Skip to content

Study of Different Kinds of Ear Tubes

Randomized Controlled Study of Transmyringeal Tubes

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00809601
Enrollment
400
Registered
2008-12-17
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2013-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Otitis Media With Effusion With Hearing Impairment, Recurrent Acute Otitis Media

Brief summary

There are different kinds of ear tubes that may be inserted into the tympanic membrane to relieve recurrent acute otitis and hearing impairment due to otitis media with effusion. The tubes differ in size, shape and material. No-one knows if there are differences between the different kinds of tubes regarding complications. The investigators' hypothesis is that there is differences between the different kinds of tubes regarding complications. To test the investigators' hypothesis, the investigators are about to conduct a randomized controlled study of four kinds of tubes having two different material and two different shapes.

Interventions

DEVICEInsertion of a specific type of ventilation tube through the tympanic membrane

The ventilation tubes are tested using one type in one ear and another type as an active comparator in the other ear. The investigators will test in total 4 different kinds of tubes. Four different combinations of tubes will be tested. The first combination will test: Shepard tube (double flanged, Fluoroplastic) vs Donaldson tube (double flanged, silicone) The second combination will test: Straight tube (single flanged, Fluoroplastic) vs Armstrong (single flanged, silicone) The third combination will test: Armstrong (single flanged, silicone) vs Donaldson tube (double flanged, silicone) The fourth combination will test: Straight tube (single flanged, Fluoroplastic) vs Shepard tube (double flanged, Fluoroplastic)

Sponsors

Centre for clinical research Vastmanland
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Danderyd Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children aged 1-10 planned for bilateral ventilation tubes

Exclusion criteria

* Ongoing ear infection * Previous insertion of ventilation tube

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to complete expulsion of the ventilation tube from the tympanic membrane45 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Need for tube extraction (pain or infection)45 months
Pain leading to health care contact45 months
Persistent tympanic membrane perforation45 months
Obstruction of the tube45 months
Presence of myringosclerosis45 months
Tube related ear infection45 months

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026