Skip to content

Extension Study Of Tanezumab In Osteoarthritis

A PHASE 3, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, LONG TERM STUDY OF THE SAFETY OF TANEZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE OR HIP

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00809783
Enrollment
2147
Registered
2008-12-17
Start date
2009-02-06
Completion date
2011-06-23
Last updated
2021-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Tanezumab OA arthritis

Brief summary

Safety extension study of Phase 3 Osteoarthritis trials with Tanezumab

Detailed description

This study was terminated on 27 October 2010 following a US FDA clinical hold for tanezumab osteoarthritis clinical studies which halted dosing and enrollment of patients on 23 June 2010 for potential safety issues.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALtanezumab

Tanezumab 10 mg

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must have participated in previous (specific) Phase 3 trials of Tanezumab in osteoarthritis

Exclusion criteria

* Willing to comply with scheduled visits and treatment plan Is medically fit to participate in the trial in the judgement of the Investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsA4091016: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 80Following parameters were analyzed for ECG abnormality: PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval, QT interval corrected using the Fridericia's formula (QTcF), QT interval corrected using the Bazett's formula (QTcB), RR interval and VR interval. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECG findings were judged by investigator and reported as adverse events were presented.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)A4091016: Baseline (Day 1) up to 112 days after last dose of study medication (up to Week 80)AE:any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE:an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason:death;initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization;life-threatening experience(immediate risk of dying);persistent or significant disability/incapacity;congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to 112 days after last dose that were absent before treatment in this study or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory FindingsA4091016: Day 1 up to Week 80Hemoglobin(Hgb),hematocrit,red blood cell(RBC):less than(\<)0.8\*lower limit of normal(LLN),MCV,MCH,MCHC\<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*ULN,platelet:\<0.5\*LLN or \>1.75\*upper limit of normal(ULN),white blood cell(WBC):\<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN,lymphocyte,neutrophil,total neutrophil:\<0.8\*LLN or\>1.2\*ULN,basophil,eosinophil,monocyte:\>1.2\*ULN;total,direct bilirubin\>1.5\*ULN,aspartate aminotransferase,alanine aminotransferase,gamma-glutamyl transferase,LDH,alkaline phosphatase:\> 3.0\*ULN,total protein,albumin:\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN;blood urea nitrogen,creatinine:\>1.3\*ULN,uric acid\>1.2\*ULN;cholesterol,triglycerides\>1.3\*ULN;sodium \<0.95\*LLN or \>1.05\*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,magnesium,bicarbonate:\<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*ULN,phosphate\<0.8\*LLN or\>1.2\*ULN;glucose \<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN,glycosylated Hgb \>1.3\*ULN,creatine kinase\>2.0\*ULN;urine(specific gravity \<1.003or\>1.030,pH \<4.5or\>8,glucose,ketone,protein,blood/Hgb,bilirubin,leukocyte esterase,crystals\>=1,RBC,WBC \>1.5\*ULN,epithelial cell\>=6,casts,hyaline cast\>1,bacteria\>20).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline to Week 80 in Physical Examination FindingsBaseline (Day 1) up to Week 80Physical examination included examination of following sites in addition to general examination: abdomen, ears, extremities, eyes, head, heart, musculoskeletal, neck, nose, skin, throat and thyroid. Clinically significant changes were judged by investigator.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Vital SignsA4091016: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 80Following parameters were analyzed for examination of vital signs: body temperature, blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormality in vital signs were judged by investigator and reported as adverse events were presented.
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain score is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC physical function score is calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104Participants answered: Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee/hip affects you, how are you doing today? Participants responded by using a 5-point scale where 1 = very good and 5 = very poor. Higher scores indicate worse condition. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseA4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104OMERACT-OARSI response:\>=50 percent(%) improvement from parent study baseline and absolute change from parent study baseline of \>=2 units at given week in WOMAC pain or physical function subscale or \>=20% improvement from parent study baseline and absolute change from parent study baseline of \>=1 unit at given week in at least 2 of following 3 items: 1)WOMAC pain subscale, 2)WOMAC physical function subscale, 3)PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1-5, higher score=more affected).WOMAC pain, physical function subscales assess amount of pain/difficulty experienced (score:0-10, higher score=higher pain/difficulty).
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreBaseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain score is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisBaseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104Participants answered: Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee/hip affects you, how are you doing today? Participants responded by using a 5-point scale where 1 = very good and 5 = very poor. Higher scores indicated worse pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104WOMAC stiffness subscale: questionnaire used to assess amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC stiffness score is calculated as mean of scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (minimum stiffness) to 10 (maximum stiffness), higher scores indicate higher stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score =0 (minimum stiffness) to 10 (maximum stiffness), higher scores indicate higher stiffness. Stiffness is defined as sensation of decreased ease in movement of knee/hip. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) and physical function (17 items) in participants with osteoarthritis of knee or hip. WOMAC average score is the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher score indicates worse response. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104Participants answered: How much pain have you had going up or down the stairs? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Higher score indicates more pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104Participants answered: How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Higher score indicates more pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 1-4, 5-8, 9-16, 17-24, 25-32, 33-40, 41-48, 49-56, 57-64, 65-72, 73-80, 81-88, 89-96, 97-104, 105-112United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved analgesics (over-the-counter or prescription) were permitted as concomitant medications to relieve the pain of osteoarthritis. These medications included opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids and viscosupplementation (hyaluronan) and were prescribed as per investigator's discretion.
Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 1-4, 5-8, 9-16, 17-24, 25-32, 33-40, 41-48, 49-56, 57-64, 65-72, 73-80, 81-88, 89-96, 97-104, 105-112FDA approved analgesics (over-the-counter or prescription) were permitted as concomitant medications to relieve the pain of osteoarthritis. These medications included opioids, topical analgesics, NSAIDs, capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids and viscosupplementation (hyaluronan) and were prescribed at the discretion of the investigator.
Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 16, 24, 56, 104The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain score is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72NIS constitutes sum of 37 standard items of neuromuscular examination used to assess muscle strength, reflexes and sensation. Each item is scored separately for left and right sides. Components of muscle weakness (24 items) scored on a scale: 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), with higher score=more weakness; components of reflexes and sensation (13 items) scored on a scale: 0= normal, 1= decreased or 2= absent. Total NIS score range 0 (no impairment) to 244 (maximum impairment), higher score = more impairment. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabA4091016: Day 1, Week 16, 24, 40, 56, 72, 80 or Early Termination (ET: anytime till Week 80)Human serum anti-drug antibody (ADA) samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Same participant may have positive ADA result at more than 1 time point.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study MedicationA4091016: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 64Number of participants were reported based on the maximum number of intravenous doses of either tanezumab or placebo received.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants randomized and treated with study medication in parent studies A4091011 (NCT00733902), A4091014 (NCT00744471), A4091015 (NCT00830063) and A4091018 (NCT00863304) who had completed the treatment period or discontinued due to lack of efficacy were eligible to enroll in this study.

