Skip to content

A Study To Evaluate The Effects Of Celecoxib (Celebrex®) Or Naproxen On Blood Pressure In Pediatric Subjects

A Phase 4, 6-week, Randomized Double Blind, Multicenter, Active-controlled Trial To Evaluate The Effects Of Celecoxib (Celebrex) Or Naproxen On Blood Pressure In Pediatric Subjects With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00807846
Enrollment
201
Registered
2008-12-12
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2021-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Juvenile Rheumatoid

Keywords

Juvenile Arthritis; Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis;Blood Pressure;Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Brief summary

This Is A Multicenter, Active-Controlled Trial To Evaluate The Effects Of Celecoxib (Celebrex®) Or Naproxen On Blood Pressure In Pediatric Subjects With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Interventions

DRUGCelecoxib

Celecoxib 50 mg or 100 mg PO BID for 6 weeks

DRUGNaproxen

Naproxen 7.5 mg/kg PO BID \[maximum of 500 mg BID\] for 6 weeks

Sponsors

Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Polyarticular (both rheumatoid factor positive and rheumatoid factor negative),oligoarticular and extended oligoarticular JIA for ≥3 months meeting the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) * Subjects with Systemic JIA with active arthritis in at least 1 joint but without active systemic features are eligible * ≥2 years of age and \<18 years of age prior to the Baseline visit * Body weight ≥10 kg at the Baseline visit * Candidate for chronic NSAID therapy in the Investigator's judgment

Exclusion criteria

* Psoriatic arthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, and undifferentiated arthritis types of JIA * Active systemic features over the prior 12 weeks in children with systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) * Subjects with psoriatic arthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, and undifferentiated arthritis should be excluded * Subjects with active Systemic JIA should not be enrolled

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 6/Final Visit6 Weeks/Final VisitValue at 6 weeks minus value at baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in DBP at Week 4.4 weeksValue at 4 weeks minus value at baseline.
Change From Baseline in Parent's Assessment of Overall Well-being at Week 6/Final Visit.6 weeksThe parent/legal guardian evaluated the participant's overall well-being at Baseline and at Week 6 (or Final Visit) by placing one vertical line on the visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS ranged from 0 to 100, with 0 being 'very well' and 100 being 'very poor.
Number of Participants With >= 30% Improvement in the Parent's Global Assessment of Overall Well-being at Week 6/Final Visit.Week 6/Final VisitThe parent/legal guardian evaluated the participant's overall well-being at Baseline and at Week 6 (or Final Visit) by placing one vertical line on the visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS ranged from 0 to 100, with 0 being 'very well' and 100 being 'very poor.
Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Well-being at Week 6/Final Visit.6 weeksParticipants, ≥8 years of age at the baseline, evaluated their own overall well-being at Baseline and at Week 6 (or Final Visit) by placing one vertical line on the VAS. The VAS ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 being 'very well' and 100 being 'very poor'.
Number of Participants With >= 30% Improvement in the Participant's Global Assessment of Overall Well-being at Week 6/Final Visit.Week 6/Final VisitParticipants, ≥8 years of age at the baseline, evaluated their own overall well-being at Baseline and at Week 6 (or Final Visit) by placing one vertical line on the VAS. The VAS ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 being 'very well' and 100 being 'very poor'.
Change From Baseline to Week 2 in SBP.2 weeksValue at 2 weeks minus value at baseline.
Change From Baseline in SBP at Week 4.4 weeksValue at 4 weeks minus value at baseline.
Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 2.2 weeksValue at 2 weeks minus value at baseline.
Change From Baseline in DBP at Week 6/Final Visit6 weeksValue at 6 weeks/Final Visit minus value at baseline.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Assessment of ABPM for SBP and DBP Pressure at Week 6/Final Visit (Sensitivity Analysis Excluding One Participant)6 weeks/Final VisitA summary of ABPM 24-hour averages for SBP and DBP are presented in this Outcome Measure. One of the participant in the Naproxen ABPM Arm had clinically implausible high BP values at Baseline. Due to the low number of participants in each Arm (12 and 11) these values had a significant impact on the mean baseline values for the Naproxen Arm. As a result, an additional sensitivity analysis was conducted, excluding this participant (Participant ID 10031002).
Change From Baseline in Assessment of ABPM for Heart Rate at Week 6/Final Visit (Sensitivity Analysis Excluding One Participant)6 weeks/Final VisitA summary of ABPM 24-hour averages for heart rate is presented in this Outcome Measure. One of the participant in the Naproxen ABPM Arm had clinically implausible high BP values at Baseline. Due to the low number of participants in each Arm (12 and 11) these values had a significant impact on the mean baseline values for the Naproxen Arm. As a result, an additional sensitivity analysis was conducted, excluding this participant (Participant ID 10031002).
Change From Baseline in Assessment of ABPM for Heart Rate at Week 6/Final Visit6 weeks/Final VisitAmbulatory BP measurements were obtained from 24 participants (in addition to the BP measurements obtained by the cuff technique) participating in the exploratory 24-hour ABPM sub-study. A summary of ABPM 24-hour averages for heart rate is presented in this Outcome Measure.
Change From Baseline in Assessment of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) for SBP and DBP at Week 6/Final Visit6 weeks/Final VisitAmbulatory BP measurements were obtained from 24 participants(in addition to the BP measurements obtained by the cuff technique) participating in the exploratory 24-hour ABPM sub-study. BP was monitored by a 24 hour Ambulatory BP device provided by a central vendor.

