Skip to content

17 Alfa Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate Versus Natural Progesterone for the Prevention of Preterm Labor

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00809939
Enrollment
800
Registered
2008-12-17
Start date
2010-12-31
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2011-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnancy

Keywords

preterm delivery, short cervical length, progesterone

Brief summary

Preterm deliveries play a significant role in neonatal morbidity and mortality. Previous studies showed that administration of progesterone to pregnant women at high risk, decrease spontaneous preterm deliveries. The purpose of this study is to compare between two different modes of treatment with progesterone for the prevention of preterm delivery: weekly injection of 17 alfa hydroxyprogesterone caproate versus daily vaginal administration of progesterone in terms of efficacy, comfort and compliance, safety and cost of treatments.

Interventions

DRUG17 alfa hydroxyprogesterone caproate

weekly injection of 250 mg until 34 weeks gestation

previous preterm delivery, treatment with daily vaginal progesterone 200 mg until 34 weeks gestation.

DRUGvaginal progesterone

daily vaginal progesterone 200 mg until 34 weeks gestation.

Sponsors

Meir Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* The subject has a history of spontaneous preterm delivery defined as earlier than 37 gestational week. * The subject has a short cervical length defined as 25 mm before 24 weeks gestation. * A singleton gestation.

Exclusion criteria

* Multifetal pregnancy. * The subject has or will have a cervical cerclage in place.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
efficacy3 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
comfort of use and consequently of that compliance3 years

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026