Skip to content

An Evaluation Of The Effectiveness And Safety Of Anidulafungin Compared To Caspofungin For The Treatment Of Deep Tissue Infection Due To Candida

Efficacy And Safety Of Eraxis/Ecalta (Anidulafungin) Compared To Cancidas (Caspofungin) In Patients With Candida Deep Tissue Infection

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00805740
Enrollment
41
Registered
2008-12-10
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2013-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Candidiasis, Fungemia

Keywords

Candidiasis; Invasive Candidiasis; Deep Tissue Candidiasis; Candida; Candidemia; Fungal Infection

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to gather information on the use of anidulafungin for the treatment of serious Candida infection. It is expected that anidulafungin will be at least as safe and as effective as the comparator drug, caspofungin.

Interventions

Subjects in this arm will receive active anidulafungin and placebo caspofungin

Subjects in this arm will receive active caspofungin and placebo anidulafungin

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of deep tissue Candida infection, defined as growth of Candida sp. from a culture specimen obtained from a normally sterile site accompanied by signs and symptoms of infection. * Male or female ≥ 16 years of age. * Expected hospitalization for at least fourteen (14) days.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy or breast feeding or planning to become pregnant during the study. * Recent treatment with one of the study drugs over the last 30 days. * Allergy to either study drug or to this class of drugs. * Significant liver dysfunction. * Suspected Candida osteomyelitis, endocarditis, meningitis or any other infections of the central nervous system.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (Day 14 To Day 42)End of Treatment (Day 14 to Day 42)Participants had successful global response if there was clinical response of cure/improvement,microbiological eradication/presumed eradication.Clinical cure:resolution of signs/symptoms (s/s) of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Clinical improvement:significant,but incomplete resolution of s/s of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Microbiological eradication/presumed eradication:baseline pathogen not isolated from original site culture,or culture data not available for participant with successful clinical outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological SuccessEOT (Day 14 to 42), 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)A participant had a successful response if there was clinical response of cure and microbiological success (eradication or presumed eradication). Clinical response of cure: resolution of signs and symptoms attributed to Candida infection; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required to complete the course of therapy. Microbiological eradication or presumed eradication: baseline pathogen not isolated from original site culture, or culture data not available for a participant with successful clinical outcome.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical ResponseDay 10A participant had a successful clinical response if there was clinical response of cure or improvement. Clinical response of cure: resolution of signs and symptoms attributed to Candida infection; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required to complete the course of therapy. Clinical response of improvement: significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required.
Percentage of Participants With Relapse2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)Relapse was defined as any baseline Candida sp. isolated following eradication (documented or presumed) or culture data not available for participants with a clinical response of failure after a previous response of success. Prophylactic treatment with oral antifungal agents was not sufficient to document a relapse.
Percentage of Participants With Global Response at 2-week and 6-week Follow-up Visit2-week follow-up (2 weeks after end of treatment [EOT]), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)Participants had successful global response if there was clinical response of cure/improvement,microbiological eradication/presumed eradication.Clinical cure:resolution of signs/symptoms (s/s) of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Clinical improvement:significant,but incomplete resolution of s/s of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Microbiological eradication/presumed eradication:baseline pathogen not isolated from original site culture,or culture data not available for participant with successful clinical outcome.
Time to Negative Blood CultureBaseline up to 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)Negative blood culture referred to absence of Candida sp. in the blood sample of participants who had a positive blood culture at baseline. Time to negative blood culture (days) was calculated as date of first negative blood culture minus first treatment date plus 1.
Percentage of Participants With All-cause MortalityBaseline to EOT (Day 14 to 42), After EOT to 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), After 2-week follow-up to 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)All-cause mortality during study therapy and at follow-up visits reported as unique death at EOT, 2 week follow-up and 6 week follow-up.
Time to DeathBaseline up to 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)Time to death (days) was assessed as date of death minus first treatment date plus 1.
Percentage of Participants With New Infection2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)New Infection: participant presenting with clinical failure with the emergence of new Candida sp. at the original site of infection or at a distant site of infection. Clinical failure: no significant improvement in signs and symptoms, or death due to Candida infection. Participants must have had received at least 3 doses of study drug to be classified as a failure.

