Osteoarthritis
Conditions
Keywords
Tanezumab OA arthritis
Brief summary
Safety extension study of Phase 3 Osteoarthritis trials with Tanezumab
Detailed description
This study was terminated on 27 October 2010 following a US FDA clinical hold for tanezumab osteoarthritis clinical studies which halted dosing and enrollment of patients on 23 June 2010 for potential safety issues.
Interventions
Tanezumab 10 mg
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Must have participated in previous (specific) Phase 3 trials of Tanezumab in osteoarthritis
Exclusion criteria
* Willing to comply with scheduled visits and treatment plan Is medically fit to participate in the trial in the judgement of the Investigator
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | A4091016: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 80 | Following parameters were analyzed for ECG abnormality: PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval, QT interval corrected using the Fridericia's formula (QTcF), QT interval corrected using the Bazett's formula (QTcB), RR interval and VR interval. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECG findings were judged by investigator and reported as adverse events were presented. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | A4091016: Baseline (Day 1) up to 112 days after last dose of study medication (up to Week 80) | AE:any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE:an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason:death;initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization;life-threatening experience(immediate risk of dying);persistent or significant disability/incapacity;congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to 112 days after last dose that were absent before treatment in this study or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs. |
| Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | A4091016: Day 1 up to Week 80 | Hemoglobin(Hgb),hematocrit,red blood cell(RBC):less than(\<)0.8\*lower limit of normal(LLN),MCV,MCH,MCHC\<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*ULN,platelet:\<0.5\*LLN or \>1.75\*upper limit of normal(ULN),white blood cell(WBC):\<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN,lymphocyte,neutrophil,total neutrophil:\<0.8\*LLN or\>1.2\*ULN,basophil,eosinophil,monocyte:\>1.2\*ULN;total,direct bilirubin\>1.5\*ULN,aspartate aminotransferase,alanine aminotransferase,gamma-glutamyl transferase,LDH,alkaline phosphatase:\> 3.0\*ULN,total protein,albumin:\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN;blood urea nitrogen,creatinine:\>1.3\*ULN,uric acid\>1.2\*ULN;cholesterol,triglycerides\>1.3\*ULN;sodium \<0.95\*LLN or \>1.05\*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,magnesium,bicarbonate:\<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*ULN,phosphate\<0.8\*LLN or\>1.2\*ULN;glucose \<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN,glycosylated Hgb \>1.3\*ULN,creatine kinase\>2.0\*ULN;urine(specific gravity \<1.003or\>1.030,pH \<4.5or\>8,glucose,ketone,protein,blood/Hgb,bilirubin,leukocyte esterase,crystals\>=1,RBC,WBC \>1.5\*ULN,epithelial cell\>=6,casts,hyaline cast\>1,bacteria\>20). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline to Week 80 in Physical Examination Findings | Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 80 | Physical examination included examination of following sites in addition to general examination: abdomen, ears, extremities, eyes, head, heart, musculoskeletal, neck, nose, skin, throat and thyroid. Clinically significant changes were judged by investigator. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Vital Signs | A4091016: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 80 | Following parameters were analyzed for examination of vital signs: body temperature, blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormality in vital signs were judged by investigator and reported as adverse events were presented. |
| Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104 | The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain score is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018. |
| Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104 | The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC physical function score is calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018. |
| Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104 | Participants answered: Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee/hip affects you, how are you doing today? Participants responded by using a 5-point scale where 1 = very good and 5 = very poor. Higher scores indicate worse condition. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018. |
| Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104 | OMERACT-OARSI response:\>=50 percent(%) improvement from parent study baseline and absolute change from parent study baseline of \>=2 units at given week in WOMAC pain or physical function subscale or \>=20% improvement from parent study baseline and absolute change from parent study baseline of \>=1 unit at given week in at least 2 of following 3 items: 1)WOMAC pain subscale, 2)WOMAC physical function subscale, 3)PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1-5, higher score=more affected).WOMAC pain, physical function subscales assess amount of pain/difficulty experienced (score:0-10, higher score=higher pain/difficulty). |
| Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104 | The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain score is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018. |
| Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104 | Participants answered: Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee/hip affects you, how are you doing today? Participants responded by using a 5-point scale where 1 = very good and 5 = very poor. Higher scores indicated worse pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018. |
| Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104 | WOMAC stiffness subscale: questionnaire used to assess amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC stiffness score is calculated as mean of scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (minimum stiffness) to 10 (maximum stiffness), higher scores indicate higher stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score =0 (minimum stiffness) to 10 (maximum stiffness), higher scores indicate higher stiffness. Stiffness is defined as sensation of decreased ease in movement of knee/hip. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018. |
| Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104 | WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) and physical function (17 items) in participants with osteoarthritis of knee or hip. WOMAC average score is the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher score indicates worse response. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018. |
| Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104 | Participants answered: How much pain have you had going up or down the stairs? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Higher score indicates more pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018. |
| Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104 | Participants answered: How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Higher score indicates more pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 1-4, 5-8, 9-16, 17-24, 25-32, 33-40, 41-48, 49-56, 57-64, 65-72, 73-80, 81-88, 89-96, 97-104, 105-112 | United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved analgesics (over-the-counter or prescription) were permitted as concomitant medications to relieve the pain of osteoarthritis. These medications included opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids and viscosupplementation (hyaluronan) and were prescribed as per investigator's discretion. |
| Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 1-4, 5-8, 9-16, 17-24, 25-32, 33-40, 41-48, 49-56, 57-64, 65-72, 73-80, 81-88, 89-96, 97-104, 105-112 | FDA approved analgesics (over-the-counter or prescription) were permitted as concomitant medications to relieve the pain of osteoarthritis. These medications included opioids, topical analgesics, NSAIDs, capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids and viscosupplementation (hyaluronan) and were prescribed at the discretion of the investigator. |
| Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 16, 24, 56, 104 | The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain score is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018. |
| Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72 | NIS constitutes sum of 37 standard items of neuromuscular examination used to assess muscle strength, reflexes and sensation. Each item is scored separately for left and right sides. Components of muscle weakness (24 items) scored on a scale: 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), with higher score=more weakness; components of reflexes and sensation (13 items) scored on a scale: 0= normal, 1= decreased or 2= absent. Total NIS score range 0 (no impairment) to 244 (maximum impairment), higher score = more impairment. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018. |
| Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | A4091016: Day 1, Week 16, 24, 40, 56, 72, 80 or Early Termination (ET: anytime till Week 80) | Human serum anti-drug antibody (ADA) samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Same participant may have positive ADA result at more than 1 time point. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | A4091016: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 64 | Number of participants were reported based on the maximum number of intravenous doses of either tanezumab or placebo received. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants randomized and treated with study medication in parent studies A4091011 (NCT00733902), A4091014 (NCT00744471), A4091015 (NCT00830063) and A4091018 (NCT00863304) who had completed the treatment period or discontinued due to lack of efficacy were eligible to enroll in this study.
Pre-assignment details
533 participants who received placebo and 294 participants who received naproxen in parent studies were randomized to receive tanezumab 2.5, 5 or 10 milligram (mg) on Day 1. The remaining participants who received tanezumab in parent studies remained on the same dose they received in parent studies.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 2.5 mg intravenous infusion administered every 8 weeks for up to 64 weeks. | 522 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 5 mg intravenous infusion administered every 8 weeks for up to 64 weeks. | 832 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg Tanezumab (RN624 or PF-04383119) 10 mg intravenous infusion administered every 8 weeks for up to 64 weeks. | 788 |
| Total | 2,142 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 34 | 52 | 71 |
| Overall Study | Death | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 39 | 52 | 63 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Other | 21 | 21 | 16 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Randomized, but not treated | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Study Terminated by Sponsor | 378 | 626 | 565 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 47 | 72 | 64 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Tanezumab 5 mg | Tanezumab 10 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized 18 to 44 years | 29 Participants | 43 Participants | 32 Participants | 104 Participants |
| Age, Customized 45 to 64 years | 298 Participants | 466 Participants | 455 Participants | 1219 Participants |
| Age, Customized Greater than or equal to 65 years | 195 Participants | 323 Participants | 301 Participants | 819 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 308 Participants | 522 Participants | 474 Participants | 1304 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 214 Participants | 310 Participants | 314 Participants | 838 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 280 / 522 | 412 / 832 | 408 / 788 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 47 / 522 | 73 / 832 | 96 / 788 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings
Hemoglobin(Hgb),hematocrit,red blood cell(RBC):less than(\<)0.8\*lower limit of normal(LLN),MCV,MCH,MCHC\<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*ULN,platelet:\<0.5\*LLN or \>1.75\*upper limit of normal(ULN),white blood cell(WBC):\<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN,lymphocyte,neutrophil,total neutrophil:\<0.8\*LLN or\>1.2\*ULN,basophil,eosinophil,monocyte:\>1.2\*ULN;total,direct bilirubin\>1.5\*ULN,aspartate aminotransferase,alanine aminotransferase,gamma-glutamyl transferase,LDH,alkaline phosphatase:\> 3.0\*ULN,total protein,albumin:\<0.8\*LLN or \>1.2\*ULN;blood urea nitrogen,creatinine:\>1.3\*ULN,uric acid\>1.2\*ULN;cholesterol,triglycerides\>1.3\*ULN;sodium \<0.95\*LLN or \>1.05\*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,magnesium,bicarbonate:\<0.9\*LLN or \>1.1\*ULN,phosphate\<0.8\*LLN or\>1.2\*ULN;glucose \<0.6\*LLN or \>1.5\*ULN,glycosylated Hgb \>1.3\*ULN,creatine kinase\>2.0\*ULN;urine(specific gravity \<1.003or\>1.030,pH \<4.5or\>8,glucose,ketone,protein,blood/Hgb,bilirubin,leukocyte esterase,crystals\>=1,RBC,WBC \>1.5\*ULN,epithelial cell\>=6,casts,hyaline cast\>1,bacteria\>20).
