Osteoarthritis, Primary Arthrosis
Conditions
Keywords
Vitamine E, E-poly, Hip, Degenerative joint disease
Brief summary
The aim of the study is to compare polyethylene wear in an uncemented total hip prosthesis with 3rd. generation highly cross-linked polyethylene with a 32 mm ceramic femoral head compared to a 36 mm ceramic head. Using X-ray, RSA and DEXA. The polyethylene to be used is E-Poly (Biomet). The H0 hypothesis is that there is no difference with regard to polyethylene wear and bone loss between the two groups.
Detailed description
Uncemented THA, 32 mm or 36 mm caput of ceramics, E-Poly inserts. Measure wear with RSA, X-Ray and bone mineral density with DEXA.
Interventions
32 mm versus 36 mm caput of ceramics Vitamin E stabilized polyethylene
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* 50-65 years old * Primary or secondary osteoarthritis
Exclusion criteria
* Significant anatomical divergence are excluded * Rheumatoid arthritis * Fracture sequelae * Dysplasia * Immune suppression or grave systemic illness
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Measure polyethylene wear and bone mineral density between the two groups | 2 year |
Countries
Norway