Skip to content

An Evaluation Of The Effectiveness And Safety Of Anidulafungin Compared To Caspofungin For The Treatment Of Serious Fungal Infection Due To Candida In Patients With A Dysfunctional Immune System

Efficacy And Safety Of Eraxis/Ecalta (Anidulafungin) Compared To Cancidas (Caspofungin) In Neutropenic Patients With Invasive Candida Infection

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00806351
Enrollment
21
Registered
2008-12-10
Start date
2009-08-31
Completion date
2011-10-31
Last updated
2012-12-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Candidiasis, Fungemia, Neutropenia

Keywords

Candidiasis; Invasive Candidiasis; Candida; Candidemia; Fungal Infection; Neutropenia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to gather information on the use of anidulafungin for the treatment of Candida infection in patients with an abnormal immune system. It is expected that anidulafungin will be at least as safe and as effective as the comparator drug, caspofungin.

Interventions

Subjects in this arm will receive active anidulafungin and placebo caspofungin

Subjects in this arm will receive active caspofungin and placebo anidulafungin

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Dysfunctional immune system (reduced neutrophils). * Confirmed Candida infection, defined as growth of Candida from a normally sterile site accompanied by signs and symptoms of infection. * Male of female ≥16 years of age. * Expected hospitalization for at least ten (10) days.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy or breast feeding or planning to become pregnant during the study. * Recent treatment with one of the study drugs over the last 30 days. * Allergy to either study drug or to this class of drugs. * Significant liver dysfunction. * Suspected Candida osteomyelitis, endocarditis, meningitis or any other infections of the central nervous system.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIVT)Day 10 up to Day 42Participant counts of global response of success, failure, or indeterminate. Success: clinical response of cure (no signs, symptoms \[s/s\] of Candida) or improvement (significant, incomplete resolution of s/s) and microbiological response of eradication (follow-up \[f/u\] culture negative) or presumed eradication (f/u culture not available and clinical success). Failure: clinical response of failure (greater than or equal to \[≥3\] doses study medication and no significant improvement of s/s or death due to Candida) and/or unsuccessful microbiological response of persistent(positive culture any Candida species \[sp\]), new infection or relapse at f/u. Indeterminate: clinical and/or microbiological response of indeterminate (evaluation could not be made due to withdrawal from study prior to assessment of cure or failure) and there was neither clinical response of failure nor unsuccessful microbiological response (persistence or new infection or relapse).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global Response at 2-Week Follow-Up Visit2 weeks post treatmentParticipant counts of global response of success, failure, or indeterminate. Success: clinical response of cure (no s/s of Candida) or improvement (significant, incomplete resolution of s/s) and microbiological response of eradication (f/u culture negative) or presumed eradication (f/u culture not available and clinical success). Failure: clinical response of failure (≥3 doses study medication and no significant improvement of s/s or death due to Candida) and/or unsuccessful microbiological response of persistent (positive culture any Candida sp), new infection or relapse at f/u. Indeterminate: clinical and/or microbiological response of indeterminate (evaluation could not be made due to withdrawal from study prior to assessment of cure or failure) and there was neither clinical response of failure nor unsuccessful microbiological response (persistence or new infection or relapse).
Global Response at 6-Week Follow-Up Visit6 weeks post treatmentParticipant counts of global response of success, failure, or indeterminate. Success: clinical response of cure (no s/s of Candida) or improvement (significant, incomplete resolution of s/s) and microbiological response of eradication (f/u culture negative) or presumed eradication (f/u culture not available and clinical success). Failure: clinical response of failure (≥3 doses study medication and no significant improvement of s/s or death due to Candida) and/or unsuccessful microbiological response of persistent (positive culture any Candida sp), new infection or relapse at f/u. Indeterminate: clinical and/or microbiological response of indeterminate (evaluation could not be made due to withdrawal from study prior to assessment of cure or failure) and there was neither clinical response of failure nor unsuccessful microbiological response (persistence or new infection or relapse).
Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at EOIVTDay 10 up to Day 42Participant counts of clinical cure (no s/s of Candida) and microbiological success (eradication \[f/u culture negative\] or presumed eradication \[f/u culture not available and a clinical response of cure\]).
Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at EOTDay 14 up to Day 56Participant counts of clinical cure (no s/s of Candida) and microbiological success (eradication \[f/u culture negative\] or presumed eradication \[f/u culture not available and a clinical response of cure\]).
Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at 2-Week Follow-Up Visit2 weeks post treatmentParticipant counts of clinical cure (no s/s of Candida) and microbiological success (eradication \[f/u culture negative\] or presumed eradication \[f/u culture not available and a clinical response of cure\]).
Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at 6-Week Follow-Up Visit6 weeks post treatmentParticipant counts of clinical cure (no s/s of Candida) and microbiological success (eradication \[f/u culture negative\] or presumed eradication \[f/u culture not available and a clinical response of cure\]).
Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)Day 14 up to Day 56Participant counts of global response of success, failure, or indeterminate. Success: clinical response of cure (no s/s of Candida) or improvement (significant, incomplete resolution of s/s) and microbiological response of eradication (f/u culture negative) or presumed eradication (f/u culture not available and clinical success). Failure: clinical response of failure (≥3 doses study medication and no significant improvement of s/s or death due to Candida) and/or unsuccessful microbiological response of persistent (positive culture any Candida sp), new infection or relapse at f/u. Indeterminate: clinical and/or microbiological response of indeterminate (evaluation could not be made due to withdrawal from study prior to assessment of cure or failure) and there was neither clinical response of failure nor unsuccessful microbiological response (persistence or new infection or relapse).
Number of Participants With Recurrence2 and 6 weeks post treatmentParticipant counts of microbiologic response of recurrence defined as any baseline Candida sp isolated following eradication, or culture data were not available for participants with a clinical response of failure after a previous response of success. Clinical failure defined as ≥3 doses study medication and no significant improvement of s/s or death due to Candida. Clinical success is resolution of s/s and no additional antifungal treatment needed.
Number of Participants With New Infections2 and 6 weeks post treatmentParticipant counts of microbiologic response of new infection defined as clinical failure with emergence of new Candida sp not identified at baseline at the original site of infection or at a distant site of infection. Clinical failure defined as ≥3 doses study medication and no significant improvement of s/s or death due to Candida.
Time to First Negative Blood Culture for Candida SpeciesBaseline up to Day 56A participant had a negative blood culture, if having determined the day of the first negative blood culture, the subsequent blood culture was also negative, or if positive, the interval between the cultures was at least 2 days. For participants whose blood culture went from positive to negative, the time to negative blood culture defined as: date of first negative blood culture minus first treatment date plus 1.
Time to DeathDay 1 up to Day 98Time to death defined as: date of death minus first treatment date plus 1.
All-Cause MortalityBaseline up to 6 weeks post treatmentAll-cause mortality during study therapy and at follow-up visits reported as unique deaths at EOIVT, end of oral treatment (EOT-oral), 2 Week Follow-Up and 6 Week Follow-Up
Clinical Response at Day 10Day 10Participant counts of clinical response categorized as success, failure, or indeterminate. Success: no s/s of Candida (cure) or significant but incomplete resolution of s/s of Candida; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required (improvement). Failure: worsening of s/s of the Candida infection. Indeterminate: evaluation could not be made due to withdrawal from study prior to assessment of cure or failure. Participants who received fewer than 3 doses of study medication were assigned a clinical efficacy response of indeterminate.