Time frame: A4091016: Day 1 up to Week 80
Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication during this study, A4091016 (NCT00809783). Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | 439 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | 679 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Findings | 624 Participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Following parameters were analyzed for ECG abnormality: PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval, QT interval corrected using the Fridericia's formula (QTcF), QT interval corrected using the Bazett's formula (QTcB), RR interval and VR interval. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECG findings were judged by investigator and reported as adverse events were presented.
Time frame: A4091016: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 80
Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication during this study, A4091016 (NCT00809783).
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | 14 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | 33 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | 17 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AE:any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE:an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason:death;initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization;life-threatening experience(immediate risk of dying);persistent or significant disability/incapacity;congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study medication and up to 112 days after last dose that were absent before treatment in this study or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAEs and all non-SAEs.
Time frame: A4091016: Baseline (Day 1) up to 112 days after last dose of study medication (up to Week 80)
Population: Intent to treat (ITT) analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication during this study, A4091016 (NCT00809783).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 363 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 47 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 573 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 73 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 547 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) And Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 96 Participants |
Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Participants answered: How much pain have you had going up or down the stairs? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Higher score indicates more pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. 'Overall number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure. Number Analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96, 104 were not reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -3.72 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.88 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -3.74 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.86 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -3.75 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.87 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -4.15 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.83 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -3.74 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.87 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -3.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.86 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -4.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.79 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 8.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.48 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -3.76 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.87 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -4.60 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.61 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -3.70 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.92 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -4.54 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.74 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -3.78 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.93 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -3.97 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.86 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -3.87 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.91 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -3.80 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.94 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -4.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.85 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -3.79 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.94 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -3.81 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.93 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 8.11 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.48 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -3.79 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.94 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -4.25 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.75 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -4.15 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.95 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -4.16 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.94 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -4.73 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.74 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -4.69 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.83 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -4.46 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.84 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -4.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.91 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -4.24 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.92 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -4.21 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.94 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -4.19 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.95 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -4.16 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.94 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 8.16 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.51 |
Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Participants answered: How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface? Participants responded by using a NRS of 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Higher score indicates more pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. 'Overall number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96, 104 were not reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -3.96 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.74 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -3.72 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.82 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -4.51 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.54 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -3.88 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.79 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -4.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.78 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -3.72 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.82 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -3.74 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.78 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -3.71 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.82 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -3.71 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.81 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -3.70 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.83 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 7.22 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.67 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -3.68 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -3.66 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.78 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -4.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.65 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -3.65 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.79 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -3.65 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.79 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -3.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.74 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -3.83 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.72 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -4.36 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.59 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -3.77 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.78 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 7.10 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.63 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -3.65 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.78 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -3.80 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.91 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -3.86 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.89 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 7.10 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.66 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -4.38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.67 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -4.24 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.73 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -4.12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.84 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -3.97 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.85 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -3.88 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.87 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -3.83 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -3.81 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.91 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline For Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -3.80 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.91 |
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72
NIS constitutes sum of 37 standard items of neuromuscular examination used to assess muscle strength, reflexes and sensation. Each item is scored separately for left and right sides. Components of muscle weakness (24 items) scored on a scale: 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), with higher score=more weakness; components of reflexes and sensation (13 items) scored on a scale: 0= normal, 1= decreased or 2= absent. Total NIS score range 0 (no impairment) to 244 (maximum impairment), higher score = more impairment. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72
Population: ITT population. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing values. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 56 | -0.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.61 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 16 | -0.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.51 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 40 | -0.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.57 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 48 | -0.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.47 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 24 | -0.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.65 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 32 | -0.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.44 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 4 | -0.10 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.97 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 72 | -0.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.57 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 64 | -0.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.58 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 8 | -0.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Parent Study Baseline | 1.06 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.16 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 24 | -0.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.74 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 72 | -0.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.59 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Parent Study Baseline | 0.95 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.55 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 4 | -0.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.15 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 8 | -0.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.43 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 16 | -0.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.79 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 32 | -0.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.66 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 40 | 0.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.62 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 48 | -0.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.54 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 56 | -0.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.56 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 64 | -0.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.59 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 40 | -0.11 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.93 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 16 | -0.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 72 | -0.11 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.87 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 48 | -0.11 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.89 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 8 | -0.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.72 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 64 | -0.12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.89 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 24 | -0.12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.82 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Parent Study Baseline | 1.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.08 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 56 | -0.11 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.89 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 32 | -0.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.79 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64 and 72 | Change at Week 4 | -0.12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.91 |