Countries

Chile, Costa Rica, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Serbia, South Africa, Switzerland, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a phase 4, 6-week, randomized double-blind, multicenter, active-controlled trial in participants with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). A total of 221 participants were screened into the study in 32 investigator sites.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 101 participants were randomized to treatment with Celecoxib and 100 participants to treatment with Naproxen. Of these randomized, 100 participants received treatment with Celecoxib and 98 participants received treatment with Naproxen. Three participants were randomized but did not receive any treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Celecoxib
Participants received celecoxib capsules 50 mg twice daily (BID) or 100 mg BID for 6 weeks. The volume/dose of the study medications was determined by the subject's weight at Baseline visit
100
Naproxen
Participants received naproxen suspension 7.5 mg/kg BID (maximum dose of 500 mg BID) for 6 weeks. The volume/dose of the study medications was determined by the subject's weight at Baseline visit
98
Total198

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event50
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy20
Overall StudyOther12
Overall StudyProtocol Violation21
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalNaproxenCelecoxib
Age, Customized
>=13 - <18 Years
77 Participants33 Participants44 Participants
Age, Customized
>=2 - <8 Years
40 Participants18 Participants22 Participants
Age, Customized
>=8 - <13 Years
81 Participants47 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
140 Participants64 Participants76 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
58 Participants34 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 10018 / 98
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1001 / 98

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 6/Final Visit

Value at 6 weeks minus value at baseline.

Time frame: 6 Weeks/Final Visit

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. The Safety Analysis set was used to analyze all BP (blood pressure) measurements.~For early terminations the last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used to impute missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CelecoxibChange From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 6/Final Visit0.366 mmHg (millimeter of mercury)Standard Error 0.7
NaproxenChange From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 6/Final Visit-0.734 mmHg (millimeter of mercury)Standard Error 0.7
Comparison: The primary analysis was based on 90% confidence interval (CI) for the difference across treatment groups (celecoxib - naproxen) in mean change from baseline in SBP. Change from Baseline in BP was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with model terms for treatment with baseline height, baseline weight, baseline age, and baseline SBP as covariates. No formal hypothesis testing was applied to the primary analysis.p-value: 0.27490% CI: [-0.56, 2.76]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in DBP at Week 4.

