Skip to content

Study Evaluating The Effects Of Bazedoxifene/Conjugated Estrogens On Endometrial Safety And Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo And Active- Controlled Efficacy And Safety Study Of The Effects Of Bazedoxifene/Conjugated Estrogens Combinations On Endometrial Hyperplasia And Prevention Of Osteoporosis In Postmenopausal Women

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00808132
Enrollment
1886
Registered
2008-12-15
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2011-02-28
Last updated
2014-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Menopause, Osteoporosis

Keywords

Postmenopausal Women, Bazedoxifene/Conjugated Estrogens

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this investigational drug for the treatment of menopausal symptoms while protecting the endometrium (uterine lining) and preventing postmenopausal osteoporosis. Subject participation will last approximately 14.5 months.

Interventions

DRUGbazedoxifene 20 mg/ conjugated estrogens 0.45 mg

One capsule, bazedoxifene 20 mg/conjugated estrogens 0.45 mg (over-encapsulated), once a day for one year.

DRUGbazedoxifene 20 mg/ conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg

One capsule, bazedoxifene 20 mg/conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg (over-encapsulated), once a day for one year.

One capsule, bazedoxifene 20 mg (over-encapsulated), once a day for one year.

DRUGconjugated estrogens 0.45 mg/ medroxyprogesterone acetate 1.5 mg

One capsule, conjugated estrogens 0.45 mg and medroxyprogesterone 1.5 mg (over-encapsulated), once a day for one year.

DRUGPlacebo

One capsule, placebo (over-encapsulated), once a day for one year.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Generally healthy, postmenopausal women, aged 40 to 64 seeking treatment for menopausal symptoms * At least 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea, OR 6 months spontaneous amenorrhea with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels \> 40 mIU/mL * Intact Uterus

Exclusion criteria

* Use of oral estrogen, progestin, androgen, or selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) containing drug products within 8 weeks before screening * A history or active presence of clinically important medical disease: eg. cardiovascular disease (stroke, heart attack), chronic renal or liver disease, breast cancer, etc.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyBaseline, Month 12BMD measurements of the anteroposterior lumbar spine were acquired by using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans, twice at Month 12 for a subset of participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy. The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan. Mean percentage change from baseline of the 2 readings were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Endometrial Hyperplasia at Month 12: Main StudyMonth 12Endometrial hyperplasia was assessed by endometrial biopsies. All endometrial biopsies were read centrally by 2 primary pathologists. If both the pathologists disagreed on the presence of hyperplasia, a third pathologist was consulted. Results were summarized for two definitions of hyperplasia (simple hyperplasia with or without atypia or complex hyperplasia with or without atypia); definition 1: participants were considered to have a diagnosis of hyperplasia when the 3 pathologists disagreed but at least 1 pathologist determined hyperplasia; definition 2: participants were considered to have a diagnosis of hyperplasia if at least 2 of the 3 pathologists agreed on the diagnosis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Month 6, 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyBaseline, Month 6, Month 12BMD measurements of the total hip were acquired by using DXA scans, twice at Month 6 and 12 for a subset of participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy. The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan. Mean percentage change from baseline of the 2 readings were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Amenorrhea: Main StudyDay 1 up to Day 364Cumulative amenorrhea was defined as the absence of any bleeding or spotting for cumulative 4-week periods throughout 1-year study.
Percent Change From Baseline in Breast Density at Month 12: Breast Density Sub-StudyBaseline, Month 12Breast density was assessed by digitalized mammograms which were centrally read by a single radiologist using specifically-developed software. Breast density was assessed for subset of participants who entered the breast density sub-study
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyBaseline, Month 6, 12Bone turnover is the removal of old bone from the body and its replacement by new bone. Bone turnover markers included serum osteocalcin, C-telopeptide, and procollagen type 1 N-propeptide (P1NP), were measured at Month 6 and Month 12 for a subset of participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy. Blood samples were collected to evaluate bone turnover markers levels.
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyBaseline, Month 3Participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 12-item questionnaires answered on a range of 1 to 6 for questions (Q) 3 to 12, 1 to 5 for Q1 (some questions are reversed so that a high score reflects more of the attributes); and Q2 answered on 0 to 24. Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range\* 100); total score range: 0 to 100; higher score = greater intensity of attribute. The items contribute to each scale and are averaged to create the 7 scale scores and a sleep quantity scale. Scales with at least one item answered was used to generate a scale score. Scales include; sleep disturbance (SD), snoring, awaken short of breath (ASoB) or with a headache (H), somnolence, sleep adequacy (SA), sleep problem index (SPI) I and II (range: 0-100) and sleep quantity (SQ \[range 0 to 24\]). Except for sleep quantity, higher scores=greater impairment.
Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyBaselineMENQOL questionnaire assessed how bothered participants were due to menopause. It consists of 29 items divided into 4 domains: vasomotor function (3 items), psychosocial function (7 items), physical function (16 items), and sexual function (3 items). Each item scores a range from 1 to 8, with 1 indicating that the participant did not experience the symptom or problem, 8 indicating that the participant was extremely bothered by the symptom or problem. The total score for each domain is the average of item scores and ranged from 1 to 8 with higher score indicating worsening of symptoms. The MENQOL total score is the mean of these 4 domain scores and ranged from 1 to 8 with higher score indicating worsening of symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyBaseline, Month 3MENQOL questionnaire assessed how bothered participants were due to menopause. It consists of 29 items divided into 4 domains: vasomotor function (3 items), psychosocial function (7 items), physical function (16 items), and sexual function (3 items). Each item scores a range from 1 to 8, with 1 indicating that the participant did not experience the symptom or problem, 8 indicating that the participant was extremely bothered by the symptom or problem. The total score for each domain is the average of item scores and ranged from 1 to 8 with higher score indicating worsening of symptoms. The MENQOL total score is the mean of these 4 domain scores and ranged from 1 to 8 with higher score indicating worsening of symptoms.
Percentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-20, 21-24, 25-28, 29-32, 33-36, 37-40, 41-44, 45-48, 49-52Percentage of participants with uterine bleeding were calculated for each 4-week period for 1-year on therapy.
Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyBaselineParticipant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 12-item questionnaires answered on a range of 1 to 6 for questions (Q) 3 to 12, 1 to 5 for Q1 (some questions are reversed so that a high score reflects more of the attributes); and Q2 answered on 0 to 24. Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range\* 100); total score range: 0 to 100; higher score = greater intensity of attribute. The items contribute to each scale and are averaged to create the 7 scale scores and a sleep quantity scale. Scales with at least one item answered was used to generate a scale score. Scales include; sleep disturbance (SD), snoring, awaken short of breath (ASoB) or with a headache (H), somnolence, sleep adequacy (SA), sleep problem index (SPI) I and II (range: 0-100) and sleep quantity (SQ \[range 0 to 24\]). Except for sleep quantity, higher scores=greater impairment.
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 6: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyBaseline, Month 6BMD measurements of the anteroposterior lumbar spine were acquired by using DXA scans, twice at Month 6 for a subset of participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy. The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan. Mean percentage change from baseline of the 2 readings were reported.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Breast TendernessScreening, Week 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-20, 21-24, 25-28, 29-32, 33-36, 37-40, 41-44, 45-48, 49-52Percentage of participants who reported at least 1 day of breast tenderness during each 4-week period for 1-year on therapy was calculated.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Chile, Colombia, Denmark, Finland, Hungary, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