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
Participants answered: Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee/hip affects you, how are you doing today? Participants responded by using a 5-point scale where 1 = very good and 5 = very poor. Higher scores indicate worse condition. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. 'Overall number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure. Number Analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96, 104 were not reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -0.88 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.95 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -1.18 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.93 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -0.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.98 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -0.88 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.93 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -0.94 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.95 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 3.45 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -0.83 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.97 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -0.83 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.97 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -0.83 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.98 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -0.98 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.99 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -0.84 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.97 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -1.06 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.98 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 3.43 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -1.22 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.97 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -0.94 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -0.94 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -1.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -1.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.99 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -1.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -0.94 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -0.93 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -0.93 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.01 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -0.96 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.09 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -1.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.06 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -0.97 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.08 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -1.22 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.99 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -0.96 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.08 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -0.97 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.07 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -1.10 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.99 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -1.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -0.96 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.09 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -1.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.05 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 3.45 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific 24-item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items) and physical function (17 items) in participants with osteoarthritis of knee or hip. WOMAC average score is the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher score indicates worse response. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. 'Overall number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96, 104 were not reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -3.38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.58 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -3.74 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.49 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -3.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.49 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -3.57 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -3.38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.58 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -3.45 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.55 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -3.39 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.57 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -3.39 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.58 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -3.41 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.57 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 6.98 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.44 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -4.18 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.31 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -4.27 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.33 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -3.64 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.47 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -3.98 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.39 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 7.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.43 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -3.86 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -3.65 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.47 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -3.64 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.48 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -3.81 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.42 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -3.64 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.48 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -3.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.49 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -3.73 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.48 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -3.82 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.62 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -3.83 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.62 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -3.89 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -3.87 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.61 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -3.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.62 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -3.82 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.63 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -4.28 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.45 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 7.01 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.46 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -4.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.41 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -4.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.51 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -3.98 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.57 |
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain score is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96 and 104 were not reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 7.20 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.43 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -4.47 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.31 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -3.73 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.59 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -3.71 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -3.72 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.59 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -3.71 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -4.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.52 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -3.98 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.49 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -3.88 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.52 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -3.76 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.56 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -3.71 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -3.87 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.55 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -4.47 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.41 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -4.19 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.44 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -3.86 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.56 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -4.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.47 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -4.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.49 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 7.20 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -3.87 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.55 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -3.90 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.56 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -3.95 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.56 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -3.87 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.55 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -4.10 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.64 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -4.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.67 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 7.19 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.47 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -4.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.66 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -4.52 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.48 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -4.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.66 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -4.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.62 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -4.45 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.53 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -4.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.67 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -4.29 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.57 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -4.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.67 |