Value at 4 weeks minus value at baseline.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. The Safety Analysis set was used to analyze all BP measurements.~For early terminations the LOCF was used to impute missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CelecoxibChange From Baseline in DBP at Week 4.-0.628 mmHgStandard Error 0.54
NaproxenChange From Baseline in DBP at Week 4.-0.848 mmHgStandard Error 0.54
Comparison: For secondary analyses, 95% CIs for the differences across treatment groups (celecoxib - naproxen) in the mean change from baseline were generated. The change from baseline in BP was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, baseline height, weight, age and baseline BP as covariates. Secondary analyses were conducted using a two-sided test with α=0.05.p-value: 0.77695% CI: [-1.3, 1.74]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in DBP at Week 6/Final Visit

Value at 6 weeks/Final Visit minus value at baseline.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. The Safety Analysis set was used to analyze all BP measurements.~For early terminations the LOCF was used to impute missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CelecoxibChange From Baseline in DBP at Week 6/Final Visit-0.535 mmHgStandard Error 0.54
NaproxenChange From Baseline in DBP at Week 6/Final Visit-0.356 mmHgStandard Error 0.54
Comparison: For secondary analyses, 95% CIs for the differences across treatment groups (celecoxib - naproxen) in the mean change from baseline were generated. The change from baseline in BP was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, baseline height, weight, age and baseline blood pressure as covariates. Secondary analyses were conducted using a two-sided test with α=0.05.p-value: 0.81595% CI: [-1.69, 1.33]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 2.

Value at 2 weeks minus value at baseline.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. The Safety Analysis set was used to analyze all BP measurements.~For early terminations the LOCF was used to impute missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CelecoxibChange From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 2.-1.346 mmHgStandard Error 0.52
NaproxenChange From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 2.-0.139 mmHgStandard Error 0.52
Comparison: For secondary analyses, 95% CIs for the differences across treatment groups (celecoxib - naproxen) in the mean change from baseline were generated. The change from baseline in BP was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, baseline height, weight, age and baseline BP as covariates. Secondary analyses were conducted using a two-sided test with α=0.05.p-value: 0.10695% CI: [-2.67, 0.26]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Parent's Assessment of Overall Well-being at Week 6/Final Visit.

The parent/legal guardian evaluated the participant's overall well-being at Baseline and at Week 6 (or Final Visit) by placing one vertical line on the visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS ranged from 0 to 100, with 0 being 'very well' and 100 being 'very poor.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Modified-Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CelecoxibChange From Baseline in Parent's Assessment of Overall Well-being at Week 6/Final Visit.-10.581 mm (millimeter)Standard Error 2.081
NaproxenChange From Baseline in Parent's Assessment of Overall Well-being at Week 6/Final Visit.-13.614 mm (millimeter)Standard Error 2.06
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 6 was analyzed using ANCOVA model as well with treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. The LS mean change from Baseline was compared between treatment groups and an appropriate p-value and 95% CI for the difference between the two treatment groups was generated. This analysis was conducted using a two-sided test with α=0.05.p-value: 0.30395% CI: [-2.76, 8.82]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Well-being at Week 6/Final Visit.

Participants, ≥8 years of age at the baseline, evaluated their own overall well-being at Baseline and at Week 6 (or Final Visit) by placing one vertical line on the VAS. The VAS ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 being 'very well' and 100 being 'very poor'.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: MITT population was used. Additional 3 participants aged \<8 yrs at Baseline in Naproxen Arm provided self-assessments. In Celecoxib Arm, 2 participants (\>=8 yrs) not provided self-assessment and 2 (\>=8 yrs) provided but they were not from MITT and were excluded; additional 1 participant (\<8 yrs) provided self-assessment and included in analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CelecoxibChange From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Well-being at Week 6/Final Visit.-12.990 mmStandard Error 2.226
NaproxenChange From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Well-being at Week 6/Final Visit.-12.588 mmStandard Error 2.115
Comparison: Change from Baseline to Week 6 was analyzed using ANCOVA model as well with treatment and Baseline value as a covariate. The LS mean change from Baseline was compared between treatment groups and an appropriate p-value and 95% CI for the difference between the two treatment groups was generated. This analysis was conducted using a two-sided test with α=0.05.p-value: 0.89795% CI: [-6.5, 5.69]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in SBP at Week 4.

Value at 4 weeks minus value at baseline.

