Skip to content

A Comparison of the Infant Truview EVO2 Video Laryngoscope and the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Pediatric Patients

A Comparison of the Infant Truview EVO2 Video Laryngoscope and the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Pediatric Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00803751
Acronym
Truview
Enrollment
60
Registered
2008-12-08
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2017-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laryngoscopy

Keywords

Laryngoscopy [E04.580.373]

Brief summary

This study is intended to examine the effectiveness of a new type of laryngoscope, the Truview EVO2, in an infant patient population. They device will be tested against the current clinical standard, the Macintosh laryngoscope, in patients undergoing surgery at our hospital in terms of ease of use, view obtained of the vocal cords, and ability to place an endotracheal tube.

Interventions

will use the Truview laryngoscope instead of the traditional Macintosh laryngoscope

DEVICEMacintosh laryngoscope

Intubation using the traditional Macintosh laryngoscope

Sponsors

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 12 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age less than one year 2. Requiring general anesthesia and orotracheal intubation 3. Weight less than 10 kg 4. ASA class 1-3

Exclusion criteria

1. Documented difficult airway 2. Facial deformities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Laryngeal View Obtained on Comarck Lehane Classificationduring laryngoscopy prior to intubation. Few minutes before intubationThe view obtained when we do laryngoscopy. The Comarck Lehane classification is as follows: 1) Most of the glottis is seen; 2a) Only the posterior part of the glottis is visible; 2b) The epiglottis is visible, but none of the glottis can be seen; 3) Not even the epiglottis is visible.
Number of Intubation Attemptsduring intubation prior to surgeryNumber of participants with the indicated number of intubation attempts (1/2/3)
Quality of Laryngeal View Obtained With 2nd Laryngoscopyduring laryngoscopy prior to intubation (few minutes prior to intubation)The view obtained when we do laryngoscopy. The Comarck Lehane classification is as follows: 1) Most of the glottis is seen; 2a) Only the posterior part of the glottis is visible; 2b) The epiglottis is visible, but none of the glottis can be seen; 3) Not even the epiglottis is visible.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time Taken for Intubationthroughout the intubation procedure
POGO Score With 1st LaryngoscopyBefore patient is intubated (few minutes before intubation)POGO score is the percent of glottic opening observed during laryngoscopy. 100% POGO score indicates a full view of glottic opening and 0% POGO score indicates no glottic opening.
POGO Score With 2nd LaryngoscopyBefore patient is intubatedPOGO score is the percent of glottic opening observed during laryngoscopy. 100% POGO score indicates a full view of glottic opening and 0% POGO score indicates no glottic opening.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The patients were recruited from pediatric day surgery.

Pre-assignment details

There were 11 patients excluded from the trial due to incomplete data.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Truview Intubation First Then With Macintosh
Receive laryngoscopy with Truview blade first and is immediately followed by laryngoscopy and intubation with Macintosh blade
26
Macintosh Intubation First Followed by Truview Intubation
Use the Macintosh laryngoscope first immediately followed by laryngoscopy and intubation with the Truview laryngoscope
23
Total49

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMacintosh Intubation First Followed by Truview IntubationTruview Intubation First Then With MacintoshTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
23 Participants26 Participants49 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous6.42 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
6.35 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1
6.39 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.13
Region of Enrollment
United States
23 participants26 participants49 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants19 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants7 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 260 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 260 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Intubation Attempts

Number of participants with the indicated number of intubation attempts (1/2/3)

Time frame: during intubation prior to surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TruviewNumber of Intubation Attempts117 Participants
TruviewNumber of Intubation Attempts24 Participants
TruviewNumber of Intubation Attempts32 Participants
Mac BladeNumber of Intubation Attempts123 Participants
Mac BladeNumber of Intubation Attempts22 Participants
Mac BladeNumber of Intubation Attempts31 Participants
p-value: 0.45Fisher Exact
Primary

Quality of Laryngeal View Obtained on Comarck Lehane Classification

The view obtained when we do laryngoscopy. The Comarck Lehane classification is as follows: 1) Most of the glottis is seen; 2a) Only the posterior part of the glottis is visible; 2b) The epiglottis is visible, but none of the glottis can be seen; 3) Not even the epiglottis is visible.

Time frame: during laryngoscopy prior to intubation. Few minutes before intubation

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TruviewQuality of Laryngeal View Obtained on Comarck Lehane Classification121 Participants
TruviewQuality of Laryngeal View Obtained on Comarck Lehane Classification2a3 Participants
TruviewQuality of Laryngeal View Obtained on Comarck Lehane Classification2b1 Participants
Mac BladeQuality of Laryngeal View Obtained on Comarck Lehane Classification2b4 Participants
Mac BladeQuality of Laryngeal View Obtained on Comarck Lehane Classification113 Participants
Mac BladeQuality of Laryngeal View Obtained on Comarck Lehane Classification2a5 Participants
p-value: 0.17Fisher Exact
Primary

Quality of Laryngeal View Obtained With 2nd Laryngoscopy

The view obtained when we do laryngoscopy. The Comarck Lehane classification is as follows: 1) Most of the glottis is seen; 2a) Only the posterior part of the glottis is visible; 2b) The epiglottis is visible, but none of the glottis can be seen; 3) Not even the epiglottis is visible.

Time frame: during laryngoscopy prior to intubation (few minutes prior to intubation)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TruviewQuality of Laryngeal View Obtained With 2nd Laryngoscopy110 Participants
TruviewQuality of Laryngeal View Obtained With 2nd Laryngoscopy2a7 Participants
TruviewQuality of Laryngeal View Obtained With 2nd Laryngoscopy2b9 Participants
Mac BladeQuality of Laryngeal View Obtained With 2nd Laryngoscopy2b0 Participants
Mac BladeQuality of Laryngeal View Obtained With 2nd Laryngoscopy121 Participants
Mac BladeQuality of Laryngeal View Obtained With 2nd Laryngoscopy2a2 Participants
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Secondary

POGO Score With 1st Laryngoscopy

POGO score is the percent of glottic opening observed during laryngoscopy. 100% POGO score indicates a full view of glottic opening and 0% POGO score indicates no glottic opening.

Time frame: Before patient is intubated (few minutes before intubation)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TruviewPOGO Score With 1st Laryngoscopy93.65 ScoreStandard Deviation 15.72
Mac BladePOGO Score With 1st Laryngoscopy73.81 ScoreStandard Deviation 23.34
p-value: 0.002t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

POGO Score With 2nd Laryngoscopy

POGO score is the percent of glottic opening observed during laryngoscopy. 100% POGO score indicates a full view of glottic opening and 0% POGO score indicates no glottic opening.

Time frame: Before patient is intubated

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TruviewPOGO Score With 2nd Laryngoscopy74.3 ScoreStandard Deviation 25.1
Mac BladePOGO Score With 2nd Laryngoscopy98.0 ScoreStandard Deviation 8.94
p-value: 0.0004t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Time Taken for Intubation

Time frame: throughout the intubation procedure

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TruviewTime Taken for Intubation25.23 secondsStandard Deviation 11.09
Mac BladeTime Taken for Intubation28.33 secondsStandard Deviation 12.67
p-value: 0.36t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026