Skip to content

Cluster Headache Cortivazol Injection (CHCI)

A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Greater Occipital Nerve Infiltration in Cluster Headache

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00804895
Acronym
CHCI
Enrollment
43
Registered
2008-12-09
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2009-10-31
Last updated
2012-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cluster Headache

Keywords

cluster headache, greater occipital nerve block, cortivazol

Brief summary

the aim of tis study is to demonstrate the efficacy of cortivazol injections at the level of the greater occipital nerve to diminish the frequency of cluster headache (episodic or chronic) attacks during an active period. Injections will be used in adjunct with oral verapamil.

Detailed description

Cluster headache is characterized by unilateral attacks of severe periorbital pain accompanied by autonomic symptoms and restlessness. Though patients may respond to the standard prophylactic treatment of verapamil, some are refractory and continue to suffer from numerous attacks, with a limit of two doses of subcutaneous sumatriptan per day. Some patients also have contra-indications to standard prophylactic or acute treatments. Other preventive treatments like systemic steroids, lithium and methysergide may cause significant side effects. We intend to show the efficacy of occipital nerve injections with cortivazol, in adjunct to verapamil, in cluster headache patients. We expect a diminution of attack frequency over two weeks, with a protocol of three injections separated by two or three days each. Tolerance and safety will be examined.

Interventions

DRUGALTIM, cortivazol injections

ALTIM, cortivazol in greater occipital nerve injection separated by 2 or 3 days each.

DRUGPROAMP, subcutaneous serum physiological saline

Three injections will be performed at the level of the greater occipital nerve with a suboccipital approach. Injection will be separated by two or three days each.

DRUGVerapamil

standard prophylactic treatment

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patient age, man or woman whose age is between 18 and 65 included * patient who signed a free express and informed consent * patient with cluster headache, episodic or chronic according to the criteria of International Headache Society (ICHD-II) * patient with more than two episodes of CH per day * patient with a normal medical examination

Exclusion criteria

* patient not affiliated with a social security scheme (or beneficiary entitled) * patient with another diagnosis ICHD-II,and being unable to differentiate CH attacks from its other cranial pain * patient of CH having started his episodic active period more than 30 days ago * patient with a contra-indication to verapamil * patient with a known allergy to cortivazol * patient with anticoagulant therapy or having a bleeding disorder * patient unable to complete the schedule crisis * patient non-compliant or unable to follow the research protocol * women without contraception, pregnant, or nursing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of patients with a daily attack frequency equal or inferior to two for the period going from two days after third injection to four days after the third injection2009

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
percentage of patients with a 50% or more decrease in attacks frequency at J152009
percentage of patients reaching a remission at J30 defined as an absence of attacks for seven days or more2009
interval between the first injection and appearance of a remission2009
percentage of patients suffering from chronic CH, having reached a daily attack frequency equal or inferior to two, presenting a recurrence of attacks after J15, defined as more than two attacks per day2009
total number of attacks on the J1-J15 period2009
number of chronic patients presenting a daily attack frequency equal or inferior to two at J902009
HIT-6 scores, comparison between groups at J0 and J302009
tolerance of treatment : percentage of patients showing side effects2009
safety of treatment: percentage of patients with serious adverse events2009
number of patients (episodic or chronic) presenting a daily attack frequency equal or inferior to two at J302009

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026