Countries

Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Switzerland, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Anidulafungin
Anidulafungin at a loading dose 200 milligram (mg) as two 100 mg consecutive infusions intravenously over 1.5 hours each, administered prior to or following placebo matched to caspofungin 70 mg infusion intravenously over 1 hour on Day 1. Anidulafungin 100 mg infusion intravenously over 1.5 hours once daily, administered prior to or following placebo matched to caspofungin 50 mg infusion intravenously over 1 hour once daily starting from Day 2 to end of treatment (Day 14 to Day 42).
26
Caspofungin
Caspofungin at a loading dose 70 mg infusion intravenously over 1 hour, administered prior to or following 2 placebo infusions, each matched to anidulafungin 100 mg infusion, intravenously over 1.5 hours each on Day 1. Caspofungin 50 mg infusion intravenously over 1 hour once daily, administered prior to or following placebo matched to anidulafungin 100 mg infusion intravenously over 1.5 hours once daily starting from Day 2 to end of treatment (Day 14 to Day 42).
13
Total39

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath74
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyRandomized, but not treated20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAnidulafunginCaspofunginTotal
Age Continuous56.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2
63.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3
58.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants5 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants8 Participants25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 2611 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 267 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (Day 14 To Day 42)

Participants had successful global response if there was clinical response of cure/improvement,microbiological eradication/presumed eradication.Clinical cure:resolution of signs/symptoms (s/s) of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Clinical improvement:significant,but incomplete resolution of s/s of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Microbiological eradication/presumed eradication:baseline pathogen not isolated from original site culture,or culture data not available for participant with successful clinical outcome.

Time frame: End of Treatment (Day 14 to Day 42)

Population: Modified Intent-To-Treat (MITT) population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had a positive culture for Candida species (sp.).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (Day 14 To Day 42)83.3 percentage of participants
CaspofunginPercentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (Day 14 To Day 42)61.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: The 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was calculated using method of exact unconditional confidence limits for the difference. Global response (rates of success) by using a 2-sided 95% CI for the true difference in efficacy (Anidulafungin minus Caspofungin) was calculated. Statistical testing was done at 2.5% alpha.95% CI: [-12.3, 53.3]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality

All-cause mortality during study therapy and at follow-up visits reported as unique death at EOT, 2 week follow-up and 6 week follow-up.

Time frame: Baseline to EOT (Day 14 to 42), After EOT to 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), After 2-week follow-up to 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With All-cause MortalityBaseline to EOT3.8 percentage of participants
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With All-cause MortalityAfter EOT to 2-week follow-up15.4 percentage of participants
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With All-cause MortalityAfter 2-week follow-up to 6-week follow-up7.7 percentage of participants
CaspofunginPercentage of Participants With All-cause MortalityBaseline to EOT15.4 percentage of participants
CaspofunginPercentage of Participants With All-cause MortalityAfter EOT to 2-week follow-up15.4 percentage of participants
CaspofunginPercentage of Participants With All-cause MortalityAfter 2-week follow-up to 6-week follow-up0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response

A participant had a successful clinical response if there was clinical response of cure or improvement. Clinical response of cure: resolution of signs and symptoms attributed to Candida infection; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required to complete the course of therapy. Clinical response of improvement: significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required.

Time frame: Day 10

Population: MITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had a positive culture for Candida species.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response70.8 percentage of participants
CaspofunginPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response76.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: The 95% CI was calculated using method of exact unconditional confidence limits for the difference. Global response (rates of success) by using a 2-sided 95% CI for the true difference in efficacy (Anidulafungin minus Caspofungin) was calculated. Statistical testing was done at 2.5% alpha.95% CI: [-39, 27.9]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Global Response at 2-week and 6-week Follow-up Visit

Participants had successful global response if there was clinical response of cure/improvement,microbiological eradication/presumed eradication.Clinical cure:resolution of signs/symptoms (s/s) of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Clinical improvement:significant,but incomplete resolution of s/s of Candida infection;no additional systemic/oral antifungal treatment needed.Microbiological eradication/presumed eradication:baseline pathogen not isolated from original site culture,or culture data not available for participant with successful clinical outcome.