Countries

Bosnia and Herzegovina, France, Italy, Poland, Russia, Slovakia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Anidulafungin
Participants received anidulafungin (100 milligrams \[mg\]) followed by matched placebo-caspofungin once daily (QD) or participants received matched placebo-caspofungin followed by active anidulafungin (100 mg) QD. Anidulafungin loading dose on Day 1 was 200 mg. Study treatments given either entirely as intravenous (IV) therapy or if protocol-specified criteria met, as sequential IV (at least 10 days) then oral antifungal therapy (14 days). Dosage of antifungal therapy (fluconazole or voriconazole tablets) determined by the Investigator. A maximum of 42 days of IV study treatment and a maximum of 14 days of oral study treatment allowed. Thus, participants may have received up to a maximum of 56 days of study therapy.
15
Caspofungin
Participants received caspofungin (35, 50, or 70 mg depending on participant's weight, baseline liver function, or receipt of an interacting drug) followed by matched placebo-anidulafungin QD or participants received matched placebo-anidulafungin followed by active caspofungin (35, 50, or 70 mg) QD. Caspofungin loading dose on Day 1 was 70 mg. Study treatments given either entirely as IV therapy or if protocol-specified criteria met, as sequential IV (at least 10 days) then oral antifungal therapy (14 days). Dosage of antifungal therapy (fluconazole or voriconazole tablets) determined by the Investigator. A maximum of 42 days of IV study treatment and a maximum of 14 days of oral study treatment allowed. Thus, participants may have received up to a maximum of 56 days of study therapy.
6
Total21

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath54

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAnidulafunginCaspofunginTotal
Age, Customized
18 to 44 years
2 participants2 participants4 participants
Age, Customized
45 to 64 years
9 participants2 participants11 participants
Age, Customized
greater than or equal to (≥) 65 years
4 participants2 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants3 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 155 / 6
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 154 / 6

Outcome results

Primary

Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIVT)

Participant counts of global response of success, failure, or indeterminate. Success: clinical response of cure (no signs, symptoms \[s/s\] of Candida) or improvement (significant, incomplete resolution of s/s) and microbiological response of eradication (follow-up \[f/u\] culture negative) or presumed eradication (f/u culture not available and clinical success). Failure: clinical response of failure (greater than or equal to \[≥3\] doses study medication and no significant improvement of s/s or death due to Candida) and/or unsuccessful microbiological response of persistent(positive culture any Candida species \[sp\]), new infection or relapse at f/u. Indeterminate: clinical and/or microbiological response of indeterminate (evaluation could not be made due to withdrawal from study prior to assessment of cure or failure) and there was neither clinical response of failure nor unsuccessful microbiological response (persistence or new infection or relapse).

Time frame: Day 10 up to Day 42

Population: Modified Intent to Treat (MITT) Population: participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had positive culture for Candida sp isolated from cultures obtained from a normally sterile site within 96 hours prior to treatment initiation. A global response of failure at EOIVT was carried forward programmatically to subsequent visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginGlobal Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIVT)Success8 participants
AnidulafunginGlobal Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIVT)Failure3 participants
AnidulafunginGlobal Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIVT)Indeterminate0 participants
CaspofunginGlobal Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIVT)Success3 participants
CaspofunginGlobal Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIVT)Failure0 participants
CaspofunginGlobal Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIVT)Indeterminate0 participants
Comparison: The 95 percent confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated using the method of exact unconditional confidence limits for the difference. Global response (rates of success) by using a 2-sided 95% CI for the true difference in efficacy (Anidulafungin minus Caspofungin) was calculated. Statistical testing was done at 2.5% alpha.95% CI: [-80.9, 40.3]
Secondary

All-Cause Mortality

All-cause mortality during study therapy and at follow-up visits reported as unique deaths at EOIVT, end of oral treatment (EOT-oral), 2 Week Follow-Up and 6 Week Follow-Up

