Skip to content

Study of Non Inferiority Bi-Profenid® 200mg Versus Bi-Profenid® 300mg Among Patients Presenting of the Post-traumatic or Rheumatologic Acute Affections of the Locomotor Apparatus (BIPROPAIN)

Non-inferiority Study of Bi-Profenid® 200 mg Versus Bi-Profenid® 300 mg in Patients Presenting With Pain Related to Closed, Benign, Acute Post-traumatic Conditions of the Motor System or Acute, Non-infectious Rheumatologic Conditions

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00810121
Enrollment
409
Registered
2008-12-17
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2009-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Brief summary

Primary objective: To demonstrate the non-inferiority of Bi-Profenid 100 mg x 2 day versus Bi-Profenid 150 mg x 2 day in patients presenting with pain related to closed, benign, acute post-traumatic conditions of the motor system or acute, non-infectious rheumatologic conditions, by comparing, on the one hand, changes in resting pain intensity over the entire day, measured at the end of the day using a numeric scale (NS), over 5 days and, on the other hand, total intake over 5 days of concomitant analgesics. Secondary Objectives: * To describe concomitant analgesic treatments * To describe the time between baseline and use of a step I, II or III analgesic * To evaluate patients pain relief using a Likert 4-class scale (complete or substantial relief, moderate relief slight relief and absence of relief) at D5 * To evaluate changes in intensity of pain when moving, over the entire day, measured at the end of the day using a numeric scale, over 5 days * To evaluate the patients overall satisfaction at the end of treatment using a 4-point Simple Verbal Scale (SVS) (very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat unsatisfied, very unsatisfied) * To evaluate the patients overall satisfaction at the end of the study using a 4-point Simple Verbal Scale (EVS) (very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat unsatisfied, very unsatisfied) * To compare the safety of the two treatments

Interventions

DRUGketoprofen 100 mg

100 mg b.i.d. for 5 days

DRUGketoprofen

150 mg b.i.d. for 5 days

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: * Male or female, more than 18 and less than 65 years of age, * Women using a method of contraception and with a negative pregnancy test before entering the study, or women who have been menopausal for at least 1 year, * Patients meeting one of the following criteria: * Closed benign trauma of the motor system occurring within the last 24 hours, * Contusion of the motor system occurring within the last 24 hours, * Acute rheumatologic conditions (acute lower back pain, lumbar sciatica, cervicobrachial neuralgia), * Abarticular rheumatism, * Requiring treatment with Bi-Profenid for 5 days, * With resting pain intensity measured on a numeric scale at baseline \>or= 3 (before administration of any treatment), * Receiving a prior medical examination suited to the study

Exclusion criteria

: * Need for surgery, * Need for hospitalization, * Need for an analgesic other than step I at the baseline visit, * Need for treatment with another selective or non-selective NSAID (per os and/or topical), including aspirin, selective cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors, corticosteroids or muscle relaxants at baseline and throughout the study, * Serious trauma: knee luxation, any fracture, ruptures such as Achilles tendon rupture, * Sprain treated with a cast, * Bursitis, * Local and/or general severe infection, * Pregnant or nursing women, * Hypersensitivity to ketoprofen or to any of the excipients of the product, * Previous history of asthma triggered by taking ketoprofen or substances with similar activity such as other NSAIDs or aspirin, * Gastrointestinal haemorrhage, cerebrovascular haemorrhage or other active haemorrhage, * Previous history of digestive haemorrhage or perforation during previous NSAID treatment, * Active intestinal ulcer, * Active peptic ulcer, previous history of peptic ulcer or recurrent haemorrhage (2 separate episodes or more of haemorrhage or ulcerations detected), * Severe hepatic failure, * Severe renal failure, * Severe heart failure, * Uncontrolled hypertension, * Hypersensitivity or intolerance to gluten, due to the presence of wheat starch (gluten), * Patients treated with oral anticoagulants, heparins, platelet antiaggregants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), lithium, methotrexate, pemetrexed and immunosuppressants The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Resting pain intensity measured using the numeric scale (NS) at the end of the day, and total intake of concomitant analgesics over 5 days. For these two parameters, the maximum value will be assigned to patients who used step II or III analgesicsbetween D1 and D5, at the end of the day

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026