This main study also included 3 sub-studies only for the purpose of the assessment of relevant parameters: breast density sub-study, osteoporosis sub-study (OSS), and sleep sub-study. A participant could participate in more than 1 sub-study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mg
Bazedoxifene 20 milligram (mg), conjugated estrogens 0.45 mg tablets-in-capsule orally once daily at approximately the same time each day continuously for 1 year.
445
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mg
Bazedoxifene 20 mg, conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg tablets-in-capsule orally once daily at approximately the same time each day continuously for 1 year.
474
Bazedoxifene 20 mg
Bazedoxifene 20 mg tablet-in-capsule orally once daily at approximately the same time each day continuously for 1 year.
230
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mg
Conjugated estrogens 0.45 mg, medroxyprogesterone acetate 1.5 mg tablets-in-capsule orally once daily at approximately the same time each day continuously for 1 year.
220
Placebo
Placebo capsule matched to bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogen or bazedoxifene alone or conjugated estrogen/medroxyprogesterone acetate tablets-in-capsule orally once daily at approximately the same time each day continuously for 1 year.
474
Total1,843

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event3433163133
Overall StudyDeath00001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up8101189
Overall StudyOther646215
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation89495
Overall StudyRandomized, but not treated107989
Overall StudyUnsatisfactory response566412
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject27182716

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgBazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgBazedoxifene 20 mgConjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous54.43 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.02
53.89 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
54.07 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.01
54.15 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
54.19 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.07
54.15 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.09
Sex: Female, Male
Female
445 Participants474 Participants230 Participants220 Participants474 Participants1843 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
407 / 445426 / 474207 / 230197 / 220423 / 474
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 44517 / 4745 / 23013 / 22018 / 474

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Endometrial Hyperplasia at Month 12: Main Study

Endometrial hyperplasia was assessed by endometrial biopsies. All endometrial biopsies were read centrally by 2 primary pathologists. If both the pathologists disagreed on the presence of hyperplasia, a third pathologist was consulted. Results were summarized for two definitions of hyperplasia (simple hyperplasia with or without atypia or complex hyperplasia with or without atypia); definition 1: participants were considered to have a diagnosis of hyperplasia when the 3 pathologists disagreed but at least 1 pathologist determined hyperplasia; definition 2: participants were considered to have a diagnosis of hyperplasia if at least 2 of the 3 pathologists agreed on the diagnosis.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Efficacy evaluable (EE) population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug, who had a screening endometrial biopsy with readings by at least 2 blinded central pathologists, had a biopsy during Month 12, or had hyperplasia diagnosed before Month 12 and had no major protocol violations.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Endometrial Hyperplasia at Month 12: Main StudyDefinition 10.30 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Endometrial Hyperplasia at Month 12: Main StudyDefinition 20.30 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Endometrial Hyperplasia at Month 12: Main StudyDefinition 10.54 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Endometrial Hyperplasia at Month 12: Main StudyDefinition 20.27 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Endometrial Hyperplasia at Month 12: Main StudyDefinition 10.00 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Endometrial Hyperplasia at Month 12: Main StudyDefinition 20.00 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Endometrial Hyperplasia at Month 12: Main StudyDefinition 20.00 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Endometrial Hyperplasia at Month 12: Main StudyDefinition 10.00 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Endometrial Hyperplasia at Month 12: Main StudyDefinition 10.85 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Endometrial Hyperplasia at Month 12: Main StudyDefinition 20.28 Percentage of Participants
Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-Study

BMD measurements of the anteroposterior lumbar spine were acquired by using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans, twice at Month 12 for a subset of participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy. The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan. Mean percentage change from baseline of the 2 readings were reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) population included all randomized participants who met inclusion criteria for osteoporosis sub-study, who had taken at least 1 dose of the study drug, and had a baseline and at least 1 post baseline value. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing values.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-Study0.24 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.29
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-Study0.60 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.27
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-Study0.07 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.4
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-Study1.30 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.39
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-Study-1.28 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.28
Comparison: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as main effects and baseline BMD and years since menopause as covariates.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.209, 2.533]ANCOVA
Comparison: Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with treatment and region as main effects and baseline BMD and years since menopause as covariates.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.822, 2.201]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-Study

Participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 12-item questionnaires answered on a range of 1 to 6 for questions (Q) 3 to 12, 1 to 5 for Q1 (some questions are reversed so that a high score reflects more of the attributes); and Q2 answered on 0 to 24. Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range\* 100); total score range: 0 to 100; higher score = greater intensity of attribute. The items contribute to each scale and are averaged to create the 7 scale scores and a sleep quantity scale. Scales with at least one item answered was used to generate a scale score. Scales include; sleep disturbance (SD), snoring, awaken short of breath (ASoB) or with a headache (H), somnolence, sleep adequacy (SA), sleep problem index (SPI) I and II (range: 0-100) and sleep quantity (SQ \[range 0 to 24\]). Except for sleep quantity, higher scores=greater impairment.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

Population: MITT population included all randomized participants who met inclusion criteria for sleep sub-study and had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline evaluation for the respective endpoint. Here N = maximum number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome and n = participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySD (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)-17.27 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2.01
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySnoring (n=110, 121, 47, 51, 108)-5.86 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.83
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyASoB or H (n=112,121,47,52,111)-4.26 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.41
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySomnolence (n=112,121,47,52,111)-10.54 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.53
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySA (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)14.22 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2.4
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySPI I (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)-13.19 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.51
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySPI II (n=112, 121, 47, 52,111)-14.01 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.51
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySQ (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 111)0.28 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.1
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyASoB or H (n=112,121,47,52,111)-5.81 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.35
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySPI I (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)-13.99 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.46
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySD (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)-18.18 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.94
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySomnolence (n=112,121,47,52,111)-9.72 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.48
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySnoring (n=110, 121, 47, 51, 108)-5.38 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.76
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySQ (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 111)0.44 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.09
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySA (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)14.30 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2.32
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySPI II (n=112, 121, 47, 52,111)-14.53 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.46
Bazedoxifene 20 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySPI II (n=112, 121, 47, 52,111)-9.64 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2.21
Bazedoxifene 20 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySQ (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 111)0.32 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.14
Bazedoxifene 20 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySomnolence (n=112,121,47,52,111)-6.12 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2.25
Bazedoxifene 20 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySPI I (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)-8.92 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2.21
Bazedoxifene 20 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyASoB or H (n=112,121,47,52,111)-3.12 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2.06
Bazedoxifene 20 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySnoring (n=110, 121, 47, 51, 108)-2.54 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2.67
Bazedoxifene 20 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySD (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)-11.64 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2.94
Bazedoxifene 20 mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySA (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)9.10 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3.52
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySnoring (n=110, 121, 47, 51, 108)-2.90 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2.55
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyASoB or H (n=112,121,47,52,111)-3.62 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.95
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySomnolence (n=112,121,47,52,111)-7.36 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2.14
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySA (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)15.10 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 3.34
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySPI I (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)-13.71 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2.09
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySQ (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 111)0.41 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.13
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySD (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)-18.01 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2.79
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySPI II (n=112, 121, 47, 52,111)-14.12 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySomnolence (n=112,121,47,52,111)-10.55 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.53
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySQ (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 111)0.36 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyASoB or H (n=112,121,47,52,111)-3.63 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySPI II (n=112, 121, 47, 52,111)-12.04 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.51
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySD (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)-14.34 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2.01
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySPI I (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)-11.84 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySnoring (n=110, 121, 47, 51, 108)-2.71 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 1.84
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySA (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)11.46 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 2.4
Comparison: Sleep disturbance: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.25395% CI: [-7.96, 2.1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Sleep disturbance: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.12795% CI: [-8.78, 1.1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Snoring: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.1895% CI: [-7.76, 1.46]ANCOVA
Comparison: Snoring: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.24795% CI: [-7.19, 1.85]ANOVA
Comparison: ASoB: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.72695% CI: [-4.15, 2.9]ANCOVA
Comparison: ASoB: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.21895% CI: [-5.63, 1.29]ANCOVA
Comparison: Somnolence: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.99695% CI: [-3.85, 3.87]ANCOVA
Comparison: Somnolence: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.66595% CI: [-2.94, 4.6]ANCOVA
Comparison: Sleep adequacy: Month 3, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.36895% CI: [-3.26, 8.78]ANOVA
Comparison: Sleep adequacy: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.34595% CI: [-3.07, 8.75]ANCOVA
Comparison: Sleep problem index I: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.48295% CI: [-5.12, 2.42]ANCOVA
Comparison: Sleep problem index I: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.25495% CI: [-5.86, 1.55]ANCOVA
Comparison: Sleep problem index II: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.30895% CI: [-5.76, 1.82]ANCOVA
Comparison: Sleep problem index II: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.1995% CI: [-6.2, 1.23]ANCOVA
Comparison: Sleep quantity: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.5595% CI: [-0.32, 0.17]ANCOVA
Comparison: Sleep quantity: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.47795% CI: [-0.15, 0.32]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-Study

MENQOL questionnaire assessed how bothered participants were due to menopause. It consists of 29 items divided into 4 domains: vasomotor function (3 items), psychosocial function (7 items), physical function (16 items), and sexual function (3 items). Each item scores a range from 1 to 8, with 1 indicating that the participant did not experience the symptom or problem, 8 indicating that the participant was extremely bothered by the symptom or problem. The total score for each domain is the average of item scores and ranged from 1 to 8 with higher score indicating worsening of symptoms. The MENQOL total score is the mean of these 4 domain scores and ranged from 1 to 8 with higher score indicating worsening of symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3