Pre-assignment details

533 participants who received placebo and 294 participants who received naproxen in parent studies were randomized to receive tanezumab 2.5, 5 or 10 milligram (mg) on Day 1. The remaining participants who received tanezumab in parent studies remained on the same dose they received in parent studies.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tanezumab 2.5 mg
Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 mg intravenous infusion administered every 8 weeks for up to 64 weeks.
522
Tanezumab 5 mg
Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg intravenous infusion administered every 8 weeks for up to 64 weeks.
832
Tanezumab 10 mg
Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg intravenous infusion administered every 8 weeks for up to 64 weeks.
788
Total2,142

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event345271
Overall StudyDeath100
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy395263
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up034
Overall StudyOther212116
Overall StudyProtocol Violation265
Overall StudyRandomized, but not treated302
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor378626565
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject477264

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTanezumab 2.5 mgTanezumab 5 mgTanezumab 10 mgTotal
Age, Customized
18 to 44 years
29 Participants43 Participants32 Participants104 Participants
Age, Customized
45 to 64 years
298 Participants466 Participants455 Participants1219 Participants
Age, Customized
Greater than or equal to 65 years
195 Participants323 Participants301 Participants819 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
308 Participants522 Participants474 Participants1304 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
214 Participants310 Participants314 Participants838 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
280 / 522412 / 832408 / 788
serious
Total, serious adverse events
47 / 52273 / 83296 / 788