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC physical function score is calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96 and 104 were not reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -3.15 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.66 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 6.75 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.62 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -3.45 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.57 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -3.16 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.66 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -3.34 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -3.16 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.65 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -3.16 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.65 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -3.21 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.65 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -3.47 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.59 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -3.93 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.39 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -3.18 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.66 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -3.75 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.45 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -4.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.38 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -3.44 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.52 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -3.43 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.53 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -3.42 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.53 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -3.42 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.53 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -3.45 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.53 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 6.81 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.57 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -3.65 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.46 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -3.60 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -3.51 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.54 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -3.59 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.65 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -3.61 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.65 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -3.59 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.65 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 6.81 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.61 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -4.10 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.44 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -4.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.49 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -3.74 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -3.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.62 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -3.64 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.65 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -3.59 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.65 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -3.87 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.55 |
Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104
WOMAC stiffness subscale: questionnaire used to assess amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC stiffness score is calculated as mean of scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (minimum stiffness) to 10 (maximum stiffness), higher scores indicate higher stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score =0 (minimum stiffness) to 10 (maximum stiffness), higher scores indicate higher stiffness. Stiffness is defined as sensation of decreased ease in movement of knee/hip. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. 'Overall number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96, 104 were not reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -3.25 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.87 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -3.46 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.78 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -3.26 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.86 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -3.29 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.86 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -3.35 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.83 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 7.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.83 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -3.69 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.81 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -4.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.66 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -3.27 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.85 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -3.56 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.83 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -3.26 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.86 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -3.73 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.76 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 7.06 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.78 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -4.29 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.63 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -4.00 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.71 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -3.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -3.81 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.71 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -3.65 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.79 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -3.64 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.77 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -3.63 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.77 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -3.63 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.77 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -3.63 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.77 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 64 | -3.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.96 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 48 | -3.87 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.96 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 8 | -4.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.76 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Parent Study Baseline | 7.05 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.85 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 56 | -3.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.96 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 4 | -4.36 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.73 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 32 | -3.91 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.95 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 24 | -4.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.91 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 72 | -3.85 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.96 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 40 | -3.90 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.95 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Change From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96 and 104 | Change at Week 16 | -4.10 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.84 |
Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage
FDA approved analgesics (over-the-counter or prescription) were permitted as concomitant medications to relieve the pain of osteoarthritis. These medications included opioids, topical analgesics, NSAIDs, capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids and viscosupplementation (hyaluronan) and were prescribed at the discretion of the investigator.
Time frame: Week 1-4, 5-8, 9-16, 17-24, 25-32, 33-40, 41-48, 49-56, 57-64, 65-72, 73-80, 81-88, 89-96, 97-104, 105-112
Population: ITT population. 'Number analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 73-80, 81-88, 89-96, 97-104 and 105-112 were not reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 57-64 | 0.5 days per week | Standard Deviation 1.66 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 25-32 | 1.7 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.89 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 1-4 | 1.8 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.98 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 17-24 | 1.8 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.93 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 5-8 | 2.0 days per week | Standard Deviation 3.13 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 41-48 | 1.3 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.59 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 9-16 | 2.1 days per week | Standard Deviation 3.09 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 33-40 | 1.6 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 49-56 | 0.9 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.03 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 65-72 | 0.3 days per week | Standard Deviation 0.97 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 5-8 | 1.9 days per week | Standard Deviation 3.06 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 25-32 | 1.4 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.64 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 41-48 | 0.8 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.08 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 49-56 | 0.8 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.05 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 65-72 | 0.0 days per week | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 1-4 | 1.6 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.83 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 9-16 | 2.0 days per week | Standard Deviation 3.07 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 17-24 | 1.7 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.84 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 33-40 | 1.1 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.33 |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 57-64 | 0.4 days per week | Standard Deviation 1.39 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 17-24 | 1.6 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.74 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 65-72 | 0.2 days per week | Standard Deviation 1.13 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 25-32 | 1.3 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.58 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 41-48 | 0.7 days per week | Standard Deviation 1.94 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 57-64 | 0.2 days per week | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 49-56 | 0.5 days per week | Standard Deviation 1.59 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 33-40 | 1.0 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.31 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 9-16 | 1.9 days per week | Standard Deviation 3 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 1-4 | 1.7 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.85 |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Days Per Week of Concomitant Analgesic Medication Usage | Week 5-8 | 1.9 days per week | Standard Deviation 3.05 |
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab
Human serum anti-drug antibody (ADA) samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using the semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Same participant may have positive ADA result at more than 1 time point.
Time frame: A4091016: Day 1, Week 16, 24, 40, 56, 72, 80 or Early Termination (ET: anytime till Week 80)
Population: ITT population. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at any time point. 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 16 | 1 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 56 | 2 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 40 | 1 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Day 1 | 0 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 80 or ET | 2 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 72 | 0 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 24 | 0 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 40 | 0 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Day 1 | 0 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 16 | 1 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 24 | 1 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 56 | 0 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 72 | 0 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 80 or ET | 2 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 56 | 1 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 16 | 4 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 80 or ET | 5 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 72 | 0 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 40 | 0 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Week 24 | 3 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) for Tanezumab | Day 1 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Vital Signs
Following parameters were analyzed for examination of vital signs: body temperature, blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormality in vital signs were judged by investigator and reported as adverse events were presented.