Population: MITT population included all randomized participants who met inclusion criteria for sleep sub-study and had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline evaluation for the respective endpoint. Here N: maximum number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome and n: participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySexual function (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)-1.20 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.16
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyVasomotor function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)-2.37 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.17
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyMENQOL Total Score (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)-1.27 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.1
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyPsychosocial function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)-0.67 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.12
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyPhysical function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)-0.92 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.1
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySexual function (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)-1.40 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.15
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyPhysical function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)-1.11 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.1
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyPsychosocial function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)-0.84 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.12
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyMENQOL Total Score (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)-1.53 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.1
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyVasomotor function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)-2.75 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.17
Bazedoxifene 20 mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyPhysical function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)-0.67 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.15
Bazedoxifene 20 mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyVasomotor function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)-1.25 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.25
Bazedoxifene 20 mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyPsychosocial function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)-0.47 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.18
Bazedoxifene 20 mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySexual function (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)-0.09 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.23
Bazedoxifene 20 mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyMENQOL Total Score (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)-0.63 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.15
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyMENQOL Total Score (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)-1.39 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.14
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyVasomotor function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)-3.19 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.24
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySexual function (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)-0.76 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.22
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyPhysical function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)-0.76 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.14
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyPsychosocial function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)-0.83 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyPhysical function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)-0.87 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudySexual function (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)-1.04 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyVasomotor function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)-1.45 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyMENQOL Total Score (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)-1.03 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Month 3: Sleep Sub-StudyPsychosocial function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)-0.74 Units on a ScaleStandard Error 0.12
Comparison: Vasomotor function: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Vasomotor function: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Psychosocial function: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.68ANCOVA
Comparison: Psychosocial function: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.493ANCOVA
Comparison: Physical function: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.698ANCOVA
Comparison: Physical function: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.055ANCOVA
Comparison: Sexual function: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.428ANCOVA
Comparison: Sexual function: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.071ANCOVA
Secondary

Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-Study

Participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 12-item questionnaires answered on a range of 1 to 6 for questions (Q) 3 to 12, 1 to 5 for Q1 (some questions are reversed so that a high score reflects more of the attributes); and Q2 answered on 0 to 24. Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range\* 100); total score range: 0 to 100; higher score = greater intensity of attribute. The items contribute to each scale and are averaged to create the 7 scale scores and a sleep quantity scale. Scales with at least one item answered was used to generate a scale score. Scales include; sleep disturbance (SD), snoring, awaken short of breath (ASoB) or with a headache (H), somnolence, sleep adequacy (SA), sleep problem index (SPI) I and II (range: 0-100) and sleep quantity (SQ \[range 0 to 24\]). Except for sleep quantity, higher scores=greater impairment.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: MITT population included all randomized participants who met inclusion criteria for sleep sub-study and had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline evaluation for the respective endpoint. Here N = maximum number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome and n = participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySD (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)48.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 22.9
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySnoring (n=110, 121, 47, 51, 108)32.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 30.1
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyASoB or H (n=112, 121, 47,52,111)12.5 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 19.2
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySomnolence (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)36.3 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.6
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySA (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)39.3 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 24.3
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySPI I (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)44.5 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.3
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySPI II (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)45.5 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 17.2
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySQ (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 111)6.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyASoB or H (n=112, 121, 47,52,111)11.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 19.4
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySPI I (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)42.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.7
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySD (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)48.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.7
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySomnolence (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)30.0 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.1
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySnoring (n=110, 121, 47, 51, 108)27.6 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 26.9
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySQ (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 111)6.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySA (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)41.7 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 23.9
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySPI II (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)43.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.8
Bazedoxifene 20 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySPI II (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)46.4 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 18
Bazedoxifene 20 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySQ (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 111)5.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Bazedoxifene 20 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySomnolence (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)34.6 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 23.5
Bazedoxifene 20 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySPI I (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)44.7 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 18.2
Bazedoxifene 20 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyASoB or H (n=112, 121, 47,52,111)13.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.1
Bazedoxifene 20 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySnoring (n=110, 121, 47, 51, 108)37.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 30.7
Bazedoxifene 20 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySD (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)50.5 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 24.4
Bazedoxifene 20 mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySA (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)37.4 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 23.2
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySnoring (n=110, 121, 47, 51, 108)33.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 29.6
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyASoB or H (n=112, 121, 47,52,111)13.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.2
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySomnolence (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)28.7 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 19.4
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySA (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)36.5 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.6
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySPI I (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)44.9 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySQ (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 111)6.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySD (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)50.4 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 21.1
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySPI II (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)45.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 16.1
PlaceboMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySomnolence (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)31.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 19.2
PlaceboMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySQ (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 111)6.2 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.1
PlaceboMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyASoB or H (n=112, 121, 47,52,111)12.1 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 20.4
PlaceboMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySPI II (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)43.7 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 18.3
PlaceboMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySD (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)47.8 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 24.6
PlaceboMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySPI I (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)43.4 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 18.1
PlaceboMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySnoring (n=110, 121, 47, 51, 108)34.4 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 30.5
PlaceboMedical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySA (n=112, 121, 47, 52, 111)40.3 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 23.6
Secondary

Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-Study

MENQOL questionnaire assessed how bothered participants were due to menopause. It consists of 29 items divided into 4 domains: vasomotor function (3 items), psychosocial function (7 items), physical function (16 items), and sexual function (3 items). Each item scores a range from 1 to 8, with 1 indicating that the participant did not experience the symptom or problem, 8 indicating that the participant was extremely bothered by the symptom or problem. The total score for each domain is the average of item scores and ranged from 1 to 8 with higher score indicating worsening of symptoms. The MENQOL total score is the mean of these 4 domain scores and ranged from 1 to 8 with higher score indicating worsening of symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: MITT population included all randomized participants who met inclusion criteria for sleep sub-study and had baseline and at least 1 post-baseline evaluation for the respective endpoint. Here N = maximum number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome and n = participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySexual function (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)3.74 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyVasomotor function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)5.40 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.564
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyMENQOL Total Score (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)4.07 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.227
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyPsychosocial function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)3.46 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.716
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyPhysical function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)3.74 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.377
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySexual function (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)3.63 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.182
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyPhysical function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)3.58 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.385
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyPsychosocial function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)3.41 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.628
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyMENQOL Total Score (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)4.05 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.246
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyVasomotor function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)5.60 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.468
Bazedoxifene 20 mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyPhysical function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)3.96 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.475
Bazedoxifene 20 mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyVasomotor function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)5.87 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.246
Bazedoxifene 20 mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyPsychosocial function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)3.49 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.663
Bazedoxifene 20 mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySexual function (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)4.05 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.265
Bazedoxifene 20 mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyMENQOL Total Score (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)4.34 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.156
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyMENQOL Total Score (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)4.15 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.314
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyVasomotor function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)5.65 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.62
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySexual function (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)3.73 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.238
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyPhysical function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)3.74 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.409
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyPsychosocial function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)3.48 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.793
PlaceboMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyPhysical function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)3.58 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.445
PlaceboMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudySexual function (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)3.83 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.243
PlaceboMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyVasomotor function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)5.62 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.596
PlaceboMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyMENQOL Total Score (n=110, 121, 47, 52, 112)4.06 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.155
PlaceboMenopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) Score at Baseline: Sleep Sub-StudyPsychosocial function (n=111, 121, 47, 52, 112)3.22 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.522
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Amenorrhea: Main Study

Cumulative amenorrhea was defined as the absence of any bleeding or spotting for cumulative 4-week periods throughout 1-year study.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 364

Population: MITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug, and had at least 1 day of on-therapy bleeding data. Here N signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Amenorrhea: Main Study87.89 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Amenorrhea: Main Study84.87 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Amenorrhea: Main Study82.35 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Amenorrhea: Main Study54.43 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Amenorrhea: Main Study83.91 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.138Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.765Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Uterine Bleeding

Percentage of participants with uterine bleeding were calculated for each 4-week period for 1-year on therapy.

Time frame: Week 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-20, 21-24, 25-28, 29-32, 33-36, 37-40, 41-44, 45-48, 49-52

Population: MITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of the study drug, and had at least 1 day of on-therapy bleeding data. Here N signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and n signifies participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 29-32 (n=376, 416, 194, 173, 405)1.60 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 41-44 (n=363, 396, 188, 162, 386)1.38 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 13-16 (n=415, 446, 213, 196, 446)2.41 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 45-48 (n=358, 394, 188, 160, 383)0.84 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 49-52 (n=357, 392, 187, 159, 380)1.68 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 9-12 (n=417, 451, 217, 199, 452)2.16 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 37-40 (n=373, 411, 191, 168, 394)1.61 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 17-20 (n=399,426,201,184,427)2.26 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 1-4 (n=440, 468, 229, 216, 470)3.86 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 5-8 (n=428, 458, 221, 205, 462)4.44 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 25-28 (n=393, 422, 197, 182, 420)2.04 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 33-36 (n=373, 413, 192, 170, 399)0.54 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 21-24 (n=395, 424, 199, 183, 423)2.78 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 41-44 (n=363, 396, 188, 162, 386)1.26 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 5-8 (n=428, 458, 221, 205, 462)5.02 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 29-32 (n=376, 416, 194, 173, 405)1.68 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 25-28 (n=393, 422, 197, 182, 420)2.13 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 1-4 (n=440, 468, 229, 216, 470)6.20 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 45-48 (n=358, 394, 188, 160, 383)2.28 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 9-12 (n=417, 451, 217, 199, 452)3.55 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 49-52 (n=357, 392, 187, 159, 380)1.28 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 21-24 (n=395, 424, 199, 183, 423)2.12 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 13-16 (n=415, 446, 213, 196, 446)2.91 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 37-40 (n=373, 411, 191, 168, 394)2.92 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 17-20 (n=399,426,201,184,427)2.58 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 33-36 (n=373, 413, 192, 170, 399)2.91 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 25-28 (n=393, 422, 197, 182, 420)1.02 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 1-4 (n=440, 468, 229, 216, 470)5.68 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 5-8 (n=428, 458, 221, 205, 462)3.62 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 9-12 (n=417, 451, 217, 199, 452)2.76 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 13-16 (n=415, 446, 213, 196, 446)3.29 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 17-20 (n=399,426,201,184,427)2.49 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 21-24 (n=395, 424, 199, 183, 423)2.01 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 29-32 (n=376, 416, 194, 173, 405)1.55 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 33-36 (n=373, 413, 192, 170, 399)2.08 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 37-40 (n=373, 411, 191, 168, 394)1.57 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 41-44 (n=363, 396, 188, 162, 386)0.00 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 45-48 (n=358, 394, 188, 160, 383)0.53 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 49-52 (n=357, 392, 187, 159, 380)1.07 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 13-16 (n=415, 446, 213, 196, 446)24.49 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 41-44 (n=363, 396, 188, 162, 386)13.58 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 1-4 (n=440, 468, 229, 216, 470)20.83 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 37-40 (n=373, 411, 191, 168, 394)14.29 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 5-8 (n=428, 458, 221, 205, 462)24.39 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 49-52 (n=357, 392, 187, 159, 380)8.81 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 45-48 (n=358, 394, 188, 160, 383)14.38 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 25-28 (n=393, 422, 197, 182, 420)14.84 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 17-20 (n=399,426,201,184,427)18.48 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 33-36 (n=373, 413, 192, 170, 399)12.94 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 21-24 (n=395, 424, 199, 183, 423)18.58 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 9-12 (n=417, 451, 217, 199, 452)25.63 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 29-32 (n=376, 416, 194, 173, 405)12.14 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 49-52 (n=357, 392, 187, 159, 380)1.58 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 17-20 (n=399,426,201,184,427)3.51 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 1-4 (n=440, 468, 229, 216, 470)4.68 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 33-36 (n=373, 413, 192, 170, 399)2.26 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 13-16 (n=415, 446, 213, 196, 446)3.36 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 37-40 (n=373, 411, 191, 168, 394)4.82 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 9-12 (n=417, 451, 217, 199, 452)4.42 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 29-32 (n=376, 416, 194, 173, 405)1.73 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 41-44 (n=363, 396, 188, 162, 386)1.55 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 5-8 (n=428, 458, 221, 205, 462)4.11 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 25-28 (n=393, 422, 197, 182, 420)3.33 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 21-24 (n=395, 424, 199, 183, 423)3.31 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Uterine BleedingWeek 45-48 (n=358, 394, 188, 160, 383)2.09 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: Week 1-4: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.624Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 5-8: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.868Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 9-12: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.087Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 13-16: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.425Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 17-20: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.307Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 21-24: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.689Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 25-28: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.285Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 29-32: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 33-36: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.065Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 37-40: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.014Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 41-44: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 45-48: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.226Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 49-52: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 1-4: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 5-8: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 9-12: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 13-16: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 17-20: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 21-24: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 25-28: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 29-32: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 33-36: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 37-40: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 41-44: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 45-48: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 49-52: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 1-4: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.317Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 5-8: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.531Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 9-12: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.61Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 13-16: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.848Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 17-20: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.551Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 21-24: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.3Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 25-28: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.299Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 29-32: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 33-36: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.66Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 37-40: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.199Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 41-44: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.77Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 45-48: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 49-52: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: 0.769Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 1-4: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 5-8: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 9-12: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 13-16: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 17-20: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 21-24: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 25-28: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 29-32: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 33-36: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 37-40: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 41-44: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 45-48: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Week 49-52: The Fisher exact test was used for comparisons between groups.p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 6: Osteoporosis Sub-Study

