Skip to content

Patient Satisfaction With Timolol in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

Patient Satisfaction With Timolol Maleate in Sorbate, Generic Timolol Gel Forming Solution or Timolol Hemihydrate in Subjects With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00804648
Enrollment
30
Registered
2008-12-09
Start date
2008-11-30
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2015-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Open Angle, Ocular Hypertension

Brief summary

This study compares patient symptoms and anterior segment safety in patients treated with timolol hemihydrate, generic timolol gel forming solution or timolol maleate.

Interventions

DRUGTimolol Maleate in Sorbate

0.5%

DRUGTimolol maleate gel forming solution

0.5%

Sponsors

Vistakon Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* willing to comply with investigator's and protocol's instructions * patients signature on the informed consent document * primary open-angle glaucoma, pigment dispersion or exfoliation glaucoma, or ocular hypertension in at least one eye * at screening intraocular pressure must be considered to be safe, in both eyes * in non-qualifying eyes the intraocular pressure should be able to be controlled safely on no pharmacologic therapy or on study medicine alone * currently treated with one glaucoma medication, untreated intraocular pressure of less than or equal to 28 mm Hg at visit 2 in both eyes

Exclusion criteria

* any abnormality preventing reliable applanation tonometry in either eye * any opacity or subject uncooperativeness that restricts adequate examination of the ocular fundus or anterior chamber in either eye * any concurrent infectious/noninfectious conjunctivitis, keratitis or uveitis in either eye * any history of allergic hypersensitivity or poor tolerance to any components of the preparations used in this trial * females of childbearing potential not using reliable means of birth control * pregnant or lactating females * any clinically significant, serious, or severe medical or psychiatric condition * participation (or current participation) in any investigational drug or device trial within 30 days prior to Visit 1 * severe prior visual acuity or field loss from any cause * inability to understand the trial procedures, and thus inability to give informed consent * progressive retinal or optic nerve disease apart from glaucoma * serious systemic or ocular disease * intraocular laser surgery within the past three months or corneal or intraocular conventional surgery within the past 6 months * concurrent use of systemic corticosteroids, by IV, oral, dermal or topical ophthalmic route. * subjects requiring tear replacement drops or allergy medications with sympathomimetics 24 hours prior to a scheduled study visit * contraindication to beta-blocker usage including: reactive airway disease, uncontrolled heart failure, or second as well as third degree cardiac block, myasthenia gravis * any subject the investigator believes will be at risk for glaucomatous progression by their participation in this trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stinging on Instillationfollowing 3 days of treatmentAssessed from subject response to survey question asking about tolerability of medicine upon instillation, using a 0 through 7 scale, with 0=complete comfort and 7=worst pain imaginable.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tear Film Break-up Timefollowing 3 days of treatment
Corneal Staining Gradefollowing 3 days of treatmentAssessed by the investigator using a slit lamp and Oxford Scheme, grading 0,1,2,3,4,5. The higher the grade the worse the staining.
Corneal Staining Countfollowing 3 days of treatmentAssessed by the investigator using a slit lamp, counting the number of spots.
Intraoclular Pressurefollowing 3 days of treatment
Basic Schirmer'sfollowing 3 days of treatmentSchirmer's measures basic tear function. The higher the number, the less dry the eye.
Conjunctival Hyperemiafollowing 3 days of treatmentAssessed by investigator using a slit lamp and a photographic grading scale. Photographs were graded: grade 0, grade 1, grade 2, grade 3. The higher the graded the worse the hyperemia.
Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Countfollowing 3 days of treatmentAssessed by investigator using slit lamp and counting number of spots.
Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Gradefollowing 3 days of treatmentAssessed by investigator using a slit lamp and Oxford Scheme, grading 0,1,2,3,4,5 according to pictures provided. The higher the grade the worse the staining.
Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Countfollowing 3 days of treatmentAssessed by investigator using a slit lamp and counting number of spots.
Visual Acuityfollowing 3 days of treatmentThe visual acuity score is a count of the number of letters the subject successfully read from the eye chart. The higher the score, the better the vision.
Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Gradefollowing 3 days of treatmentAssessed by investigator using a slit lamp and the Oxford Scheme, grading 0,1,2,3,4,5 according to pictures provided. The higher the grade the worse the staining.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall30
Total30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall
Age, Continuous66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 302 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Stinging on Instillation

Assessed from subject response to survey question asking about tolerability of medicine upon instillation, using a 0 through 7 scale, with 0=complete comfort and 7=worst pain imaginable.