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings

Hemoglobin(Hgb),hematocrit,red blood cell(RBC):less than(\<)0.8\*lower limit of normal(LLN),MCV,MCH,MCHC\<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*ULN,platelet:\<0.5\*LLN or \>1.75\*upper limit of normal(ULN),white blood cell(WBC):\<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN,lymphocyte,neutrophil,total neutrophil:\<0.8\*LLN or\>1.2\*ULN,basophil,eosinophil,monocyte:\>1.2\*ULN;total,direct bilirubin\>1.5\*ULN,aspartate aminotransferase,alanine aminotransferase,gamma-glutamyl transferase,LDH,alkaline phosphatase:\> 3.0\*ULN,total protein,albumin:\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN;blood urea nitrogen,creatinine:\>1.3\*ULN,uric acid\>1.2\*ULN;cholesterol,triglycerides\>1.3\*ULN;sodium \<0.95\*LLN or \>1.05\*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,magnesium,bicarbonate:\<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*ULN,phosphate\<0.8\*LLN or\>1.2\*ULN;glucose \<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN,glycosylated Hgb \>1.3\*ULN,creatine kinase\>2.0\*ULN;urine(specific gravity \<1.003or\>1.030,pH \<4.5or\>8,glucose,ketone,protein,blood/Hgb,bilirubin,leukocyte esterase,crystals\>=1,RBC,WBC \>1.5\*ULN,epithelial cell\>=6,casts,hyaline cast\>1,bacteria\>20).

Time frame: A4091016: Day 1 up to Week 80

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication during this study, A4091016 (NCT00809783). Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings439 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings679 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings624 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

Following parameters were analyzed for ECG abnormality: PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval, QT interval corrected using the Fridericia's formula (QTcF), QT interval corrected using the Bazett's formula (QTcB), RR interval and VR interval. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECG findings were judged by investigator and reported as adverse events were presented.

Time frame: A4091016: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 80

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication during this study, A4091016 (NCT00809783).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings14 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings33 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings17 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

AE:any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE:an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason:death;initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization;life-threatening experience(immediate risk of dying);persistent or significant disability/incapacity;congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to 112 days after last dose that were absent before treatment in this study or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs.

Time frame: A4091016: Baseline (Day 1) up to 112 days after last dose of study medication (up to Week 80)

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication during this study, A4091016 (NCT00809783).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs363 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs47 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs573 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs73 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs547 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs96 Participants
Secondary

Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104

Participants answered: How much pain have you had going up or down the stairs? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Higher score indicates more pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.

Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104

Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. 'Overall number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure. Number Analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96, 104 were not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-3.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.88
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-3.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-3.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-4.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-3.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-3.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-4.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.79
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline8.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-3.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-4.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-3.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.92
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-4.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.74
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-3.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.93
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-3.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-3.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-3.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-4.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.85
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-3.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-3.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.93
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline8.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-3.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-4.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-4.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.95
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-4.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-4.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.74
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-4.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-4.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.84
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-4.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-4.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.92
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-4.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-4.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.95
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-4.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline8.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.51
Secondary

Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104

Participants answered: How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Higher score indicates more pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.

Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104

Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. 'Overall number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96, 104 were not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-3.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.74
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-3.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.82
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-4.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.54
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-3.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.79
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-4.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-3.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.82
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-3.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-3.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.82
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-3.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-3.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline7.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.67
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-3.68 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-3.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-4.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-3.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.79
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-3.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.79
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-3.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.74
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-3.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-4.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.59
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-3.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline7.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.63
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-3.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-3.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-3.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.89
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline7.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-4.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-4.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.73
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-4.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.84
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-3.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.85
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-3.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-3.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-3.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-3.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
Secondary

Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72

NIS constitutes sum of 37 standard items of neuromuscular examination used to assess muscle strength, reflexes and sensation. Each item is scored separately for left and right sides. Components of muscle weakness (24 items) scored on a scale: 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), with higher score=more weakness; components of reflexes and sensation (13 items) scored on a scale: 0= normal, 1= decreased or 2= absent. Total NIS score range 0 (no impairment) to 244 (maximum impairment), higher score = more impairment. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.

Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72

Population: ITT population. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing values. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 56-0.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 16-0.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.51
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 40-0.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.57
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 48-0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.47
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 24-0.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 32-0.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 4-0.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 72-0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.57
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 64-0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 8-0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Parent Study Baseline1.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.16
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 24-0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.74
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 72-0.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Parent Study Baseline0.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 4-0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 8-0.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.43
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 16-0.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 32-0.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 400.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 48-0.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 56-0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 64-0.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.59
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 40-0.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 16-0.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 72-0.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.87
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 48-0.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 8-0.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 64-0.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 24-0.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Parent Study Baseline1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.08
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 56-0.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 32-0.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72Change at Week 4-0.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.91
Secondary

Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104

Participants answered: Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee/hip affects you, how are you doing today? Participants responded by using a 5-point scale where 1 = very good and 5 = very poor. Higher scores indicate worse condition. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.

Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104

Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. 'Overall number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure. Number Analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96, 104 were not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-0.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-1.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-0.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-0.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-0.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline3.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-0.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-0.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-0.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-0.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-0.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-1.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline3.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-1.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-0.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-0.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-1.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-1.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-1.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-0.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-0.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-0.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-0.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-1.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-0.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-1.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-0.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-0.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-1.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-1.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-0.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-1.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline3.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104

WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) and physical function (17 items) in participants with osteoarthritis of knee or hip. WOMAC average score is the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher score indicates worse response. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.

Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104

Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. 'Overall number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96, 104 were not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-3.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-3.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-3.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-3.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-3.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-3.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-3.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.57
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-3.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-3.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.57
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline6.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-4.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-4.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-3.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.47
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-3.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline7.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.43
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-3.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-3.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.47
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-3.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.48
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-3.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-3.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.48
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-3.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-3.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.48
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-3.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-3.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-3.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-3.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-3.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-3.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-4.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline7.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.46
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-4.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-4.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.51
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-3.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.57
Secondary

Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104

The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain score is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.

Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104

Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96 and 104 were not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline7.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.43
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-4.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-3.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.59
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-3.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-3.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.59
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-3.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-4.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-3.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-3.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-3.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-3.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-3.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-4.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.41
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-4.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-3.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-4.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.47
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-4.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline7.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-3.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-3.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-3.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-3.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-4.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-4.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline7.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.47
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-4.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-4.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.48
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-4.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-4.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-4.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-4.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-4.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.57
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-4.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
Secondary

Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104

The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC physical function score is calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.

Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104

Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96 and 104 were not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-3.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline6.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-3.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.57
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-3.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-3.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-3.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-3.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-3.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-3.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.59
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-3.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-3.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-3.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-4.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-3.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-3.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-3.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-3.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-3.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline6.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.57
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-3.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.46
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-3.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-3.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.54
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-3.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-3.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-3.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline6.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.61
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-4.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-4.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-3.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-3.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-3.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-3.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.65
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-3.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
Secondary

Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104

WOMAC stiffness subscale: questionnaire used to assess amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC stiffness score is calculated as mean of scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (minimum stiffness) to 10 (maximum stiffness), higher scores indicate higher stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score =0 (minimum stiffness) to 10 (maximum stiffness), higher scores indicate higher stiffness. Stiffness is defined as sensation of decreased ease in movement of knee/hip. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.

Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104

Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. 'Overall number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96, 104 were not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-3.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-3.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.78
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-3.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-3.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-3.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline7.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-3.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.81
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-4.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-3.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.85
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-3.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Tanezumab 2.5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-3.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-3.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline7.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.78
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-4.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-4.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.71
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-3.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-3.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.71
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-3.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.79
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-3.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-3.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-3.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
Tanezumab 5 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-3.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 64-3.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.96
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 48-3.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.96
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 8-4.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Parent Study Baseline7.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 56-3.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.96
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 4-4.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.73
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 32-3.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.95
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 24-4.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 72-3.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.96
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 40-3.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.95
Tanezumab 10 mgChange From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104Change at Week 16-4.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.84
Secondary

Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage

FDA approved analgesics (over-the-counter or prescription) were permitted as concomitant medications to relieve the pain of osteoarthritis. These medications included opioids, topical analgesics, NSAIDs, capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids and viscosupplementation (hyaluronan) and were prescribed at the discretion of the investigator.

Time frame: Week 1-4, 5-8, 9-16, 17-24, 25-32, 33-40, 41-48, 49-56, 57-64, 65-72, 73-80, 81-88, 89-96, 97-104, 105-112

