Skip to content

Corticosteroid Pulse After Ablation

SAAB: Randomized, Double Blind STudy of Corticosteroid Pulse After Ablation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00807586
Acronym
SAAB
Enrollment
119
Registered
2008-12-12
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2019-08-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Atrial Fibrillation, Corticosteroid, Radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Brief summary

Radiofrequency ablation is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation. However, about 20% of the time the atrial fibrillation recurs. Steroids given after the ablation may decrease inflammation caused by the ablation and thus improve healing and decrease the chance of recurrence of atrial fibrillation. In this study patients will be randomized to receive intravenous steroids or not immediately following the ablation.

Detailed description

Atrial fibrillation, a common arrhythmia, is the source of considerable morbidity. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in adults is 0.5%, increasing to 10% in those patients over the age of seventy five. Numbers are expected to increase nearly 2.5 fold over the next 50 years. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation to cure atrial fibrillation has become an established and effective therapy in the many atrial fibrillation patients. However, approximately 20% return with recurrent atrial fibrillation after ablation. RF ablation directly targets the substrate for atrial fibrillation, cauterizing cardiac tissue through the application of radiofrequency energy , causing a myocardial lesion which effectively blocks the errant pathway. This process of RF ablation induces an inflammatory effect. As the lesion heals it often enlarges. This may contribute to recurrence of atrial fibrillation after ablation, as well as increased pain. There is some early evidence that a single dose of corticosteroids after ablation may improve the healing process, thus decreasing pain and incidence of recurrent atrial fibrillation. The aim of the study is to determine the usefulness of a one time dose of solumedrol following radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation..

Interventions

100mg, given once within 2 hours of the end of the ablation procedure

DRUGPlacebo

Normal saline (1.6 cc)

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 * Drug refractory, symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to solumedrol * Persistent or permanent Atrial Fibrillation * Previous history of radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Atrial Arrhythmias at 6 Weeks6 weeksClinically significant atrial arrhythmias include ER, urgent care, or hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, cardioversion for atrial fibrillation, or atrial fibrillation requiring an increase in anti-arrhythmia medication

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cardiac Pain Assessmentone day and one weekPerception of cardiac pain assessed by a numerical pain scale (0= no pain; 10=worst pain imaginable)
Symptoms Post Ablation Requiring Diuretic6 weeksOccurrence of shortness of breath or edema requiring administration of a diuretic
Repeat Intervention3 monthsNeed for repeat ablation

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Steroid
Solumedrol: 100mg, given once within 2 hours of the end of the ablation procedure
60
Placebo
Placebo: Normal saline (1.6 cc)
59
Total119

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSteroidPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
60.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
14 participants13 participants27 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
46 participants46 participants92 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
25 / 6017 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 600 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Atrial Arrhythmias at 6 Weeks

Clinically significant atrial arrhythmias include ER, urgent care, or hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, cardioversion for atrial fibrillation, or atrial fibrillation requiring an increase in anti-arrhythmia medication

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: 3 patients lost to follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SteroidNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Atrial Arrhythmias at 6 Weeks4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Atrial Arrhythmias at 6 Weeks12 Participants
Secondary

Cardiac Pain Assessment

Perception of cardiac pain assessed by a numerical pain scale (0= no pain; 10=worst pain imaginable)

Time frame: one day and one week

Population: 4 patients lost to follow up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SteroidCardiac Pain AssessmentPain Scale Day 10.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
SteroidCardiac Pain AssessmentPain Scale Week 10.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
PlaceboCardiac Pain AssessmentPain Scale Day 11.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
PlaceboCardiac Pain AssessmentPain Scale Week 10.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Secondary

Repeat Intervention

Need for repeat ablation

Time frame: 3 months

Population: 14 patients lost to follow up

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SteroidRepeat Intervention2 Participants
PlaceboRepeat Intervention8 Participants
Secondary

Symptoms Post Ablation Requiring Diuretic

Occurrence of shortness of breath or edema requiring administration of a diuretic

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Data were not collected on this outcome

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026