BMD measurements of the anteroposterior lumbar spine were acquired by using DXA scans, twice at Month 6 for a subset of participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy. The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan. Mean percentage change from baseline of the 2 readings were reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: MITT population included all randomized participants who met inclusion criteria for osteoporosis sub-study, who had taken at least 1 dose of the study drug, and had baseline and at least 1 post baseline value. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here N signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 6: Osteoporosis Sub-Study0.12 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.28
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 6: Osteoporosis Sub-Study0.51 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.26
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 6: Osteoporosis Sub-Study0.00 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.39
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 6: Osteoporosis Sub-Study0.64 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.37
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Lumbar Spine at Month 6: Osteoporosis Sub-Study-0.68 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.27
Comparison: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as main effects and baseline BMD and years since menopause as covariates.p-value: 0.01795% CI: [0.139, 1.47]ANCOVA
Comparison: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as main effects and baseline BMD and years since menopause as covariates.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.556, 1.83]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Month 6, 12: Osteoporosis Sub-Study

BMD measurements of the total hip were acquired by using DXA scans, twice at Month 6 and 12 for a subset of participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy. The second scan was to be performed on the same day as the first; however, the participant was to be removed completely from the table after the first scan and repositioned for the second scan. Mean percentage change from baseline of the 2 readings were reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12

Population: MITT for osteoporosis sub-study. LOCF method was used to impute missing values. Here n signifies participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Month 6, 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyChange at Month 6 (n=117, 136, 55, 57, 134)0.43 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.18
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Month 6, 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyChange at Month 12 (n=119, 139, 56, 59, 139)0.50 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.2
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Month 6, 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyChange at Month 6 (n=117, 136, 55, 57, 134)0.66 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.17
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Month 6, 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyChange at Month 12 (n=119, 139, 56, 59, 139)0.89 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.18
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Month 6, 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyChange at Month 6 (n=117, 136, 55, 57, 134)0.32 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.25
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Month 6, 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyChange at Month 12 (n=119, 139, 56, 59, 139)0.47 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.27
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Month 6, 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyChange at Month 12 (n=119, 139, 56, 59, 139)0.71 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.26
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Month 6, 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyChange at Month 6 (n=117, 136, 55, 57, 134)0.45 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.24
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Month 6, 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyChange at Month 6 (n=117, 136, 55, 57, 134)-0.90 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.17
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of Total Hip at Month 6, 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyChange at Month 12 (n=119, 139, 56, 59, 139)-0.72 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.18
Comparison: Month 6: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as main effects and baseline BMD and years since menopause as covariates.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.901, 1.742]ANCOVA
Comparison: Month 12: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as main effects and baseline BMD and years since menopause as covariates.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.756, 1.671]ANCOVA
Comparison: Month 6: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as main effects and baseline BMD and years since menopause as covariates.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.152, 1.962]ANCOVA
Comparison: Month 12: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as main effects and baseline BMD and years since menopause as covariates.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.164, 2.044]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-Study

Bone turnover is the removal of old bone from the body and its replacement by new bone. Bone turnover markers included serum osteocalcin, C-telopeptide, and procollagen type 1 N-propeptide (P1NP), were measured at Month 6 and Month 12 for a subset of participants who entered the osteoporosis substudy. Blood samples were collected to evaluate bone turnover markers levels.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12