Time frame: Baseline up to 6 weeks post treatment

Population: Safety Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginAll-Cause Mortalityat 6 Week Follow-Up Visit2 participants
AnidulafunginAll-Cause Mortalityat 2 Week Follow-Up Visit1 participants
AnidulafunginAll-Cause Mortalityat EOIVT1 participants
AnidulafunginAll-Cause Mortalityat EOT - oral1 participants
CaspofunginAll-Cause Mortalityat EOT - oral0 participants
CaspofunginAll-Cause Mortalityat 6 Week Follow-Up Visit0 participants
CaspofunginAll-Cause Mortalityat EOIVT1 participants
CaspofunginAll-Cause Mortalityat 2 Week Follow-Up Visit3 participants
Secondary

Clinical Response at Day 10

Participant counts of clinical response categorized as success, failure, or indeterminate. Success: no s/s of Candida (cure) or significant but incomplete resolution of s/s of Candida; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required (improvement). Failure: worsening of s/s of the Candida infection. Indeterminate: evaluation could not be made due to withdrawal from study prior to assessment of cure or failure. Participants who received fewer than 3 doses of study medication were assigned a clinical efficacy response of indeterminate.

Time frame: Day 10

Population: MITT Population; Number of participants analyzed (N): participants with evaluable data

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginClinical Response at Day 10Success7 participants
AnidulafunginClinical Response at Day 10Failure0 participants
AnidulafunginClinical Response at Day 10Indeterminate2 participants
CaspofunginClinical Response at Day 10Success3 participants
CaspofunginClinical Response at Day 10Failure0 participants
CaspofunginClinical Response at Day 10Indeterminate0 participants
Comparison: The 95% CI was calculated using the method of exact unconditional confidence limits for the difference. Global response (rates of success) by using a 2-sided 95% CI for the true difference in efficacy (Anidulafungin minus Caspofungin) was calculated. Statistical testing was done at 2.5% alpha.95% CI: [-90.6, 31.9]
Secondary

Global Response at 2-Week Follow-Up Visit

Participant counts of global response of success, failure, or indeterminate. Success: clinical response of cure (no s/s of Candida) or improvement (significant, incomplete resolution of s/s) and microbiological response of eradication (f/u culture negative) or presumed eradication (f/u culture not available and clinical success). Failure: clinical response of failure (≥3 doses study medication and no significant improvement of s/s or death due to Candida) and/or unsuccessful microbiological response of persistent (positive culture any Candida sp), new infection or relapse at f/u. Indeterminate: clinical and/or microbiological response of indeterminate (evaluation could not be made due to withdrawal from study prior to assessment of cure or failure) and there was neither clinical response of failure nor unsuccessful microbiological response (persistence or new infection or relapse).

Time frame: 2 weeks post treatment

Population: MITT Population; subset of participants who, according to the investigator, completed therapy and participants with global response of failure at EOIVT or EOT. A global response of failure at the 2-week and 6-week visits carried forward programmatically to all subsequent visits. Number of participants analyzed (N): participants with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginGlobal Response at 2-Week Follow-Up VisitSuccess6 participants
AnidulafunginGlobal Response at 2-Week Follow-Up VisitFailure3 participants
AnidulafunginGlobal Response at 2-Week Follow-Up VisitIndeterminate0 participants
CaspofunginGlobal Response at 2-Week Follow-Up VisitSuccess1 participants
CaspofunginGlobal Response at 2-Week Follow-Up VisitFailure0 participants
CaspofunginGlobal Response at 2-Week Follow-Up VisitIndeterminate0 participants
Comparison: The 95% CI was calculated using the method of exact unconditional confidence limits for the difference. Global response (rates of success) by using a 2-sided 95% CI for the true difference in efficacy (Anidulafungin minus Caspofungin) was calculated. Statistical testing was done at 2.5% alpha.95% CI: [-97.5, 63.9]
Secondary

Global Response at 6-Week Follow-Up Visit

Participant counts of global response of success, failure, or indeterminate. Success: clinical response of cure (no s/s of Candida) or improvement (significant, incomplete resolution of s/s) and microbiological response of eradication (f/u culture negative) or presumed eradication (f/u culture not available and clinical success). Failure: clinical response of failure (≥3 doses study medication and no significant improvement of s/s or death due to Candida) and/or unsuccessful microbiological response of persistent (positive culture any Candida sp), new infection or relapse at f/u. Indeterminate: clinical and/or microbiological response of indeterminate (evaluation could not be made due to withdrawal from study prior to assessment of cure or failure) and there was neither clinical response of failure nor unsuccessful microbiological response (persistence or new infection or relapse).