Time frame: 4 weeks

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. The Safety Analysis set was used to analyze all BP measurements.~For early terminations the LOCF was used to impute missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CelecoxibChange From Baseline in SBP at Week 4.-0.170 mmHgStandard Error 0.58
NaproxenChange From Baseline in SBP at Week 4.-2.007 mmHgStandard Error 0.58
Comparison: For secondary analyses, 95% CIs for the differences across treatment groups (celecoxib - naproxen) in the mean change from baseline were generated. The change from baseline in blood pressure was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, baseline height, weight, age and baseline BP as covariates.~Secondary analyses were conducted using a two-sided test with α=0.05.p-value: 0.02795% CI: [0.21, 3.46]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 2 in SBP.

Value at 2 weeks minus value at baseline.

Time frame: 2 weeks

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. The Safety Analysis set was used to analyze all BP measurements.~For early terminations the LOCF was used to impute missing data.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CelecoxibChange From Baseline to Week 2 in SBP.-0.202 mmHgStandard Error 0.53
NaproxenChange From Baseline to Week 2 in SBP.-1.290 mmHgStandard Error 0.53
Comparison: For secondary analyses, 95% CIs for the differences across treatment groups (celecoxib - naproxen) in the mean change from baseline were generated. The change from baseline in BP was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, baseline height, weight, age and baseline BP as covariates. Secondary analyses were conducted using a two-sided test with α=0.05.p-value: 0.14895% CI: [-0.39, 2.57]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With >= 30% Improvement in the Parent's Global Assessment of Overall Well-being at Week 6/Final Visit.

The parent/legal guardian evaluated the participant's overall well-being at Baseline and at Week 6 (or Final Visit) by placing one vertical line on the visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS ranged from 0 to 100, with 0 being 'very well' and 100 being 'very poor.

Time frame: Week 6/Final Visit

Population: The MITT Population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CelecoxibNumber of Participants With >= 30% Improvement in the Parent's Global Assessment of Overall Well-being at Week 6/Final Visit.47 Participants
NaproxenNumber of Participants With >= 30% Improvement in the Parent's Global Assessment of Overall Well-being at Week 6/Final Visit.54 Participants
Comparison: The number of subjects with at least a 30% improvement in Parent/Guardian's Global Assessment of Overall Well-Being was compared between the two treatment groups using a chi-square test. A 95% CI for the difference in incidence between groups was also computed.p-value: 0.39295% CI: [-0.202, 0.079]Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With >= 30% Improvement in the Participant's Global Assessment of Overall Well-being at Week 6/Final Visit.

Participants, ≥8 years of age at the baseline, evaluated their own overall well-being at Baseline and at Week 6 (or Final Visit) by placing one vertical line on the VAS. The VAS ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 being 'very well' and 100 being 'very poor'.

Time frame: Week 6/Final Visit

Population: MITT population was used. Additional 3 participants aged \<8 yrs at Baseline in Naproxen Arm provided self-assessments. In Celecoxib Arm, 2 participants (\>=8 yrs) not provided self-assessment and 2 (\>=8 yrs) provided but they were not from MITT and were excluded; additional 1 participant (\<8 yrs) provided self-assessment and included in analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CelecoxibNumber of Participants With >= 30% Improvement in the Participant's Global Assessment of Overall Well-being at Week 6/Final Visit.33 Participants
NaproxenNumber of Participants With >= 30% Improvement in the Participant's Global Assessment of Overall Well-being at Week 6/Final Visit.45 Participants
Comparison: The number of participants with at least a 30% improvement in participant's Global Assessment of Overall Well-Being was compared between the two treatment groups using a chi-square test. A 95% CI for the difference in incidence between groups was also computed.p-value: 0.295% CI: [-0.257, 0.053]Chi-squared
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Assessment of ABPM for Heart Rate at Week 6/Final Visit

Ambulatory BP measurements were obtained from 24 participants (in addition to the BP measurements obtained by the cuff technique) participating in the exploratory 24-hour ABPM sub-study. A summary of ABPM 24-hour averages for heart rate is presented in this Outcome Measure.