Population: MITT for osteoporosis substudy. Here N signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and n signifies participants who were evaluable at specified time points for each arm respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyOsteocalcin: Month 6 (n=115, 136, 56, 56, 134)-25.21 Percent Change
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyOsteocalcin: Month 12 (n=104, 127, 52, 50, 125)-30.46 Percent Change
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyC-Telopeptide: Month 6 (n=115, 136, 56, 56, 133)-34.16 Percent Change
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyC-Telopeptide: Month 12 (n=104, 127, 52,50,124)-40.86 Percent Change
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyP1NP: Month 6 (n=114,135, 57, 56, 133)-33.73 Percent Change
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyP1NP: Month 12 (n=103, 127, 53, 50, 125)-42.38 Percent Change
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyP1NP: Month 6 (n=114,135, 57, 56, 133)-30.26 Percent Change
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyP1NP: Month 12 (n=103, 127, 53, 50, 125)-43.58 Percent Change
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyOsteocalcin: Month 6 (n=115, 136, 56, 56, 134)-27.79 Percent Change
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyC-Telopeptide: Month 6 (n=115, 136, 56, 56, 133)-41.41 Percent Change
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyC-Telopeptide: Month 12 (n=104, 127, 52,50,124)-50.06 Percent Change
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyOsteocalcin: Month 12 (n=104, 127, 52, 50, 125)-37.02 Percent Change
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyC-Telopeptide: Month 12 (n=104, 127, 52,50,124)-27.39 Percent Change
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyP1NP: Month 6 (n=114,135, 57, 56, 133)-17.38 Percent Change
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyOsteocalcin: Month 6 (n=115, 136, 56, 56, 134)-15.60 Percent Change
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyC-Telopeptide: Month 6 (n=115, 136, 56, 56, 133)-29.37 Percent Change
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyOsteocalcin: Month 12 (n=104, 127, 52, 50, 125)-16.05 Percent Change
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyP1NP: Month 12 (n=103, 127, 53, 50, 125)-23.97 Percent Change
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyC-Telopeptide: Month 12 (n=104, 127, 52,50,124)-52.56 Percent Change
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyOsteocalcin: Month 12 (n=104, 127, 52, 50, 125)-32.79 Percent Change
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyC-Telopeptide: Month 6 (n=115, 136, 56, 56, 133)-54.05 Percent Change
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyP1NP: Month 12 (n=103, 127, 53, 50, 125)-50.19 Percent Change
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyP1NP: Month 6 (n=114,135, 57, 56, 133)-39.99 Percent Change
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyOsteocalcin: Month 6 (n=115, 136, 56, 56, 134)-25.34 Percent Change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyP1NP: Month 6 (n=114,135, 57, 56, 133)5.99 Percent Change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyC-Telopeptide: Month 6 (n=115, 136, 56, 56, 133)-10.17 Percent Change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyOsteocalcin: Month 12 (n=104, 127, 52, 50, 125)-5.28 Percent Change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyP1NP: Month 12 (n=103, 127, 53, 50, 125)-11.13 Percent Change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyC-Telopeptide: Month 12 (n=104, 127, 52,50,124)-5.52 Percent Change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Turnover Markers (BTMs) at Month 6 and Month 12: Osteoporosis Sub-StudyOsteocalcin: Month 6 (n=115, 136, 56, 56, 134)-3.19 Percent Change
Comparison: C-Telopeptide: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Osteocalcin: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Osteocalcin: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: 0.0074ANCOVA
Comparison: Osteocalcin: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Osteocalcin: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Osteocalcin: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Osteocalcin: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Osteocalcin: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Osteocalcin: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Osteocalcin: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Osteocalcin: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: 0.0016ANCOVA
Comparison: Osteocalcin: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Osteocalcin: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: C-Telopeptide: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: C-Telopeptide: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: 0.1058ANCOVA
Comparison: C-Telopeptide: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: C-Telopeptide: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: 0.0024ANCOVA
Comparison: C-Telopeptide: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: C-Telopeptide: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: C-Telopeptide: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: C-Telopeptide: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: C-Telopeptide: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: 0.0012ANCOVA
Comparison: C-Telopeptide: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: C-Telopeptide: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: P1NP: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: P1NP: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: 0.0029ANCOVA
Comparison: P1NP: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: P1NP: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: 0.0046ANCOVA
Comparison: P1NP: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: P1NP: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: 0.0043ANCOVA
Comparison: P1NP: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: P1NP: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: P1NP: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: 0.0016ANCOVA
Comparison: P1NP: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: P1NP: Month 6, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: P1NP: Month 12, ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors, and baseline as covariate.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Breast Density at Month 12: Breast Density Sub-Study

Breast density was assessed by digitalized mammograms which were centrally read by a single radiologist using specifically-developed software. Breast density was assessed for subset of participants who entered the breast density sub-study

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

Population: Per-Protocol (PP) population included all randomized participants who met inclusion criteria for breast density sub-study, who had a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline breast density evaluation and did not have substantial protocol violations. Here N signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Breast Density at Month 12: Breast Density Sub-Study-0.38 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.22
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Breast Density at Month 12: Breast Density Sub-Study-0.45 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.22
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercent Change From Baseline in Breast Density at Month 12: Breast Density Sub-Study-0.25 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.3
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercent Change From Baseline in Breast Density at Month 12: Breast Density Sub-Study1.60 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.35
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Breast Density at Month 12: Breast Density Sub-Study-0.32 Percent ChangeStandard Error 0.23
Comparison: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.83295% CI: [-0.632, 0.509]ANCOVA
Comparison: ANCOVA model was used with treatment and region as factors and baseline as a covariate.p-value: 0.65195% CI: [-0.696, 0.436]ANCOVA
Other Pre-specified

Percentage of Participants With Breast Tenderness

Percentage of participants who reported at least 1 day of breast tenderness during each 4-week period for 1-year on therapy was calculated.

