Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
This single arm study will assess the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis who have an inadequate response to current non-biologic DMARDs. Patients will receive iv infusions of tocilizumab 8mg/kg every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions, either as monotherapy or in combination with their current non-biologic DMARDs.
Interventions
8mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for 24 weeks
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* adult patients, \>=18 years of age; * moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis; * inadequate response to current non-biologic DMARDs
Exclusion criteria
* rheumatic autoimmune disease or inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis; * previous treatment with other biologics.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Baseline up to Week 24 | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both serious as well as non-serious AEs. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Disease Activity Score (DAS28) | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | DAS28 was calculated from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) using 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (mm/hour) or C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/dL), and general health (GH) status (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale \[VAS\] where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 was calculated using following formulas: DAS28-ESR = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*GH of disease activity; DAS28-CRP = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36\*ln(10\*CRP+1) + 0.014\*GH of disease activity. DAS28-ESR was adopted to calculate DAS28 if effective ESR data was available; otherwise DAS28-CRP was adopted to calculate DAS28. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28 \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 \<2.6 = clinical remission. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) or CRP (mg/dL), and general health (GH) status (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale \[VAS\] where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 was calculated using following formulas: DAS28-ESR = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*GH of disease activity; DAS28-CRP = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36\*ln(10\*CRP+1) + 0.014\*GH of disease activity. DAS28-ESR was adopted to calculate DAS28 if effective ESR data was available; otherwise DAS28-CRP was adopted to calculate DAS28. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28 \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 \<2.6 = clinical remission. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%), 50%, and 70% improvement respectively, in tender or swollen joint counts and in 3 of the following criteria: (1) Participant's assessment of pain (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no pain and 100=unbearable pain); (2) Participant's assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity); (3) Investigator's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity); (4) Participant's assessment of functional disability via health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) (measured using 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do). |
| C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | — |
| Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued the Study | Up to Week 24 | — |
| Percentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Level Elevation More Than 1.5 Times Upper Limit of Normal | Up to Week 24 | Normal range of ALT is 7 to 56 units per liter (U/L) of serum. Normal range of AST is 5 to 40 units per liter (U/L) of serum. |
| Percentage of Participants With Lipid Level Elevations | Week 24 | Low density lipoprotein (LDL) level was categorized as 'Optimal (less than \[\<\] 100 milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\])', 'Near Optimal/Above Optimal (100-129 mg/dL)', 'Borderline High (130-159 mg/dL)', 'High (160-189 mg/dL)', and 'Very high (190 mg/dL)'. High density lipoprotein (HDL) level was categorized as 'Acceptable (40-59 mg/dL)', 'High (\>=60 mg/dL)'. Total cholesterol (TC) level was categorized as 'Desirable (\<200 mg/dL)', 'Borderline High (200-239 mg/dL)', 'High (\>=240 mg/dL)'. |
| Neutrophil Count | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12 | — |
| Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is the rate at which red blood cells sediment in a period of one hour. |
Countries
Finland
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Tocilizumab Participants received tocilizumab at a dose of 8 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) via intravenous infusion every 4 weeks up to 24 weeks. | 14 |
| Total | 14 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Tocilizumab |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 53.86 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.662 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 11 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 3 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 13 / 14 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 14 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both serious as well as non-serious AEs.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 92.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 7.1 percentage of participants |
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study. 'n'=number of participants evaluable for specified category.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level | Baseline (n=14) | 35.81 milligram per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 19.459 |
| Tocilizumab | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level | Week 4 (n=14) | 1.29 milligram per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 0.994 |
| Tocilizumab | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level | Week 8 (n=13) | 1.43 milligram per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 0.91 |
| Tocilizumab | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level | Week 12 (n=12) | 1.16 milligram per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level | Week 16 (n=13) | 2.42 milligram per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 3.486 |