Time frame: A4091016: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 80
Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication during this study, A4091016 (NCT00809783).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Vital Signs | 12 participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Vital Signs | 13 participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in Vital Signs | 23 participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline to Week 80 in Physical Examination Findings
Physical examination included examination of following sites in addition to general examination: abdomen, ears, extremities, eyes, head, heart, musculoskeletal, neck, nose, skin, throat and thyroid. Clinically significant changes were judged by investigator.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 80
Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication during this study, A4091016 (NCT00809783).
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline to Week 80 in Physical Examination Findings | 26 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline to Week 80 in Physical Examination Findings | 48 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline to Week 80 in Physical Examination Findings | 53 Participants |
Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104
The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain score is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 16, 24, 56, 104
Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 104 were not reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=90% reduction | 81 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=10% reduction | 449 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: 100% reduction | 30 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=20% reduction | 431 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: 100% reduction | 29 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=80% reduction | 128 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=90% reduction | 87 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=10% reduction | 457 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=80% reduction | 141 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=20% reduction | 419 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=30% reduction | 397 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=70% reduction | 199 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=30% reduction | 382 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: Greater than 0% reduction | 478 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=60% reduction | 264 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=40% reduction | 352 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=70% reduction | 187 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=50% reduction | 313 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=40% reduction | 358 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: Greater than 0% reduction | 477 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=60% reduction | 249 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=50% reduction | 327 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: 100% reduction | 30 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=50% reduction | 296 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=60% reduction | 267 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=10% reduction | 462 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=40% reduction | 334 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=70% reduction | 203 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=30% reduction | 371 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=80% reduction | 149 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: Greater than 0% reduction | 470 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=20% reduction | 409 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=90 reduction | 94 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=20% reduction | 701 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=70% reduction | 349 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=10% reduction | 750 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: Greater than 0% reduction | 773 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=60% reduction | 404 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: Greater than 0% reduction | 782 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=10% reduction | 750 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=30% reduction | 639 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=40% reduction | 573 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=50% reduction | 510 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=60% reduction | 432 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=80% reduction | 264 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=90 reduction | 156 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: 100% reduction | 68 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: Greater than 0% reduction | 782 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=20% reduction | 692 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=30% reduction | 643 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=40% reduction | 567 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=50% reduction | 512 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=60% reduction | 425 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=70% reduction | 335 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=80% reduction | 255 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=90% reduction | 160 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: 100% reduction | 69 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=10% reduction | 735 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=20% reduction | 677 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=30% reduction | 613 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=40% reduction | 545 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=50% reduction | 483 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=70% reduction | 331 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=80% reduction | 250 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=90% reduction | 158 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: 100% reduction | 63 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: 100% reduction | 78 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=70% reduction | 339 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: 100% reduction | 66 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: Greater than 0% reduction | 726 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=90 reduction | 171 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=20% reduction | 665 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=10% reduction | 689 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=80% reduction | 271 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: Greater than 0% reduction | 733 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=20% reduction | 640 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=70% reduction | 359 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=80% reduction | 255 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=30% reduction | 590 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=60% reduction | 453 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=10% reduction | 708 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=40% reduction | 538 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=50% reduction | 522 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: 100% reduction | 69 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=40% reduction | 552 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=50% reduction | 480 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=50% reduction | 497 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=30% reduction | 605 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=40% reduction | 577 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=60% reduction | 432 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=20% reduction | 655 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=60% reduction | 414 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=70% reduction | 357 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=10% reduction | 703 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 16: >=30% reduction | 626 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=80% reduction | 271 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: Greater than 0% reduction | 734 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 56: >=90% reduction | 151 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16, 24, 56 and 104 | Week 24: >=90% reduction | 169 Participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication
United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved analgesics (over-the-counter or prescription) were permitted as concomitant medications to relieve the pain of osteoarthritis. These medications included opioids, topical analgesics, non-steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), capsaicin products, oral/injectable corticosteroids and viscosupplementation (hyaluronan) and were prescribed as per investigator's discretion.