Time frame: 6 weeks post treatment

Population: MITT Population; subset of participants who, according to the investigator, completed therapy and participants with global response of failure at EOIVT or EOT. A global response of failure at the 2-week and 6-week visits carried forward programmatically to all subsequent visits. Number of participants analyzed (N): participants with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginGlobal Response at 6-Week Follow-Up VisitSuccess5 participants
AnidulafunginGlobal Response at 6-Week Follow-Up VisitFailure4 participants
AnidulafunginGlobal Response at 6-Week Follow-Up VisitIndeterminate0 participants
CaspofunginGlobal Response at 6-Week Follow-Up VisitSuccess1 participants
CaspofunginGlobal Response at 6-Week Follow-Up VisitFailure0 participants
CaspofunginGlobal Response at 6-Week Follow-Up VisitIndeterminate0 participants
Comparison: The 95% CI was calculated using the method of exact unconditional confidence limits for the difference. Global response (rates of success) by using a 2-sided 95% CI for the true difference in efficacy (Anidulafungin minus Caspofungin) was calculated. Statistical testing was done at 2.5% alpha.95% CI: [-97.5, 55]
Secondary

Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)

Participant counts of global response of success, failure, or indeterminate. Success: clinical response of cure (no s/s of Candida) or improvement (significant, incomplete resolution of s/s) and microbiological response of eradication (f/u culture negative) or presumed eradication (f/u culture not available and clinical success). Failure: clinical response of failure (≥3 doses study medication and no significant improvement of s/s or death due to Candida) and/or unsuccessful microbiological response of persistent (positive culture any Candida sp), new infection or relapse at f/u. Indeterminate: clinical and/or microbiological response of indeterminate (evaluation could not be made due to withdrawal from study prior to assessment of cure or failure) and there was neither clinical response of failure nor unsuccessful microbiological response (persistence or new infection or relapse).

Time frame: Day 14 up to Day 56

Population: MITT Population; A global response of failure at EOT was carried forward programmatically to all subsequent visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginGlobal Response at End of Treatment (EOT)Success8 participants
AnidulafunginGlobal Response at End of Treatment (EOT)Failure3 participants
AnidulafunginGlobal Response at End of Treatment (EOT)Indeterminate0 participants
CaspofunginGlobal Response at End of Treatment (EOT)Success3 participants
CaspofunginGlobal Response at End of Treatment (EOT)Failure0 participants
CaspofunginGlobal Response at End of Treatment (EOT)Indeterminate0 participants
Comparison: The 95% CI was calculated using the method of exact unconditional confidence limits for the difference. Global response (rates of success) by using a 2-sided 95% CI for the true difference in efficacy (Anidulafungin minus Caspofungin) was calculated. Statistical testing was done at 2.5% alpha.95% CI: [-80.9, 40.3]
Secondary

Number of Participants With New Infections

Participant counts of microbiologic response of new infection defined as clinical failure with emergence of new Candida sp not identified at baseline at the original site of infection or at a distant site of infection. Clinical failure defined as ≥3 doses study medication and no significant improvement of s/s or death due to Candida.