Time frame: Screening, Week 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-20, 21-24, 25-28, 29-32, 33-36, 37-40, 41-44, 45-48, 49-52

Population: MITT population included all randomized participants who took 1 dose of study drug and had at least 20 days of data available at screening and at least 20 continuous days of data in at least one 4-week interval after baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 25-28 (n=389, 409, 193, 179, 416)3.08 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 9-12 (n=412, 439, 212, 196, 447)5.83 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 49-52 (n=353, 380, 183, 156, 376)3.12 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 29-32 (n=372, 403, 190, 171, 401)4.57 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 41-44 (n=359, 384, 184, 159, 382)3.62 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 5-8 (n=423, 447, 216, 202, 456)8.04 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 13-16 (n=411, 433, 208, 193, 440)7.06 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 21-24 (n=391, 410, 195, 180, 416)4.60 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 1-4 (n=426, 449, 220, 205, 457)9.39 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 37-40 (n=369, 399, 187, 166, 390)4.07 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessScreening (n=429, 449, 220, 206, 457)6.29 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 17-20 (n=395, 412, 197, 181, 420)4.05 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 45-48 (n=354, 382, 184, 157, 379)3.67 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.45 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 33-36 (n=369, 401, 188, 168, 395)2.98 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 1-4 (n=426, 449, 220, 205, 457)9.13 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 29-32 (n=372, 403, 190, 171, 401)3.97 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 21-24 (n=391, 410, 195, 180, 416)3.90 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessScreening (n=429, 449, 220, 206, 457)6.46 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 25-28 (n=389, 409, 193, 179, 416)5.62 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 45-48 (n=354, 382, 184, 157, 379)3.14 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 5-8 (n=423, 447, 216, 202, 456)6.94 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 41-44 (n=359, 384, 184, 159, 382)2.60 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 9-12 (n=412, 439, 212, 196, 447)7.97 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 49-52 (n=353, 380, 183, 156, 376)2.89 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 37-40 (n=369, 399, 187, 166, 390)4.01 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 13-16 (n=411, 433, 208, 193, 440)8.31 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 33-36 (n=369, 401, 188, 168, 395)3.49 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mg / Conjugated Estrogens 0.625 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 17-20 (n=395, 412, 197, 181, 420)4.37 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 45-48 (n=354, 382, 184, 157, 379)2.17 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessScreening (n=429, 449, 220, 206, 457)4.55 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 1-4 (n=426, 449, 220, 205, 457)5.91 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 5-8 (n=423, 447, 216, 202, 456)7.87 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 9-12 (n=412, 439, 212, 196, 447)6.60 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 13-16 (n=411, 433, 208, 193, 440)8.65 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 17-20 (n=395, 412, 197, 181, 420)6.09 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 21-24 (n=391, 410, 195, 180, 416)5.64 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 25-28 (n=389, 409, 193, 179, 416)4.15 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 29-32 (n=372, 403, 190, 171, 401)1.58 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 33-36 (n=369, 401, 188, 168, 395)3.19 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 37-40 (n=369, 399, 187, 166, 390)2.67 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 41-44 (n=359, 384, 184, 159, 382)1.63 Percentage of Participants
Bazedoxifene 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 49-52 (n=353, 380, 183, 156, 376)1.64 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 33-36 (n=369, 401, 188, 168, 395)12.50 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 17-20 (n=395, 412, 197, 181, 420)17.13 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 41-44 (n=359, 384, 184, 159, 382)9.43 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 13-16 (n=411, 433, 208, 193, 440)21.24 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 5-8 (n=423, 447, 216, 202, 456)24.26 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 29-32 (n=372, 403, 190, 171, 401)15.20 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 45-48 (n=354, 382, 184, 157, 379)10.83 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 49-52 (n=353, 380, 183, 156, 376)9.62 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 37-40 (n=369, 399, 187, 166, 390)12.05 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 1-4 (n=426, 449, 220, 205, 457)20.49 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 25-28 (n=389, 409, 193, 179, 416)15.64 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessScreening (n=429, 449, 220, 206, 457)7.28 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 21-24 (n=391, 410, 195, 180, 416)15.00 Percentage of Participants
Conjugated Estrogens 0.45mg/Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 1.5mgPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 9-12 (n=412, 439, 212, 196, 447)23.98 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 17-20 (n=395, 412, 197, 181, 420)4.29 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 29-32 (n=372, 403, 190, 171, 401)2.00 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 13-16 (n=411, 433, 208, 193, 440)5.91 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 33-36 (n=369, 401, 188, 168, 395)2.28 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 9-12 (n=412, 439, 212, 196, 447)5.37 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 37-40 (n=369, 399, 187, 166, 390)3.08 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 5-8 (n=423, 447, 216, 202, 456)8.55 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 49-52 (n=353, 380, 183, 156, 376)2.66 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 41-44 (n=359, 384, 184, 159, 382)2.62 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 1-4 (n=426, 449, 220, 205, 457)8.32 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 45-48 (n=354, 382, 184, 157, 379)3.17 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 21-24 (n=391, 410, 195, 180, 416)4.33 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessWeek 25-28 (n=389, 409, 193, 179, 416)4.09 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Breast TendernessScreening (n=429, 449, 220, 206, 457)6.56 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: Week 1-4: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.546Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 5-8: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.821Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 9-12: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.698Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 13-16: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.446Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 17-20: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.892Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 21-24: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.81Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 25-28: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.473Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 29-32: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.03Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 33-36: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.453Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 37-40: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.391Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 41-44: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.407Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 45-48: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.644Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 49-52: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.666Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 1-4: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.641Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 5-8: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.361Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 9-12: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.1Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 13-16: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.142Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 17-20: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.906Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 21-24: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.798Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 25-28: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.258Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 29-32: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.058Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 33-36: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.23Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 37-40: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.36Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 41-44: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.892Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 45-48: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.912Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Week 49-52: Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by baseline value.p-value: 0.791Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 23, 2026