Time frame: Week 1-4, 5-8, 9-16, 17-24, 25-32, 33-40, 41-48, 49-56, 57-64, 65-72, 73-80, 81-88, 89-96, 97-104, 105-112
Population: ITT population. 'Number Analyzed' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 73-80, 81-88, 89-96, 97-104 and 105-112 were not reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 57-64 | 11.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 1-4 | 31.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 17-24 | 40.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 65-72 | 10.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 49-56 | 37.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 25-32 | 40.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 9-16 | 39.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 41-48 | 42.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 33-40 | 36.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 5-8 | 33.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 33-40 | 26.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 49-56 | 34.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 5-8 | 35.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 57-64 | 28.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 41-48 | 19.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 65-72 | 4.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 9-16 | 44.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 17-24 | 43.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 1-4 | 28.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 25-32 | 34.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 65-72 | 16.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 1-4 | 31.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 5-8 | 32.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 9-16 | 45.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 17-24 | 47.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 25-32 | 30.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 41-48 | 34.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 49-56 | 16.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 57-64 | 31.6 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medication | Week 33-40 | 35.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score
The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip joint during past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain score is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Overall number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96 and 104 were not reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 72: >=30% reduction | 71.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 48: >=90% reduction | 15.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 16: >=90% reduction | 18.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 4: >=50% reduction | 70.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 48: >=70% reduction | 35.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 24: >=50% reduction | 60.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 32: >=30% reduction | 72.6 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 48: >=50% reduction | 56.6 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 24: >=70% reduction | 38.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 48: >=30% reduction | 71.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 24: >=90% reduction | 16.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 64: >=90% reduction | 15.6 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 40: >=90% reduction | 15.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 64: >=70% reduction | 36.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 40: >=70% reduction | 37.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 32: >=50% reduction | 57.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 4: >=90% reduction | 21.6 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 40: >=50% reduction | 57.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 32: >=70% reduction | 36.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 72: >=70% reduction | 36.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 40: >=30% reduction | 71.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 32: >=90% reduction | 16.6 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 64: >=50% reduction | 56.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 8: >=30% reduction | 75.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 72: >=90% reduction | 15.6 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 64: >=30% reduction | 71.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 72: >=50% reduction | 56.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 56: >=90% reduction | 15.6 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 8: >=70% reduction | 41.6 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 56: >=70% reduction | 36.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 8: >=90% reduction | 18.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 24: >=30% reduction | 73.6 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 4: >=70% reduction | 48.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 16: >=30% reduction | 76.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 4: >=30% reduction | 83.6 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 56: >=50% reduction | 57.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 16: >=50% reduction | 63.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 8: >=50% reduction | 64.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 56: >=30% reduction | 71.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 16: >=70% reduction | 39.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 56: >=50% reduction | 58.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 4: >=70% reduction | 50.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 8: >=70% reduction | 43.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 16: >=90% reduction | 18.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 24: >=70% reduction | 40.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 40: >=90% reduction | 19.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 64: >=90% reduction | 19.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 4: >=30% reduction | 82.6 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 4: >=50% reduction | 68.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 4: >=90% reduction | 23.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 8: >=30% reduction | 78.6 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 8: >=50% reduction | 63.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 8: >=90% reduction | 20.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 16: >=30% reduction | 76.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 16: >=50% reduction | 61.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 16: >=70% reduction | 42.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 24: >=30% reduction | 77.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 24: >=50% reduction | 61.6 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 24: >=90% reduction | 19.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 32: >=30% reduction | 75.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 32: >=50% reduction | 59.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 32: >=70% reduction | 42.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 32: >=90% reduction | 19.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 40: >=30% reduction | 74.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 40: >=50% reduction | 58.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 40: >=70% reduction | 41.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 48: >=30% reduction | 73.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 48: >=50% reduction | 58.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 48: >=70% reduction | 40.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 48: >=90% reduction | 18.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 56: >=30% reduction | 73.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 56: >=70% reduction | 39.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 56: >=90% reduction | 19.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 64: >=30% reduction | 73.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 64: >=50% reduction | 58.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 64: >=70% reduction | 39.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 72: >=30% reduction | 73.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 72: >=50% reduction | 58.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 72: >=70% reduction | 39.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 72: >=90% reduction | 19.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 4: >=30% reduction | 81.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 48: >=70% reduction | 43.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 16: >=70% reduction | 45.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 72: >=70% reduction | 43.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 48: >=90% reduction | 19.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 16: >=50% reduction | 66.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 72: >=30% reduction | 75.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 56: >=30% reduction | 75.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 16: >=30% reduction | 79.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 8: >=90% reduction | 25.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 56: >=50% reduction | 61.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 8: >=70% reduction | 48.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 48: >=50% reduction | 61.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 56: >=70% reduction | 43.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 8: >=50% reduction | 68.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 16: >=90% reduction | 21.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 56: >=90% reduction | 19.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 8: >=30% reduction | 81.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 72: >=50% reduction | 61.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 64: >=30% reduction | 75.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 4: >=90% reduction | 24.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 40: >=70% reduction | 43.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 64: >=50% reduction | 61.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 32: >=90% reduction | 20.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 32: >=70% reduction | 43.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 4: >=70% reduction | 48.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 40: >=30% reduction | 75.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 32: >=50% reduction | 62.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 72: >=90% reduction | 19.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 40: >=50% reduction | 61.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 32: >=30% reduction | 75.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 64: >=70% reduction | 43.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 24: >=90% reduction | 21.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 40: >=90% reduction | 19.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 24: >=70% reduction | 45.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 4: >=50% reduction | 69.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 48: >=30% reduction | 75.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 24: >=50% reduction | 63.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 64: >=90% reduction | 19.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With at Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Parent Study Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score | Week 24: >=30% reduction | 77.1 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis
Participants answered: Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee/hip affects you, how are you doing today? Participants responded by using a 5-point scale where 1 = very good and 5 = very poor. Higher scores indicated worse pain. Parent study baseline value calculated as average of pre-dose measurements of the participants from study A4091011, A4091014, A4091015 and A4091018.