Time frame: 6 weeks/Final Visit

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. For one participant in Naproxen Arm the device failed to collect 11 out of 24 readings at Week 6 and this participant was not included in analysis. ABPM data were analyzed for 12 and 11 participants in Celecoxib and Naproxen Arms respectively.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CelecoxibChange From Baseline in Assessment of ABPM for Heart Rate at Week 6/Final Visit2.5 bpm (beats per minute)Standard Deviation 6.34
NaproxenChange From Baseline in Assessment of ABPM for Heart Rate at Week 6/Final Visit3.7 bpm (beats per minute)Standard Deviation 8.5
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Assessment of ABPM for Heart Rate at Week 6/Final Visit (Sensitivity Analysis Excluding One Participant)

A summary of ABPM 24-hour averages for heart rate is presented in this Outcome Measure. One of the participant in the Naproxen ABPM Arm had clinically implausible high BP values at Baseline. Due to the low number of participants in each Arm (12 and 11) these values had a significant impact on the mean baseline values for the Naproxen Arm. As a result, an additional sensitivity analysis was conducted, excluding this participant (Participant ID 10031002).

Time frame: 6 weeks/Final Visit

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. A total of 22 out of 24 participants were analyzed in this sensitivity analysis. Two participants were excluded, one due to outlying BP values at Baseline and another due to the device failure to collect 11 out of 24 readings).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CelecoxibChange From Baseline in Assessment of ABPM for Heart Rate at Week 6/Final Visit (Sensitivity Analysis Excluding One Participant)2.5 bpmStandard Deviation 6.34
NaproxenChange From Baseline in Assessment of ABPM for Heart Rate at Week 6/Final Visit (Sensitivity Analysis Excluding One Participant)3.3 bpmStandard Deviation 8.82
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Assessment of ABPM for SBP and DBP Pressure at Week 6/Final Visit (Sensitivity Analysis Excluding One Participant)

A summary of ABPM 24-hour averages for SBP and DBP are presented in this Outcome Measure. One of the participant in the Naproxen ABPM Arm had clinically implausible high BP values at Baseline. Due to the low number of participants in each Arm (12 and 11) these values had a significant impact on the mean baseline values for the Naproxen Arm. As a result, an additional sensitivity analysis was conducted, excluding this participant (Participant ID 10031002).

Time frame: 6 weeks/Final Visit

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. A total of 22 out of 24 participants were analyzed in this sensitivity analysis. Two participants were excluded, one due to outlying BP values at Baseline and another due to the device failure to collect 11 out of 24 readings).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CelecoxibChange From Baseline in Assessment of ABPM for SBP and DBP Pressure at Week 6/Final Visit (Sensitivity Analysis Excluding One Participant)SBP2.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.02
CelecoxibChange From Baseline in Assessment of ABPM for SBP and DBP Pressure at Week 6/Final Visit (Sensitivity Analysis Excluding One Participant)DBP0.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.23
NaproxenChange From Baseline in Assessment of ABPM for SBP and DBP Pressure at Week 6/Final Visit (Sensitivity Analysis Excluding One Participant)SBP1.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.13
NaproxenChange From Baseline in Assessment of ABPM for SBP and DBP Pressure at Week 6/Final Visit (Sensitivity Analysis Excluding One Participant)DBP0.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.86
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Assessment of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) for SBP and DBP at Week 6/Final Visit

Ambulatory BP measurements were obtained from 24 participants(in addition to the BP measurements obtained by the cuff technique) participating in the exploratory 24-hour ABPM sub-study. BP was monitored by a 24 hour Ambulatory BP device provided by a central vendor.

Time frame: 6 weeks/Final Visit

Population: Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. For one participant in Naproxen Arm the device failed to collect 11 out of 24 readings at Week 6 and this participant was not included in analysis. ABPM data were analyzed for 12 and 11 participants in Celecoxib and Naproxen Arms respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CelecoxibChange From Baseline in Assessment of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) for SBP and DBP at Week 6/Final VisitSBP2.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.02
CelecoxibChange From Baseline in Assessment of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) for SBP and DBP at Week 6/Final VisitDBP0.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.23
NaproxenChange From Baseline in Assessment of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) for SBP and DBP at Week 6/Final VisitSBP-1.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 12.4
NaproxenChange From Baseline in Assessment of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) for SBP and DBP at Week 6/Final VisitDBP-1.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 5.36

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026