Population: ITT population. 'Number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 73-80, 81-88, 89-96, 97-104 and 105-112 were not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tanezumab 2.5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 57-640.5 days per weekStandard Deviation 1.66
Tanezumab 2.5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 25-321.7 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.89
Tanezumab 2.5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 1-41.8 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.98
Tanezumab 2.5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 17-241.8 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.93
Tanezumab 2.5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 5-82.0 days per weekStandard Deviation 3.13
Tanezumab 2.5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 41-481.3 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.59
Tanezumab 2.5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 9-162.1 days per weekStandard Deviation 3.09
Tanezumab 2.5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 33-401.6 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.8
Tanezumab 2.5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 49-560.9 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.03
Tanezumab 2.5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 65-720.3 days per weekStandard Deviation 0.97
Tanezumab 5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 5-81.9 days per weekStandard Deviation 3.06
Tanezumab 5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 25-321.4 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.64
Tanezumab 5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 41-480.8 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.08
Tanezumab 5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 49-560.8 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.05
Tanezumab 5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 65-720.0 days per weekStandard Deviation 0.19
Tanezumab 5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 1-41.6 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.83
Tanezumab 5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 9-162.0 days per weekStandard Deviation 3.07
Tanezumab 5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 17-241.7 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.84
Tanezumab 5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 33-401.1 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.33
Tanezumab 5 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 57-640.4 days per weekStandard Deviation 1.39
Tanezumab 10 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 17-241.6 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.74
Tanezumab 10 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 65-720.2 days per weekStandard Deviation 1.13
Tanezumab 10 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 25-321.3 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.58
Tanezumab 10 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 41-480.7 days per weekStandard Deviation 1.94
Tanezumab 10 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 57-640.2 days per weekStandard Deviation 0.67
Tanezumab 10 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 49-560.5 days per weekStandard Deviation 1.59
Tanezumab 10 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 33-401.0 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.31
Tanezumab 10 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 9-161.9 days per weekStandard Deviation 3
Tanezumab 10 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 1-41.7 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.85
Tanezumab 10 mgDays Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication UsageWeek 5-81.9 days per weekStandard Deviation 3.05
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab

Human serum anti-drug antibody (ADA) samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Same participant may have positive ADA result at more than 1 time point.

Time frame: A4091016: Day 1, Week 16, 24, 40, 56, 72, 80 or Early Termination (ET: anytime till Week 80)

Population: ITT population. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at any time point. 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 161 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 562 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 401 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabDay 10 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 80 or ET2 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 720 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 240 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 400 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabDay 10 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 161 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 241 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 560 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 720 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 80 or ET2 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 561 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 164 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 80 or ET5 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 720 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 400 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabWeek 243 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for TanezumabDay 10 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Vital Signs

Following parameters were analyzed for examination of vital signs: body temperature, blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormality in vital signs were judged by investigator and reported as adverse events were presented.

Time frame: A4091016: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 80

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication during this study, A4091016 (NCT00809783).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Vital Signs12 participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Vital Signs13 participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Vital Signs23 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline to Week 80 in Physical Examination Findings

Physical examination included examination of following sites in addition to general examination: abdomen, ears, extremities, eyes, head, heart, musculoskeletal, neck, nose, skin, throat and thyroid. Clinically significant changes were judged by investigator.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 80

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication during this study, A4091016 (NCT00809783).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline to Week 80 in Physical Examination Findings26 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline to Week 80 in Physical Examination Findings48 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline to Week 80 in Physical Examination Findings53 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104

The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain score is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.

Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 16, 24, 56, 104

Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 104 were not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=90% reduction81 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=10% reduction449 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: 100% reduction30 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=20% reduction431 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: 100% reduction29 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=80% reduction128 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=90% reduction87 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=10% reduction457 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=80% reduction141 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=20% reduction419 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=30% reduction397 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=70% reduction199 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=30% reduction382 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: Greater than 0% reduction478 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=60% reduction264 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=40% reduction352 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=70% reduction187 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=50% reduction313 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=40% reduction358 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: Greater than 0% reduction477 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=60% reduction249 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=50% reduction327 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: 100% reduction30 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=50% reduction296 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=60% reduction267 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=10% reduction462 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=40% reduction334 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=70% reduction203 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=30% reduction371 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=80% reduction149 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: Greater than 0% reduction470 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=20% reduction409 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=90 reduction94 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=20% reduction701 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=70% reduction349 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=10% reduction750 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: Greater than 0% reduction773 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=60% reduction404 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: Greater than 0% reduction782 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=10% reduction750 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=30% reduction639 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=40% reduction573 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=50% reduction510 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=60% reduction432 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=80% reduction264 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=90 reduction156 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: 100% reduction68 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: Greater than 0% reduction782 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=20% reduction692 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=30% reduction643 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=40% reduction567 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=50% reduction512 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=60% reduction425 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=70% reduction335 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=80% reduction255 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=90% reduction160 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: 100% reduction69 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=10% reduction735 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=20% reduction677 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=30% reduction613 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=40% reduction545 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=50% reduction483 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=70% reduction331 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=80% reduction250 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=90% reduction158 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: 100% reduction63 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: 100% reduction78 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=70% reduction339 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: 100% reduction66 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: Greater than 0% reduction726 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=90 reduction171 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=20% reduction665 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=10% reduction689 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=80% reduction271 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: Greater than 0% reduction733 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=20% reduction640 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=70% reduction359 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=80% reduction255 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=30% reduction590 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=60% reduction453 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=10% reduction708 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=40% reduction538 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=50% reduction522 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: 100% reduction69 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=40% reduction552 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=50% reduction480 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=50% reduction497 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=30% reduction605 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=40% reduction577 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=60% reduction432 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=20% reduction655 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=60% reduction414 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=70% reduction357 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=10% reduction703 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 16: >=30% reduction626 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=80% reduction271 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: Greater than 0% reduction734 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 56: >=90% reduction151 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104Week 24: >=90% reduction169 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication

United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved analgesics (over-the-counter or prescription) were permitted as concomitant medications to relieve the pain of osteoarthritis. These medications included opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids and viscosupplementation (hyaluronan) and were prescribed as per investigator's discretion.

Time frame: Week 1-4, 5-8, 9-16, 17-24, 25-32, 33-40, 41-48, 49-56, 57-64, 65-72, 73-80, 81-88, 89-96, 97-104, 105-112

Population: ITT population. 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 73-80, 81-88, 89-96, 97-104 and 105-112 were not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 57-6411.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 1-431.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 17-2440.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 65-7210.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 49-5637.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 25-3240.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 9-1639.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 41-4842.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 33-4036.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 5-833.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 33-4026.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 49-5634.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 5-835.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 57-6428.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 41-4819.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 65-724.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 9-1644.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 17-2443.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 1-428.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 25-3234.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 65-7216.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 1-431.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 5-832.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 9-1645.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 17-2447.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 25-3230.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 41-4834.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 49-5616.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 57-6431.6 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic MedicationWeek 33-4035.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score

The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain score is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.

Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104

Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96 and 104 were not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 72: >=30% reduction71.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 48: >=90% reduction15.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 16: >=90% reduction18.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 4: >=50% reduction70.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 48: >=70% reduction35.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 24: >=50% reduction60.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 32: >=30% reduction72.6 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 48: >=50% reduction56.6 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 24: >=70% reduction38.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 48: >=30% reduction71.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 24: >=90% reduction16.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 64: >=90% reduction15.6 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 40: >=90% reduction15.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 64: >=70% reduction36.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 40: >=70% reduction37.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 32: >=50% reduction57.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 4: >=90% reduction21.6 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 40: >=50% reduction57.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 32: >=70% reduction36.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 72: >=70% reduction36.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 40: >=30% reduction71.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 32: >=90% reduction16.6 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 64: >=50% reduction56.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 8: >=30% reduction75.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 72: >=90% reduction15.6 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 64: >=30% reduction71.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 72: >=50% reduction56.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 56: >=90% reduction15.6 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 8: >=70% reduction41.6 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 56: >=70% reduction36.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 8: >=90% reduction18.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 24: >=30% reduction73.6 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 4: >=70% reduction48.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 16: >=30% reduction76.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 4: >=30% reduction83.6 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 56: >=50% reduction57.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 16: >=50% reduction63.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 8: >=50% reduction64.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 56: >=30% reduction71.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 16: >=70% reduction39.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 56: >=50% reduction58.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 4: >=70% reduction50.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 8: >=70% reduction43.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 16: >=90% reduction18.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 24: >=70% reduction40.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 40: >=90% reduction19.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 64: >=90% reduction19.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 4: >=30% reduction82.6 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 4: >=50% reduction68.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 4: >=90% reduction23.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 8: >=30% reduction78.6 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 8: >=50% reduction63.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 8: >=90% reduction20.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 16: >=30% reduction76.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 16: >=50% reduction61.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 16: >=70% reduction42.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 24: >=30% reduction77.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 24: >=50% reduction61.6 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 24: >=90% reduction19.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 32: >=30% reduction75.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 32: >=50% reduction59.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 32: >=70% reduction42.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 32: >=90% reduction19.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 40: >=30% reduction74.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 40: >=50% reduction58.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 40: >=70% reduction41.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 48: >=30% reduction73.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 48: >=50% reduction58.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 48: >=70% reduction40.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 48: >=90% reduction18.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 56: >=30% reduction73.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 56: >=70% reduction39.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 56: >=90% reduction19.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 64: >=30% reduction73.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 64: >=50% reduction58.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 64: >=70% reduction39.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 72: >=30% reduction73.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 72: >=50% reduction58.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 72: >=70% reduction39.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 72: >=90% reduction19.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 4: >=30% reduction81.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 48: >=70% reduction43.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 16: >=70% reduction45.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 72: >=70% reduction43.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 48: >=90% reduction19.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 16: >=50% reduction66.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 72: >=30% reduction75.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 56: >=30% reduction75.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 16: >=30% reduction79.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 8: >=90% reduction25.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 56: >=50% reduction61.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 8: >=70% reduction48.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 48: >=50% reduction61.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 56: >=70% reduction43.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 8: >=50% reduction68.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 16: >=90% reduction21.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 56: >=90% reduction19.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 8: >=30% reduction81.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 72: >=50% reduction61.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 64: >=30% reduction75.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 4: >=90% reduction24.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 40: >=70% reduction43.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 64: >=50% reduction61.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 32: >=90% reduction20.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 32: >=70% reduction43.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 4: >=70% reduction48.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 40: >=30% reduction75.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 32: >=50% reduction62.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 72: >=90% reduction19.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 40: >=50% reduction61.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 32: >=30% reduction75.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 64: >=70% reduction43.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 24: >=90% reduction21.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 40: >=90% reduction19.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 24: >=70% reduction45.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 4: >=50% reduction69.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 48: >=30% reduction75.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 24: >=50% reduction63.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 64: >=90% reduction19.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreWeek 24: >=30% reduction77.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis

Participants answered: Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee/hip affects you, how are you doing today? Participants responded by using a 5-point scale where 1 = very good and 5 = very poor. Higher scores indicated worse pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.

Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104

Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. 'Overall number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure. Number Analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96, 104 were not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 4824.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 2425.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 6424.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 4025.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 3225.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 828.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 437.6 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 5624.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 1629.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 7224.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 3228.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 436.6 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 831.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 1630.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 2428.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 4026.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 4826.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 5626.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 6426.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 7226.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 4830.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 834.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 4029.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 5630.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 437.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 2432.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 3231.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 7230.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 1631.7 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of OsteoarthritisWeek 6430.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response

OMERACT-OARSI response:\>=50 percent(%) improvement from parent study baseline and absolute change from parent study baseline of \>=2 units at given week in WOMAC pain or physical function subscale or \>=20% improvement from parent study baseline and absolute change from parent study baseline of \>=1 unit at given week in at least 2 of following 3 items: 1)WOMAC pain subscale, 2)WOMAC physical function subscale, 3)PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1-5, higher score=more affected).WOMAC pain, physical function subscales assess amount of pain/difficulty experienced (score:0-10, higher score=higher pain/difficulty).

Time frame: A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication during this study, A4091016 (NCT00809783). LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96 and 104 were not reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 5674.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 2477.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 486.8 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 7274.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 3275.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 880.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 4075.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 6474.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 1680.1 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 4874.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 488.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 5679.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 6479.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 1683.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 7279.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 4879.4 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 2482.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 3279.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 4079.3 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 883.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 7279.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 4879.6 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 486.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 885.0 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 1682.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 2481.5 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 3280.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 4079.9 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 5679.2 percentage of participants
Tanezumab 10 mgPercentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) ResponseWeek 6479.2 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication

Number of participants were reported based on the maximum number of intravenous doses of either tanezumab or placebo received.

Time frame: A4091016: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 64

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication during this study, A4091016 (NCT00809783).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication4 doses78 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication9 doses3 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication6 doses76 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication5 doses81 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication2 doses91 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication8 doses13 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication3 doses92 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication1 dose39 Participants
Tanezumab 2.5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication7 doses49 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication5 doses104 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication2 doses161 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication1 dose81 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication3 doses172 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication4 doses158 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication6 doses79 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication7 doses59 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication8 doses13 Participants
Tanezumab 5 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication9 doses5 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication3 doses177 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication2 doses164 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication7 doses41 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication1 dose69 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication9 doses2 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication5 doses121 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication4 doses141 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication8 doses11 Participants
Tanezumab 10 mgNumber of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication6 doses62 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026