| Tocilizumab | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level | Week 20 (n=13) | 1.10 milligram per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 0.648 |
| Tocilizumab | C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level | Week 24 (n=13) | 2.96 milligram per liter (mg/L) | Standard Deviation 3.577 |
Disease Activity Score (DAS28)
DAS28 was calculated from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) using 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (mm/hour) or C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/dL), and general health (GH) status (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale \[VAS\] where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 was calculated using following formulas: DAS28-ESR = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*GH of disease activity; DAS28-CRP = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36\*ln(10\*CRP+1) + 0.014\*GH of disease activity. DAS28-ESR was adopted to calculate DAS28 if effective ESR data was available; otherwise DAS28-CRP was adopted to calculate DAS28. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28 \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 \<2.6 = clinical remission.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study. 'n'=number of participants evaluable for specified category.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score (DAS28) | DAS28 ESR: Baseline (n=14) | 5.9896986 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.0636917 |
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score (DAS28) | DAS28 ESR: Week 4 (n=14) | 2.852859 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3154333 |
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score (DAS28) | DAS28 ESR: Week 8 (n=13) | 2.1529895 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.0578132 |
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score (DAS28) | DAS28 ESR: Week 12 (n=12) | 1.9199257 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9622713 |
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score (DAS28) | DAS28 ESR: Week 16 (n=13) | 1.6475303 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.205548 |
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score (DAS28) | DAS28 ESR: Week 20 (n=13) | 1.6527143 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9999803 |
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score (DAS28) | DAS28 ESR: Week 24 (n=13) | 1.977934 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5634882 |
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score (DAS28) | DAS28 CRP: Baseline (n=14) | 5.7627144 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9613441 |
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score (DAS28) | DAS28 CRP: Week 4 (n=14) | 3.3564332 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2154714 |
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score (DAS28) | DAS28 CRP: Week 8 (n=13) | 2.684394 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9556779 |
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score (DAS28) | DAS28 CRP: Week 12 (n=12) | 2.5826295 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.0084694 |
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score (DAS28) | DAS28 CRP: Week 16 (n=13) | 2.3791197 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.0837377 |
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score (DAS28) | DAS28 CRP: Week 20 (n=13) | 2.2859272 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.0212892 |
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score (DAS28) | DAS28 CRP: Week 24 (n=13) | 2.3343281 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2686423 |
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is the rate at which red blood cells sediment in a period of one hour.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study. 'n'=number of participants evaluable for specified category.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) | Baseline (n=14) | 37.14 millimeter per hour (mm/h) | Standard Deviation 18.102 |
| Tocilizumab | Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) | Week 4 (n=14) | 3.71 millimeter per hour (mm/h) | Standard Deviation 3.832 |
| Tocilizumab | Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) | Week 8 (n=13) | 4.85 millimeter per hour (mm/h) | Standard Deviation 8.543 |
| Tocilizumab | Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) | Week 12 (n=12) | 2.42 millimeter per hour (mm/h) | Standard Deviation 0.996 |
| Tocilizumab | Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) | Week 16 (n=13) | 3.00 millimeter per hour (mm/h) | Standard Deviation 2.677 |
| Tocilizumab | Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) | Week 20 (n=13) | 2.46 millimeter per hour (mm/h) | Standard Deviation 1.05 |
| Tocilizumab | Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) | Week 24 (n=13) | 6.46 millimeter per hour (mm/h) | Standard Deviation 7.666 |
Neutrophil Count
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study. 'n'=number of participants evaluable for specified category.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Neutrophil Count | Baseline (n=13) | 5.53 E^9 per liter | Standard Deviation 1.849 |
| Tocilizumab | Neutrophil Count | Week 4 (n=14) | 2.31 E^9 per liter | Standard Deviation 0.971 |
| Tocilizumab | Neutrophil Count | Week 8 (n=13) | 2.32 E^9 per liter | Standard Deviation 1.059 |
| Tocilizumab | Neutrophil Count | Week 12 (n=11) | 2.12 E^9 per liter | Standard Deviation 0.675 |
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response
ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%), 50%, and 70% improvement respectively, in tender or swollen joint counts and in 3 of the following criteria: (1) Participant's assessment of pain (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no pain and 100=unbearable pain); (2) Participant's assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity); (3) Investigator's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity); (4) Participant's assessment of functional disability via health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) (measured using 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do).
