1.9199257 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9622713
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score (DAS28)DAS28 ESR: Week 16 (n=13)1.6475303 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.205548
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score (DAS28)DAS28 ESR: Week 20 (n=13)1.6527143 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9999803
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score (DAS28)DAS28 ESR: Week 24 (n=13)1.977934 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5634882
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score (DAS28)DAS28 CRP: Baseline (n=14)5.7627144 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9613441
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score (DAS28)DAS28 CRP: Week 4 (n=14)3.3564332 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2154714
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score (DAS28)DAS28 CRP: Week 8 (n=13)2.684394 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9556779
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score (DAS28)DAS28 CRP: Week 12 (n=12)2.5826295 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0084694
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score (DAS28)DAS28 CRP: Week 16 (n=13)2.3791197 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0837377
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score (DAS28)DAS28 CRP: Week 20 (n=13)2.2859272 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.0212892
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score (DAS28)DAS28 CRP: Week 24 (n=13)2.3343281 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2686423
Secondary

Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)

The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is the rate at which red blood cells sediment in a period of one hour.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study. 'n'=number of participants evaluable for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabErythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Baseline (n=14)37.14 millimeter per hour (mm/h)Standard Deviation 18.102
TocilizumabErythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Week 4 (n=14)3.71 millimeter per hour (mm/h)Standard Deviation 3.832
TocilizumabErythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Week 8 (n=13)4.85 millimeter per hour (mm/h)Standard Deviation 8.543
TocilizumabErythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Week 12 (n=12)2.42 millimeter per hour (mm/h)Standard Deviation 0.996
TocilizumabErythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Week 16 (n=13)3.00 millimeter per hour (mm/h)Standard Deviation 2.677
TocilizumabErythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Week 20 (n=13)2.46 millimeter per hour (mm/h)Standard Deviation 1.05
TocilizumabErythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Week 24 (n=13)6.46 millimeter per hour (mm/h)Standard Deviation 7.666
Secondary

Neutrophil Count

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12

Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study. 'n'=number of participants evaluable for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabNeutrophil CountBaseline (n=13)5.53 E^9 per literStandard Deviation 1.849
TocilizumabNeutrophil CountWeek 4 (n=14)2.31 E^9 per literStandard Deviation 0.971
TocilizumabNeutrophil CountWeek 8 (n=13)2.32 E^9 per literStandard Deviation 1.059
TocilizumabNeutrophil CountWeek 12 (n=11)2.12 E^9 per literStandard Deviation 0.675
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response

ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%), 50%, and 70% improvement respectively, in tender or swollen joint counts and in 3 of the following criteria: (1) Participant's assessment of pain (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no pain and 100=unbearable pain); (2) Participant's assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity); (3) Investigator's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity); (4) Participant's assessment of functional disability via health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) (measured using 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do).

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study. 'n'=number of participants evaluable for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR20: Week 4 (n=14)57.14 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR20: Week 8 (n=13)100.00 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR20: Week 12 (n=13)76.92 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR20: Week 16 (n=13)100.00 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR20: Week 20 (n=13)84.62 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR20: Week 24 (n=13)100.00 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR50: Week 4 (n=14)28.57 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR50: Week 8 (n=13)76.92 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR50: Week 12 (n=13)61.54 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR50: Week 16 (n=13)76.92 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR50: Week 20 (n=13)76.92 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR50: Week 24 (n=13)61.54 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR70: Week 4 (n=14)0.00 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR70: Week 8 (n=13)46.15 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR70: Week 12 (n=13)30.77 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR70: Week 16 (n=13)46.15 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR70: Week 20 (n=13)53.85 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 ResponseACR70: Week 24 (n=13)61.54 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)

DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) or CRP (mg/dL), and general health (GH) status (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale \[VAS\] where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 was calculated using following formulas: DAS28-ESR = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*GH of disease activity; DAS28-CRP = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36\*ln(10\*CRP+1) + 0.014\*GH of disease activity. DAS28-ESR was adopted to calculate DAS28 if effective ESR data was available; otherwise DAS28-CRP was adopted to calculate DAS28. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28 \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 \<2.6 = clinical remission.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study. 'n'=number of participants evaluable for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)DAS28 ESR: Week 4 (n=14)42.86 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)DAS28 ESR: Week 8 (n=13)69.23 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)DAS28 ESR: Week 12 (n=12)83.33 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)DAS28 ESR: Week 16 (n=13)76.92 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)DAS28 ESR: Week 20 (n=13)84.62 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)DAS28 ESR: Week 24 (n=13)69.23 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)DAS28 CRP: Week 4 (n=14)35.71 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)DAS28 CRP: Week 8 (n=13)46.15 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)DAS28 CRP: Week 12 (n=12)41.67 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)DAS28 CRP: Week 16 (n=13)61.54 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)DAS28 CRP: Week 20 (n=13)76.92 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)DAS28 CRP: Week 24 (n=13)61.54 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued the Study

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued the Study7.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Level Elevation More Than 1.5 Times Upper Limit of Normal

Normal range of ALT is 7 to 56 units per liter (U/L) of serum. Normal range of AST is 5 to 40 units per liter (U/L) of serum.

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Level Elevation More Than 1.5 Times Upper Limit of Normal>1.5 ULN ALT7.14 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Level Elevation More Than 1.5 Times Upper Limit of Normal>1.5 ULN AST7.69 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Lipid Level Elevations

Low density lipoprotein (LDL) level was categorized as 'Optimal (less than \[\<\] 100 milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\])', 'Near Optimal/Above Optimal (100-129 mg/dL)', 'Borderline High (130-159 mg/dL)', 'High (160-189 mg/dL)', and 'Very high (190 mg/dL)'. High density lipoprotein (HDL) level was categorized as 'Acceptable (40-59 mg/dL)', 'High (\>=60 mg/dL)'. Total cholesterol (TC) level was categorized as 'Desirable (\<200 mg/dL)', 'Borderline High (200-239 mg/dL)', 'High (\>=240 mg/dL)'.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Lipid Level ElevationsLDL: Optimal15.38 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Lipid Level ElevationsLDL: Near Optimal/Above Optimal30.77 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Lipid Level ElevationsLDL: Borderline High38.46 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Lipid Level ElevationsLDL: High15.38 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Lipid Level ElevationsLDL: Very high0.00 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Lipid Level ElevationsHDL: Acceptable30.77 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Lipid Level ElevationsHDL: High69.23 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Lipid Level ElevationsTC: Desirable30.77 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Lipid Level ElevationsTC: Borderline High30.77 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Lipid Level ElevationsTC: High38.46 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026