Time frame: 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after end of treatment [EOT]), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

Population: MITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had a positive culture for Candida species. Only participants who completed therapy or who had global response of failure at EOT were evaluable for 2- and 6-week follow-up analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Global Response at 2-week and 6-week Follow-up Visit2-week follow-up76.2 percentage of participants
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Global Response at 2-week and 6-week Follow-up Visit6-week follow-up66.7 percentage of participants
CaspofunginPercentage of Participants With Global Response at 2-week and 6-week Follow-up Visit2-week follow-up54.5 percentage of participants
CaspofunginPercentage of Participants With Global Response at 2-week and 6-week Follow-up Visit6-week follow-up54.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: 2-week follow-up: The 95% CI was calculated using method of exact unconditional confidence limits for the difference. Global response (rates of success) by using a 2-sided 95% CI for the true difference in efficacy (Anidulafungin minus Caspofungin) was calculated. Statistical testing was done at 2.5% alpha.95% CI: [-13.6, 55.6]
Comparison: 6-week follow-up: The 95% CI was calculated using method of exact unconditional confidence limits for the difference. Global response (rates of success) by using a 2-sided 95% CI for the true difference in efficacy (Anidulafungin minus Caspofungin) was calculated. Statistical testing was done at 2.5% alpha.95% CI: [-23.3, 47.3]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With New Infection

New Infection: participant presenting with clinical failure with the emergence of new Candida sp. at the original site of infection or at a distant site of infection. Clinical failure: no significant improvement in signs and symptoms, or death due to Candida infection. Participants must have had received at least 3 doses of study drug to be classified as a failure.

Time frame: 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

Population: MITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had a positive culture for Candida species.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With New Infection2-week follow-up0 percentage of participants
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With New Infection6-week follow-up0 percentage of participants
CaspofunginPercentage of Participants With New Infection2-week follow-up0 percentage of participants
CaspofunginPercentage of Participants With New Infection6-week follow-up0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Relapse

Relapse was defined as any baseline Candida sp. isolated following eradication (documented or presumed) or culture data not available for participants with a clinical response of failure after a previous response of success. Prophylactic treatment with oral antifungal agents was not sufficient to document a relapse.

Time frame: 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

Population: MITT population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had a positive culture for Candida species.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Relapse2-week follow-up0 percentage of participants
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Relapse6-week follow-up0 percentage of participants
CaspofunginPercentage of Participants With Relapse2-week follow-up0 percentage of participants
CaspofunginPercentage of Participants With Relapse6-week follow-up0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success

A participant had a successful response if there was clinical response of cure and microbiological success (eradication or presumed eradication). Clinical response of cure: resolution of signs and symptoms attributed to Candida infection; no additional systemic or oral antifungal treatment required to complete the course of therapy. Microbiological eradication or presumed eradication: baseline pathogen not isolated from original site culture, or culture data not available for a participant with successful clinical outcome.

Time frame: EOT (Day 14 to 42), 2-week follow-up (2 weeks after EOT), 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

Population: MITT population. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Here, 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological SuccessEOT (n=21,8)81.0 percentage of participants
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success2-week follow-up (n=16,6)87.5 percentage of participants
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success6-week follow-up (n=15,6)93.3 percentage of participants
CaspofunginPercentage of Participants With Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological SuccessEOT (n=21,8)62.5 percentage of participants
CaspofunginPercentage of Participants With Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success2-week follow-up (n=16,6)100.0 percentage of participants
CaspofunginPercentage of Participants With Response Based on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Success6-week follow-up (n=15,6)100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Death

Time to death (days) was assessed as date of death minus first treatment date plus 1.

Time frame: Baseline up to 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AnidulafunginTime to Death23.0 days
CaspofunginTime to Death11.5 days
Secondary

Time to Negative Blood Culture

Negative blood culture referred to absence of Candida sp. in the blood sample of participants who had a positive blood culture at baseline. Time to negative blood culture (days) was calculated as date of first negative blood culture minus first treatment date plus 1.

Time frame: Baseline up to 6-week follow-up (6 weeks after EOT)

Population: A sub-set of MITT population included only those participants who had a positive blood culture for Candida species at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AnidulafunginTime to Negative Blood Culture2.0 days
CaspofunginTime to Negative Blood Culture3.5 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026