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study. 'n'=number of participants evaluable for specified category.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR20: Week 4 (n=14) | 57.14 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR20: Week 8 (n=13) | 100.00 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR20: Week 12 (n=13) | 76.92 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR20: Week 16 (n=13) | 100.00 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR20: Week 20 (n=13) | 84.62 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR20: Week 24 (n=13) | 100.00 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR50: Week 4 (n=14) | 28.57 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR50: Week 8 (n=13) | 76.92 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR50: Week 12 (n=13) | 61.54 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR50: Week 16 (n=13) | 76.92 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR50: Week 20 (n=13) | 76.92 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR50: Week 24 (n=13) | 61.54 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR70: Week 4 (n=14) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR70: Week 8 (n=13) | 46.15 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR70: Week 12 (n=13) | 30.77 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR70: Week 16 (n=13) | 46.15 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR70: Week 20 (n=13) | 53.85 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20), ACR50 and ACR70 Response | ACR70: Week 24 (n=13) | 61.54 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6)
DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) or CRP (mg/dL), and general health (GH) status (measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale \[VAS\] where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28 was calculated using following formulas: DAS28-ESR = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*GH of disease activity; DAS28-CRP = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36\*ln(10\*CRP+1) + 0.014\*GH of disease activity. DAS28-ESR was adopted to calculate DAS28 if effective ESR data was available; otherwise DAS28-CRP was adopted to calculate DAS28. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28 \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate disease activity and DAS \>5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 \<2.6 = clinical remission.
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study. 'n'=number of participants evaluable for specified category.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | DAS28 ESR: Week 4 (n=14) | 42.86 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | DAS28 ESR: Week 8 (n=13) | 69.23 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | DAS28 ESR: Week 12 (n=12) | 83.33 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | DAS28 ESR: Week 16 (n=13) | 76.92 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | DAS28 ESR: Week 20 (n=13) | 84.62 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | DAS28 ESR: Week 24 (n=13) | 69.23 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | DAS28 CRP: Week 4 (n=14) | 35.71 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | DAS28 CRP: Week 8 (n=13) | 46.15 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | DAS28 CRP: Week 12 (n=12) | 41.67 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | DAS28 CRP: Week 16 (n=13) | 61.54 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | DAS28 CRP: Week 20 (n=13) | 76.92 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | DAS28 CRP: Week 24 (n=13) | 61.54 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued the Study
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued the Study | 7.1 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Level Elevation More Than 1.5 Times Upper Limit of Normal
Normal range of ALT is 7 to 56 units per liter (U/L) of serum. Normal range of AST is 5 to 40 units per liter (U/L) of serum.
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Level Elevation More Than 1.5 Times Upper Limit of Normal | >1.5 ULN ALT | 7.14 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Level Elevation More Than 1.5 Times Upper Limit of Normal | >1.5 ULN AST | 7.69 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Lipid Level Elevations
Low density lipoprotein (LDL) level was categorized as 'Optimal (less than \[\<\] 100 milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\])', 'Near Optimal/Above Optimal (100-129 mg/dL)', 'Borderline High (130-159 mg/dL)', 'High (160-189 mg/dL)', and 'Very high (190 mg/dL)'. High density lipoprotein (HDL) level was categorized as 'Acceptable (40-59 mg/dL)', 'High (\>=60 mg/dL)'. Total cholesterol (TC) level was categorized as 'Desirable (\<200 mg/dL)', 'Borderline High (200-239 mg/dL)', 'High (\>=240 mg/dL)'.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: Analysis population included all participants who entered the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Lipid Level Elevations | LDL: Optimal | 15.38 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Lipid Level Elevations | LDL: Near Optimal/Above Optimal | 30.77 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Lipid Level Elevations | LDL: Borderline High | 38.46 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Lipid Level Elevations | LDL: High | 15.38 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Lipid Level Elevations | LDL: Very high | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Lipid Level Elevations | HDL: Acceptable | 30.77 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Lipid Level Elevations | HDL: High | 69.23 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Lipid Level Elevations | TC: Desirable | 30.77 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Lipid Level Elevations | TC: Borderline High | 30.77 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Lipid Level Elevations | TC: High | 38.46 percentage of participants |