Time frame: 2 and 6 weeks post treatment

Population: MITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginNumber of Participants With New Infections2 weeks post treatment0 participants
AnidulafunginNumber of Participants With New Infections6 weeks post treatment0 participants
CaspofunginNumber of Participants With New Infections2 weeks post treatment0 participants
CaspofunginNumber of Participants With New Infections6 weeks post treatment0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Recurrence

Participant counts of microbiologic response of recurrence defined as any baseline Candida sp isolated following eradication, or culture data were not available for participants with a clinical response of failure after a previous response of success. Clinical failure defined as ≥3 doses study medication and no significant improvement of s/s or death due to Candida. Clinical success is resolution of s/s and no additional antifungal treatment needed.

Time frame: 2 and 6 weeks post treatment

Population: MITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginNumber of Participants With Recurrence2 Weeks post treatment0 participants
AnidulafunginNumber of Participants With Recurrence6 Weeks post treatment0 participants
CaspofunginNumber of Participants With Recurrence2 Weeks post treatment0 participants
CaspofunginNumber of Participants With Recurrence6 Weeks post treatment0 participants
Secondary

Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at 2-Week Follow-Up Visit

Participant counts of clinical cure (no s/s of Candida) and microbiological success (eradication \[f/u culture negative\] or presumed eradication \[f/u culture not available and a clinical response of cure\]).

Time frame: 2 weeks post treatment

Population: MITT Population; subset of participants with clinical cure or improvement and microbiological eradication or presumed eradication; Number of participants analyzed (N): participants with evaluable data a specified time point

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginResponse Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at 2-Week Follow-Up Visit4 participants
CaspofunginResponse Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at 2-Week Follow-Up Visit1 participants
Secondary

Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at 6-Week Follow-Up Visit

Participant counts of clinical cure (no s/s of Candida) and microbiological success (eradication \[f/u culture negative\] or presumed eradication \[f/u culture not available and a clinical response of cure\]).

Time frame: 6 weeks post treatment

Population: MITT Population; subset of participants with clinical cure or improvement and microbiological eradication or presumed eradication; Number of participants analyzed (N): participants with evaluable data a specified time point

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginResponse Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at 6-Week Follow-Up Visit6 participants
CaspofunginResponse Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at 6-Week Follow-Up Visit1 participants
Secondary

Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at EOIVT

Participant counts of clinical cure (no s/s of Candida) and microbiological success (eradication \[f/u culture negative\] or presumed eradication \[f/u culture not available and a clinical response of cure\]).

Time frame: Day 10 up to Day 42

Population: MITT Population; subset of participants with clinical cure or improvement and microbiological eradication or presumed eradication. A global response of failure at EOIVT was carried forward programmatically to all subsequent visits.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginResponse Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at EOIVT7 participants
CaspofunginResponse Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at EOIVT2 participants
Secondary

Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at EOT

Participant counts of clinical cure (no s/s of Candida) and microbiological success (eradication \[f/u culture negative\] or presumed eradication \[f/u culture not available and a clinical response of cure\]).

Time frame: Day 14 up to Day 56

Population: MITT Population; subset of participants with clinical cure or improvement and microbiological eradication or presumed eradication. A global response of failure at EOT was carried forward programmatically to all subsequent visits.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginResponse Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at EOT6 participants
CaspofunginResponse Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success at EOT3 participants
Secondary

Time to Death

Time to death defined as: date of death minus first treatment date plus 1.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 98

Population: Safety Population;subset of participants who died

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AnidulafunginTime to Death34.0 days
CaspofunginTime to Death15.5 days
Secondary

Time to First Negative Blood Culture for Candida Species

A participant had a negative blood culture, if having determined the day of the first negative blood culture, the subsequent blood culture was also negative, or if positive, the interval between the cultures was at least 2 days. For participants whose blood culture went from positive to negative, the time to negative blood culture defined as: date of first negative blood culture minus first treatment date plus 1.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 56

Population: MITT Population; subset of participants who had a positive blood culture for Candida sp. on Day 1 of treatment. No participant in the Caspofungin treatment arm had a positive blood culture for Candida sp. on Day 1 of treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AnidulafunginTime to First Negative Blood Culture for Candida Species2.0 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026