Time frame: following 3 days of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%Stinging on Instillation0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Timolol Maleate 0.5%Stinging on Instillation1.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%Stinging on Instillation0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Basic Schirmer's

Schirmer's measures basic tear function. The higher the number, the less dry the eye.

Time frame: following 3 days of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%Basic Schirmer's17.7 mm of moistureStandard Deviation 9.7
Timolol Maleate 0.5%Basic Schirmer's14.8 mm of moistureStandard Deviation 7.3
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%Basic Schirmer's15.4 mm of moistureStandard Deviation 6.4
Secondary

Conjunctival Hyperemia

Assessed by investigator using a slit lamp and a photographic grading scale. Photographs were graded: grade 0, grade 1, grade 2, grade 3. The higher the graded the worse the hyperemia.

Time frame: following 3 days of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%Conjunctival Hyperemia0.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Timolol Maleate 0.5%Conjunctival Hyperemia0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%Conjunctival Hyperemia0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Count

Assessed by investigator using slit lamp and counting number of spots.

Time frame: following 3 days of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Count11.0 number of spotsStandard Deviation 12.5
Timolol Maleate 0.5%Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Count10.3 number of spotsStandard Deviation 15.7
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Count12.9 number of spotsStandard Deviation 14.8
Secondary

Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Grade

Assessed by investigator using a slit lamp and the Oxford Scheme, grading 0,1,2,3,4,5 according to pictures provided. The higher the grade the worse the staining.

Time frame: following 3 days of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Grade1.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Timolol Maleate 0.5%Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Grade1.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%Conjunctival Staining - Nasal Grade1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Count

Assessed by investigator using a slit lamp and counting number of spots.

Time frame: following 3 days of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Count4.7 number of spotsStandard Deviation 7.3
Timolol Maleate 0.5%Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Count4.8 number of spotsStandard Deviation 8.6
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Count5.3 number of spotsStandard Deviation 6.7
Secondary

Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Grade

Assessed by investigator using a slit lamp and Oxford Scheme, grading 0,1,2,3,4,5 according to pictures provided. The higher the grade the worse the staining.

Time frame: following 3 days of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Grade0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Timolol Maleate 0.5%Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Grade0.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%Conjunctival Staining - Temporal Grade0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Corneal Staining Count

Assessed by the investigator using a slit lamp, counting the number of spots.

Time frame: following 3 days of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%Corneal Staining Count10.5 Number of spotsStandard Deviation 12.5
Timolol Maleate 0.5%Corneal Staining Count10.4 Number of spotsStandard Deviation 13.4
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%Corneal Staining Count8.3 Number of spotsStandard Deviation 8.3
Secondary

Corneal Staining Grade

Assessed by the investigator using a slit lamp and Oxford Scheme, grading 0,1,2,3,4,5. The higher the grade the worse the staining.

Time frame: following 3 days of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%Corneal Staining Grade1.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Timolol Maleate 0.5%Corneal Staining Grade1.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%Corneal Staining Grade1.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Intraoclular Pressure

Time frame: following 3 days of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%Intraoclular Pressure16.3 mm of mercuryStandard Deviation 3.1
Timolol Maleate 0.5%Intraoclular Pressure16.2 mm of mercuryStandard Deviation 2.4
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%Intraoclular Pressure16.2 mm of mercuryStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Tear Film Break-up Time

Time frame: following 3 days of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%Tear Film Break-up Time8.5 SecondsStandard Deviation 6.1
Timolol Maleate 0.5%Tear Film Break-up Time7.7 SecondsStandard Deviation 4.9
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%Tear Film Break-up Time8.5 SecondsStandard Deviation 5.7
Secondary

Visual Acuity

The visual acuity score is a count of the number of letters the subject successfully read from the eye chart. The higher the score, the better the vision.

Time frame: following 3 days of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Timolol Hemihydrate 0.5%Visual Acuity52.3 number of lettersStandard Deviation 5.6
Timolol Maleate 0.5%Visual Acuity52.5 number of lettersStandard Deviation 6.1
Timolol Maleate Gel Forming Solution 0.5%Visual Acuity51.4 number of lettersStandard Deviation 5.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026