Skip to content

Role of Chest Ultrasound in Diagnosing and Follow-up of Pneumonia

Role of Chest Ultrasound in Diagnosing and Follow-up of Pneumonia. Prospective Comparison Between X-ray Chest Film in Two Planes and Low-dose Spiral Computed Tomography

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00808457
Enrollment
397
Registered
2008-12-15
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
2011-02-28
Last updated
2011-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pneumonia

Keywords

chest ultrasound, pneumonia, X-ray, CT, Sensitivity and specificity of chest ultrasound in diagnosing pneumonia

Brief summary

The study of a large number of patients (at least 200 patients) from several European centres aims to investigate the value of chest ultrasound in diagnosing and checking the course of pneumonia as compared to a chest X-ray film in two planes and - in case of a controversial X-ray finding- as compared to low-dose CT. An X-ray finding is regarded controversial, if infiltrates cannot be reliably excluded or not reliably represented and if a definite diagnosis is, thus, not possible. A low-dose CT is indicated even in case of a positive chest ultrasound and negative X-ray finding. Sonographic recording and characterization of pneumonic infiltrates is performed both at the time of diagnosing and in the further course under therapy.

Detailed description

The primary target criterion is • Assessing the sensitivity of chest ultrasound in diagnosing pneumonia. Secondary target criteria comprise * Assessing specificity, negative and positive predictive value of chest ultrasound at the time of diagnosing, * Characterizing pneumonic infiltrates at the time of diagnosing and further course, * Describing the association between clinical, X-ray and sonographic findings in the course of pneumonia. The tertiary target criterion includes • Characterizing the range of pathogens detected by microbiological examination.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University of Jena
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients with clinically suspected CAP who received no antibiotic treatment yet * Patients in whom a chest X-ray in 2 planes was already performed, can be included in the study, if chest ultrasound is performed within 24 hours after X-ray and if the X-ray finding is neither available to nor known to the examiner doing the ultrasound examination. * Age \> 18 years * Patient's declaration of consent is available.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with HAP * Age \<18 years * Patients in whom the time difference between chest ultrasound and chest X-ray in 2 planes is more than 24 hours * Patients whose X-ray findings are with the examiner doing the ultrasound or are known to him * Pregnancy and lactation * Missing declaration of consent by the patient.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
sensitivity of chest ultrasound in diagnosing pneumoniabaseline diagnostic

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Specificitybaseline diagnostic

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026