Time frame: Baseline of the parent study (A4091011, A4091014, A4091015, A4091018); A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48,56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Population: ITT population. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. 'Overall number of participants analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure. Number Analyzed = participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group, respectively. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96, 104 were not reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 48 | 24.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 24 | 25.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 64 | 24.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 40 | 25.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 32 | 25.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 8 | 28.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 4 | 37.6 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 56 | 24.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 16 | 29.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 72 | 24.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 32 | 28.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 4 | 36.6 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 8 | 31.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 16 | 30.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 24 | 28.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 40 | 26.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 48 | 26.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 56 | 26.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 64 | 26.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 72 | 26.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 48 | 30.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 8 | 34.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 40 | 29.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 56 | 30.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 4 | 37.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 24 | 32.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 32 | 31.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 72 | 30.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 16 | 31.7 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points From Parent Study Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis | Week 64 | 30.1 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response
OMERACT-OARSI response:\>=50 percent(%) improvement from parent study baseline and absolute change from parent study baseline of \>=2 units at given week in WOMAC pain or physical function subscale or \>=20% improvement from parent study baseline and absolute change from parent study baseline of \>=1 unit at given week in at least 2 of following 3 items: 1)WOMAC pain subscale, 2)WOMAC physical function subscale, 3)PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1-5, higher score=more affected).WOMAC pain, physical function subscales assess amount of pain/difficulty experienced (score:0-10, higher score=higher pain/difficulty).
Time frame: A4091016: Week 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, 96, 104
Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication during this study, A4091016 (NCT00809783). LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Efficacy results were not collected beyond Week 72 due to clinical hold. Therefore, results for Week 80, 88, 96 and 104 were not reported.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 56 | 74.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 24 | 77.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 4 | 86.8 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 72 | 74.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 32 | 75.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 8 | 80.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 40 | 75.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 64 | 74.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 16 | 80.1 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 48 | 74.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 4 | 88.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 56 | 79.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 64 | 79.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 16 | 83.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 72 | 79.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 48 | 79.4 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 24 | 82.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 32 | 79.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 40 | 79.3 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 8 | 83.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 72 | 79.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 48 | 79.6 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 4 | 86.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 8 | 85.0 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 16 | 82.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 24 | 81.5 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 32 | 80.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 40 | 79.9 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 56 | 79.2 percentage of participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response | Week 64 | 79.2 percentage of participants |
Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication
Number of participants were reported based on the maximum number of intravenous doses of either tanezumab or placebo received.
Time frame: A4091016: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 64
Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of intravenous study medication during this study, A4091016 (NCT00809783).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 4 doses | 78 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 9 doses | 3 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 6 doses | 76 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 5 doses | 81 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 2 doses | 91 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 8 doses | 13 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 3 doses | 92 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 1 dose | 39 Participants |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 7 doses | 49 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 5 doses | 104 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 2 doses | 161 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 1 dose | 81 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 3 doses | 172 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 4 doses | 158 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 6 doses | 79 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 7 doses | 59 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 8 doses | 13 Participants |
| Tanezumab 5 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 9 doses | 5 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 3 doses | 177 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 2 doses | 164 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 7 doses | 41 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 1 dose | 69 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 9 doses | 2 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 5 doses | 121 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 4 doses | 141 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 8 doses | 11 Participants |
| Tanezumab 10 mg | Number of Participants Classified According to Number of Intravenous Doses of Study Medication | 6 doses | 62 Participants |